Format fix some of 2006 entries' index.html

This commit is contained in:
Cody Boone Ferguson committed 2024-09-02 13:02:28 -07:00
1 parent d3ba52c5bd
commit 513e0c9001
8 files changed
+65 -49

No files matched your search

+5 -5
View File
@@ -417,16 +417,16 @@ Location: <a href="../../location.html#US">US</a> - <em>United States of America
<pre><code> a 0 1</code></pre>
<p>where <code>a</code> is the row (<code>a</code>-<code>i</code>), <code>0</code> is the column (<code>0</code>-<code>8</code>) and <code>1</code> is the
number (<code>1</code>-<code>9</code>).</p>
<p>NOTE: if you do not input three different ‘words’ it will block. You can input
<p><strong>NOTE</strong>: if you do not input three different ‘words’ it will block. You can input
more text to fulfil the program’s requirements.</p>
<p>NOTE: if your move is invalid it will prompt you again but not show the board.</p>
<p><strong>NOTE</strong>: if your move is invalid it will prompt you again but not show the board.</p>
<h2 id="judges-remarks">Judges’ remarks:</h2>
<p>This entry turns a newspaper solitaire puzzle into a competition
with the computer to be the last one moving. The object of this
<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2006/meyer/meyer.c">source code</a> is to determine the object of this <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2006/meyer/meyer.c">source
code</a>! :-)</p>
<h2 id="authors-remarks">Author’s remarks:</h2>
<p>I wanted submit a fully object-oriented entry to show that
<p>I wanted to submit a fully object-oriented entry to show that
object-orientated code:</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>is ridiculously bloated.</li>
@@ -443,8 +443,8 @@ you shouldn’t break in any case: Rule Nr 2, The size of …</p>
<em>manually</em> translated it from a generic object-oriented programming
language to C, it didn’t just end up unreadable, but awfully
messed up, i.e. obfuscated.</p>
<p>As it is already (pre)translated to C, you could also call it an object-
disoriented program.</p>
<p>As it is already (pre)translated to C, you could also call it an
object-disoriented program.</p>
<p>Comparing this program to a potential object-oriented implementation,
it is obvious, that object-oriented code isn’t ‘<code>WYWIWID</code>’ (‘what
you write is what it does’). It may be tempting to think that</p>