Minor fixes and updates to FAQ

'FAQ 6.10: How does someone make a change to a file and submit that
change as a GitHub pull request?' has been updated to note that the
authors of winning entries tend to have more deference but that the
judges still have the final say in the matter.

There were some typos (including links) and formatting fixes as well.

faq.html

@@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ file includes just missing files and we welcome these too!</p>
 write-up</strong> of how IOCCC winning entries are presented!</p>
 <p>In any event we will happily add you to the <a
 href="thanks-for-help.html">thanks</a> file for your help!</p>
-<p>And of course, an IOCCC entry may update their own entries (metadata
+<p>And of course, an IOCCC author may update their own entries (metadata
 as well as source code and any extra files) by opening a <a
 href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/winner/pulls">GitHub pull request</a>
 against the master <a
@@ -2203,7 +2203,7 @@ instructional material?</h3>
 material, we request that you ask the <a href="judges.html">IOCCC
 judges</a> first.</p>
 <p>Please send your request using the instructions on the <a
-href="contact.html">contacting the IOCCC Judges</a> page.</p>
+href="/contact.html">contacting the IOCCC Judges</a> page.</p>
 <h3
 id="faq-6.4-why-do-you-sometimes-use-the-first-person-plural"><a name="faq6_4"></a>FAQ
 6.4: Why do you sometimes use the first person plural?</h3>
@@ -2217,13 +2217,13 @@ href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._D._C._Willard">F. D. C.
 Willard</a> as well as the <a
 href="https://journals.aps.org/2014/04/01/aps-announces-a-new-open-access-initiative">APS
 New Open Access Initiative</a>.</p>
-<p>The number of <a href="../judges.html">IOCCC judges</a> has always
-been “&gt; 1” such that IOCCC judges often prefer to themselves in the
-plural, sometimes <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural">in the
-common plural</a>, sometimes in the <a
-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosism">first person plural</a>,
-there may be some who reject such a practice. Therefore please consider
-that when you believe that just one of the <a
+<p>The number of <a href="https://www.ioccc.org/judges.html">IOCCC
+judges</a> has always been “&gt; 1” such that IOCCC judges often prefer
+to themselves in the plural, sometimes <a
+href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural">in the common plural</a>,
+sometimes in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosism">first
+person plural</a>, there may be some who reject such a practice.
+Therefore please consider that when you believe that just one of the <a
 href="../judges.html">IOCCC judges</a> is in action, you may consider
 that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._D._C._Willard">F. D. C.
 Willard</a> has been consulted, agreed, and has authorized the statement
@@ -2943,6 +2943,11 @@ link to the script that discusses this and gives supposed examples.</p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>Once you’ve done this you should click on <em>Create pull
 request</em>.</p>
+<p>IMPORTANT NOTE: although the <a
+href="https://www.ioccc.org/judges.html">Judges</a> will give more
+deference to the authors of edited entries the <a
+href="https://www.ioccc.org/judges.html">Judges</a> also retain the
+final editorial say in the matter.</p>
 <h4 id="what-to-do-after-a-merge">What to do after a merge</h4>
 <p>When the judges have merged the pull request you now need to make
 sure your fork has the merge. To do this from the command line, assuming