Merge pull request #379 from xexyl/1992-ant

Format fix 1992/ant/README.md
This commit is contained in:
Landon Curt Noll authored and GitHub committed 2023-04-09 13:41:46 -07:00
commit 0338ba3a8d
2 files changed
+87 -62

No files matched your search

+63 -46
View File
@@ -1,26 +1,32 @@
# Most Useful Program: # Most Useful Program:
Albert van der Horst Albert van der Horst
S P&A R&C S P&A R&C
Oranjestraat 8 Oranjestraat 8
3511 RA UTRECHT 3511 RA UTRECHT
The Netherlands The Netherlands
## To build: ## To build:
make all ```sh
make all
```
## To run: ## To run:
./albert number ```sh
./albert number
```
## Try: ## Try:
./albert 1234567890123456789 ```sh
./albert 1234567890123456789
```
## Alternate code: ## Alternate code:
An alternate version of this entry, albert.alt.c, is provided. An alternate version of this entry, [albert.alt.c](albert.alt.c), is provided.
Leo Broukhis, before he was an IOCCC judge, sent the IOCCC Leo Broukhis, before he was an IOCCC judge, sent the IOCCC
judges this Email message: judges this Email message:
@@ -46,7 +52,9 @@ is the file before applying Leo Broukhis' fix.
To compile this alternate version: To compile this alternate version:
make alt ```sh
make alt
```
Use `albert.alt` as you would `albert` above. Use `albert.alt` as you would `albert` above.
@@ -56,65 +64,74 @@ We were impressed with the speed at which it was able to factor
arbitrarily large numbers consisting of factors that fit into arbitrarily large numbers consisting of factors that fit into
a long. a long.
## Author's comments ## Author's comments:
The Obfuscated version of the Horst algorithm. The Obfuscated version of the Horst algorithm.
This program will factor unlimited length numbers and print the This program will factor unlimited length numbers and print the
factors in ascending order. Numbers of one digit (e.g. 8) factors in ascending order. Numbers of one digit (e.g. 8)
are rejected without notice. are rejected without notice.
It quits as soon as there is at most one
factor left, but that factor will not be shown. It quits as soon as there is at most one factor left, but that factor will not
It accomplishes this efficiently, without resorting to division be shown. It accomplishes this efficiently, without resorting to division or
or multiplication, until the candidate factor no longer fits in multiplication, until the candidate factor no longer fits in a signed long.
a signed long.
The nicest way is to rename the program into e.g. 4294967297 The nicest way is to rename the program into e.g. 4294967297
if you want to factor Fermat's 4th number. Then just run it. if you want to factor Fermat's 4th number. Then just run it.
Or you may type "prog <some-number>"
A nice one is also (30 ones) Or you may type `./albert <some-number>`
albert 111111111111111111111111111111 A nice one is also (30 ones):
```sh
./albert 111111111111111111111111111111
```
Apart from the foregoing there are no special execution instructions. Apart from the foregoing there are no special execution instructions.
To customize the program into a factorizer of a fixed number, use To customize the program into a factorizer of a fixed number, use
```sh
cc albert.c -o 4294967297 cc albert.c -o 4294967297
```
or some such. or some such.
There are no data files used, and it is not possible to feed input There are no data files used, and it is not possible to feed input
via stdin. via stdin.
I think this program is a nice example of algorithmic obfuscation. I think this program is a nice example of algorithmic obfuscation. Several
Several times two similar algorithms are merged into one. Then you times two similar algorithms are merged into one. Then you need quite some
need quite some tricks to get it running, such as long jumps tricks to get it running, such as long jumps through recursive subroutines. I
through recursive subroutines. I felt like a sword smith, felt like a sword smith, welding the sword very long, folding it again to the
welding the sword very long, folding it again to the proper proper length, keep on hammering till it is tight, then fold again. Always
length, keep on hammering till it is tight, then fold again. keeping it at the proper red hot temperature, but not too hot lest the hardness
Always keeping it at the proper red hot temperature, but not too fades.
hot lest the hardness fades.
The strict naming conventions for subroutines did not make things
much clearer after all, but it was not supposed to.
I would like to draw attention to the robustness of the program The strict naming conventions for subroutines did not make things much clearer
with respect to error handling and the nice stopping criterion. after all, but it was not supposed to.
The aesthetic appeal of some lines is at the expense of clearness,
I apologize. I would like to draw attention to the robustness of the program with respect to
Running the program through the c-beautifier reveals nothing, error handling and the nice stopping criterion. The aesthetic appeal of some
it will only destroy some of the lay out. lines is at the expense of clearness, I apologize.
Running the program through lint shows the usual remarks for a
K&R program. Defeating this through casts does not make a program Running the program through the C-beautifier reveals nothing, it will only
destroy some of the lay out. Running the program through lint shows the usual
remarks for a K&R program. Defeating this through casts does not make a program
cleaner in my opinion. cleaner in my opinion.
Here are some hints, but they may not be too helpful. ### Hints:
1. The Horst algorithm is described in the Hobby Computer Club
Newsletter, year 82, part 4, a real Dutch treat. Here are some hints, but they may not be too helpful:
Assembler, c and Forth version have been around for some years.
1. The Horst algorithm is described in the Hobby Computer Club Newsletter, year
82, part 4, a real Dutch treat. Assembly, C and Forth version have been around
for some years.
2. Does fractal programming exist after all? 2. Does fractal programming exist after all?
3. You remember the ToomCook algorithm in Knuth? 3. You remember the ToomCook algorithm in Knuth? It uses iteration instead of
It uses iteration instead of recursion and is quite jumpy. recursion and is quite jumpy. This program shares these disadvantages in a
This program shares these disadvantages in a modified form. modified form.
4. The Conversion is to be found in Knuth, not so the Observation. 4. The Conversion is to be found in Knuth, not so the Observation. The
The Observation: "if it ends in a zero, it is divisible by ten" Observation: "if it ends in a zero, it is divisible by ten".
## Copyright and CC BY-SA 4.0 License: ## Copyright and CC BY-SA 4.0 License:
+24 -16
View File
@@ -1,43 +1,51 @@
# Best Utility: # Best Utility:
Anthony C Howe Anthony C Howe
Mortice Kern Systems Inc. Mortice Kern Systems Inc.
Unit 1, 14 Weber Street North Unit 1, 14 Weber Street North
Waterloo, Ontario Waterloo, Ontario
N2J 3G4 N2J 3G4
Canada Canada
## To build: ## To build:
make all ```sh
make all
```
## To run: ## To run:
./am Makefile ```sh
./am Makefile
```
where `Makefile` is a Makefile to use. where `Makefile` is a Makefile to use.
## Try: ## Try:
./ant ant.test.mk ```sh
./ant ant.test.mk
```
We also suggest that you try: We also suggest that you try:
make am ```sh
./am Makefile am_clobber # clobber everything except am make am
./am Makefile all ./am Makefile am_clobber # clobber everything except am
./am Makefile all
```
## Judges' comments ## Judges' comments:
Like much of Posix, obfuscation has its place. Your task is to Like much of POSIX, obfuscation has its place. Your task is to
figure out where. figure out where.
This entry comes complete with a Posix-like command description. This entry comes complete with a Posix-like command description.
Interested Posix balloters should lobby the IEEE for an obfuscated Interested POSIX balloters should lobby the IEEE for an obfuscated
P1003 sub-committee. P1003 subcommittee.
## Author's comments: ## Author's comments: