diff --git a/2004/hibachi/.gitignore b/2004/hibachi/.gitignore index 6ab1a25e1..378eac25d 100644 --- a/2004/hibachi/.gitignore +++ b/2004/hibachi/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -hibachi +build diff --git a/2004/hibachi/Makefile b/2004/hibachi/Makefile index 84ef098e4..1be03d962 100644 --- a/2004/hibachi/Makefile +++ b/2004/hibachi/Makefile @@ -1,362 +1,332 @@ -#!/bin/make +#!/usr/bin/env make # -# 2004 makefile +# IOCCC 2004 winning entry - hibachi + +################################################################################ # -# Copyright (C) 2004, Landon Curt Noll, Simon Cooper, Peter Seebach -# and Leonid A. Broukhis. All Rights Reserved. Permission for personal, -# educational or non-profit use is granted provided this copyright and -# notice are included in its entirety and remains unaltered. All other -# uses must receive prior permission from the contest judges. +# Regarding individual entries: +# +# IOCCC winning entry code may not work on your system. Even with standards, +# conditions and build environments change, especially when it comes to more +# extreme code such you might find in an IOCCC winner. Moreover, what was +# allowed and liked in one IOCCC contest may no longer be liked/allowed in +# later IOCCC years. +# +# Corrections on winning author and fixing typos in remarks are VERY WELCOME. +# +# GitHub pull requests are welcome: +# +# If you have a patch that might make running an entry work in modern Unix-like +# environments, please create a GitHub pull request for the IOCCC judges to +# consider. +# +# Suggestions and corrections regarding Makefiles, winning author information, +# fixing typos in remarks, and code patches are welcome via opening a GitHub +# issue or better yet, by creating a GitHub pull request for the IOCCC judges +# to consider. To form a GitHub issue or GitHub pull, please visit: +# +# https://github.com/ioccc-src/winner +# +################################################################################ + +# This work by Landon Curt Noll and Leonid A. Broukhis is licensed under: +# +# Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. +# +# See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ -# tool locations +############################# +# shell used by this Makefile +############################# # -SHELL= /bin/sh -CP= cp -CPP= cpp -GUNZIP= gunzip -LD= ld -MAKE= make -RM= rm -SED= sed -TAR= tar -TRUE= true +SHELL= bash - -# Special flags for the gavin entry +####################### +# common tool locations +####################### # -# FYI: Older versions of GCC have a bug in -O2 optimization, hence -O1 -# -GAVIN_OPT= -O1 -GAVIN_FLAGS=\ - '-DY(m)=*((int*)(m))'\ - '-DE(f,a,b,c)=((G((*)))(f))(a,b,c)'\ - '-DM=for(D=0;D<786432;D++)'\ - '-DZ=int i=0,j=0,h,n,p=393728,s=26739,C,D'\ - '-DV=0x90200'\ - '-DK=0'\ - '-DR=while((C=E(V-8,100,0,0))&3&&(D=E(V-8,96,0,0))|3){'\ - '-DL(c,d)=E(V+8,100,c,0);R}E(V+8,96,d,0);R}' - +include ../../var.mk # Set X11_LIBDIR to the directory where the X11 library resides # -X11_LIBDIR= /usr/X11R6/lib +#X11_LIBDIR= /usr/X11R6/lib +#X11_LIBDIR= /usr/X11/lib +X11_LIBDIR= /opt/X11/lib -#CINCLUDE= -I ${HOMEBREW_PREFIX}/include/SDL2 +# Set X11_INCLUDEDIR to the directory where the X11 include files reside +# +#X11_INCDIR= /usr/X11R6/include +#X11_INCDIR= /usr/X11/include +X11_INCDIR= /opt/X11/include -# optimization +# Common C compiler warnings to silence +# +#CSILENCE= +CSILENCE= -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-parameter + +# Common C compiler warning flags +# +#CWARN= ${CSILENCE} +#CWARN= -Wall ${CSILENCE} +#CWARN= -Wall -Wextra ${CSILENCE} +CWARN= -Wall -Wextra -pedantic ${CSILENCE} + +# Compiler standard +# +#CSTD= +#CSTD= -ansi +CSTD= -std=gnu99 + +# Compiler bit architecture +# +# Some entries require 32-bitness: +# ARCH= -m32 +# +# Some entries require 64-bitness: +# ARCH= -m64 +# +# By default we assume nothing: +# +ARCH= + +# Defines that are needed to compile +# +CDEFINE= +#CDEFINE= -DIOCCC + +# Include files that are needed to compile +# +CINCLUDE= +#CINCLUDE= -include stdlib.h +#CINCLUDE= -include stdio.h +#CINCLUDE= -include stdlib.h -include stdio.h +#CINCLUDE= -I ${X11_INCDIR} -I ${X11_INCDIR}/X11 +#CINCLUDE= `${SDL2_CONFIG} --cflags` + +# Optimization # # Most compiles will safely use -O2. Some can use only -O1 or -O. -# A few compilers have broken optimizers and thus you may -# not want anything. +# A few compilers have broken optimizers or this entry make break +# under those buggy optimizers and thus you may not want anything. +# Reasonable compilers will allow for -O3. # #OPT= #OPT= -O #OPT= -O1 -OPT= -O2 +#OPT= -O2 +OPT= -O3 +# Default flags for ANSI C compilation +# +CFLAGS= ${CSTD} ${CWARN} ${ARCH} ${CDEFINE} ${CINCLUDE} ${OPT} -# flags for ANSI compiles +# Libraries needed to build # -# NOTE: Some ANSI compilers make use of -Xa to turn on ANSI mode, -# others such as gcc may want -ansi, others (Compaq Tru64 Unix) -# want -std1, and others may want nothing at all. -# Adjust the CFLAGS line as needed. -# -# NOTE: Some compilers cannot optimize, or optimize some entries -# incorrectly. You might want to turn on -O to see if your -# compiler can handle them. -# -# -#CFLAGS= -Xa ${OPT} -#CFLAGS= -std1 $(OPT) -CFLAGS= -ansi ${OPT} +LIBS= +#LIBS= -lm +#LIBS= -L ${X11_LIBDIR} -lX11 +#LIBS= `${SDL2_CONFIG} --libs` - -# ANSI compiler -# -# Set CC to the name of your ANSI compiler. -# -# Some entries seem to need gcc. If you have gcc, set -# both CC and MAY_NEED_GCC to gcc. -# -# If you do not have gcc, set CC to the name of your ANSI compiler, and -# set MAY_NEED_GCC to either ${CC} (and hope for the best) or to just : -# to disable such programs. +# C compiler to use # CC= cc -MAY_NEED_GCC= gcc +#CC=clang +#CC=gcc - -# 2004 winners +# Compiler add-ons or replacements for clang only # -WINNERS= anonymous arachnid burley gavare gavin hibachi hoyle jdalbec \ - kopczynski newbern omoikane schnitzi sds vik1 vik2 -CLEAN= anonymous_clean arachnid_clean burley_clean gavare_clean gavin_clean \ - hibachi_clean hoyle_clean jdalbec_clean kopczynski_clean \ - newbern_clean omoikane_clean schnitzi_clean sds_clean vik1_clean \ - vik2_clean -CLOBBER= anonymous_clobber arachnid_clobber burley_clobber gavare_clobber \ - gavin_clobber hibachi_clobber hoyle_clobber jdalbec_clobber \ - kopczynski_clobber newbern_clobber omoikane_clobber schnitzi_clobber \ - sds_clobber vik1_clobber vik2_clobber -ALT_NAMES= hoyle.orig kopczynski.orig -DATA_FILES= arachnid_files gavin_files hibachi_files kopczynski_files \ - newbern_files omoikane_files schnitzi_files - - -# default build +ifeq ($(CC),clang) # -all: ${WINNERS} - - -# Best use of "Precious" Lines +#CSILENCE+= # -anonymous: anonymous.c - ${CC} anonymous.c -o anonymous - -anonymous_clean: - ${RM} -f anonymous.o - -anonymous_clobber: anonymous_clean - ${RM} -f anonymous - - -# Best use of Vision +CWARN+= -Weverything # -arachnid: arachnid.c - ${CC} -o arachnid -DL=LINES -DS=COLS \ - -DW=mvwaddch\(w,v,u,acs_map\[l\[m\[u arachnid.c -lncurses +endif -arachnid_clean: - ${RM} -f arachnid.o - -arachnid_clobber: arachnid_clean - ${RM} -f arachnid - -arachnid_files: arachnid.info - - -# Best Calculated Risk +# Specific add-ons or replacements for gcc only # -burley: burley.c - ${CC} -ansi burley.c -o burley - -burley_clean: - ${RM} -f burley.o - -burley_clobber: burley_clean - ${RM} -f burley - - -# Best Use of Light and Spheres +ifeq ($(CC),gcc) # -gavare: gavare.c - ${CC} -O3 gavare.c -o gavare - -gavare_clean: - ${RM} -f gavare.o - -gavare_clobber: gavare_clean - ${RM} -f gavare - - -# Best of Show +#CSILENCE+= # -gavin: gavin.c - ${CC} ${GAVIN_OPT} -o gavin ${GAVIN_FLAGS} gavin.c - ${RM} -f kernel - ./gavin > kernel - ${CC} ${GAVIN_OPT} -c ${GAVIN_FLAGS} -DB=_start '-Dputchar(a)=' gavin.c - ${RM} -f sh - ${LD} -s -o sh gavin.o - ${RM} -f vi - ${CP} sh vi - ${RM} -f fs.tar - ${TAR} -cvf fs.tar sh vi gavin.c gavin.hint prim - -gavin_clean: - ${RM} -f sh vi kernel gavin.o - -gavin_clobber: gavin_clean - ${RM} -f gavin fs.tar - -gavin_files: boot.b lilo.conf prim gavin_install.txt - - -# Best Abuse of the Guidelines +#CWARN+= # -hibachi: hibachi.tar.gz - ${RM} -f hibachi.tar - ${GUNZIP} < hibachi.tar.gz > hibachi.tar - ${TAR} -xvf hibachi.tar - ${RM} -f hibachi.tar - (cd hibachi && ${SHELL} ./configure) - ([ -f hibachi/makefile ] && cd hibachi && $(MAKE) -f makefile || true) - -hibachi_clean: - ${RM} -f hibachi/hibachi.o hibachi.tar - -hibachi_clobber: hibachi_clean - ${RM} -rf hibachi - -hibachi_files: hibachi.tar.gz +endif -# Most Functional Output +############################## +# Special flags for this entry +############################## # -hoyle: hoyle.c - ${CC} hoyle.c -o hoyle -lm - -hoyle.orig: hoyle.orig.c - ${CC} hoyle.orig.c -o hoyle.orig -lm - -hoyle_clean: - ${RM} -f hoyle.o hoyle.orig.o - -hoyle_clobber: hoyle_clean - ${RM} -f hoyle hoyle.orig - - -# Best Abuse of the Periodic Table +ENTRY= hibachi +PROG= ${ENTRY} # -jdalbec: jdalbec.c - @${RM} -f jdalbec2.c - -${CC} -E jdalbec.c > jdalbec2.c - @${RM} -f jdalbec3.c - ${SED} -e 's/ (/(/g' < jdalbec2.c > jdalbec3.c - ${CC} -ansi jdalbec3.c -o jdalbec - -jdalbec_clean: - ${RM} -f jdalbec2.c jdalbec3.c jdalbec.o - -jdalbec_clobber: jdalbec_clean - ${RM} -f jdalbec - - -# Best one-liner +OBJ= ${PROG}.o +DATA= +TARGET= build/${PROG} # -kopczynski: kopczynski.c - ${CC} -Dif=while kopczynski.c -o kopczynski - -kopczynski.orig: kopczynski.orig.c - ${CC} -Dif=while kopczynski.orig.c -o kopczynski.orig - -kopczynski_clean: - ${RM} -f kopczynski.o kopczynski.orig.o - -kopczynski_clobber: kopczynski_clean - ${RM} -f kopczynski kopczynski.orig - -kopczynski_files: kopczynski-10 kopczynski-11 kopczynski-8a kopczynski-8b \ - kopczynski-8c kopczynski-9 +ALT_OBJ= +ALT_TARGET= -# Best Font Engine +################# +# build the entry +################# # -newbern: newbern.c - ${CC} newbern.c -o newbern +all: data ${TARGET} + @${TRUE} -newbern_clean: - ${RM} -f newbern.o +.PHONY: all alt data everything clean clobber install \ + love haste waste maker easter_egg sandwich \ + supernova deep_magic magic charon pluto -newbern_clobber: newbern_clean - ${RM} -f newbern +build/${PROG}: src + ${RM} -rf build + ${CP} -v -r src build + cd build; CFLAGS="${CSTD} ${CWARN} ${ARCH} ${CDEFINE} ${CINCLUDE} ${OPT}" \ + LDFLAGS="${LIBS}" \ + CC="${CC}" \ + ${SHELL} ./configure + cd build; ${MAKE} -newbern_files: newbern.dat - - -# Best Utility +# alternative executable # -omoikane: omoikane.c - ${CC} -O omoikane.c -o omoikane +alt: data ${ALT_TARGET} + @${TRUE} -omoikane_clean: - ${RM} -f omoikane.o - -omoikane_clobber: omoikane_clean - ${RM} -f omoikane - -omoikane_files: omoikane.info - - -# Best Non-Use of Curses +# data files # -schnitzi: schnitzi.c - ${CC} schnitzi.c -o schnitzi +data: ${DATA} + @${TRUE} -schnitzi_clean: - ${RM} -f schnitzi.o - -schnitzi_clobber: schnitzi_clean - ${RM} -f schnitzi - -schnitzi_files: schnitzi.inp0 schnitzi.inp1 - - -# Best Abuse of Indentation +# both all and alt # -sds: sds.c - ${CC} -o sds sds.c - -sds_clean: - ${RM} -f sds_encoder.c sds_encoder.o sds.o - -sds_clobber: sds_clean - ${RM} -f sds sds_encoder - - -# Best X11 Game -# -vik1: vik1.c - ${CC} -ansi -O2 -o vik1 vik1.c -L${X11_LIBDIR} -lX11 - -vik1_clean: - ${RM} -f vik1.o - -vik1_clobber: vik1_clean - ${RM} -f vik1 - - -# Best Abuse of CPP -# -vik2: vik2.c - @${RM} -f vik2_1.c - ${CC} -E '-DSTOP=_5' '-DFNAME="vik2_1.c"' vik2.c > vik2_1.c - @${RM} -f vik2_2.c - ${CC} -E vik2_1.c > vik2_2.c - ${CC} -O vik2_2.c -o vik2 - -vik2_clean: - ${RM} -f vik2_1.c vik2_2.c vik2.o - -vik2_clobber: vik2_clean - ${RM} -f vik2 +everything: all alt +############### # utility rules +############### # -everything: ${WINNERS} ${ALT_NAMES} ${DATA_FILES} +clean: + ${RM} -f ${OBJ} ${ALT_OBJ} + @-if [ -f indent.c ]; then \ + echo ${RM} -f indent.c; \ + ${RM} -f indent.c; \ + fi +clobber: clean + ${RM} -f ${TARGET} ${ALT_TARGET} + ${RM} -rf build + @-if [ -e sandwich ]; then \ + ${RM} -f sandwich; \ + echo 'ate sandwich'; \ + fi + +install: + @echo "Dr. Spock says that is not logical!" + @${TRUE} + +# you may be able to misunderstand the source by reading indent.c +# +indent.c: ${PROG}.c + @if which "${GINDENT}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ + echo ${RM} -f $@; \ + ${RM} -f $@; \ + echo "${GINDENT} < $< > $@"; \ + ${GINDENT} < $< > $@; \ + elif which "${INDENT}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ + echo ${RM} -f $@; \ + ${RM} -f $@; \ + echo "${INDENT} < $< > $@"; \ + ${INDENT} < $< > $@; \ + else \ + echo "no intent tool found, ident $< yourself, sorry"; \ + echo "exit 1"; \ + exit 1; \ + fi + + +################## +# 133t hacker rulz +################## +# love: @echo 'not war?' + @${TRUE} haste: $(MAKE) waste - -waste: - @echo 'waste' - -clean: ${CLEAN} - ${RM} -f a.out core - -clobber: ${CLOBBER} - ${RM} -f ${WINNERS} - ${RM} -f ${ALT_NAMES} - -nuke: clobber @${TRUE} -install: all - ${CAT} ${WINNERS} ${ALT_NAMES} > /dev/null +waste: + @echo 'haste' + @${TRUE} + +maker: + @echo 'Participate in a maker faire' + @${TRUE} + +easter_egg: + @echo "you expected to often misunderstand this $${RANDOM} magic" + @echo "chongo '' /\\oo/\\" + @echo "Eggy" + +sandwich: easter_egg + @if [ `id -u` -eq 0 ]; then \ + echo 'Okay.'; \ + echo "$${RANDOM}`date +%s`$${RANDOM}" > $@; \ + else \ + echo 'What? Make it yourself.'; \ + exit 1; \ + fi + +# Understand the history of the Homebrew Computer Club +# as well as the West Coast Computer Faire and +# you might be confused different. :-) +# +supernova: sandwich + @-if [ -r .code_anal ]; then \ + ${RM} -f .code_anal_v6; \ + else \ + echo "planet deniers, like some members of the IAU, are so cute when they try to defend their logic"; \ + fi + @echo "A $@ helps ${MAKE} the elements that help form planets" + @${TRUE} + +deep_magic: supernova + @-if [ -r .code_anal ]; then \ + ccode_analysis --deep_magic 7889066cdbdf09b0408021754586e895be641cc9be29e7eafd3ca65359541f17 \ + --FNV1a_hash_512_bit -v2 "${PROG}" "${PROG}.c"; \ + else \ + echo "Wrong! Do it again!"; \ + sleep 2; \ + echo "Wrong! Do it again!"; \ + sleep 2; \ + echo "Wrong! Do it again!"; \ + fi + @${TRUE} + +magic: deep_magic + @-if [ -r .code_anal ]; then \ + ccode_analysis --level 20003 --mode 5717175 --FNV1a_hash_512_bit -v2 "${PROG}" "${PROG}.c"; \ + else \ + echo "If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding!"; \ + echo "How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?!"; \ + fi + @${TRUE} + +# The IOCCC resident astronomer states +# +charon: magic + @echo "$@ is a dwarf planet" + @echo "dwarf is a type of planet" + @echo "therefore IAU, $@ is a planet" + +pluto: charon + ${MAKE} charon + @echo "$@ is a dwarf planet" + @echo "dwarf is a type of planet" + @echo "therefore, $@ is a planet" + @echo "having lots of planets is good feature because supernovae can help ${MAKE} a lot of them" diff --git a/2004/hibachi/README.md b/2004/hibachi/README.md index f9b593ce5..d9e41ecbc 100644 --- a/2004/hibachi/README.md +++ b/2004/hibachi/README.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Best Abuse of the Guidelines: +# Best Abuse of the Guidelines: Anthony Howe Snert @@ -8,162 +8,172 @@ Best Abuse of the Guidelines: http://www.snert.com/ +# To build: -Judges' Comments: +```sh +make +``` - To build (simple: Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux, Mac OS X): +### To run: - tar -zxf hibachi.tgz - cd hibachi - ./configure - make +```sh +./hibachi-start.sh +``` - Try: +### Try: - cd hibachi - ./hibachi-start.sh +```sh +./hibachi-start.sh +``` - Then use your web browser to visit http://localhost:8008/ +Then use your web browser to visit http://localhost:8008/ - This entry violates the guidelines in so many ways! We are not - exactly sure how many org's will be upset with this entry, but we - are considering starting an IOCCC standards body just to reign in - the likes Mr Howe. +## Judges' comments: - This entry also has the dubious honour of being the only one to have - been submitted with its own ./configure script. +This entry violates the guidelines in so many ways! We are not +exactly sure how many org's will be upset with this entry, but we +are considering starting an IOCCC standards body just to reign in +the likes Mr Howe. +This entry also has the dubious honour of being the only one to have +been submitted with its own ./configure script. -Selected Author's Comments: +## Author's comments: - README.TXT Feb 2004 - ========== +### README.TXT (Feb 2004) - Hibachi is a simple, small, and (probably) very secure web server. +Hibachi is a simple, small, and (probably) very secure web server. - There is a `hibachi.tgz' file that unpacks several support - files and a sub-directory tree containing the documentation and - examples. It can be viewed by: +There is a `hibachi.tgz' file that unpacks several support +files and a sub-directory tree containing the documentation and +examples. It can be viewed by: - tar -zxf hibachi.tgz - lynx hibachi/localhost/index.html + tar -zxf hibachi.tgz + lynx hibachi/localhost/index.html - Or once Hibachi is running, use a web browser, preferably one that - supports images and JavaScript, to view the documentation and try - some of the CGI examples: +Or once Hibachi is running, use a web browser, preferably one that +supports images and JavaScript, to view the documentation and try +some of the CGI examples: - http://localhost:8008/ + http://localhost:8008/ +### Building - Building - -------- +To build just the executable: - To build just the executable: +For Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux (newer), Mac OS X: - # Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux (newer), Mac OS X - gcc -o hibachi hibachi.c +```sh +gcc -o hibachi hibachi.c +``` - # Linux (older) - gcc -DSHUT_WR=1 -o hibachi hibachi.c +For Linux (older): - # SunOS - gcc -o hibachi hibachi.c -lnsl -lsocket +```sh +gcc -DSHUT_WR=1 -o hibachi hibachi.c +`` - Since some systems place socket and network functions into other - libraries, a GNU autoconf ./configure script has been provided to - figure out the necessary link libraries, to verify all the - necessary headers and functions are present, and setup the #! - paths for the CGI examples. In which case the preferred build - commands are: +For SunOS: - ./configure [--enable-port=number] - make +```sh +gcc -o hibachi hibachi.c -lnsl -lsocket +``` - To start the server on the default port (8008): +Since some systems place socket and network functions into other +libraries, a GNU autoconf ./configure script has been provided to +figure out the necessary link libraries, to verify all the +necessary headers and functions are present, and setup the #! +paths for the CGI examples. In which case the preferred build +commands are: - ./hibachi-start.sh & +``` +./configure [--enable-port=number] +make +``` - To test the server: +To start the server on the default port (8008): - lynx http://localhost:8008/ +```sh +./hibachi-start.sh & +``` - To stop the server: +To test the server: - kill %1 +```sh +lynx http://localhost:8008/ +``` +To stop the server: - Features - -------- +```sh +kill %1 +``` - o Supports virtual hosts. +### Features - o Supports all MIME types. +* Supports virtual hosts. - o Supports Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts and programs. +* Supports all MIME types. - o Supports multiple index.