diff --git a/thanks-for-help.html b/thanks-for-help.html index 059221939..a5e4aef48 100644 --- a/thanks-for-help.html +++ b/thanks-for-help.html @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ including making it no longer require -traditional-cpp. Fixing to compare the fix from the original entry. There was another problem to resolve as well, however.

First of all, as noted above, the entry required -traditional-cpp (which -not all compilers support clang does not support). It needed +not all compilers support clang does not support). It needed that option in modern systems because of two things it did:

    #define a(x)get/***/x/***/id())
 
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ and MSC to compile this code, based on the authors’ remarks, except that Cody
 did not change the " #Q" string as that showed worse looking output
 instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in
 question (i.e. it was only tested in the original entry). YMMV.

-

Although this is appreciated we agree with him that no one +

Although this is appreciated we agree with him that no one very few users here will need it! :-)

@@ -3734,7 +3734,7 @@ running make test.

ShellCheck. He also made ShellCheck not be a cow and/or (to use Bart Simpson’s advice :-) ) ‘not have a cow’ about certain things (including one thing it was wrong about) in cow.sh (which was renamed from cow) -mootoo.

+mootoo.

Cody also renamed the file on.one.liners to on.one.liners.txt to help with browsers/GitHub.

diff --git a/thanks-for-help.md b/thanks-for-help.md index 71cb3c3ad..4cc36ae17 100644 --- a/thanks-for-help.md +++ b/thanks-for-help.md @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ to compare the fix from the original entry. There was another problem to resolve as well, however. First of all, as noted above, the entry required `-traditional-cpp` (which -not all compilers support `clang` does not support). It needed +not all compilers support `clang` does not support). It needed that option in modern systems because of two things it did: ``` @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ did not change the `" #Q"` string as that showed worse looking output instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in question (i.e. it was only tested in the original entry). YMMV. -Although this is appreciated we agree with him that no one +Although this is appreciated we agree with him that no one [very few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0) [users](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows) [here](https://www.ioccc.org) will need it! :-) @@ -5228,7 +5228,7 @@ Cody also fixed the script [check.sh](2019/burton/check.sh) (renamed from ShellCheck. He also made ShellCheck not be a cow and/or (to use Bart Simpson's advice :-) ) 'not have a cow' about certain things (including one thing it was wrong about) in [cow.sh](2019/burton/cow.sh) (which was renamed from `cow`) -mootoo. +mootoo. Cody also renamed the file `on.one.liners` to [on.one.liners.txt](2019/burton/on.one.liners.txt) to help with