195fcb53a0 qt: Follow Qt docs when implementing rowCount and columnCount (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[`QAbstractItemModel::rowCount`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractitemmodel.html#rowCount):
> **Note:** When implementing a table based model, `rowCount()` should return 0 when the parent is valid.
[`QAbstractItemModel::columnCount`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractitemmodel.html#columnCount):
> **Note:** When implementing a table based model, `columnCount()` should return 0 when the parent is valid.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
Tested ACK 195fcb53a0. Compiled and ran on macOS (Big Sur 11.1 and Catalina 10.15.7), Arch Linux, and FreeBSD. visually verified no weird effects with the `Address`, `Ban`, `Peer`, and `Transaction` tables. As already stated, the code change brings us inline with what the QT Docs recommend.
Tree-SHA512: 179a3430e68e77b22cdf642964cd96c023a2286ee256bbeb25b43df3d2eef6f59978c8d92173c6be5071d127fdcd6aa338142f6eaf003ff08e4abd65172d20ca
90f9fc274b qt: Save QSplitter state in QSettings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR adds the ability to save the `QSplitter` widget state in `QSettings` during shutdown, and restore it on startup.
A user no longer needs to adjust the splitter every time :)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 90f9fc274b
jonatack:
ACK 90f9fc274b this sets the "PeersTabSplitterSizes" value in the RPCConsole dtor and restores it in the RPCConsole ctor; tested in Debian with various split settings, tab open/close sequences, and shutdown methods, and the Peers window split state was faithfully maintained.
Tree-SHA512: efbd6a4cee512982944955d36775e75a8a217b1dc49e62d42c6e402d2710dd44324b2c3c1edeb5fe38d9229e0e4a39734d1f4e63405ade8694762e1bbf72020b
This change (1) prevents overlapping date and amount strings,
and (2) guaranties that "eye" sign at the end of the watch-only
address/label is always visible.
198fff88f3 GUI: Define MAX_DIGITS_BTC for magic number in BitcoinUnits::format (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
A magic number snuck in with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16432
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 198fff88f3, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
kristapsk:
utACK 198fff88f3
Tree-SHA512: 78dc23c2ae61bac41e5e34eebf57274599cb2ebb0b18d46e8a3228d42b256a1bc9bb17091c748f0f692ef1c4c241cfbd3e30a12bcd12222a234c1a9547ebe786
03edb52eee qt: Remove redundant BitcoinGUI::setTrayIconVisible (Hennadii Stepanov)
17174f8328 gui: Replace "Hide tray icon" option with positive "Show tray icon" one (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change makes easier both (1) using this option, and (2) reasoning about the code.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 03edb52eee
Tree-SHA512: 38e317492210d4fb13302dea383bd1f4f0ae1219d7ff2fdcb78607f15ac61a51969acaadb59b72c3f075b6356ef54368eb46fb49e6e1bd42db6d5804b97e232b
1e62350ca2 refactor: Improve use of explicit keyword (Fabian Jahr)
c502a6dbfb lint: Use c++17 std in cppcheck linter (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I found the `extended-lint-cppcheck` linter still uses `std=c++11` when reviewing #20471. The only difference in the output after this change is one line is missing:
```
src/script/descriptor.cpp:159:5: warning: Struct 'PubkeyProvider' has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit. [noExplicitConstructor]
```
After some digging, I am still not sure why this one is ignored with c++17 when 40 other`noExplicitConstructor` warnings were still appearing.
In the second commit, I fix these warnings, adding `explicit` where appropriate and adding fixes to ignore otherwise.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1e62350ca2: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1e62350ca2
Tree-SHA512: dff7b324429a57160e217cf38d9ddbb6e70c6cb3d3e3e0bd4013d88e07afc2292c3df94d0acf7122e9d486322821682ecf15c8f2724a78667764c05d47f89a12
8963b2c71f qt: Improve comments in WalletController::getOrCreateWallet() (Hennadii Stepanov)
5fcfee68af qt: Call setParent() in the parent's context (Hennadii Stepanov)
5659e73493 qt: Add ObjectInvoke template function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `setParent(parent)` internally calls `QCoreApplication::sendEvent(parent, QChildEvent)` that implies running in the thread which created the parent object. That is not the case always, and an internal assertion fails in the debug mode.