* file types: +* Supports Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts and programs. - index.htm, index.html, index.php, index.pl, - index.sh, index.rb, index.py +* Supports multiple index.* file types: - o Supports subset of RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 methods: + index.htm, index.html, index.php, index.pl, + index.sh, index.rb, index.py - GET, HEAD, and POST +* Supports subset of RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 methods: - o Simple & straight forward configuration using environment variables. + GET, HEAD, and POST - o Portability across Unix-like environments, such as: +* Simple & straight forward configuration using environment variables. - Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux, SunOS. +* Portability across Unix-like environments, such as: - o Known to work with Lynx, Mozilla, Opera, and Internet Explorer - web browsers. + Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux, SunOS. - o Is a dedicated process-forking server that does not use inetd. +* Known to work with Lynx, Mozilla, Opera, and Internet Explorer + web browsers. - o Is secure against relative path file snooping. +* Is a dedicated process-forking server that does not use inetd. - o Is secure against directory searches. +* Is secure against relative path file snooping. - o CGI script execution managed through Unix file permissions. +* Is secure against directory searches. - o ~155 lines of source, - 1940 bytes long by IOCCC 2004 rules, - ~6KB compiled & stripped for FreeBSD. +* CGI script execution managed through Unix file permissions. - o Superior & smaller than micro_httpd from http://www.acme.com/ +* ~155 lines of source, + 1940 bytes long by IOCCC 2004 rules, + ~6KB compiled & stripped for FreeBSD. - o And has a really cool tongue-in-cheek animated logo too. +* Superior & smaller than micro_httpd from http://www.acme.com/ +* And has a really cool tongue-in-cheek animated logo too. - Comments - -------- +### Comments - o This code is properly indented using the One True Brace style. +* This code is properly indented using the One True Brace style. - o HTTP/1.0 200 OK == HTTP/1.1 200 OK CRLF Connection: close ? +* HTTP/1.0 200 OK == HTTP/1.1 200 OK CRLF Connection: close ? - o getenv() == putenv() ? +* getenv() == putenv() ? - o Hibachi can serve www.ioccc.org. +* Hibachi can serve www.ioccc.org. - o Commented spoiler available. +* Commented spoiler available. +### Known Issues - Known Issues - ------------ +* The "links" text browser does not support RFC 2616 section 7.2.1 + paragraph 3 sentence 2, and so fails to display responses from + hibachi. - o The "links" text browser does not support RFC 2616 section 7.2.1 - paragraph 3 sentence 2, and so fails to display responses from - hibachi. +### Suggested IOCCC Categories - - Suggested IOCCC Categories - -------------------------- - - Best Utility - Best Support - Most Portable Package - Most Likely to Cook Apache - Best Interpretation of RFC 2616 - Winner of The Far Too Much Free Time Award + Best Utility + Best Support + Most Portable Package + Most Likely to Cook Apache + Best Interpretation of RFC 2616 + Winner of The Far Too Much Free Time Award diff --git a/2004/hibachi/hibachi.tar.gz b/2004/hibachi/hibachi.tar.gz deleted file mode 100644 index d84c6d4e9..000000000 Binary files a/2004/hibachi/hibachi.tar.gz and /dev/null differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/configure b/2004/hibachi/src/configure new file mode 100755 index 000000000..5f4c2ab2a --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/configure @@ -0,0 +1,4874 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles. +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.57 for hibachi 1.0. +# +# Report bugs to >. +# +# Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 +# Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# This configure script is free software; the Free Software Foundation +# gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it. +# +# Public Domain 2004 by Anthony Howe. +## --------------------- ## +## M4sh Initialization. ## +## --------------------- ## + +# Be Bourne compatible +if test -n "${ZSH_VERSION+set}" && (emulate sh) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + emulate sh + NULLCMD=: + # Zsh 3.x and 4.x performs word splitting on ${1+"$@"}, which + # is contrary to our usage. Disable this feature. + alias -g '${1+"$@"}'='"$@"' +elif test -n "${BASH_VERSION+set}" && (set -o posix) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + set -o posix +fi + +# Support unset when possible. +if (FOO=FOO; unset FOO) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_unset=unset +else + as_unset=false +fi + + +# Work around bugs in pre-3.0 UWIN ksh. +$as_unset ENV MAIL MAILPATH +PS1='$ ' +PS2='> ' +PS4='+ ' + +# NLS nuisances. +for as_var in \ + LANG LANGUAGE LC_ADDRESS LC_ALL LC_COLLATE LC_CTYPE LC_IDENTIFICATION \ + LC_MEASUREMENT LC_MESSAGES LC_MONETARY LC_NAME LC_NUMERIC LC_PAPER \ + LC_TELEPHONE LC_TIME +do + if (set +x; test -n "`(eval $as_var=C; export $as_var) 2>&1`"); then + eval $as_var=C; export $as_var + else + $as_unset $as_var + fi +done + +# Required to use basename. +if expr a : '\(a\)' >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_expr=expr +else + as_expr=false +fi + +if (basename /) >/dev/null 2>&1 && test "X`basename / 2>&1`" = "X/"; then + as_basename=basename +else + as_basename=false +fi + + +# Name of the executable. +as_me=`$as_basename "$0" || +$as_expr X/"$0" : '.*/\([^/][^/]*\)/*$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(//\)$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(/\)$' \| \ + . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null || +echo X/"$0" | + sed '/^.*\/\([^/][^/]*\)\/*$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\/\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\/\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/; q; } + s/.*/./; q'` + + +# PATH needs CR, and LINENO needs CR and PATH. +# Avoid depending upon Character Ranges. +as_cr_letters='abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' +as_cr_LETTERS='ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' +as_cr_Letters=$as_cr_letters$as_cr_LETTERS +as_cr_digits='0123456789' +as_cr_alnum=$as_cr_Letters$as_cr_digits + +# The user is always right. +if test "${PATH_SEPARATOR+set}" != set; then + echo "#! /bin/sh" >conf$$.sh + echo "exit 0" >>conf$$.sh + chmod +x conf$$.sh + if (PATH="/nonexistent;."; conf$$.sh) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + PATH_SEPARATOR=';' + else + PATH_SEPARATOR=: + fi + rm -f conf$$.sh +fi + + + as_lineno_1=$LINENO + as_lineno_2=$LINENO + as_lineno_3=`(expr $as_lineno_1 + 1) 2>/dev/null` + test "x$as_lineno_1" != "x$as_lineno_2" && + test "x$as_lineno_3" = "x$as_lineno_2" || { + # Find who we are. Look in the path if we contain no path at all + # relative or not. + case $0 in + *[\\/]* ) as_myself=$0 ;; + *) as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + test -r "$as_dir/$0" && as_myself=$as_dir/$0 && break +done + + ;; + esac + # We did not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND' + # in which case we are not to be found in the path. + if test "x$as_myself" = x; then + as_myself=$0 + fi + if test ! -f "$as_myself"; then + { echo "$as_me: error: cannot find myself; rerun with an absolute path" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + fi + case $CONFIG_SHELL in + '') + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in /bin$PATH_SEPARATOR/usr/bin$PATH_SEPARATOR$PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for as_base in sh bash ksh sh5; do + case $as_dir in + /*) + if ("$as_dir/$as_base" -c ' + as_lineno_1=$LINENO + as_lineno_2=$LINENO + as_lineno_3=`(expr $as_lineno_1 + 1) 2>/dev/null` + test "x$as_lineno_1" != "x$as_lineno_2" && + test "x$as_lineno_3" = "x$as_lineno_2" ') 2>/dev/null; then + $as_unset BASH_ENV || test "${BASH_ENV+set}" != set || { BASH_ENV=; export BASH_ENV; } + $as_unset ENV || test "${ENV+set}" != set || { ENV=; export ENV; } + CONFIG_SHELL=$as_dir/$as_base + export CONFIG_SHELL + exec "$CONFIG_SHELL" "$0" ${1+"$@"} + fi;; + esac + done +done +;; + esac + + # Create $as_me.lineno as a copy of $as_myself, but with $LINENO + # uniformly replaced by the line number. The first 'sed' inserts a + # line-number line before each line; the second 'sed' does the real + # work. The second script uses 'N' to pair each line-number line + # with the numbered line, and appends trailing '-' during + # substitution so that $LINENO is not a special case at line end. + # (Raja R Harinath suggested sed '=', and Paul Eggert wrote the + # second 'sed' script. Blame Lee E. McMahon for sed's syntax. :-) + sed '=' <$as_myself | + sed ' + N + s,$,-, + : loop + s,^\(['$as_cr_digits']*\)\(.*\)[$]LINENO\([^'$as_cr_alnum'_]\),\1\2\1\3, + t loop + s,-$,, + s,^['$as_cr_digits']*\n,, + ' >$as_me.lineno && + chmod +x $as_me.lineno || + { echo "$as_me: error: cannot create $as_me.lineno; rerun with a POSIX shell" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + + # Don't try to exec as it changes $[0], causing all sort of problems + # (the dirname of $[0] is not the place where we might find the + # original and so on. Autoconf is especially sensible to this). + . ./$as_me.lineno + # Exit status is that of the last command. + exit +} + + +case `echo "testing\c"; echo 1,2,3`,`echo -n testing; echo 1,2,3` in + *c*,-n*) ECHO_N= ECHO_C=' +' ECHO_T=' ' ;; + *c*,* ) ECHO_N=-n ECHO_C= ECHO_T= ;; + *) ECHO_N= ECHO_C='\c' ECHO_T= ;; +esac + +if expr a : '\(a\)' >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_expr=expr +else + as_expr=false +fi + +rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file +echo >conf$$.file +if ln -s conf$$.file conf$$ 2>/dev/null; then + # We could just check for DJGPP; but this test a) works b) is more generic + # and c) will remain valid once DJGPP supports symlinks (DJGPP 2.04). + if test -f conf$$.exe; then + # Don't use ln at all; we don't have any links + as_ln_s='cp -p' + else + as_ln_s='ln -s' + fi +elif ln conf$$.file conf$$ 2>/dev/null; then + as_ln_s=ln +else + as_ln_s='cp -p' +fi +rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file + +if mkdir -p . 2>/dev/null; then + as_mkdir_p=: +else + as_mkdir_p=false +fi + +as_executable_p="test -f" + +# Sed expression to map a string onto a valid CPP name. +as_tr_cpp="sed y%*$as_cr_letters%P$as_cr_LETTERS%;s%[^_$as_cr_alnum]%_%g" + +# Sed expression to map a string onto a valid variable name. +as_tr_sh="sed y%*+%pp%;s%[^_$as_cr_alnum]%_%g" + + +# IFS +# We need space, tab and new line, in precisely that order. +as_nl=' +' +IFS=" $as_nl" + +# CDPATH. +$as_unset CDPATH + + +# Name of the host. +# hostname on some systems (SVR3.2, Linux) returns a bogus exit status, +# so uname gets run too. +ac_hostname=`(hostname || uname -n) 2>/dev/null | sed 1q` + +exec 6>&1 + +# +# Initializations. +# +ac_default_prefix=/usr/local +ac_config_libobj_dir=. +cross_compiling=no +subdirs= +MFLAGS= +MAKEFLAGS= +SHELL=${CONFIG_SHELL-/bin/sh} + +# Maximum number of lines to put in a shell here document. +# This variable seems obsolete. It should probably be removed, and +# only ac_max_sed_lines should be used. +: ${ac_max_here_lines=38} + +# Identity of this package. +PACKAGE_NAME='hibachi' +PACKAGE_TARNAME='hibachi' +PACKAGE_VERSION='1.0' +PACKAGE_STRING='hibachi 1.0' +PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='Anthony Howe ' + +ac_unique_file="$PACKAGE_NAME.c" +# Factoring default headers for most tests. +ac_includes_default="\ +#include +#if HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H +# include +#endif +#if HAVE_SYS_STAT_H +# include +#endif +#if STDC_HEADERS +# include +# include +#else +# if HAVE_STDLIB_H +# include +# endif +#endif +#if HAVE_STRING_H +# if !STDC_HEADERS && HAVE_MEMORY_H +# include +# endif +# include +#endif +#if HAVE_STRINGS_H +# include +#endif +#if HAVE_INTTYPES_H +# include +#else +# if HAVE_STDINT_H +# include +# endif +#endif +#if HAVE_UNISTD_H +# include +#endif" + +ac_subst_vars='SHELL PATH_SEPARATOR PACKAGE_NAME PACKAGE_TARNAME PACKAGE_VERSION PACKAGE_STRING PACKAGE_BUGREPORT exec_prefix prefix program_transform_name bindir sbindir libexecdir datadir sysconfdir sharedstatedir localstatedir libdir includedir oldincludedir infodir mandir build_alias host_alias target_alias DEFS ECHO_C ECHO_N ECHO_T LIBS package_copyright package_major package_minor package_author perl_exe ac_pt_perl_exe ruby_exe ac_pt_ruby_exe php_exe ac_pt_php_exe enable_port CC_E CC_E_NAME CC_O CC_O_NAME CC CFLAGS LDFLAGS CPPFLAGS ac_ct_CC EXEEXT OBJEXT LN_S CPP EGREP LIBOBJS LTLIBOBJS' +ac_subst_files='' + +# Initialize some variables set by options. +ac_init_help= +ac_init_version=false +# The variables have the same names as the options, with +# dashes changed to underlines. +cache_file=/dev/null +exec_prefix=NONE +no_create= +no_recursion= +prefix=NONE +program_prefix=NONE +program_suffix=NONE +program_transform_name=s,x,x, +silent= +site= +srcdir= +verbose= +x_includes=NONE +x_libraries=NONE + +# Installation directory options. +# These are left unexpanded so users can "make install exec_prefix=/foo" +# and all the variables that are supposed to be based on exec_prefix +# by default will actually change. +# Use braces instead of parens because sh, perl, etc. also accept them. +bindir='${exec_prefix}/bin' +sbindir='${exec_prefix}/sbin' +libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/libexec' +datadir='${prefix}/share' +sysconfdir='${prefix}/etc' +sharedstatedir='${prefix}/com' +localstatedir='${prefix}/var' +libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib' +includedir='${prefix}/include' +oldincludedir='/usr/include' +infodir='${prefix}/info' +mandir='${prefix}/man' + +ac_prev= +for ac_option +do + # If the previous option needs an argument, assign it. + if test -n "$ac_prev"; then + eval "$ac_prev=\$ac_option" + ac_prev= + continue + fi + + ac_optarg=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x[^=]*=\(.*\)'` + + # Accept the important Cygnus configure options, so we can diagnose typos. + + case $ac_option in + + -bindir | --bindir | --bindi | --bind | --bin | --bi) + ac_prev=bindir ;; + -bindir=* | --bindir=* | --bindi=* | --bind=* | --bin=* | --bi=*) + bindir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -build | --build | --buil | --bui | --bu) + ac_prev=build_alias ;; + -build=* | --build=* | --buil=* | --bui=* | --bu=*) + build_alias=$ac_optarg ;; + + -cache-file | --cache-file | --cache-fil | --cache-fi \ + | --cache-f | --cache- | --cache | --cach | --cac | --ca | --c) + ac_prev=cache_file ;; + -cache-file=* | --cache-file=* | --cache-fil=* | --cache-fi=* \ + | --cache-f=* | --cache-=* | --cache=* | --cach=* | --cac=* | --ca=* | --c=*) + cache_file=$ac_optarg ;; + + --config-cache | -C) + cache_file=config.cache ;; + + -datadir | --datadir | --datadi | --datad | --data | --dat | --da) + ac_prev=datadir ;; + -datadir=* | --datadir=* | --datadi=* | --datad=* | --data=* | --dat=* \ + | --da=*) + datadir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -disable-* | --disable-*) + ac_feature=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x-*disable-\(.*\)'` + # Reject names that are not valid shell variable names. + expr "x$ac_feature" : ".*[^-_$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + { echo "$as_me: error: invalid feature name: $ac_feature" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ac_feature=`echo $ac_feature | sed 's/-/_/g'` + eval "enable_$ac_feature=no" ;; + + -enable-* | --enable-*) + ac_feature=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x-*enable-\([^=]*\)'` + # Reject names that are not valid shell variable names. + expr "x$ac_feature" : ".*[^-_$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + { echo "$as_me: error: invalid feature name: $ac_feature" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ac_feature=`echo $ac_feature | sed 's/-/_/g'` + case $ac_option in + *=*) ac_optarg=`echo "$ac_optarg" | sed "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g"`;; + *) ac_optarg=yes ;; + esac + eval "enable_$ac_feature='$ac_optarg'" ;; + + -exec-prefix | --exec_prefix | --exec-prefix | --exec-prefi \ + | --exec-pref | --exec-pre | --exec-pr | --exec-p | --exec- \ + | --exec | --exe | --ex) + ac_prev=exec_prefix ;; + -exec-prefix=* | --exec_prefix=* | --exec-prefix=* | --exec-prefi=* \ + | --exec-pref=* | --exec-pre=* | --exec-pr=* | --exec-p=* | --exec-=* \ + | --exec=* | --exe=* | --ex=*) + exec_prefix=$ac_optarg ;; + + -gas | --gas | --ga | --g) + # Obsolete; use --with-gas. + with_gas=yes ;; + + -help | --help | --hel | --he | -h) + ac_init_help=long ;; + -help=r* | --help=r* | --hel=r* | --he=r* | -hr*) + ac_init_help=recursive ;; + -help=s* | --help=s* | --hel=s* | --he=s* | -hs*) + ac_init_help=short ;; + + -host | --host | --hos | --ho) + ac_prev=host_alias ;; + -host=* | --host=* | --hos=* | --ho=*) + host_alias=$ac_optarg ;; + + -includedir | --includedir | --includedi | --included | --include \ + | --includ | --inclu | --incl | --inc) + ac_prev=includedir ;; + -includedir=* | --includedir=* | --includedi=* | --included=* | --include=* \ + | --includ=* | --inclu=* | --incl=* | --inc=*) + includedir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -infodir | --infodir | --infodi | --infod | --info | --inf) + ac_prev=infodir ;; + -infodir=* | --infodir=* | --infodi=* | --infod=* | --info=* | --inf=*) + infodir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -libdir | --libdir | --libdi | --libd) + ac_prev=libdir ;; + -libdir=* | --libdir=* | --libdi=* | --libd=*) + libdir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -libexecdir | --libexecdir | --libexecdi | --libexecd | --libexec \ + | --libexe | --libex | --libe) + ac_prev=libexecdir ;; + -libexecdir=* | --libexecdir=* | --libexecdi=* | --libexecd=* | --libexec=* \ + | --libexe=* | --libex=* | --libe=*) + libexecdir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -localstatedir | --localstatedir | --localstatedi | --localstated \ + | --localstate | --localstat | --localsta | --localst \ + | --locals | --local | --loca | --loc | --lo) + ac_prev=localstatedir ;; + -localstatedir=* | --localstatedir=* | --localstatedi=* | --localstated=* \ + | --localstate=* | --localstat=* | --localsta=* | --localst=* \ + | --locals=* | --local=* | --loca=* | --loc=* | --lo=*) + localstatedir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -mandir | --mandir | --mandi | --mand | --man | --ma | --m) + ac_prev=mandir ;; + -mandir=* | --mandir=* | --mandi=* | --mand=* | --man=* | --ma=* | --m=*) + mandir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -nfp | --nfp | --nf) + # Obsolete; use --without-fp. + with_fp=no ;; + + -no-create | --no-create | --no-creat | --no-crea | --no-cre \ + | --no-cr | --no-c | -n) + no_create=yes ;; + + -no-recursion | --no-recursion | --no-recursio | --no-recursi \ + | --no-recurs | --no-recur | --no-recu | --no-rec | --no-re | --no-r) + no_recursion=yes ;; + + -oldincludedir | --oldincludedir | --oldincludedi | --oldincluded \ + | --oldinclude | --oldinclud | --oldinclu | --oldincl | --oldinc \ + | --oldin | --oldi | --old | --ol | --o) + ac_prev=oldincludedir ;; + -oldincludedir=* | --oldincludedir=* | --oldincludedi=* | --oldincluded=* \ + | --oldinclude=* | --oldinclud=* | --oldinclu=* | --oldincl=* | --oldinc=* \ + | --oldin=* | --oldi=* | --old=* | --ol=* | --o=*) + oldincludedir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -prefix | --prefix | --prefi | --pref | --pre | --pr | --p) + ac_prev=prefix ;; + -prefix=* | --prefix=* | --prefi=* | --pref=* | --pre=* | --pr=* | --p=*) + prefix=$ac_optarg ;; + + -program-prefix | --program-prefix | --program-prefi | --program-pref \ + | --program-pre | --program-pr | --program-p) + ac_prev=program_prefix ;; + -program-prefix=* | --program-prefix=* | --program-prefi=* \ + | --program-pref=* | --program-pre=* | --program-pr=* | --program-p=*) + program_prefix=$ac_optarg ;; + + -program-suffix | --program-suffix | --program-suffi | --program-suff \ + | --program-suf | --program-su | --program-s) + ac_prev=program_suffix ;; + -program-suffix=* | --program-suffix=* | --program-suffi=* \ + | --program-suff=* | --program-suf=* | --program-su=* | --program-s=*) + program_suffix=$ac_optarg ;; + + -program-transform-name | --program-transform-name \ + | --program-transform-nam | --program-transform-na \ + | --program-transform-n | --program-transform- \ + | --program-transform | --program-transfor \ + | --program-transfo | --program-transf \ + | --program-trans | --program-tran \ + | --progr-tra | --program-tr | --program-t) + ac_prev=program_transform_name ;; + -program-transform-name=* | --program-transform-name=* \ + | --program-transform-nam=* | --program-transform-na=* \ + | --program-transform-n=* | --program-transform-=* \ + | --program-transform=* | --program-transfor=* \ + | --program-transfo=* | --program-transf=* \ + | --program-trans=* | --program-tran=* \ + | --progr-tra=* | --program-tr=* | --program-t=*) + program_transform_name=$ac_optarg ;; + + -q | -quiet | --quiet | --quie | --qui | --qu | --q \ + | -silent | --silent | --silen | --sile | --sil) + silent=yes ;; + + -sbindir | --sbindir | --sbindi | --sbind | --sbin | --sbi | --sb) + ac_prev=sbindir ;; + -sbindir=* | --sbindir=* | --sbindi=* | --sbind=* | --sbin=* \ + | --sbi=* | --sb=*) + sbindir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -sharedstatedir | --sharedstatedir | --sharedstatedi \ + | --sharedstated | --sharedstate | --sharedstat | --sharedsta \ + | --sharedst | --shareds | --shared | --share | --shar \ + | --sha | --sh) + ac_prev=sharedstatedir ;; + -sharedstatedir=* | --sharedstatedir=* | --sharedstatedi=* \ + | --sharedstated=* | --sharedstate=* | --sharedstat=* | --sharedsta=* \ + | --sharedst=* | --shareds=* | --shared=* | --share=* | --shar=* \ + | --sha=* | --sh=*) + sharedstatedir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -site | --site | --sit) + ac_prev=site ;; + -site=* | --site=* | --sit=*) + site=$ac_optarg ;; + + -srcdir | --srcdir | --srcdi | --srcd | --src | --sr) + ac_prev=srcdir ;; + -srcdir=* | --srcdir=* | --srcdi=* | --srcd=* | --src=* | --sr=*) + srcdir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -sysconfdir | --sysconfdir | --sysconfdi | --sysconfd | --sysconf \ + | --syscon | --sysco | --sysc | --sys | --sy) + ac_prev=sysconfdir ;; + -sysconfdir=* | --sysconfdir=* | --sysconfdi=* | --sysconfd=* | --sysconf=* \ + | --syscon=* | --sysco=* | --sysc=* | --sys=* | --sy=*) + sysconfdir=$ac_optarg ;; + + -target | --target | --targe | --targ | --tar | --ta | --t) + ac_prev=target_alias ;; + -target=* | --target=* | --targe=* | --targ=* | --tar=* | --ta=* | --t=*) + target_alias=$ac_optarg ;; + + -v | -verbose | --verbose | --verbos | --verbo | --verb) + verbose=yes ;; + + -version | --version | --versio | --versi | --vers | -V) + ac_init_version=: ;; + + -with-* | --with-*) + ac_package=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x-*with-\([^=]*\)'` + # Reject names that are not valid shell variable names. + expr "x$ac_package" : ".*[^-_$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + { echo "$as_me: error: invalid package name: $ac_package" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ac_package=`echo $ac_package| sed 's/-/_/g'` + case $ac_option in + *=*) ac_optarg=`echo "$ac_optarg" | sed "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g"`;; + *) ac_optarg=yes ;; + esac + eval "with_$ac_package='$ac_optarg'" ;; + + -without-* | --without-*) + ac_package=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x-*without-\(.*\)'` + # Reject names that are not valid shell variable names. + expr "x$ac_package" : ".*[^-_$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + { echo "$as_me: error: invalid package name: $ac_package" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ac_package=`echo $ac_package | sed 's/-/_/g'` + eval "with_$ac_package=no" ;; + + --x) + # Obsolete; use --with-x. + with_x=yes ;; + + -x-includes | --x-includes | --x-include | --x-includ | --x-inclu \ + | --x-incl | --x-inc | --x-in | --x-i) + ac_prev=x_includes ;; + -x-includes=* | --x-includes=* | --x-include=* | --x-includ=* | --x-inclu=* \ + | --x-incl=* | --x-inc=* | --x-in=* | --x-i=*) + x_includes=$ac_optarg ;; + + -x-libraries | --x-libraries | --x-librarie | --x-librari \ + | --x-librar | --x-libra | --x-libr | --x-lib | --x-li | --x-l) + ac_prev=x_libraries ;; + -x-libraries=* | --x-libraries=* | --x-librarie=* | --x-librari=* \ + | --x-librar=* | --x-libra=* | --x-libr=* | --x-lib=* | --x-li=* | --x-l=*) + x_libraries=$ac_optarg ;; + + -*) { echo "$as_me: error: unrecognized option: $ac_option +Try \`$0 --help' for more information." >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ;; + + *=*) + ac_envvar=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x\([^=]*\)='` + # Reject names that are not valid shell variable names. + expr "x$ac_envvar" : ".*[^_$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + { echo "$as_me: error: invalid variable name: $ac_envvar" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + ac_optarg=`echo "$ac_optarg" | sed "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g"` + eval "$ac_envvar='$ac_optarg'" + export $ac_envvar ;; + + *) + # FIXME: should be removed in autoconf 3.0. + echo "$as_me: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target" >&2 + expr "x$ac_option" : ".*[^-._$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null && + echo "$as_me: WARNING: invalid host type: $ac_option" >&2 + : ${build_alias=$ac_option} ${host_alias=$ac_option} ${target_alias=$ac_option} + ;; + + esac +done + +if test -n "$ac_prev"; then + ac_option=--`echo $ac_prev | sed 's/_/-/g'` + { echo "$as_me: error: missing argument to $ac_option" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +fi + +# Be sure to have absolute paths. +for ac_var in exec_prefix prefix +do + eval ac_val=$`echo $ac_var` + case $ac_val in + [\\/$]* | ?:[\\/]* | NONE | '' ) ;; + *) { echo "$as_me: error: expected an absolute directory name for --$ac_var: $ac_val" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; };; + esac +done + +# Be sure to have absolute paths. +for ac_var in bindir sbindir libexecdir datadir sysconfdir sharedstatedir \ + localstatedir libdir includedir oldincludedir infodir mandir +do + eval ac_val=$`echo $ac_var` + case $ac_val in + [\\/$]* | ?:[\\/]* ) ;; + *) { echo "$as_me: error: expected an absolute directory name for --$ac_var: $ac_val" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; };; + esac +done + +# There might be people who depend on the old broken behavior: `$host' +# used to hold the argument of --host etc. +# FIXME: To remove some day. +build=$build_alias +host=$host_alias +target=$target_alias + +# FIXME: To remove some day. +if test "x$host_alias" != x; then + if test "x$build_alias" = x; then + cross_compiling=maybe + echo "$as_me: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use --host. + If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be used." >&2 + elif test "x$build_alias" != "x$host_alias"; then + cross_compiling=yes + fi +fi + +ac_tool_prefix= +test -n "$host_alias" && ac_tool_prefix=$host_alias- + +test "$silent" = yes && exec 6>/dev/null + + +# Find the source files, if location was not specified. +if test -z "$srcdir"; then + ac_srcdir_defaulted=yes + # Try the directory containing this script, then its parent. + ac_confdir=`(dirname "$0") 2>/dev/null || +$as_expr X"$0" : 'X\(.*[^/]\)//*[^/][^/]*/*$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(//\)[^/]' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(//\)$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(/\)' \| \ + . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null || +echo X"$0" | + sed '/^X\(.*[^/]\)\/\/*[^/][^/]*\/*$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)[^/].*/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/; q; } + s/.*/./; q'` + srcdir=$ac_confdir + if test ! -r $srcdir/$ac_unique_file; then + srcdir=.. + fi +else + ac_srcdir_defaulted=no +fi +if test ! -r $srcdir/$ac_unique_file; then + if test "$ac_srcdir_defaulted" = yes; then + { echo "$as_me: error: cannot find sources ($ac_unique_file) in $ac_confdir or .." >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + else + { echo "$as_me: error: cannot find sources ($ac_unique_file) in $srcdir" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + fi +fi +(cd $srcdir && test -r ./$ac_unique_file) 2>/dev/null || + { echo "$as_me: error: sources are in $srcdir, but \`cd $srcdir' does not work" >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +srcdir=`echo "$srcdir" | sed 's%\([^\\/]\)[\\/]*$%\1%'` +ac_env_build_alias_set=${build_alias+set} +ac_env_build_alias_value=$build_alias +ac_cv_env_build_alias_set=${build_alias+set} +ac_cv_env_build_alias_value=$build_alias +ac_env_host_alias_set=${host_alias+set} +ac_env_host_alias_value=$host_alias +ac_cv_env_host_alias_set=${host_alias+set} +ac_cv_env_host_alias_value=$host_alias +ac_env_target_alias_set=${target_alias+set} +ac_env_target_alias_value=$target_alias +ac_cv_env_target_alias_set=${target_alias+set} +ac_cv_env_target_alias_value=$target_alias +ac_env_CC_set=${CC+set} +ac_env_CC_value=$CC +ac_cv_env_CC_set=${CC+set} +ac_cv_env_CC_value=$CC +ac_env_CFLAGS_set=${CFLAGS+set} +ac_env_CFLAGS_value=$CFLAGS +ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set=${CFLAGS+set} +ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value=$CFLAGS +ac_env_LDFLAGS_set=${LDFLAGS+set} +ac_env_LDFLAGS_value=$LDFLAGS +ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_set=${LDFLAGS+set} +ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_value=$LDFLAGS +ac_env_CPPFLAGS_set=${CPPFLAGS+set} +ac_env_CPPFLAGS_value=$CPPFLAGS +ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=${CPPFLAGS+set} +ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value=$CPPFLAGS +ac_env_CPP_set=${CPP+set} +ac_env_CPP_value=$CPP +ac_cv_env_CPP_set=${CPP+set} +ac_cv_env_CPP_value=$CPP + +# +# Report the --help message. +# +if test "$ac_init_help" = "long"; then + # Omit some internal or obsolete options to make the list less imposing. + # This message is too long to be a string in the A/UX 3.1 sh. + cat <<_ACEOF +\`configure' configures hibachi 1.0 to adapt to many kinds of systems. + +Usage: $0 [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]... + +To assign environment variables (e.g., CC, CFLAGS...), specify them as +VAR=VALUE. See below for descriptions of some of the useful variables. + +Defaults for the options are specified in brackets. + +Configuration: + -h, --help display this help and exit + --help=short display options specific to this package + --help=recursive display the short help of all the included packages + -V, --version display version information and exit + -q, --quiet, --silent do not print \`checking...' messages + --cache-file=FILE cache test results in FILE [disabled] + -C, --config-cache alias for \`--cache-file=config.cache' + -n, --no-create do not create output files + --srcdir=DIR find the sources in DIR [configure dir or \`..'] + +_ACEOF + + cat <<_ACEOF +Installation directories: + --prefix=PREFIX install architecture-independent files in PREFIX + [$ac_default_prefix] + --exec-prefix=EPREFIX install architecture-dependent files in EPREFIX + [PREFIX] + +By default, \`make install' will install all the files in +\`$ac_default_prefix/bin', \`$ac_default_prefix/lib' etc. You can specify +an installation prefix other than \`$ac_default_prefix' using \`--prefix', +for instance \`--prefix=\$HOME'. + +For better control, use the options below. + +Fine tuning of the installation directories: + --bindir=DIR user executables [EPREFIX/bin] + --sbindir=DIR system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin] + --libexecdir=DIR program executables [EPREFIX/libexec] + --datadir=DIR read-only architecture-independent data [PREFIX/share] + --sysconfdir=DIR read-only single-machine data [PREFIX/etc] + --sharedstatedir=DIR modifiable architecture-independent data [PREFIX/com] + --localstatedir=DIR modifiable single-machine data [PREFIX/var] + --libdir=DIR object code libraries [EPREFIX/lib] + --includedir=DIR C header files [PREFIX/include] + --oldincludedir=DIR C header files for non-gcc [/usr/include] + --infodir=DIR info documentation [PREFIX/info] + --mandir=DIR man documentation [PREFIX/man] +_ACEOF + + cat <<\_ACEOF +_ACEOF +fi + +if test -n "$ac_init_help"; then + case $ac_init_help in + short | recursive ) echo "Configuration of hibachi 1.0:";; + esac + cat <<\_ACEOF + +Optional Features: + --disable-FEATURE do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no) + --enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes] + --enable-port=number specifiy the server port number, default is 8008 + +Some influential environment variables: + CC C compiler command + CFLAGS C compiler flags + LDFLAGS linker flags, e.g. -L if you have libraries in a + nonstandard directory + CPPFLAGS C/C++ preprocessor flags, e.g. -I if you have + headers in a nonstandard directory + CPP C preprocessor + +Use these variables to override the choices made by `configure' or to help +it to find libraries and programs with nonstandard names/locations. + +Report bugs to >. +_ACEOF +fi + +if test "$ac_init_help" = "recursive"; then + # If there are subdirs, report their specific --help. + ac_popdir=`pwd` + for ac_dir in : $ac_subdirs_all; do test "x$ac_dir" = x: && continue + test -d $ac_dir || continue + ac_builddir=. + +if test "$ac_dir" != .; then + ac_dir_suffix=/`echo "$ac_dir" | sed 's,^\.[\\/],,'` + # A "../" for each directory in $ac_dir_suffix. + ac_top_builddir=`echo "$ac_dir_suffix" | sed 's,/[^\\/]*,../,g'` +else + ac_dir_suffix= ac_top_builddir= +fi + +case $srcdir in + .) # No --srcdir option. We are building in place. + ac_srcdir=. + if test -z "$ac_top_builddir"; then + ac_top_srcdir=. + else + ac_top_srcdir=`echo $ac_top_builddir | sed 's,/$,,'` + fi ;; + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]* ) # Absolute path. + ac_srcdir=$srcdir$ac_dir_suffix; + ac_top_srcdir=$srcdir ;; + *) # Relative path. + ac_srcdir=$ac_top_builddir$srcdir$ac_dir_suffix + ac_top_srcdir=$ac_top_builddir$srcdir ;; +esac +# Don't blindly perform a `cd "$ac_dir"/$ac_foo && pwd` since $ac_foo can be +# absolute. +ac_abs_builddir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_builddir && pwd` +ac_abs_top_builddir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd ${ac_top_builddir}. && pwd` +ac_abs_srcdir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_srcdir && pwd` +ac_abs_top_srcdir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_top_srcdir && pwd` + + cd $ac_dir + # Check for guested configure; otherwise get Cygnus style configure. + if test -f $ac_srcdir/configure.gnu; then + echo + $SHELL $ac_srcdir/configure.gnu --help=recursive + elif test -f $ac_srcdir/configure; then + echo + $SHELL $ac_srcdir/configure --help=recursive + elif test -f $ac_srcdir/configure.ac || + test -f $ac_srcdir/configure.in; then + echo + $ac_configure --help + else + echo "$as_me: WARNING: no configuration information is in $ac_dir" >&2 + fi + cd $ac_popdir + done +fi + +test -n "$ac_init_help" && exit 0 +if $ac_init_version; then + cat <<\_ACEOF +hibachi configure 1.0 +generated by GNU Autoconf 2.57 + +Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 +Free Software Foundation, Inc. +This configure script is free software; the Free Software Foundation +gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it. + +Public Domain 2004 by Anthony Howe. +_ACEOF + exit 0 +fi +exec 5>config.log +cat >&5 <<_ACEOF +This file contains any messages produced by compilers while +running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. + +It was created by hibachi $as_me 1.0, which was +generated by GNU Autoconf 2.57. Invocation command line was + + $ $0 $@ + +_ACEOF +{ +cat <<_ASUNAME +## --------- ## +## Platform. ## +## --------- ## + +hostname = `(hostname || uname -n) 2>/dev/null | sed 1q` +uname -m = `(uname -m) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +uname -r = `(uname -r) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +uname -s = `(uname -s) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +uname -v = `(uname -v) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` + +/usr/bin/uname -p = `(/usr/bin/uname -p) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/bin/uname -X = `(/bin/uname -X) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` + +/bin/arch = `(/bin/arch) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/usr/bin/arch -k = `(/usr/bin/arch -k) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/usr/convex/getsysinfo = `(/usr/convex/getsysinfo) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +hostinfo = `(hostinfo) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/bin/machine = `(/bin/machine) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/usr/bin/oslevel = `(/usr/bin/oslevel) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` +/bin/universe = `(/bin/universe) 2>/dev/null || echo unknown` + +_ASUNAME + +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + echo "PATH: $as_dir" +done + +} >&5 + +cat >&5 <<_ACEOF + + +## ----------- ## +## Core tests. ## +## ----------- ## + +_ACEOF + + +# Keep a trace of the command line. +# Strip out --no-create and --no-recursion so they do not pile up. +# Strip out --silent because we don't want to record it for future runs. +# Also quote any args containing shell meta-characters. +# Make two passes to allow for proper duplicate-argument suppression. +ac_configure_args= +ac_configure_args0= +ac_configure_args1= +ac_sep= +ac_must_keep_next=false +for ac_pass in 1 2 +do + for ac_arg + do + case $ac_arg in + -no-create | --no-c* | -n | -no-recursion | --no-r*) continue ;; + -q | -quiet | --quiet | --quie | --qui | --qu | --q \ + | -silent | --silent | --silen | --sile | --sil) + continue ;; + *" "*|*" "*|*[\[\]\~\#\$\^\&\*\(\)\{\}\\\|\;\<\>\?\"\']*) + ac_arg=`echo "$ac_arg" | sed "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g"` ;; + esac + case $ac_pass in + 1) ac_configure_args0="$ac_configure_args0 '$ac_arg'" ;; + 2) + ac_configure_args1="$ac_configure_args1 '$ac_arg'" + if test $ac_must_keep_next = true; then + ac_must_keep_next=false # Got value, back to normal. + else + case $ac_arg in + *=* | --config-cache | -C | -disable-* | --disable-* \ + | -enable-* | --enable-* | -gas | --g* | -nfp | --nf* \ + | -q | -quiet | --q* | -silent | --sil* | -v | -verb* \ + | -with-* | --with-* | -without-* | --without-* | --x) + case "$ac_configure_args0 " in + "$ac_configure_args1"*" '$ac_arg' "* ) continue ;; + esac + ;; + -* ) ac_must_keep_next=true ;; + esac + fi + ac_configure_args="$ac_configure_args$ac_sep'$ac_arg'" + # Get rid of the leading space. + ac_sep=" " + ;; + esac + done +done +$as_unset ac_configure_args0 || test "${ac_configure_args0+set}" != set || { ac_configure_args0=; export ac_configure_args0; } +$as_unset ac_configure_args1 || test "${ac_configure_args1+set}" != set || { ac_configure_args1=; export ac_configure_args1; } + +# When interrupted or exit'd, cleanup temporary files, and complete +# config.log. We remove comments because anyway the quotes in there +# would cause problems or look ugly. +# WARNING: Be sure not to use single quotes in there, as some shells, +# such as our DU 5.0 friend, will then `close' the trap. +trap 'exit_status=$? + # Save into config.log some information that might help in debugging. + { + echo + + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ---------------- ## +## Cache variables. ## +## ---------------- ## +_ASBOX + echo + # The following way of writing the cache mishandles newlines in values, +{ + (set) 2>&1 | + case `(ac_space='"'"' '"'"'; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` in + *ac_space=\ *) + sed -n \ + "s/'"'"'/'"'"'\\\\'"'"''"'"'/g; + s/^\\([_$as_cr_alnum]*_cv_[_$as_cr_alnum]*\\)=\\(.*\\)/\\1='"'"'\\2'"'"'/p" + ;; + *) + sed -n \ + "s/^\\([_$as_cr_alnum]*_cv_[_$as_cr_alnum]*\\)=\\(.*\\)/\\1=\\2/p" + ;; + esac; +} + echo + + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ----------------- ## +## Output variables. ## +## ----------------- ## +_ASBOX + echo + for ac_var in $ac_subst_vars + do + eval ac_val=$`echo $ac_var` + echo "$ac_var='"'"'$ac_val'"'"'" + done | sort + echo + + if test -n "$ac_subst_files"; then + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ------------- ## +## Output files. ## +## ------------- ## +_ASBOX + echo + for ac_var in $ac_subst_files + do + eval ac_val=$`echo $ac_var` + echo "$ac_var='"'"'$ac_val'"'"'" + done | sort + echo + fi + + if test -s confdefs.h; then + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ----------- ## +## confdefs.h. ## +## ----------- ## +_ASBOX + echo + sed "/^$/d" confdefs.h | sort + echo + fi + test "$ac_signal" != 0 && + echo "$as_me: caught signal $ac_signal" + echo "$as_me: exit $exit_status" + } >&5 + rm -f core core.* *.core && + rm -rf conftest* confdefs* conf$$* $ac_clean_files && + exit $exit_status + ' 0 +for ac_signal in 1 2 13 15; do + trap 'ac_signal='$ac_signal'; { (exit 1); exit 1; }' $ac_signal +done +ac_signal=0 + +# confdefs.h avoids OS command line length limits that DEFS can exceed. +rm -rf conftest* confdefs.h +# AIX cpp loses on an empty file, so make sure it contains at least a newline. +echo >confdefs.h + +# Predefined preprocessor variables. + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define PACKAGE_NAME "$PACKAGE_NAME" +_ACEOF + + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define PACKAGE_TARNAME "$PACKAGE_TARNAME" +_ACEOF + + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define PACKAGE_VERSION "$PACKAGE_VERSION" +_ACEOF + + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define PACKAGE_STRING "$PACKAGE_STRING" +_ACEOF + + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "$PACKAGE_BUGREPORT" +_ACEOF + + +# Let the site file select an alternate cache file if it wants to. +# Prefer explicitly selected file to automatically selected ones. +if test -z "$CONFIG_SITE"; then + if test "x$prefix" != xNONE; then + CONFIG_SITE="$prefix/share/config.site $prefix/etc/config.site" + else + CONFIG_SITE="$ac_default_prefix/share/config.site $ac_default_prefix/etc/config.site" + fi +fi +for ac_site_file in $CONFIG_SITE; do + if test -r "$ac_site_file"; then + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: loading site script $ac_site_file" >&5 +echo "$as_me: loading site script $ac_site_file" >&6;} + sed 's/^/| /' "$ac_site_file" >&5 + . "$ac_site_file" + fi +done + +if test -r "$cache_file"; then + # Some versions of bash will fail to source /dev/null (special + # files actually), so we avoid doing that. + if test -f "$cache_file"; then + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: loading cache $cache_file" >&5 +echo "$as_me: loading cache $cache_file" >&6;} + case $cache_file in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]* ) . $cache_file;; + *) . ./$cache_file;; + esac + fi +else + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: creating cache $cache_file" >&5 +echo "$as_me: creating cache $cache_file" >&6;} + >$cache_file +fi + +# Check that the precious variables saved in the cache have kept the same +# value. +ac_cache_corrupted=false +for ac_var in `(set) 2>&1 | + sed -n 's/^ac_env_\([a-zA-Z_0-9]*\)_set=.*/\1/p'`; do + eval ac_old_set=\$ac_cv_env_${ac_var}_set + eval ac_new_set=\$ac_env_${ac_var}_set + eval ac_old_val="\$ac_cv_env_${ac_var}_value" + eval ac_new_val="\$ac_env_${ac_var}_value" + case $ac_old_set,$ac_new_set in + set,) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: \`$ac_var' was set to \`$ac_old_val' in the previous run" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: \`$ac_var' was set to \`$ac_old_val' in the previous run" >&2;} + ac_cache_corrupted=: ;; + ,set) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: \`$ac_var' was not set in the previous run" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: \`$ac_var' was not set in the previous run" >&2;} + ac_cache_corrupted=: ;; + ,);; + *) + if test "x$ac_old_val" != "x$ac_new_val"; then + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: \`$ac_var' has changed since the previous run:" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: \`$ac_var' has changed since the previous run:" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: former value: $ac_old_val" >&5 +echo "$as_me: former value: $ac_old_val" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: current value: $ac_new_val" >&5 +echo "$as_me: current value: $ac_new_val" >&2;} + ac_cache_corrupted=: + fi;; + esac + # Pass precious variables to config.status. + if test "$ac_new_set" = set; then + case $ac_new_val in + *" "*|*" "*|*[\[\]\~\#\$\^\&\*\(\)\{\}\\\|\;\<\>\?\"\']*) + ac_arg=$ac_var=`echo "$ac_new_val" | sed "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g"` ;; + *) ac_arg=$ac_var=$ac_new_val ;; + esac + case " $ac_configure_args " in + *" '$ac_arg' "*) ;; # Avoid dups. Use of quotes ensures accuracy. + *) ac_configure_args="$ac_configure_args '$ac_arg'" ;; + esac + fi +done +if $ac_cache_corrupted; then + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: changes in the environment can compromise the build" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: changes in the environment can compromise the build" >&2;} + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: run \`make distclean' and/or \`rm $cache_file' and start over" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: run \`make distclean' and/or \`rm $cache_file' and start over" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +fi + +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +package_copyright='Public Domain 2004 by Anthony Howe.' + + +package_major=`echo $PACKAGE_VERSION | sed -e 's/^\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)/\1/'` + +package_minor=`echo $PACKAGE_VERSION | sed -e 's/^\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)/\2/'` + +package_author=$PACKAGE_BUGREPORT + + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _NAME "$PACKAGE_NAME" +_ACEOF + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _MAJOR $package_major +_ACEOF + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _MINOR $package_minor +_ACEOF + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _AUTHOR "$package_author" +_ACEOF + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _VERSION "$PACKAGE_NAME/$PACKAGE_VERSION" +_ACEOF + +cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define _COPYRIGHT "$package_copyright" +_ACEOF + + +OS=`uname -s` + +####################################################################### +# Setup paths +####################################################################### + +# The total perspective vortex "You are here..." + + + +# If localstatedir still has its original value, then use our prefered default. +if test "$localstatedir" = '${prefix}/var'; then + if test "$OS" = 'Linux'; then + localstatedir='/var/lib' + elif test "$OS" = 'FreeBSD'; then + localstatedir='/var/state' + elif test "$OS" = 'SunOS'; then + localstatedir='/var/opt' + else + localstatedir='/var' + fi +fi + +if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}perl", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}perl; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_perl_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $perl_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_perl_exe="$perl_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_perl_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +perl_exe=$ac_cv_path_perl_exe + +if test -n "$perl_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $perl_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$perl_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_path_perl_exe"; then + ac_pt_perl_exe=$perl_exe + # Extract the first word of "perl", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy perl; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ac_pt_perl_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe="$ac_pt_perl_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + test -z "$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe" && ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe="/usr/local/bin/perl" + ;; +esac +fi +ac_pt_perl_exe=$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_perl_exe + +if test -n "$ac_pt_perl_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_pt_perl_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_pt_perl_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + perl_exe=$ac_pt_perl_exe +else + perl_exe="$ac_cv_path_perl_exe" +fi + + + +if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}ruby", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}ruby; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ruby_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ruby_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ruby_exe="$ruby_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ruby_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +ruby_exe=$ac_cv_path_ruby_exe + +if test -n "$ruby_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ruby_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ruby_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_path_ruby_exe"; then + ac_pt_ruby_exe=$ruby_exe + # Extract the first word of "ruby", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ruby; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ac_pt_ruby_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe="$ac_pt_ruby_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + test -z "$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe" && ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe="/usr/local/bin/ruby" + ;; +esac +fi +ac_pt_ruby_exe=$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_ruby_exe + +if test -n "$ac_pt_ruby_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_pt_ruby_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_pt_ruby_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + ruby_exe=$ac_pt_ruby_exe +else + ruby_exe="$ac_cv_path_ruby_exe" +fi + + + +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}php.cgi", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}php.cgi; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +php_exe=$ac_cv_path_php_exe + +if test -n "$php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_path_php_exe"; then + ac_pt_php_exe=$php_exe + # Extract the first word of "php.cgi", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy php.cgi; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ac_pt_php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$ac_pt_php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +ac_pt_php_exe=$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe + +if test -n "$ac_pt_php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_pt_php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_pt_php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + php_exe=$ac_pt_php_exe +else + php_exe="$ac_cv_path_php_exe" +fi + +fi +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}php-cgi", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}php-cgi; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +php_exe=$ac_cv_path_php_exe + +if test -n "$php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_path_php_exe"; then + ac_pt_php_exe=$php_exe + # Extract the first word of "php-cgi", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy php-cgi; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ac_pt_php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$ac_pt_php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +ac_pt_php_exe=$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe + +if test -n "$ac_pt_php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_pt_php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_pt_php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + php_exe=$ac_pt_php_exe +else + php_exe="$ac_cv_path_php_exe" +fi + +fi +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + # Note this might be either the CLI or CGI version. + if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}php", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}php; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + ;; +esac +fi +php_exe=$ac_cv_path_php_exe + +if test -n "$php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_path_php_exe"; then + ac_pt_php_exe=$php_exe + # Extract the first word of "php", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy php; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + case $ac_pt_php_exe in + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$ac_pt_php_exe" # Let the user override the test with a path. + ;; + *) + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + + test -z "$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe" && ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe="/usr/local/bin/php" + ;; +esac +fi +ac_pt_php_exe=$ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe + +if test -n "$ac_pt_php_exe"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_pt_php_exe" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_pt_php_exe" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + php_exe=$ac_pt_php_exe +else + php_exe="$ac_cv_path_php_exe" +fi + + + if test -e $php_exe; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking if $php_exe is the CGI binary" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking if $php_exe is the CGI binary... $ECHO_C" >&6 + if $php_exe -v | grep -q '(cli)'; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 + else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6 + fi + fi +fi + + +####################################################################### +# Auxliary files to be modified later +####################################################################### + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files makefile" + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files hibachi-start.sh" + + +if test ! -d localhost; then + if test -e supplement.tar; then + tar -xf supplement.tar + elif test -e supplement.tar.gz; then + tar -zxf supplement.tar.gz + fi +fi +if test -d localhost; then + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl" + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files localhost/test/php/index_php" + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files localhost/test/php/sendform.php" + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files localhost/test/php/info.php" + + ac_config_files="$ac_config_files localhost/test/ruby/index_rb" + +fi + +####################################################################### +# Configuration options +####################################################################### + +# Check whether --enable-port or --disable-port was given. +if test "${enable_port+set}" = set; then + enableval="$enable_port" + +else + enable_port=8008 + +fi; + + +####################################################################### +# Setup compiler predefines and exceptions. +####################################################################### + +# Tradional cc options. These are different for Borland C. +CC_E='-o' + +CC_E_NAME='-o $@' + +CC_O='-o' + +CC_O_NAME='-o $*$O' + + +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}gcc", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}gcc; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="$CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="${ac_tool_prefix}gcc" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +CC=$ac_cv_prog_CC +if test -n "$CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_prog_CC"; then + ac_ct_CC=$CC + # Extract the first word of "gcc", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy gcc; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="$ac_ct_CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="gcc" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +ac_ct_CC=$ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC +if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_ct_CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_ct_CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + CC=$ac_ct_CC +else + CC="$ac_cv_prog_CC" +fi + +if test -z "$CC"; then + if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}cc", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}cc; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="$CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="${ac_tool_prefix}cc" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +CC=$ac_cv_prog_CC +if test -n "$CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$ac_cv_prog_CC"; then + ac_ct_CC=$CC + # Extract the first word of "cc", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy cc; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="$ac_ct_CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="cc" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +ac_ct_CC=$ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC +if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_ct_CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_ct_CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + CC=$ac_ct_CC +else + CC="$ac_cv_prog_CC" +fi + +fi +if test -z "$CC"; then + # Extract the first word of "cc", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy cc; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="$CC" # Let the user override the test. +else + ac_prog_rejected=no +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + if test "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" = "/usr/ucb/cc"; then + ac_prog_rejected=yes + continue + fi + ac_cv_prog_CC="cc" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +if test $ac_prog_rejected = yes; then + # We found a bogon in the path, so make sure we never use it. + set dummy $ac_cv_prog_CC + shift + if test $# != 0; then + # We chose a different compiler from the bogus one. + # However, it has the same basename, so the bogon will be chosen + # first if we set CC to just the basename; use the full file name. + shift + ac_cv_prog_CC="$as_dir/$ac_word${1+' '}$@" + fi +fi +fi +fi +CC=$ac_cv_prog_CC +if test -n "$CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + +fi +if test -z "$CC"; then + if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then + for ac_prog in cl + do + # Extract the first word of "$ac_tool_prefix$ac_prog", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy $ac_tool_prefix$ac_prog; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="$CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_CC="$ac_tool_prefix$ac_prog" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +CC=$ac_cv_prog_CC +if test -n "$CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + test -n "$CC" && break + done +fi +if test -z "$CC"; then + ac_ct_CC=$CC + for ac_prog in cl +do + # Extract the first word of "$ac_prog", so it can be a program name with args. +set dummy $ac_prog; ac_word=$2 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_word" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_word... