diff --git a/1990/baruch/README.md b/1990/baruch/README.md
index 8381ea610..f8a750f1a 100644
--- a/1990/baruch/README.md
+++ b/1990/baruch/README.md
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Israel
 make all
 ```
 
+There is [alternate code](#alternate-code) for those using Turbo-C or MSC.
+
 ## To run:
 
 ```sh
@@ -36,22 +38,22 @@ Why is there no output?
 
 ### Alternate code:
 
-[Cody Boone Ferguson](/winners.html#Cody_Boone_Ferguson) provided alternate code
-for users using Turbo-C or MSC, based on the authors' remarks below, except
-that he did not change the `" #Q"` string as that showed worse looking output
-instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in
-question. YMMV. Thank you Cody (though we all think <strike>[no
-one](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/no_one#Pronoun)</strike> [very
-few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
+This alternate code is for the [very few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
 [users](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows)
-[here](https://www.ioccc.org) will need it :-) )!
+[here](https://www.ioccc.org) who will need it but nonetheless if you're using
+Turbo-C or MSC, the code is based on the authors' remarks except that the `"
+#Q"` string was not changed as that showed worse looking output instead of
+improved output though admittedly we have no way to test the compilers in
+question. YMMV.
 
-To compile:
+#### To build:
 
 ```sh
 make alt
 ```
 
+#### To use:
+
 Use `baruch.alt` as you would `baruch`.
 
 
diff --git a/thanks-for-fixes.md b/thanks-for-fixes.md
index d68c11574..b34223c47 100644
--- a/thanks-for-fixes.md
+++ b/thanks-for-fixes.md
@@ -560,8 +560,17 @@ details in that file and further details are in the [bugs.md](bugs.md) file.
 
 ## [1990/baruch](1990/baruch/baruch.c) ([README.md](1990/baruch/README.md]))
 
-Cody added an [alternate version](1990/baruch/baruch.alt.c) which allows certain
-compilers to compile the code, based on the author's remarks.
+Cody added an [alternate version](1990/baruch/baruch.alt.c) which allows Turbo-C
+and MSC to compile this code, based on the authors' remarks, except that Cody
+did not change the `" #Q"` string as that showed worse looking output
+instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in
+question. YMMV.
+
+Although this is appreciated we agree with him that <strike>no one</strike>
+[very few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
+[users](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows)
+[here](https://www.ioccc.org) will need it! :-)
+
 
 
 ## [1990/cmills](1990/cmills/cmills.c) ([README.md](1990/cmills/README.md]))