doc: Clarify that vpindexToConnect is in reverse order

Also, style-fixups of touched code

src/validation.cpp

@@ -1337,16 +1337,14 @@ static void CheckForkWarningConditions() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
     AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
     // Before we get past initial download, we cannot reliably alert about forks
     // (we assume we don't get stuck on a fork before finishing our initial sync)
-    if (::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload())
+    if (::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
         return;
+    }
 
-    if (pindexBestInvalid && pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork > ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork + (GetBlockProof(*::ChainActive().Tip()) * 6))
-    {
+    if (pindexBestInvalid && pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork > ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork + (GetBlockProof(*::ChainActive().Tip()) * 6)) {
         LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Found invalid chain at least ~6 blocks longer than our best chain.\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__);
         SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(true);
-    }
-    else
-    {
+    } else {
         SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(false);
     }
 }
@@ -2710,7 +2708,7 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
         fBlocksDisconnected = true;
     }
 
-    // Build list of new blocks to connect.
+    // Build list of new blocks to connect (in descending height order).
     std::vector<CBlockIndex*> vpindexToConnect;
     bool fContinue = true;
     int nHeight = pindexFork ? pindexFork->nHeight : -1;