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="$ac_ct_CC" # Let the user override the test. +else +as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for ac_exec_ext in '' $ac_executable_extensions; do + if $as_executable_p "$as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext"; then + ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC="$ac_prog" + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: found $as_dir/$ac_word$ac_exec_ext" >&5 + break 2 + fi +done +done + +fi +fi +ac_ct_CC=$ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC +if test -n "$ac_ct_CC"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_ct_CC" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_ct_CC" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6 +fi + + test -n "$ac_ct_CC" && break +done + + CC=$ac_ct_CC +fi + +fi + + +test -z "$CC" && { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: no acceptable C compiler found in \$PATH +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: no acceptable C compiler found in \$PATH +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + +# Provide some information about the compiler. +echo "$as_me:$LINENO:" \ + "checking for C compiler version" >&5 +ac_compiler=`set X $ac_compile; echo $2` +{ (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compiler --version &5\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compiler --version &5) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } +{ (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compiler -v &5\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compiler -v &5) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } +{ (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compiler -V &5\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compiler -V &5) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } + +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +ac_clean_files_save=$ac_clean_files +ac_clean_files="$ac_clean_files a.out a.exe b.out" +# Try to create an executable without -o first, disregard a.out. +# It will help us diagnose broken compilers, and finding out an intuition +# of exeext. +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for C compiler default output" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for C compiler default output... $ECHO_C" >&6 +ac_link_default=`echo "$ac_link" | sed 's/ -o *conftest[^ ]*//'` +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link_default\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link_default) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; then + # Find the output, starting from the most likely. This scheme is +# not robust to junk in `.', hence go to wildcards (a.*) only as a last +# resort. + +# Be careful to initialize this variable, since it used to be cached. +# Otherwise an old cache value of `no' led to `EXEEXT = no' in a Makefile. +ac_cv_exeext= +# b.out is created by i960 compilers. +for ac_file in a_out.exe a.exe conftest.exe a.out conftest a.* conftest.* b.out +do + test -f "$ac_file" || continue + case $ac_file in + *.$ac_ext | *.xcoff | *.tds | *.d | *.pdb | *.xSYM | *.bb | *.bbg | *.o | *.obj ) + ;; + conftest.$ac_ext ) + # This is the source file. + ;; + [ab].out ) + # We found the default executable, but exeext='' is most + # certainly right. + break;; + *.* ) + ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : '[^.]*\(\..*\)'` + # FIXME: I believe we export ac_cv_exeext for Libtool, + # but it would be cool to find out if it's true. Does anybody + # maintain Libtool? --akim. + export ac_cv_exeext + break;; + * ) + break;; + esac +done +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +{ { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: C compiler cannot create executables +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: C compiler cannot create executables +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 77); exit 77; }; } +fi + +ac_exeext=$ac_cv_exeext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_file" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_file" >&6 + +# Check the compiler produces executables we can run. If not, either +# the compiler is broken, or we cross compile. +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether the C compiler works" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether the C compiler works... $ECHO_C" >&6 +# FIXME: These cross compiler hacks should be removed for Autoconf 3.0 +# If not cross compiling, check that we can run a simple program. +if test "$cross_compiling" != yes; then + if { ac_try='./$ac_file' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + cross_compiling=no + else + if test "$cross_compiling" = maybe; then + cross_compiling=yes + else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot run C compiled programs. +If you meant to cross compile, use \`--host'. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot run C compiled programs. +If you meant to cross compile, use \`--host'. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + fi + fi +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6 + +rm -f a.out a.exe conftest$ac_cv_exeext b.out +ac_clean_files=$ac_clean_files_save +# Check the compiler produces executables we can run. If not, either +# the compiler is broken, or we cross compile. +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we are cross compiling" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether we are cross compiling... $ECHO_C" >&6 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $cross_compiling" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$cross_compiling" >&6 + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for suffix of executables" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for suffix of executables... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; then + # If both `conftest.exe' and `conftest' are `present' (well, observable) +# catch `conftest.exe'. For instance with Cygwin, `ls conftest' will +# work properly (i.e., refer to `conftest.exe'), while it won't with +# `rm'. +for ac_file in conftest.exe conftest conftest.*; do + test -f "$ac_file" || continue + case $ac_file in + *.$ac_ext | *.xcoff | *.tds | *.d | *.pdb | *.xSYM | *.bb | *.bbg | *.o | *.obj ) ;; + *.* ) ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : '[^.]*\(\..*\)'` + export ac_cv_exeext + break;; + * ) break;; + esac +done +else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot compute suffix of executables: cannot compile and link +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot compute suffix of executables: cannot compile and link +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +fi + +rm -f conftest$ac_cv_exeext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_exeext" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_exeext" >&6 + +rm -f conftest.$ac_ext +EXEEXT=$ac_cv_exeext +ac_exeext=$EXEEXT +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for suffix of object files" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for suffix of object files... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_objext+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.o conftest.obj +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; then + for ac_file in `(ls conftest.o conftest.obj; ls conftest.*) 2>/dev/null`; do + case $ac_file in + *.$ac_ext | *.xcoff | *.tds | *.d | *.pdb | *.xSYM | *.bb | *.bbg ) ;; + *) ac_cv_objext=`expr "$ac_file" : '.*\.\(.*\)'` + break;; + esac +done +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +{ { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +fi + +rm -f conftest.$ac_cv_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_objext" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_objext" >&6 +OBJEXT=$ac_cv_objext +ac_objext=$OBJEXT +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ +#ifndef __GNUC__ + choke me +#endif + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_compiler_gnu=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +ac_compiler_gnu=no +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu=$ac_compiler_gnu + +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu" >&6 +GCC=`test $ac_compiler_gnu = yes && echo yes` +ac_test_CFLAGS=${CFLAGS+set} +ac_save_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS +CFLAGS="-g" +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether $CC accepts -g" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether $CC accepts -g... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_cc_g+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_prog_cc_g=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +ac_cv_prog_cc_g=no +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_prog_cc_g" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_prog_cc_g" >&6 +if test "$ac_test_CFLAGS" = set; then + CFLAGS=$ac_save_CFLAGS +elif test $ac_cv_prog_cc_g = yes; then + if test "$GCC" = yes; then + CFLAGS="-g -O2" + else + CFLAGS="-g" + fi +else + if test "$GCC" = yes; then + CFLAGS="-O2" + else + CFLAGS= + fi +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $CC option to accept ANSI C" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $CC option to accept ANSI C... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc=no +ac_save_CC=$CC +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +/* Most of the following tests are stolen from RCS 5.7's src/conf.sh. */ +struct buf { int x; }; +FILE * (*rcsopen) (struct buf *, struct stat *, int); +static char *e (p, i) + char **p; + int i; +{ + return p[i]; +} +static char *f (char * (*g) (char **, int), char **p, ...) +{ + char *s; + va_list v; + va_start (v,p); + s = g (p, va_arg (v,int)); + va_end (v); + return s; +} +int test (int i, double x); +struct s1 {int (*f) (int a);}; +struct s2 {int (*f) (double a);}; +int pairnames (int, char **, FILE *(*)(struct buf *, struct stat *, int), int, int); +int argc; +char **argv; +int +main () +{ +return f (e, argv, 0) != argv[0] || f (e, argv, 1) != argv[1]; + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +# Don't try gcc -ansi; that turns off useful extensions and +# breaks some systems' header files. +# AIX -qlanglvl=ansi +# Ultrix and OSF/1 -std1 +# HP-UX 10.20 and later -Ae +# HP-UX older versions -Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE +# SVR4 -Xc -D__EXTENSIONS__ +for ac_arg in "" -qlanglvl=ansi -std1 -Ae "-Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE" "-Xc -D__EXTENSIONS__" +do + CC="$ac_save_CC $ac_arg" + rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc=$ac_arg +break +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +done +rm -f conftest.$ac_ext conftest.$ac_objext +CC=$ac_save_CC + +fi + +case "x$ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc" in + x|xno) + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: none needed" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}none needed" >&6 ;; + *) + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc" >&6 + CC="$CC $ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc" ;; +esac + +# Some people use a C++ compiler to compile C. Since we use `exit', +# in C++ we need to declare it. In case someone uses the same compiler +# for both compiling C and C++ we need to have the C++ compiler decide +# the declaration of exit, since it's the most demanding environment. +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#ifndef __cplusplus + choke me +#endif +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + for ac_declaration in \ + ''\ + '#include ' \ + 'extern "C" void std::exit (int) throw (); using std::exit;' \ + 'extern "C" void std::exit (int); using std::exit;' \ + 'extern "C" void exit (int) throw ();' \ + 'extern "C" void exit (int);' \ + 'void exit (int);' +do + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +$ac_declaration +int +main () +{ +exit (42); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + : +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +continue +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +$ac_declaration +int +main () +{ +exit (42); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + break +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +done +rm -f conftest* +if test -n "$ac_declaration"; then + echo '#ifdef __cplusplus' >>confdefs.h + echo $ac_declaration >>confdefs.h + echo '#endif' >>confdefs.h +fi + +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether ln -s works" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether ln -s works... $ECHO_C" >&6 +LN_S=$as_ln_s +if test "$LN_S" = "ln -s"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6 +else + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no, using $LN_S" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}no, using $LN_S" >&6 +fi + + + +####################################################################### +# Check for libraries. +####################################################################### + + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for library containing socket" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for library containing socket... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_search_socket+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + ac_func_search_save_LIBS=$LIBS +ac_cv_search_socket=no +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" +#endif +/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 + builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ +char socket (); +int +main () +{ +socket (); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_search_socket="none required" +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext +if test "$ac_cv_search_socket" = no; then + for ac_lib in socket nsl; do + LIBS="-l$ac_lib $ac_func_search_save_LIBS" + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" +#endif +/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 + builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ +char socket (); +int +main () +{ +socket (); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_search_socket="-l$ac_lib" +break +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext + done +fi +LIBS=$ac_func_search_save_LIBS +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_search_socket" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_search_socket" >&6 +if test "$ac_cv_search_socket" != no; then + test "$ac_cv_search_socket" = "none required" || LIBS="$ac_cv_search_socket $LIBS" + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define HAVE_SOCKET 1 +_ACEOF + +fi + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for library containing inet_ntoa" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for library containing inet_ntoa... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + ac_func_search_save_LIBS=$LIBS +ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa=no +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" +#endif +/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 + builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ +char inet_ntoa (); +int +main () +{ +inet_ntoa (); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa="none required" +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext +if test "$ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa" = no; then + for ac_lib in socket nsl resolv; do + LIBS="-l$ac_lib $ac_func_search_save_LIBS" + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" +#endif +/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 + builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ +char inet_ntoa (); +int +main () +{ +inet_ntoa (); + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa="-l$ac_lib" +break +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext + done +fi +LIBS=$ac_func_search_save_LIBS +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa" >&6 +if test "$ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa" != no; then + test "$ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa" = "none required" || LIBS="$ac_cv_search_inet_ntoa $LIBS" + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define HAVE_INET_NTOA 1 +_ACEOF + +fi + + +####################################################################### +# Check for headers. +####################################################################### + +# Need these ANSI C headers. +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking how to run the C preprocessor" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking how to run the C preprocessor... $ECHO_C" >&6 +# On Suns, sometimes $CPP names a directory. +if test -n "$CPP" && test -d "$CPP"; then + CPP= +fi +if test -z "$CPP"; then + if test "${ac_cv_prog_CPP+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + # Double quotes because CPP needs to be expanded + for CPP in "$CC -E" "$CC -E -traditional-cpp" "/lib/cpp" + do + ac_preproc_ok=false +for ac_c_preproc_warn_flag in '' yes +do + # Use a header file that comes with gcc, so configuring glibc + # with a fresh cross-compiler works. + # Prefer to if __STDC__ is defined, since + # exists even on freestanding compilers. + # On the NeXT, cc -E runs the code through the compiler's parser, + # not just through cpp. "Syntax error" is here to catch this case. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#ifdef __STDC__ +# include +#else +# include +#endif + Syntax error +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + : +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + # Broken: fails on valid input. +continue +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext + + # OK, works on sane cases. Now check whether non-existent headers + # can be detected and how. