Merge #20220: wallet, rpc: explicit fee rate follow-ups/fixes for 0.21

0be29000c0 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be406 wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c005083 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa603 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1 wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f84 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1 wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:

  - bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
  - adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
  - improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
  - fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units

  This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.

ACKs for top commit:
  kallewoof:
    Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c0
  meshcollider:
    Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c0

Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
This commit is contained in:
Samuel Dobson committed 2020-11-04 16:35:23 +13:00
commit 5d32009f1a
7 files changed
+282 -95

No files matched your search

+63 -47
View File
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ from decimal import Decimal
import io
from test_framework.blocktools import add_witness_commitment, create_block, create_coinbase, send_to_witness
from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, CTransaction
from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, COIN, CTransaction
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ NORMAL = 0.00100000
HIGH = 0.00500000
TOO_HIGH = 1.00000000
BTC_MODE = "BTC/kB"
SAT_MODE = "sat/B"
class BumpFeeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
@@ -76,10 +78,9 @@ class BumpFeeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.log.info("Running tests")
dest_address = peer_node.getnewaddress()
self.test_invalid_parameters(rbf_node, dest_address)
test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, "default", rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, "fee_rate", rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
test_feerate_args(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
for mode in ["default", "fee_rate", BTC_MODE, SAT_MODE]:
test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, mode, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
self.test_invalid_parameters(rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
test_segwit_bumpfee_succeeds(self, rbf_node, dest_address)
test_nonrbf_bumpfee_fails(self, peer_node, dest_address)
test_notmine_bumpfee_fails(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address)
@@ -98,28 +99,56 @@ class BumpFeeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
test_small_output_with_feerate_succeeds(self, rbf_node, dest_address)
test_no_more_inputs_fails(self, rbf_node, dest_address)
def test_invalid_parameters(self, node, dest_address):
txid = spend_one_input(node, dest_address)
# invalid estimate mode
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid estimate_mode parameter", node.bumpfee, txid, {
"estimate_mode": "moo",
})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type string", node.bumpfee, txid, {
"estimate_mode": 38,
})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type string", node.bumpfee, txid, {
"estimate_mode": {
"foo": "bar",
},
})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid estimate_mode parameter", node.bumpfee, txid, {
"estimate_mode": Decimal("3.141592"),
})
# confTarget and conf_target
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "confTarget and conf_target options should not both be set", node.bumpfee, txid, {
"confTarget": 123,
"conf_target": 456,
})
def test_invalid_parameters(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
self.log.info('Test invalid parameters')
rbfid = spend_one_input(rbf_node, dest_address)
self.sync_mempools((rbf_node, peer_node))
assert rbfid in rbf_node.getrawmempool() and rbfid in peer_node.getrawmempool()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Unexpected key totalFee", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"totalFee": NORMAL})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "is too high (cannot be higher than", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": TOO_HIGH})
# For each fee mode, bumping to just above minrelay should fail to increase the total fee enough.
for options in [{"fee_rate": INSUFFICIENT}, {"conf_target": INSUFFICIENT, "estimate_mode": BTC_MODE}, {"conf_target": 1, "estimate_mode": SAT_MODE}]:
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Insufficient total fee", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, options)
self.log.info("Test explicit fee rate raises RPC error if estimate_mode is passed without a conf_target")
for unit, fee_rate in {"SAT/B": 100, "BTC/KB": NORMAL}.items():
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Selected estimate_mode {} requires a fee rate to be specified in conf_target".format(unit),
rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": fee_rate, "estimate_mode": unit})
self.log.info("Test explicit fee rate raises RPC error if both fee_rate and conf_target are passed")
error_both = "Cannot specify both conf_target and fee_rate. Please provide either a confirmation " \
"target in blocks for automatic fee estimation, or an explicit fee rate."
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, error_both, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"conf_target": NORMAL, "fee_rate": NORMAL})
self.log.info("Test invalid conf_target settings")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "confTarget and conf_target options should not both be set",
rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"confTarget": 123, "conf_target": 456})
for field in ["confTarget", "conf_target"]:
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "is too high (cannot be higher than -maxtxfee",
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": BTC_MODE, "conf_target": 2009}))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "is too high (cannot be higher than -maxtxfee",
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": SAT_MODE, "conf_target": 2009 * 10000}))
self.log.info("Test invalid estimate_mode settings")
for k, v in {"number": 42, "object": {"foo": "bar"}}.items():
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type string for estimate_mode, got {}".format(k),
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": v, "fee_rate": NORMAL}))
for mode in ["foo", Decimal("3.141592")]:
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid estimate_mode parameter",
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": mode, "fee_rate": NORMAL}))
self.log.info("Test invalid fee_rate settings")
for mode in ["unset", "economical", "conservative", BTC_MODE, SAT_MODE]:
self.log.debug("{}".format(mode))
for k, v in {"string": "", "object": {"foo": "bar"}}.items():
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type number for fee_rate, got {}".format(k),
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": mode, "fee_rate": v}))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range",
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": mode, "fee_rate": -1}))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid fee_rate 0.00000000 BTC/kB (must be greater than 0)",
lambda: rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"estimate_mode": mode, "fee_rate": 0}))
self.clear_mempool()
@@ -132,6 +161,13 @@ def test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, mode, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
if mode == "fee_rate":
bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
elif mode == BTC_MODE:
bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, {"conf_target": NORMAL, "estimate_mode": BTC_MODE})
bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"conf_target": NORMAL, "estimate_mode": BTC_MODE})
elif mode == SAT_MODE:
sat_fee = NORMAL * COIN / 1000 # convert NORMAL from BTC/kB to sat/B
bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, {"conf_target": sat_fee, "estimate_mode": SAT_MODE})
bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"conf_target": sat_fee, "estimate_mode": SAT_MODE})
else:
bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid)
bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid)
@@ -158,26 +194,6 @@ def test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, mode, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
self.clear_mempool()
def test_feerate_args(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
self.log.info('Test fee_rate args')
rbfid = spend_one_input(rbf_node, dest_address)
self.sync_mempools((rbf_node, peer_node))
assert rbfid in rbf_node.getrawmempool() and rbfid in peer_node.getrawmempool()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "conf_target can't be set with fee_rate. Please provide either a confirmation target in blocks for automatic fee estimation, or an explicit fee rate.", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL, "confTarget": 1})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Unexpected key totalFee", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"totalFee": NORMAL})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "conf_target can't be set with fee_rate. Please provide either a confirmation target in blocks for automatic fee estimation, or an explicit fee rate.", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate":0.00001, "confTarget": 1})
# Bumping to just above minrelay should fail to increase total fee enough, at least
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Insufficient total fee", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": INSUFFICIENT})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": -1})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "is too high (cannot be higher than", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": TOO_HIGH})
self.clear_mempool()
def test_segwit_bumpfee_succeeds(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
self.log.info('Test that segwit-sourcing bumpfee works')
# Create a transaction with segwit output, then create an RBF transaction