Slight change in 'greater challenge' line

In the line in README.md and index.html files that said:

    ### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge

I added a ':' at the end of the line.

There were some entries that had a link fix in the index.html file but I
only looked up through 1995/leo as those still have to have a 'look and
feel' check and it would just slow things down.
This commit is contained in:
Cody Boone Ferguson committed 2024-07-09 11:06:20 -07:00
1 parent 1e16109f84
commit 41abeda97a
94 files changed
+104 -102

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Just say
(Btw, tcc has its roots in IOCCC...)
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:
**If you want a greater challenge, don't read any further**:
just try to understand the program via the source.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ C99, or long lines as an extension. This code has been tested on:</p></li>
<li><p>AIX 5.3, IBM eServer p5-550, gcc 3.3.3 and AIX CC Version 6</p>
<p>(Btw, tcc has its roots in IOCCC…)</p></li>
</ul>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge</h3>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:</h3>
<p><strong>If you want a greater challenge, don’t read any further</strong>:
just try to understand the program via the source.</p>
<p>If you get stuck, come back and read below for additional hints and information.</p>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ the actual `argv` strings to be writable, though.
- Some seemingly redundant code works to eliminate warnings and evade a gcc bug.
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:
**If you want a greater challenge, don't read any further**:
just try to understand the program via the source.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ the actual <code>argv</code> strings to be writable, though.</li>
<li>This program doesn’t work with <code>%e</code> style numbers like <code>1e-4</code>.</li>
<li>Some seemingly redundant code works to eliminate warnings and evade a gcc bug.</li>
</ul>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge</h3>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:</h3>
<p><strong>If you want a greater challenge, don’t read any further</strong>:
just try to understand the program via the source.</p>
<p>If you get stuck, come back and read below for additional hints and information.</p>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ reflection ray at an object's surface, given the incoming
direction and surface normal.
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge
### NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:
**If you want a greater challenge, don't read any further**:
just try to understand the program via the source.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ by the source code itself: the geometric construction of a
reflection ray at an object’s surface, given the incoming
direction and surface normal.</p></li>
</ul>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge</h3>
<h3 id="notice-to-those-who-wish-for-a-greater-challenge">NOTICE to those who wish for a greater challenge:</h3>
<p><strong>If you want a greater challenge, don’t read any further</strong>:
just try to understand the program via the source.</p>
<p>If you get stuck, come back and read below for additional hints and information.</p>