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + # Broken: success on invalid input. +continue +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + # Passes both tests. +ac_preproc_ok=: +break +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext + +done +# Because of `break', _AC_PREPROC_IFELSE's cleaning code was skipped. +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext +if $ac_preproc_ok; then + break +fi + + done + ac_cv_prog_CPP=$CPP + +fi + CPP=$ac_cv_prog_CPP +else + ac_cv_prog_CPP=$CPP +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $CPP" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$CPP" >&6 +ac_preproc_ok=false +for ac_c_preproc_warn_flag in '' yes +do + # Use a header file that comes with gcc, so configuring glibc + # with a fresh cross-compiler works. + # Prefer to if __STDC__ is defined, since + # exists even on freestanding compilers. + # On the NeXT, cc -E runs the code through the compiler's parser, + # not just through cpp. "Syntax error" is here to catch this case. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#ifdef __STDC__ +# include +#else +# include +#endif + Syntax error +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + : +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + # Broken: fails on valid input. +continue +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext + + # OK, works on sane cases. Now check whether non-existent headers + # can be detected and how. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + # Broken: success on invalid input. +continue +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + # Passes both tests. +ac_preproc_ok=: +break +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext + +done +# Because of `break', _AC_PREPROC_IFELSE's cleaning code was skipped. +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext +if $ac_preproc_ok; then + : +else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: C preprocessor \"$CPP\" fails sanity check +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: C preprocessor \"$CPP\" fails sanity check +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +fi + +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu + + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for egrep" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for egrep... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_prog_egrep+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + if echo a | (grep -E '(a|b)') >/dev/null 2>&1 + then ac_cv_prog_egrep='grep -E' + else ac_cv_prog_egrep='egrep' + fi +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_prog_egrep" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_prog_egrep" >&6 + EGREP=$ac_cv_prog_egrep + + +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for ANSI C header files" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for ANSI C header files... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_header_stdc+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +#include +#include +#include + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_header_stdc=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +ac_cv_header_stdc=no +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext + +if test $ac_cv_header_stdc = yes; then + # SunOS 4.x string.h does not declare mem*, contrary to ANSI. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include + +_ACEOF +if (eval "$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext") 2>&5 | + $EGREP "memchr" >/dev/null 2>&1; then + : +else + ac_cv_header_stdc=no +fi +rm -f conftest* + +fi + +if test $ac_cv_header_stdc = yes; then + # ISC 2.0.2 stdlib.h does not declare free, contrary to ANSI. + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include + +_ACEOF +if (eval "$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext") 2>&5 | + $EGREP "free" >/dev/null 2>&1; then + : +else + ac_cv_header_stdc=no +fi +rm -f conftest* + +fi + +if test $ac_cv_header_stdc = yes; then + # /bin/cc in Irix-4.0.5 gets non-ANSI ctype macros unless using -ansi. + if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then + : +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include +#if ((' ' & 0x0FF) == 0x020) +# define ISLOWER(c) ('a' <= (c) && (c) <= 'z') +# define TOUPPER(c) (ISLOWER(c) ? 'A' + ((c) - 'a') : (c)) +#else +# define ISLOWER(c) \ + (('a' <= (c) && (c) <= 'i') \ + || ('j' <= (c) && (c) <= 'r') \ + || ('s' <= (c) && (c) <= 'z')) +# define TOUPPER(c) (ISLOWER(c) ? ((c) | 0x40) : (c)) +#endif + +#define XOR(e, f) (((e) && !(f)) || (!(e) && (f))) +int +main () +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) + if (XOR (islower (i), ISLOWER (i)) + || toupper (i) != TOUPPER (i)) + exit(2); + exit (0); +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && { ac_try='./conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + : +else + echo "$as_me: program exited with status $ac_status" >&5 +echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +( exit $ac_status ) +ac_cv_header_stdc=no +fi +rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +fi +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_header_stdc" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_header_stdc" >&6 +if test $ac_cv_header_stdc = yes; then + +cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF +#define STDC_HEADERS 1 +_ACEOF + +fi + +# On IRIX 5.3, sys/types and inttypes.h are conflicting. + + + + + + + + + +for ac_header in sys/types.h sys/stat.h stdlib.h string.h memory.h strings.h \ + inttypes.h stdint.h unistd.h +do +as_ac_Header=`echo "ac_cv_header_$ac_header" | $as_tr_sh` +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_header" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_header... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +$ac_includes_default + +#include <$ac_header> +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + eval "$as_ac_Header=yes" +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +eval "$as_ac_Header=no" +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&6 +if test `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'` = yes; then + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define `echo "HAVE_$ac_header" | $as_tr_cpp` 1 +_ACEOF + +fi + +done + + + + + +for ac_header in stdio.h stdlib.h string.h +do +as_ac_Header=`echo "ac_cv_header_$ac_header" | $as_tr_sh` +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_header" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_header... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&6 +else + # Is the header compilable? +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking $ac_header usability" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking $ac_header usability... $ECHO_C" >&6 +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +$ac_includes_default +#include <$ac_header> +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_header_compiler=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +ac_header_compiler=no +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_header_compiler" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_header_compiler" >&6 + +# Is the header present? +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking $ac_header presence" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking $ac_header presence... $ECHO_C" >&6 +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include <$ac_header> +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + ac_header_preproc=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + ac_header_preproc=no +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_header_preproc" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_header_preproc" >&6 + +# So? What about this header? +case $ac_header_compiler:$ac_header_preproc in + yes:no ) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;} + ( + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ------------------------------------ ## +## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## +## ------------------------------------ ## +_ASBOX + ) | + sed "s/^/$as_me: WARNING: /" >&2 + ;; + no:yes ) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: present but cannot be compiled" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: present but cannot be compiled" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;} + ( + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ------------------------------------ ## +## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## +## ------------------------------------ ## +_ASBOX + ) | + sed "s/^/$as_me: WARNING: /" >&2 + ;; +esac +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_header" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_header... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + eval "$as_ac_Header=$ac_header_preproc" +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&6 + +fi +if test `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'` = yes; then + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define `echo "HAVE_$ac_header" | $as_tr_cpp` 1 +_ACEOF + +else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: Missing required ANSI C header. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: Missing required ANSI C header. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + +fi + +done + + +# Need these I/O headers. + + + + + + + + +for ac_header in arpa/inet.h dirent.h fcntl.h netinet/in.h sys/socket.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h unistd.h +do +as_ac_Header=`echo "ac_cv_header_$ac_header" | $as_tr_sh` +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_header" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_header... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&6 +else + # Is the header compilable? +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking $ac_header usability" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking $ac_header usability... $ECHO_C" >&6 +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +$ac_includes_default +#include <$ac_header> +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_compile\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_compile) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest.$ac_objext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_header_compiler=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +ac_header_compiler=no +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_header_compiler" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_header_compiler" >&6 + +# Is the header present? +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking $ac_header presence" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking $ac_header presence... $ECHO_C" >&6 +cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +#include <$ac_header> +_ACEOF +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext) 2>conftest.er1 + ac_status=$? + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err + rm -f conftest.er1 + cat conftest.err >&5 + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } >/dev/null; then + if test -s conftest.err; then + ac_cpp_err=$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag + else + ac_cpp_err= + fi +else + ac_cpp_err=yes +fi +if test -z "$ac_cpp_err"; then + ac_header_preproc=yes +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + + ac_header_preproc=no +fi +rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_header_preproc" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_header_preproc" >&6 + +# So? What about this header? +case $ac_header_compiler:$ac_header_preproc in + yes:no ) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;} + ( + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ------------------------------------ ## +## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## +## ------------------------------------ ## +_ASBOX + ) | + sed "s/^/$as_me: WARNING: /" >&2 + ;; + no:yes ) + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: present but cannot be compiled" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: present but cannot be compiled" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&2;} + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5 +echo "$as_me: WARNING: $ac_header: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;} + ( + cat <<\_ASBOX +## ------------------------------------ ## +## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## +## ------------------------------------ ## +_ASBOX + ) | + sed "s/^/$as_me: WARNING: /" >&2 + ;; +esac +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_header" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_header... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_Header+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + eval "$as_ac_Header=$ac_header_preproc" +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'`" >&6 + +fi +if test `eval echo '${'$as_ac_Header'}'` = yes; then + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define `echo "HAVE_$ac_header" | $as_tr_cpp` 1 +_ACEOF + +else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: Missing required I/O header. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: Missing required I/O header. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + +fi + +done + + + + + + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for SHUT_WR" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for SHUT_WR... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if test "${ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR+set}" = set; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + + if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ + + $ac_includes_default +#include + +int +main () +{ + +#ifdef SHUT_WR + exit(0); +#else + exit(1); +#endif + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && { ac_try='./conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR=yes +else + echo "$as_me: program exited with status $ac_status" >&5 +echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +( exit $ac_status ) +ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR=no +fi +rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi + +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR" >&6 + +if test $ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR = 'no'; then + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DSHUT_WR=1" +fi + +####################################################################### +# Check for functions. +####################################################################### + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +for ac_func in accept bind close closedir dup2 fork getenv inet_ntoa listen open opendir putenv read readdir recv send shutdown snprintf socket sscanf stat strcspn strncat strncmp strstr strtol system tolower waitpid +do +as_ac_var=`echo "ac_cv_func_$ac_func" | $as_tr_sh` +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for $ac_func" >&5 +echo $ECHO_N "checking for $ac_func... $ECHO_C" >&6 +if eval "test \"\${$as_ac_var+set}\" = set"; then + echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 +else + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +#line $LINENO "configure" +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +/* System header to define __stub macros and hopefully few prototypes, + which can conflict with char $ac_func (); below. + Prefer to if __STDC__ is defined, since + exists even on freestanding compilers. */ +#ifdef __STDC__ +# include +#else +# include +#endif +/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" +{ +#endif +/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 + builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ +char $ac_func (); +/* The GNU C library defines this for functions which it implements + to always fail with ENOSYS. Some functions are actually named + something starting with __ and the normal name is an alias. */ +#if defined (__stub_$ac_func) || defined (__stub___$ac_func) +choke me +#else +char (*f) () = $ac_func; +#endif +#ifdef __cplusplus +} +#endif + +int +main () +{ +return f != $ac_func; + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext +if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_link) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } && + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext' + { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_try\"") >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then + eval "$as_ac_var=yes" +else + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5 +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5 + +eval "$as_ac_var=no" +fi +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: `eval echo '${'$as_ac_var'}'`" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T}`eval echo '${'$as_ac_var'}'`" >&6 +if test `eval echo '${'$as_ac_var'}'` = yes; then + cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF +#define `echo "HAVE_$ac_func" | $as_tr_cpp` 1 +_ACEOF + +else + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: Missing required function. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: Missing required function. +See \`config.log' for more details." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + +fi +done + + +####################################################################### +# Generate output. +####################################################################### + +cat >confcache <<\_ACEOF +# This file is a shell script that caches the results of configure +# tests run on this system so they can be shared between configure +# scripts and configure runs, see configure's option --config-cache. +# It is not useful on other systems. If it contains results you don't +# want to keep, you may remove or edit it. +# +# config.status only pays attention to the cache file if you give it +# the --recheck option to rerun configure. +# +# `ac_cv_env_foo' variables (set or unset) will be overridden when +# loading this file, other *unset* `ac_cv_foo' will be assigned the +# following values. + +_ACEOF + +# The following way of writing the cache mishandles newlines in values, +# but we know of no workaround that is simple, portable, and efficient. +# So, don't put newlines in cache variables' values. +# Ultrix sh set writes to stderr and can't be redirected directly, +# and sets the high bit in the cache file unless we assign to the vars. +{ + (set) 2>&1 | + case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` in + *ac_space=\ *) + # `set' does not quote correctly, so add quotes (double-quote + # substitution turns \\\\ into \\, and sed turns \\ into \). + sed -n \ + "s/'/'\\\\''/g; + s/^\\([_$as_cr_alnum]*_cv_[_$as_cr_alnum]*\\)=\\(.*\\)/\\1='\\2'/p" + ;; + *) + # `set' quotes correctly as required by POSIX, so do not add quotes. + sed -n \ + "s/^\\([_$as_cr_alnum]*_cv_[_$as_cr_alnum]*\\)=\\(.*\\)/\\1=\\2/p" + ;; + esac; +} | + sed ' + t clear + : clear + s/^\([^=]*\)=\(.*[{}].*\)$/test "${\1+set}" = set || &/ + t end + /^ac_cv_env/!s/^\([^=]*\)=\(.