diff --git a/next/guidelines.html b/next/guidelines.html
index a070e98f4..05369a497 100644
--- a/next/guidelines.html
+++ b/next/guidelines.html
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ writing by contacting the judges.
IOCCC Guidelines version
-These IOCCC guidelines are version 28.13 2024-08-22.
+These IOCCC guidelines are version 28.14 2024-08-24.
IMPORTANT: Be SURE to read the IOCCC rules.
@@ -905,11 +905,25 @@ compiler produces a different result: so your submission won’t be penalized fo
not meeting your claims).
+On the other hand, some warnings cannot be disabled and are enabled by compilers
+without any warning option specified. These are sometimes inevitable in
+obfuscated code and even in some non-obfuscated code.
+
+
+Additionally, some compilers like to warn about certain use of char *s which
+is not only likely dubious itself it obviously can’t (always) be avoided so you should
+not worry about this either; this is the warning -Wno-unsafe-buffer-usage. See
+also the
+FAQ on “forced warnings”
+and the
+FAQ on “-Weverything”.
+
+
If your submission issues lots of warnings but is otherwise
marvelously obfuscated in multiple levels, don’t worry about it. Nevertheless,
be sure that the warnings do not constitute a potential “show stopper”
compiler problem. Be sure that compilers such as both gcc and clang won’t
-produce a compile error and refuse to compile your code: unless for some
+produce a compiler error and refuse to compile your code: unless for some
reason that is what you intend to happen in which case document that too in your
remarks.md file. :-)
diff --git a/next/guidelines.md b/next/guidelines.md
index 85b29f7f2..b7ebc1736 100644
--- a/next/guidelines.md
+++ b/next/guidelines.md
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ writing by [contacting the judges](../contact.html).
-These [IOCCC guidelines](guidelines.html) are version **28.13 2024-08-22**.
+These [IOCCC guidelines](guidelines.html) are version **28.14 2024-08-24**.
**IMPORTANT**: Be **SURE** to read the [IOCCC rules](rules.html).
@@ -651,12 +651,28 @@ compiler produces a different result: so your submission won't be penalized for
not meeting your claims).
+
+On the other hand, some warnings cannot be disabled and are enabled by compilers
+without any warning option specified. These are sometimes inevitable in
+obfuscated code and even in some non-obfuscated code.
+
+
+
+Additionally, some compilers like to warn about certain use of `char *`s which
+is not only likely dubious itself it obviously can't (always) be avoided so you should
+not worry about this either; this is the warning `-Wno-unsafe-buffer-usage`. See
+also the
+FAQ on "[forced warnings](../faq.html#forced_warnings)"
+and the
+FAQ on "[`-Weverything`](../faq.html#weverything)".
+
+
If your submission issues lots of warnings but is otherwise
marvelously obfuscated in multiple levels, don't worry about it. Nevertheless,
be sure that the warnings do not constitute a potential "**show stopper**"
compiler problem. Be sure that compilers such as both `gcc` and `clang` won't
-produce a compile **error** and refuse to compile your code: unless for some
+produce a compiler **error** and refuse to compile your code: unless for some
reason that is what you intend to happen in which case document that too in your
`remarks.md` file. :-)