diff --git a/faq.html b/faq.html
index 5c9768549..bb3579d04 100644
--- a/faq.html
+++ b/faq.html
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@
IOCCC FAQ Table of Contents
-This is FAQ version 28.2.1 2025-01-18.
+This is FAQ version 28.2.2 2025-01-30.
- Q 0.0: How can I enter the IOCCC?
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ command line (if any command line options and arguments are used)
and any input or actions if applicable.
We highly recommend that you explain why you think your entry is
well obfuscated.
-For those entries that win the IOCCC, we often use much of text from the
+
For those submissions that win the IOCCC, we often use much of text from the
remarks.md file in the Author’s remarks section of the index.html file.
For this reason, a well written remarks.md file is considered a plus.
While not required, consider adding bit of humor to your remarks.md
@@ -1281,6 +1281,7 @@ or “Best of Show award”.
- 1985/shapiro
- 1986/wall
- 1987/lievaart
+- 1991/westley
Starting from 1988, the entry we liked the most in that year is called
“Best of Show”. Here are the “Best of Show” entries:
@@ -1293,15 +1294,22 @@ or “Best of Show award”.
1996/august
1998/banks
2000/jarijyrki
+2001/jason
+2004/gavin
+2005/persano
+2006/toledo2
+2011/akari
+2013/cable2
+2018/mills
2020/carlini
In 1993, 1994 and 1995 the judges were unable to select a clear overall
winning entry. So to give a nod to the entry that had the highest approval ranking
from the judges, they used the following awards:
These could be considered the ‘best entry’ for those years with 1 or
more other entries that came in close behind.
diff --git a/faq.md b/faq.md
index 8e55d2f1b..bc3d5046c 100644
--- a/faq.md
+++ b/faq.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# IOCCC FAQ Table of Contents
-This is FAQ version **28.2.1 2025-01-18**.
+This is FAQ version **28.2.2 2025-01-30**.
## 0. [Entering the IOCCC: the bare minimum you need to know](#enter_questions)
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ and any input or actions if applicable.
We highly recommend that you explain why you think your entry is
well obfuscated.
-For those entries that win the IOCCC, we often use much of text from the
+For those submissions that win the IOCCC, we often use much of text from the
`remarks.md` file in the _Author's remarks_ section of the `index.html` file.
For this reason, a well written `remarks.md` file is considered a plus.
@@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ In 1984-1987, the "`Grand Prize`" winning entries are:
- [1985/shapiro](1985/shapiro/index.html)
- [1986/wall](1986/wall/index.html)
- [1987/lievaart](1987/lievaart/index.html)
+- [1991/westley](1991/westley/index.html)
Starting from 1988, the entry we liked the most in that year is called
"`Best of Show`". Here are the "`Best of Show`" entries:
@@ -1082,6 +1083,13 @@ Starting from 1988, the entry we liked the most in that year is called
- [1996/august](1996/august/index.html)
- [1998/banks](1998/banks/index.html)
- [2000/jarijyrki](2000/jarijyrki/index.html)
+- [2001/jason](2001/jason/index.html)
+- [2004/gavin](2004/gavin/index.html)
+- [2005/persano](2005/persano/index.html)
+- [2006/toledo2](2006/toledo2/index.html)
+- [2011/akari](2011/akari/index.html)
+- [2013/cable2](2013/cable2/index.html)
+- [2018/mills](2018/mills/index.html)
- [2020/carlini](2020/carlini/index.html)
@@ -1089,9 +1097,9 @@ In 1993, 1994 and 1995 the judges were unable to select a clear overall
winning entry. So to give a nod to the entry that had the highest approval ranking
from the judges, they used the following awards:
-- [1993/rince](1993/rince/index.html) - `Most Well Rounded`
-- [1994/shapiro](1994/shapiro/index.html) - `Most Well Rounded`
-- [1995/leo](1995/leo/index.html) - `Best Use of Obfuscation`
+- [1993/rince](1993/rince/index.html) - `Most well rounded`
+- [1994/shapiro](1994/shapiro/index.html) - `Most well rounded obfuscation`
+- [1995/leo](1995/leo/index.html) - `Best use of obfuscation`
These could be considered the '`best entry`' for those years with 1 or
more other entries that came in close behind.