*\)$/\1=${\1=\2}/ + : end' >>confcache +if diff $cache_file confcache >/dev/null 2>&1; then :; else + if test -w $cache_file; then + test "x$cache_file" != "x/dev/null" && echo "updating cache $cache_file" + cat confcache >$cache_file + else + echo "not updating unwritable cache $cache_file" + fi +fi +rm -f confcache + +test "x$prefix" = xNONE && prefix=$ac_default_prefix +# Let make expand exec_prefix. +test "x$exec_prefix" = xNONE && exec_prefix='${prefix}' + +# VPATH may cause trouble with some makes, so we remove $(srcdir), +# ${srcdir} and @srcdir@ from VPATH if srcdir is ".", strip leading and +# trailing colons and then remove the whole line if VPATH becomes empty +# (actually we leave an empty line to preserve line numbers). +if test "x$srcdir" = x.; then + ac_vpsub='/^[ ]*VPATH[ ]*=/{ +s/:*\$(srcdir):*/:/; +s/:*\${srcdir}:*/:/; +s/:*@srcdir@:*/:/; +s/^\([^=]*=[ ]*\):*/\1/; +s/:*$//; +s/^[^=]*=[ ]*$//; +}' +fi + +# Transform confdefs.h into DEFS. +# Protect against shell expansion while executing Makefile rules. +# Protect against Makefile macro expansion. +# +# If the first sed substitution is executed (which looks for macros that +# take arguments), then we branch to the quote section. Otherwise, +# look for a macro that doesn't take arguments. +cat >confdef2opt.sed <<\_ACEOF +t clear +: clear +s,^[ ]*#[ ]*define[ ][ ]*\([^ (][^ (]*([^)]*)\)[ ]*\(.*\),-D\1=\2,g +t quote +s,^[ ]*#[ ]*define[ ][ ]*\([^ ][^ ]*\)[ ]*\(.*\),-D\1=\2,g +t quote +d +: quote +s,[ `~#$^&*(){}\\|;'"<>?],\\&,g +s,\[,\\&,g +s,\],\\&,g +s,\$,$$,g +p +_ACEOF +# We use echo to avoid assuming a particular line-breaking character. +# The extra dot is to prevent the shell from consuming trailing +# line-breaks from the sub-command output. A line-break within +# single-quotes doesn't work because, if this script is created in a +# platform that uses two characters for line-breaks (e.g., DOS), tr +# would break. +ac_LF_and_DOT=`echo; echo .` +DEFS=`sed -n -f confdef2opt.sed confdefs.h | tr "$ac_LF_and_DOT" ' .'` +rm -f confdef2opt.sed + + +ac_libobjs= +ac_ltlibobjs= +for ac_i in : $LIBOBJS; do test "x$ac_i" = x: && continue + # 1. Remove the extension, and $U if already installed. + ac_i=`echo "$ac_i" | + sed 's/\$U\././;s/\.o$//;s/\.obj$//'` + # 2. Add them. + ac_libobjs="$ac_libobjs $ac_i\$U.$ac_objext" + ac_ltlibobjs="$ac_ltlibobjs $ac_i"'$U.lo' +done +LIBOBJS=$ac_libobjs + +LTLIBOBJS=$ac_ltlibobjs + + + +: ${CONFIG_STATUS=./config.status} +ac_clean_files_save=$ac_clean_files +ac_clean_files="$ac_clean_files $CONFIG_STATUS" +{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: creating $CONFIG_STATUS" >&5 +echo "$as_me: creating $CONFIG_STATUS" >&6;} +cat >$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF +#! $SHELL +# Generated by $as_me. +# Run this file to recreate the current configuration. +# Compiler output produced by configure, useful for debugging +# configure, is in config.log if it exists. + +debug=false +ac_cs_recheck=false +ac_cs_silent=false +SHELL=\${CONFIG_SHELL-$SHELL} +_ACEOF + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF +## --------------------- ## +## M4sh Initialization. ## +## --------------------- ## + +# Be Bourne compatible +if test -n "${ZSH_VERSION+set}" && (emulate sh) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + emulate sh + NULLCMD=: + # Zsh 3.x and 4.x performs word splitting on ${1+"$@"}, which + # is contrary to our usage. Disable this feature. + alias -g '${1+"$@"}'='"$@"' +elif test -n "${BASH_VERSION+set}" && (set -o posix) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + set -o posix +fi + +# Support unset when possible. +if (FOO=FOO; unset FOO) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_unset=unset +else + as_unset=false +fi + + +# Work around bugs in pre-3.0 UWIN ksh. +$as_unset ENV MAIL MAILPATH +PS1='$ ' +PS2='> ' +PS4='+ ' + +# NLS nuisances. +for as_var in \ + LANG LANGUAGE LC_ADDRESS LC_ALL LC_COLLATE LC_CTYPE LC_IDENTIFICATION \ + LC_MEASUREMENT LC_MESSAGES LC_MONETARY LC_NAME LC_NUMERIC LC_PAPER \ + LC_TELEPHONE LC_TIME +do + if (set +x; test -n "`(eval $as_var=C; export $as_var) 2>&1`"); then + eval $as_var=C; export $as_var + else + $as_unset $as_var + fi +done + +# Required to use basename. +if expr a : '\(a\)' >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_expr=expr +else + as_expr=false +fi + +if (basename /) >/dev/null 2>&1 && test "X`basename / 2>&1`" = "X/"; then + as_basename=basename +else + as_basename=false +fi + + +# Name of the executable. +as_me=`$as_basename "$0" || +$as_expr X/"$0" : '.*/\([^/][^/]*\)/*$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(//\)$' \| \ + X"$0" : 'X\(/\)$' \| \ + . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null || +echo X/"$0" | + sed '/^.*\/\([^/][^/]*\)\/*$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\/\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\/\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/; q; } + s/.*/./; q'` + + +# PATH needs CR, and LINENO needs CR and PATH. +# Avoid depending upon Character Ranges. +as_cr_letters='abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' +as_cr_LETTERS='ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' +as_cr_Letters=$as_cr_letters$as_cr_LETTERS +as_cr_digits='0123456789' +as_cr_alnum=$as_cr_Letters$as_cr_digits + +# The user is always right. +if test "${PATH_SEPARATOR+set}" != set; then + echo "#! /bin/sh" >conf$$.sh + echo "exit 0" >>conf$$.sh + chmod +x conf$$.sh + if (PATH="/nonexistent;."; conf$$.sh) >/dev/null 2>&1; then + PATH_SEPARATOR=';' + else + PATH_SEPARATOR=: + fi + rm -f conf$$.sh +fi + + + as_lineno_1=$LINENO + as_lineno_2=$LINENO + as_lineno_3=`(expr $as_lineno_1 + 1) 2>/dev/null` + test "x$as_lineno_1" != "x$as_lineno_2" && + test "x$as_lineno_3" = "x$as_lineno_2" || { + # Find who we are. Look in the path if we contain no path at all + # relative or not. + case $0 in + *[\\/]* ) as_myself=$0 ;; + *) as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in $PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + test -r "$as_dir/$0" && as_myself=$as_dir/$0 && break +done + + ;; + esac + # We did not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND' + # in which case we are not to be found in the path. + if test "x$as_myself" = x; then + as_myself=$0 + fi + if test ! -f "$as_myself"; then + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot find myself; rerun with an absolute path" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot find myself; rerun with an absolute path" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + fi + case $CONFIG_SHELL in + '') + as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR +for as_dir in /bin$PATH_SEPARATOR/usr/bin$PATH_SEPARATOR$PATH +do + IFS=$as_save_IFS + test -z "$as_dir" && as_dir=. + for as_base in sh bash ksh sh5; do + case $as_dir in + /*) + if ("$as_dir/$as_base" -c ' + as_lineno_1=$LINENO + as_lineno_2=$LINENO + as_lineno_3=`(expr $as_lineno_1 + 1) 2>/dev/null` + test "x$as_lineno_1" != "x$as_lineno_2" && + test "x$as_lineno_3" = "x$as_lineno_2" ') 2>/dev/null; then + $as_unset BASH_ENV || test "${BASH_ENV+set}" != set || { BASH_ENV=; export BASH_ENV; } + $as_unset ENV || test "${ENV+set}" != set || { ENV=; export ENV; } + CONFIG_SHELL=$as_dir/$as_base + export CONFIG_SHELL + exec "$CONFIG_SHELL" "$0" ${1+"$@"} + fi;; + esac + done +done +;; + esac + + # Create $as_me.lineno as a copy of $as_myself, but with $LINENO + # uniformly replaced by the line number. The first 'sed' inserts a + # line-number line before each line; the second 'sed' does the real + # work. The second script uses 'N' to pair each line-number line + # with the numbered line, and appends trailing '-' during + # substitution so that $LINENO is not a special case at line end. + # (Raja R Harinath suggested sed '=', and Paul Eggert wrote the + # second 'sed' script. Blame Lee E. McMahon for sed's syntax. :-) + sed '=' <$as_myself | + sed ' + N + s,$,-, + : loop + s,^\(['$as_cr_digits']*\)\(.*\)[$]LINENO\([^'$as_cr_alnum'_]\),\1\2\1\3, + t loop + s,-$,, + s,^['$as_cr_digits']*\n,, + ' >$as_me.lineno && + chmod +x $as_me.lineno || + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot create $as_me.lineno; rerun with a POSIX shell" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot create $as_me.lineno; rerun with a POSIX shell" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + + # Don't try to exec as it changes $[0], causing all sort of problems + # (the dirname of $[0] is not the place where we might find the + # original and so on. Autoconf is especially sensible to this). + . ./$as_me.lineno + # Exit status is that of the last command. + exit +} + + +case `echo "testing\c"; echo 1,2,3`,`echo -n testing; echo 1,2,3` in + *c*,-n*) ECHO_N= ECHO_C=' +' ECHO_T=' ' ;; + *c*,* ) ECHO_N=-n ECHO_C= ECHO_T= ;; + *) ECHO_N= ECHO_C='\c' ECHO_T= ;; +esac + +if expr a : '\(a\)' >/dev/null 2>&1; then + as_expr=expr +else + as_expr=false +fi + +rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file +echo >conf$$.file +if ln -s conf$$.file conf$$ 2>/dev/null; then + # We could just check for DJGPP; but this test a) works b) is more generic + # and c) will remain valid once DJGPP supports symlinks (DJGPP 2.04). + if test -f conf$$.exe; then + # Don't use ln at all; we don't have any links + as_ln_s='cp -p' + else + as_ln_s='ln -s' + fi +elif ln conf$$.file conf$$ 2>/dev/null; then + as_ln_s=ln +else + as_ln_s='cp -p' +fi +rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file + +if mkdir -p . 2>/dev/null; then + as_mkdir_p=: +else + as_mkdir_p=false +fi + +as_executable_p="test -f" + +# Sed expression to map a string onto a valid CPP name. +as_tr_cpp="sed y%*$as_cr_letters%P$as_cr_LETTERS%;s%[^_$as_cr_alnum]%_%g" + +# Sed expression to map a string onto a valid variable name. +as_tr_sh="sed y%*+%pp%;s%[^_$as_cr_alnum]%_%g" + + +# IFS +# We need space, tab and new line, in precisely that order. +as_nl=' +' +IFS=" $as_nl" + +# CDPATH. +$as_unset CDPATH + +exec 6>&1 + +# Open the log real soon, to keep \$[0] and so on meaningful, and to +# report actual input values of CONFIG_FILES etc. instead of their +# values after options handling. Logging --version etc. is OK. +exec 5>>config.log +{ + echo + sed 'h;s/./-/g;s/^.../## /;s/...$/ ##/;p;x;p;x' <<_ASBOX +## Running $as_me. ## +_ASBOX +} >&5 +cat >&5 <<_CSEOF + +This file was extended by hibachi $as_me 1.0, which was +generated by GNU Autoconf 2.57. Invocation command line was + + CONFIG_FILES = $CONFIG_FILES + CONFIG_HEADERS = $CONFIG_HEADERS + CONFIG_LINKS = $CONFIG_LINKS + CONFIG_COMMANDS = $CONFIG_COMMANDS + $ $0 $@ + +_CSEOF +echo "on `(hostname || uname -n) 2>/dev/null | sed 1q`" >&5 +echo >&5 +_ACEOF + +# Files that config.status was made for. +if test -n "$ac_config_files"; then + echo "config_files=\"$ac_config_files\"" >>$CONFIG_STATUS +fi + +if test -n "$ac_config_headers"; then + echo "config_headers=\"$ac_config_headers\"" >>$CONFIG_STATUS +fi + +if test -n "$ac_config_links"; then + echo "config_links=\"$ac_config_links\"" >>$CONFIG_STATUS +fi + +if test -n "$ac_config_commands"; then + echo "config_commands=\"$ac_config_commands\"" >>$CONFIG_STATUS +fi + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF + +ac_cs_usage="\ +\`$as_me' instantiates files from templates according to the +current configuration. + +Usage: $0 [OPTIONS] [FILE]... + + -h, --help print this help, then exit + -V, --version print version number, then exit + -q, --quiet do not print progress messages + -d, --debug don't remove temporary files + --recheck update $as_me by reconfiguring in the same conditions + --file=FILE[:TEMPLATE] + instantiate the configuration file FILE + +Configuration files: +$config_files + +Report bugs to ." +_ACEOF + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF +ac_cs_version="\\ +hibachi config.status 1.0 +configured by $0, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.57, + with options \\"`echo "$ac_configure_args" | sed 's/[\\""\`\$]/\\\\&/g'`\\" + +Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 +Free Software Foundation, Inc. +This config.status script is free software; the Free Software Foundation +gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it." +srcdir=$srcdir +_ACEOF + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF +# If no file are specified by the user, then we need to provide default +# value. By we need to know if files were specified by the user. +ac_need_defaults=: +while test $# != 0 +do + case $1 in + --*=*) + ac_option=`expr "x$1" : 'x\([^=]*\)='` + ac_optarg=`expr "x$1" : 'x[^=]*=\(.*\)'` + ac_shift=: + ;; + -*) + ac_option=$1 + ac_optarg=$2 + ac_shift=shift + ;; + *) # This is not an option, so the user has probably given explicit + # arguments. + ac_option=$1 + ac_need_defaults=false;; + esac + + case $ac_option in + # Handling of the options. +_ACEOF +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF + -recheck | --recheck | --rechec | --reche | --rech | --rec | --re | --r) + ac_cs_recheck=: ;; + --version | --vers* | -V ) + echo "$ac_cs_version"; exit 0 ;; + --he | --h) + # Conflict between --help and --header + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: ambiguous option: $1 +Try \`$0 --help' for more information." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: ambiguous option: $1 +Try \`$0 --help' for more information." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; };; + --help | --hel | -h ) + echo "$ac_cs_usage"; exit 0 ;; + --debug | --d* | -d ) + debug=: ;; + --file | --fil | --fi | --f ) + $ac_shift + CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES $ac_optarg" + ac_need_defaults=false;; + --header | --heade | --head | --hea ) + $ac_shift + CONFIG_HEADERS="$CONFIG_HEADERS $ac_optarg" + ac_need_defaults=false;; + -q | -quiet | --quiet | --quie | --qui | --qu | --q \ + | -silent | --silent | --silen | --sile | --sil | --si | --s) + ac_cs_silent=: ;; + + # This is an error. + -*) { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: unrecognized option: $1 +Try \`$0 --help' for more information." >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: unrecognized option: $1 +Try \`$0 --help' for more information." >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } ;; + + *) ac_config_targets="$ac_config_targets $1" ;; + + esac + shift +done + +ac_configure_extra_args= + +if $ac_cs_silent; then + exec 6>/dev/null + ac_configure_extra_args="$ac_configure_extra_args --silent" +fi + +_ACEOF +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF +if \$ac_cs_recheck; then + echo "running $SHELL $0 " $ac_configure_args \$ac_configure_extra_args " --no-create --no-recursion" >&6 + exec $SHELL $0 $ac_configure_args \$ac_configure_extra_args --no-create --no-recursion +fi + +_ACEOF + + + + + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF +for ac_config_target in $ac_config_targets +do + case "$ac_config_target" in + # Handling of arguments. + "makefile" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES makefile" ;; + "hibachi-start.sh" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES hibachi-start.sh" ;; + "localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl" ;; + "localhost/test/php/index_php" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES localhost/test/php/index_php" ;; + "localhost/test/php/sendform.php" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES localhost/test/php/sendform.php" ;; + "localhost/test/php/info.php" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES localhost/test/php/info.php" ;; + "localhost/test/ruby/index_rb" ) CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES localhost/test/ruby/index_rb" ;; + *) { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: invalid argument: $ac_config_target" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: invalid argument: $ac_config_target" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; };; + esac +done + +# If the user did not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate, +# then the envvar interface is used. Set only those that are not. +# We use the long form for the default assignment because of an extremely +# bizarre bug on SunOS 4.1.3. +if $ac_need_defaults; then + test "${CONFIG_FILES+set}" = set || CONFIG_FILES=$config_files +fi + +# Have a temporary directory for convenience. Make it in the build tree +# simply because there is no reason to put it here, and in addition, +# creating and moving files from /tmp can sometimes cause problems. +# Create a temporary directory, and hook for its removal unless debugging. +$debug || +{ + trap 'exit_status=$?; rm -rf $tmp && exit $exit_status' 0 + trap '{ (exit 1); exit 1; }' 1 2 13 15 +} + +# Create a (secure) tmp directory for tmp files. + +{ + tmp=`(umask 077 && mktemp -d -q "./confstatXXXXXX") 2>/dev/null` && + test -n "$tmp" && test -d "$tmp" +} || +{ + tmp=./confstat$$-$RANDOM + (umask 077 && mkdir $tmp) +} || +{ + echo "$me: cannot create a temporary directory in ." >&2 + { (exit 1); exit 1; } +} + +_ACEOF + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF + +# +# CONFIG_FILES section. +# + +# No need to generate the scripts if there are no CONFIG_FILES. +# This happens for instance when ./config.status config.h +if test -n "\$CONFIG_FILES"; then + # Protect against being on the right side of a sed subst in config.status. + sed 's/,@/@@/; s/@,/@@/; s/,;t t\$/@;t t/; /@;t t\$/s/[\\\\&,]/\\\\&/g; + s/@@/,@/; s/@@/@,/; s/@;t t\$/,;t t/' >\$tmp/subs.sed <<\\CEOF +s,@SHELL@,$SHELL,;t t +s,@PATH_SEPARATOR@,$PATH_SEPARATOR,;t t +s,@PACKAGE_NAME@,$PACKAGE_NAME,;t t +s,@PACKAGE_TARNAME@,$PACKAGE_TARNAME,;t t +s,@PACKAGE_VERSION@,$PACKAGE_VERSION,;t t +s,@PACKAGE_STRING@,$PACKAGE_STRING,;t t +s,@PACKAGE_BUGREPORT@,$PACKAGE_BUGREPORT,;t t +s,@exec_prefix@,$exec_prefix,;t t +s,@prefix@,$prefix,;t t +s,@program_transform_name@,$program_transform_name,;t t +s,@bindir@,$bindir,;t t +s,@sbindir@,$sbindir,;t t +s,@libexecdir@,$libexecdir,;t t +s,@datadir@,$datadir,;t t +s,@sysconfdir@,$sysconfdir,;t t +s,@sharedstatedir@,$sharedstatedir,;t t +s,@localstatedir@,$localstatedir,;t t +s,@libdir@,$libdir,;t t +s,@includedir@,$includedir,;t t +s,@oldincludedir@,$oldincludedir,;t t +s,@infodir@,$infodir,;t t +s,@mandir@,$mandir,;t t +s,@build_alias@,$build_alias,;t t +s,@host_alias@,$host_alias,;t t +s,@target_alias@,$target_alias,;t t +s,@DEFS@,$DEFS,;t t +s,@ECHO_C@,$ECHO_C,;t t +s,@ECHO_N@,$ECHO_N,;t t +s,@ECHO_T@,$ECHO_T,;t t +s,@LIBS@,$LIBS,;t t +s,@package_copyright@,$package_copyright,;t t +s,@package_major@,$package_major,;t t +s,@package_minor@,$package_minor,;t t +s,@package_author@,$package_author,;t t +s,@perl_exe@,$perl_exe,;t t +s,@ac_pt_perl_exe@,$ac_pt_perl_exe,;t t +s,@ruby_exe@,$ruby_exe,;t t +s,@ac_pt_ruby_exe@,$ac_pt_ruby_exe,;t t +s,@php_exe@,$php_exe,;t t +s,@ac_pt_php_exe@,$ac_pt_php_exe,;t t +s,@enable_port@,$enable_port,;t t +s,@CC_E@,$CC_E,;t t +s,@CC_E_NAME@,$CC_E_NAME,;t t +s,@CC_O@,$CC_O,;t t +s,@CC_O_NAME@,$CC_O_NAME,;t t +s,@CC@,$CC,;t t +s,@CFLAGS@,$CFLAGS,;t t +s,@LDFLAGS@,$LDFLAGS,;t t +s,@CPPFLAGS@,$CPPFLAGS,;t t +s,@ac_ct_CC@,$ac_ct_CC,;t t +s,@EXEEXT@,$EXEEXT,;t t +s,@OBJEXT@,$OBJEXT,;t t +s,@LN_S@,$LN_S,;t t +s,@CPP@,$CPP,;t t +s,@EGREP@,$EGREP,;t t +s,@LIBOBJS@,$LIBOBJS,;t t +s,@LTLIBOBJS@,$LTLIBOBJS,;t t +CEOF + +_ACEOF + + cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF + # Split the substitutions into bite-sized pieces for seds with + # small command number limits, like on Digital OSF/1 and HP-UX. + ac_max_sed_lines=48 + ac_sed_frag=1 # Number of current file. + ac_beg=1 # First line for current file. + ac_end=$ac_max_sed_lines # Line after last line for current file. + ac_more_lines=: + ac_sed_cmds= + while $ac_more_lines; do + if test $ac_beg -gt 1; then + sed "1,${ac_beg}d; ${ac_end}q" $tmp/subs.sed >$tmp/subs.frag + else + sed "${ac_end}q" $tmp/subs.sed >$tmp/subs.frag + fi + if test ! -s $tmp/subs.frag; then + ac_more_lines=false + else + # The purpose of the label and of the branching condition is to + # speed up the sed processing (if there are no `@' at all, there + # is no need to browse any of the substitutions). + # These are the two extra sed commands mentioned above. + (echo ':t + /@[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*@/!b' && cat $tmp/subs.frag) >$tmp/subs-$ac_sed_frag.sed + if test -z "$ac_sed_cmds"; then + ac_sed_cmds="sed -f $tmp/subs-$ac_sed_frag.sed" + else + ac_sed_cmds="$ac_sed_cmds | sed -f $tmp/subs-$ac_sed_frag.sed" + fi + ac_sed_frag=`expr $ac_sed_frag + 1` + ac_beg=$ac_end + ac_end=`expr $ac_end + $ac_max_sed_lines` + fi + done + if test -z "$ac_sed_cmds"; then + ac_sed_cmds=cat + fi +fi # test -n "$CONFIG_FILES" + +_ACEOF +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF +for ac_file in : $CONFIG_FILES; do test "x$ac_file" = x: && continue + # Support "outfile[:infile[:infile...]]", defaulting infile="outfile.in". + case $ac_file in + - | *:- | *:-:* ) # input from stdin + cat >$tmp/stdin + ac_file_in=`echo "$ac_file" | sed 's,[^:]*:,,'` + ac_file=`echo "$ac_file" | sed 's,:.