Make thanks file MUCH MORE humble and improve FAQ

Something that has bothered me VERY MUCH for A VERY LONG TIME is that
the honour roll (under my name) was not very humble and in some respects
rather redundant. I have fixed this a great deal and improved the
readability of it too (grammar and so on).

I also added a point about fixing many entries that no longer worked and
I also did this for Yusuke Endoh too as he was responsible for fixing
numerous (at the least) entries that no longer worked (and it should be
acknowledged and honoured just as much as what I did).

The FAQ I improved is related to one of the things that is in the above,
to do with alternate code. It now explains some of the purposes of
alternate code and why (in some cases) alt code was added when it might
or might not be useful (a judgement call that invariably is not always
perfect). It notes that in many cases the alternate code comes from the
author directly.

With these changes a problem that I felt was a VERY BIG problem should
be resolved now.

faq.html

@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
 <li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_3">4.3 - Why do author remarks sometimes not match the source and/or why are there
 other inconsistencies with the original entry?</a></li>
 <li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_4">4.4 - What is the meaning of the file ending in .orig.c in IOCCC entries?</a></li>
-<li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_5">4.5 - Why were alternate versions added to some entries when the original entry worked fine and well?</a></li>
+<li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_5">4.5 - What are alternate versions and why were alternate versions added to some entries when the original entry worked fine and well?</a></li>
 <li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_6">4.6 - Why was arg count and/or type changed in main() in some older entries?</a></li>
 <li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_7">4.7 - Why were some filenames changed?</a></li>
 <li><a class="normal" href="#faq4_8">4.8 - Why were files added or removed from some entries?</a></li>
@@ -3444,20 +3444,31 @@ we can find.</p>
 <div id="faq4_5">
 <div id="alt">
 <div id="alt_code">
-<h3 id="faq-4.5-why-were-alternate-versions-added-to-some-entries-when-the-original-entry-worked-fine-and-well">FAQ 4.5: Why were alternate versions added to some entries when the original entry worked fine and well?</h3>
+<h3 id="faq-4.5-what-are-alternate-versions-and-why-were-alternate-versions-added-to-some-entries-when-the-original-entry-worked-fine-and-well">FAQ 4.5: What are alternate versions and why were alternate versions added to some entries when the original entry worked fine and well?</h3>
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>
-<p>This was a judgement call and the reasons vary. In many cases it was simply to
-make the entry more presentable to more people but without modifying the entry
-itself, which would be tampering with the entry, and in some cases it would be
-changing it so much that it would no longer be what was submitted.</p>
+<p>The alternate versions are exactly what they sound like, versions of their
+respective entries that were not the winning source code but have additional
+features added (often by the author) or fixes, updates at the request of the
+judges (upon winning the contest), unobfuscated versions and a variety of other
+things for instance letting it work on more than one platform (where it would
+not be possible to do in the original submission).</p>
+<p>In some cases the alternate code added come directly from the author (some of
+which already were in the website) but there were other cases where alternate
+code was added that might or might not be necessary; this was a judgement call
+and the reasons vary.</p>
+<p>In many cases it was simply to make the entry more presentable to more people
+but without modifying the entry itself, which would be tampering with the entry
+(a problem that we tried to avoid as much as possible although we certainly did
+not manage to do this perfectly), and in some cases it would be changing it so
+much that it would no longer be what was submitted.</p>
 <p>In one case an alternate version was created to help locate and fix a bug that
 prevented the entry from working properly and it seemed like it should be added
-as well, for fun.</p>
-<p>In some cases it might be better to not have them but as noted this is a
+as well, for fun (it is a game).</p>
+<p>In some cases it might be better to not have them but as noted this was a
 judgement call.</p>
-<p>See the
+<p>See also the
 FAQ on “<a href="#original_source_code">original source code</a>”
 for more information.</p>
 <p>Jump to: <a href="#">top</a></p>