Steps to reproduce this issue on master (007e15dcd7) on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64):
```
$ make -C depends DEBUG=1
$ CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site ./configure
$ make
$ QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1 lldb src/qt/bitcoin-qt -- --regtest -debug=qt
(lldb) target create "src/qt/bitcoin-qt"
Current executable set to '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64).
(lldb) settings set -- target.run-args "--regtest" "-debug=qt"
(lldb) run
Process 431562 launched: '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64)
# load wallet via GUI
Process 431562 stopped
* thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1
(lldb) bt
* thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
* frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1
frame #1: 0x00007ffff7924859 libc.so.6`__GI_abort at abort.c:79:7
frame #2: 0x0000555556508ec4 bitcoin-qt`::qt_message_fatal((null)=<unavailable>, context=<unavailable>, message=<unavailable>) at qlogging.cpp:1690:15
frame #3: 0x00005555565099cf bitcoin-qt`QMessageLogger::fatal(this=<unavailable>, msg=<unavailable>) const at qlogging.cpp:796:21
frame #4: 0x000055555650479d bitcoin-qt`qt_assert_x(where=<unavailable>, what=<unavailable>, file=<unavailable>, line=<unavailable>) at qglobal.cpp:3088:46
frame #5: 0x0000555556685733 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplicationPrivate::checkReceiverThread(receiver=0x0000555557b27510) at qcoreapplication.cpp:557:5
frame #6: 0x00005555567ced86 bitcoin-qt`QApplication::notify(this=0x00007fffffffd4a0, receiver=0x0000555557b27510, e=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qapplication.cpp:2956:27
frame #7: 0x0000555556685d31 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplication::notifyInternal2(receiver=0x0000555557b27510, event=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qcoreapplication.cpp:1024:24
frame #8: 0x00005555566c9224 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(QObject*) [inlined] QCoreApplication::sendEvent(event=<unavailable>, receiver=<unavailable>) at qcoreapplication.h:233:59
frame #9: 0x00005555566c9210 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(this=0x00007fff85855260, o=0x0000555557b27510) at qobject.cpp:2036
frame #10: 0x00005555566c9b41 bitcoin-qt`QObject::setParent(this=<unavailable>, parent=<unavailable>) at qobject.cpp:1980:24
frame #11: 0x0000555555710be8 bitcoin-qt`WalletController::getOrCreateWallet(std::unique_ptr<interfaces::Wallet, std::default_delete<interfaces::Wallet> >) + 2534
...
```
Fixes#18835.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8963b2c71f. No changes since last review, just rebase because of conflict on some adjacent lines
jonasschnelli:
utACK 8963b2c71f
Tree-SHA512: fef615904168717df3d8a0bd85eccc3eef990cc3e66c9fa280c8ef08ea009a7cb5a2a4f868ed0be3c0fe5bf683e8465850b5958deb896fdadd22d296186c9586
86b1ab64b1 refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
As all deprecated warning in Qt 5.15.0 were eliminated in #46, Qt 5.15.1 introduced another one that is fixed in this PR.
Required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20182.
Details in Qt docs:
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdatetime.html#toString-1
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdate.html#toString-1
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
Tested ACK 86b1ab6 on MacOS 10.15.7 and Arch Linux both with Qt 5.15.1
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 86b1ab64b1
Tree-SHA512: 1dbba8ee70c895bf58317172a9901cdbe5503b1d6258f51caaae88d88d332d9fbd4697c995192d31e3618ddfd532c5f5881289b3af1184422e5a9263a1224115
When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask
passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button
and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction
through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the
passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same
form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow.
Hennadii Stepanov