*,,'` ;; + *:* ) ac_file_in=`echo "$ac_file" | sed 's,[^:]*:,,'` + ac_file=`echo "$ac_file" | sed 's,:.*,,'` ;; + * ) ac_file_in=$ac_file.in ;; + esac + + # Compute @srcdir@, @top_srcdir@, and @INSTALL@ for subdirectories. + ac_dir=`(dirname "$ac_file") 2>/dev/null || +$as_expr X"$ac_file" : 'X\(.*[^/]\)//*[^/][^/]*/*$' \| \ + X"$ac_file" : 'X\(//\)[^/]' \| \ + X"$ac_file" : 'X\(//\)$' \| \ + X"$ac_file" : 'X\(/\)' \| \ + . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null || +echo X"$ac_file" | + sed '/^X\(.*[^/]\)\/\/*[^/][^/]*\/*$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)[^/].*/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/; q; } + s/.*/./; q'` + { if $as_mkdir_p; then + mkdir -p "$ac_dir" + else + as_dir="$ac_dir" + as_dirs= + while test ! -d "$as_dir"; do + as_dirs="$as_dir $as_dirs" + as_dir=`(dirname "$as_dir") 2>/dev/null || +$as_expr X"$as_dir" : 'X\(.*[^/]\)//*[^/][^/]*/*$' \| \ + X"$as_dir" : 'X\(//\)[^/]' \| \ + X"$as_dir" : 'X\(//\)$' \| \ + X"$as_dir" : 'X\(/\)' \| \ + . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null || +echo X"$as_dir" | + sed '/^X\(.*[^/]\)\/\/*[^/][^/]*\/*$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)[^/].*/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/; q; } + /^X\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/; q; } + s/.*/./; q'` + done + test ! -n "$as_dirs" || mkdir $as_dirs + fi || { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot create directory \"$ac_dir\"" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot create directory \"$ac_dir\"" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }; } + + ac_builddir=. + +if test "$ac_dir" != .; then + ac_dir_suffix=/`echo "$ac_dir" | sed 's,^\.[\\/],,'` + # A "../" for each directory in $ac_dir_suffix. + ac_top_builddir=`echo "$ac_dir_suffix" | sed 's,/[^\\/]*,../,g'` +else + ac_dir_suffix= ac_top_builddir= +fi + +case $srcdir in + .) # No --srcdir option. We are building in place. + ac_srcdir=. + if test -z "$ac_top_builddir"; then + ac_top_srcdir=. + else + ac_top_srcdir=`echo $ac_top_builddir | sed 's,/$,,'` + fi ;; + [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]* ) # Absolute path. + ac_srcdir=$srcdir$ac_dir_suffix; + ac_top_srcdir=$srcdir ;; + *) # Relative path. + ac_srcdir=$ac_top_builddir$srcdir$ac_dir_suffix + ac_top_srcdir=$ac_top_builddir$srcdir ;; +esac +# Don't blindly perform a `cd "$ac_dir"/$ac_foo && pwd` since $ac_foo can be +# absolute. +ac_abs_builddir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_builddir && pwd` +ac_abs_top_builddir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd ${ac_top_builddir}. && pwd` +ac_abs_srcdir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_srcdir && pwd` +ac_abs_top_srcdir=`cd "$ac_dir" && cd $ac_top_srcdir && pwd` + + + + if test x"$ac_file" != x-; then + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: creating $ac_file" >&5 +echo "$as_me: creating $ac_file" >&6;} + rm -f "$ac_file" + fi + # Let's still pretend it is `configure' which instantiates (i.e., don't + # use $as_me), people would be surprised to read: + # /* config.h. Generated by config.status. */ + if test x"$ac_file" = x-; then + configure_input= + else + configure_input="$ac_file. " + fi + configure_input=$configure_input"Generated from `echo $ac_file_in | + sed 's,.*/,,'` by configure." + + # First look for the input files in the build tree, otherwise in the + # src tree. + ac_file_inputs=`IFS=: + for f in $ac_file_in; do + case $f in + -) echo $tmp/stdin ;; + [\\/$]*) + # Absolute (can't be DOS-style, as IFS=:) + test -f "$f" || { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot find input file: $f" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot find input file: $f" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + echo $f;; + *) # Relative + if test -f "$f"; then + # Build tree + echo $f + elif test -f "$srcdir/$f"; then + # Source tree + echo $srcdir/$f + else + # /dev/null tree + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: cannot find input file: $f" >&5 +echo "$as_me: error: cannot find input file: $f" >&2;} + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; } + fi;; + esac + done` || { (exit 1); exit 1; } +_ACEOF +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF + sed "$ac_vpsub +$extrasub +_ACEOF +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF +:t +/@[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*@/!b +s,@configure_input@,$configure_input,;t t +s,@srcdir@,$ac_srcdir,;t t +s,@abs_srcdir@,$ac_abs_srcdir,;t t +s,@top_srcdir@,$ac_top_srcdir,;t t +s,@abs_top_srcdir@,$ac_abs_top_srcdir,;t t +s,@builddir@,$ac_builddir,;t t +s,@abs_builddir@,$ac_abs_builddir,;t t +s,@top_builddir@,$ac_top_builddir,;t t +s,@abs_top_builddir@,$ac_abs_top_builddir,;t t +" $ac_file_inputs | (eval "$ac_sed_cmds") >$tmp/out + rm -f $tmp/stdin + if test x"$ac_file" != x-; then + mv $tmp/out $ac_file + else + cat $tmp/out + rm -f $tmp/out + fi + + # Run the commands associated with the file. + case $ac_file in + hibachi-start.sh ) find . -name '*.sh' -exec chmod 755 \{\} \; ;; + localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl ) chmod 755 localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl ;; + localhost/test/php/index_php ) mv localhost/test/php/index_php localhost/test/php/index.php; chmod 755 localhost/test/php/index.php ;; + localhost/test/php/sendform.php ) chmod 755 localhost/test/php/sendform.php ;; + localhost/test/php/info.php ) chmod 755 localhost/test/php/info.php ;; + localhost/test/ruby/index_rb ) mv localhost/test/ruby/index_rb localhost/test/ruby/index.rb; chmod 755 localhost/test/ruby/index.rb ;; + esac +done +_ACEOF + +cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF + +{ (exit 0); exit 0; } +_ACEOF +chmod +x $CONFIG_STATUS +ac_clean_files=$ac_clean_files_save + + +# configure is writing to config.log, and then calls config.status. +# config.status does its own redirection, appending to config.log. +# Unfortunately, on DOS this fails, as config.log is still kept open +# by configure, so config.status won't be able to write to it; its +# output is simply discarded. So we exec the FD to /dev/null, +# effectively closing config.log, so it can be properly (re)opened and +# appended to by config.status. When coming back to configure, we +# need to make the FD available again. +if test "$no_create" != yes; then + ac_cs_success=: + ac_config_status_args= + test "$silent" = yes && + ac_config_status_args="$ac_config_status_args --quiet" + exec 5>/dev/null + $SHELL $CONFIG_STATUS $ac_config_status_args || ac_cs_success=false + exec 5>>config.log + # Use ||, not &&, to avoid exiting from the if with $? = 1, which + # would make configure fail if this is the last instruction. + $ac_cs_success || { (exit 1); exit 1; } +fi + + +echo +echo $PACKAGE_NAME/$package_major.$package_minor +#echo $package_copyright +echo +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: prefix..................: $prefix" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T} prefix..................: $prefix" >&6 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: datadir.................: $datadir" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T} datadir.................: $datadir" >&6 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: CFLAGS..................: $CFLAGS" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T} CFLAGS..................: $CFLAGS" >&6 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: LDFLAGS.................: $LDFLAGS" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T} LDFLAGS.................: $LDFLAGS" >&6 +echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: LIBS....................: $LIBS" >&5 +echo "${ECHO_T} LIBS....................: $LIBS" >&6 +echo diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/configure.in b/2004/hibachi/src/configure.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..256a8b1e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/configure.in @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +####################################################################### +# Thus it begins... +####################################################################### + +AC_INIT(hibachi, 1.0, [Anthony Howe ]) + +dnl The autoconf version I learned to deal with. +AC_PREREQ(2.57) + +dnl Yes I wrote this mess. +AC_COPYRIGHT([Public Domain 2004 by Anthony Howe.]) + +AC_SUBST(package_copyright, ['Public Domain 2004 by Anthony Howe.']) + +AC_SUBST(package_major, [[`echo $PACKAGE_VERSION | sed -e 's/^\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)/\1/'`]]) +AC_SUBST(package_minor, [[`echo $PACKAGE_VERSION | sed -e 's/^\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)/\2/'`]]) +AC_SUBST(package_author, $PACKAGE_BUGREPORT) + +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_NAME, ["$PACKAGE_NAME"]) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_MAJOR, $package_major) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_MINOR, $package_minor) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_AUTHOR, ["$package_author"]) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_VERSION, ["$PACKAGE_NAME/$PACKAGE_VERSION"]) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(_COPYRIGHT, ["$package_copyright"]) + +OS=`uname -s` + +####################################################################### +# Setup paths +####################################################################### + +# The total perspective vortex "You are here..." +AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR($PACKAGE_NAME.c) + +dnl AC_SUBST(srcdir) +dnl AC_SUBST(top_srcdir) +dnl AC_SUBST(abs_srcdir) +dnl AC_SUBST(abs_top_srcdir) +dnl +dnl AC_SUBST(builddir) +dnl AC_SUBST(top_builddir) +dnl AC_SUBST(abs_builddir) +dnl AC_SUBST(abs_top_builddir) + +# If localstatedir still has its original value, then use our prefered default. +if test "$localstatedir" = '${prefix}/var'; then + if test "$OS" = 'Linux'; then + localstatedir='/var/lib' + elif test "$OS" = 'FreeBSD'; then + localstatedir='/var/state' + elif test "$OS" = 'SunOS'; then + localstatedir='/var/opt' + else + localstatedir='/var' + fi +fi + +AC_PATH_TOOL(perl_exe, perl, [/usr/local/bin/perl]) +AC_SUBST(perl_exe) + +AC_PATH_TOOL(ruby_exe, ruby, [/usr/local/bin/ruby]) +AC_SUBST(ruby_exe) + +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + AC_PATH_TOOL(php_exe, php.cgi) +fi +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + AC_PATH_TOOL(php_exe, php-cgi) +fi +if test -z "$php_exe"; then + # Note this might be either the CLI or CGI version. + AC_PATH_TOOL(php_exe, php, [/usr/local/bin/php]) + + if test -e $php_exe; then + AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $php_exe is the CGI binary]) + if $php_exe -v | grep -q '(cli)'; then + AC_MSG_RESULT(no) +dnl unset ac_cv_path_ac_pt_php_exe +dnl unset ac_cv_path_php_exe +dnl unset php_exe + else + AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) + fi + fi +fi +AC_SUBST(php_exe) + +####################################################################### +# Auxliary files to be modified later +####################################################################### + +AC_CONFIG_FILES(makefile) +AC_CONFIG_FILES(hibachi-start.sh, [find . -name '*.sh' -exec chmod 755 \{\} \;]) + +if test ! -d localhost; then + if test -e supplement.tar; then + tar -xf supplement.tar + elif test -e supplement.tar.gz; then + tar -zxf supplement.tar.gz + fi +fi +if test -d localhost; then + AC_CONFIG_FILES(localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl, [chmod 755 localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl]) + AC_CONFIG_FILES(localhost/test/php/index_php, [mv localhost/test/php/index_php localhost/test/php/index.php; chmod 755 localhost/test/php/index.php]) + AC_CONFIG_FILES(localhost/test/php/sendform.php, [chmod 755 localhost/test/php/sendform.php]) + AC_CONFIG_FILES(localhost/test/php/info.php, [chmod 755 localhost/test/php/info.php]) + AC_CONFIG_FILES(localhost/test/ruby/index_rb, [mv localhost/test/ruby/index_rb localhost/test/ruby/index.rb; chmod 755 localhost/test/ruby/index.rb]) +fi + +####################################################################### +# Configuration options +####################################################################### + +AC_ARG_ENABLE(port, + [AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-port=number],[specifiy the server port number, default is 8008])], + [], [enable_port=8008] +) +AC_SUBST(enable_port) + +####################################################################### +# Setup compiler predefines and exceptions. +####################################################################### + +# Tradional cc options. These are different for Borland C. +AC_SUBST(CC_E, '-o') +AC_SUBST(CC_E_NAME, '-o $@') +AC_SUBST(CC_O, '-o') +AC_SUBST(CC_O_NAME, '-o $*$O') + +AC_PROG_CC +AC_PROG_LN_S +dnl AC_PROG_MAKE_SET + +dnl AC_CHECK_TOOL(RANLIB, ranlib, true) + +####################################################################### +# Check for libraries. +####################################################################### + +AC_SEARCH_LIBS(socket, [socket nsl],[AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([AS_TR_CPP([HAVE_SOCKET])])]) +AC_SEARCH_LIBS(inet_ntoa, [socket nsl resolv],[AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([AS_TR_CPP([HAVE_INET_NTOA])])]) + +####################################################################### +# Check for headers. +####################################################################### + +# Need these ANSI C headers. +AC_CHECK_HEADERS( + [stdio.h stdlib.h string.h], + [], [AC_MSG_FAILURE([Missing required ANSI C header.], 1)] +) + +# Need these I/O headers. +AC_CHECK_HEADERS( + [arpa/inet.h dirent.h fcntl.h netinet/in.h sys/socket.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h unistd.h], + [], [AC_MSG_FAILURE([Missing required I/O header.], 1)] +) + +dnl ################################################################### +dnl This should be in aclocal.m4 instead, but I couldn't be +dnl bothered with an aclocal.m4 file for just one macro. +dnl ################################################################### +dnl +dnl APR_CHECK_DEFINE(symbol, header_file) +dnl +AC_DEFUN(APR_CHECK_DEFINE,[ + AC_CACHE_CHECK([for $1],ac_cv_define_$1,[ + AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([ + AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT() +#include <$2> + ], [[ +#ifdef $1 + exit(0); +#else + exit(1); +#endif + ]])], [ac_cv_define_$1=yes],[ac_cv_define_$1=no]) + ]) +]) + +APR_CHECK_DEFINE(SHUT_WR, sys/socket.h) +if test $ac_cv_define_SHUT_WR = 'no'; then + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DSHUT_WR=1" +fi + +####################################################################### +# Check for functions. +####################################################################### + +AC_CHECK_FUNCS( + [ accept bind close closedir dup2 fork getenv inet_ntoa listen open opendir putenv read readdir recv send shutdown snprintf socket sscanf stat strcspn strncat strncmp strstr strtol system tolower waitpid], + [], [AC_MSG_FAILURE([Missing required function.], 1)] +) + +####################################################################### +# Generate output. +####################################################################### + +AC_OUTPUT() + +echo +echo $PACKAGE_NAME/$package_major.$package_minor +#echo $package_copyright +echo +AC_MSG_RESULT([ prefix..................: $prefix]) +AC_MSG_RESULT([ datadir.................: $datadir]) +AC_MSG_RESULT([ CFLAGS..................: $CFLAGS]) +AC_MSG_RESULT([ LDFLAGS.................: $LDFLAGS]) +AC_MSG_RESULT([ LIBS....................: $LIBS]) +echo diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..988851c34 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# +# hibachi-start.sh +# +# Limited implementation of RFC 2616 and CGI/1.1. +# +# Public Domain 2002, 2004 by Anthony Howe. All rights released. +# +# usage: +# +# hibachi-start.sh & +# + +####################################################################### +# Do NOT modify the following section if you are security conscious. +####################################################################### + +# +# Reset internal field separator to space, tab, newline. +# Not 100% effective if the environment we inherited has +# already played silly buggers with IFS like "IFS='S'". +# +# Use #!/usr/bin/env -i /bin/sh on shells that support +# option passing and #! lines longer than 32 bytes to +# guarantee a clean environment. +# +IFS=' +' + +SED=$(which sed) + +# +# Get a clean environment to work with. This works for all +# Bourne like shells under Linux and Cygwin environments. +# +unset $(env | $SED -e 's/^\([^=]*\).*/\1/') + +# +# Path of safe executables. +# +export PATH='/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin' + +# +# Disable any environment file. +# +unset ENV + +# +# Disable cd shortcuts. +# +unset CDPATH + +####################################################################### +# Minimum required for serving static files. +####################################################################### + +prefix=/usr/local +exec_prefix=${prefix} + +datadir=${prefix}/share +sysconfdir=${prefix}/etc +sharedstatedir=${prefix}/com +localstatedir=/var +sbindir=${exec_prefix}/sbin +bindir=${exec_prefix}/bin + +# +# The port to be used by the Hibachi web server. +# +# This is NOT normally a server parameter, but information about the +# client connection, but since Hibachi only listens on one port, we +# assume to know what the incoming port is and listen on that. Also +# for the purpose of demonstration, we can't bind to a privileged +# port. +# +export SERVER_PORT=8008 + +# +# The root of the Hibachi document tree. Virtual hosts +# are implemented as subdirectories from this location. +# +# For example, to setup virtual hosts by name or IP: +# +# /usr/local/share/hibachi/ +# localhost/ +# index.html +# ... +# 127.0.0.1 -> localhost/ +# +# www.ioccc.org/ +# index.html +# ... +# 64.81.251.233 -> www.ioccc.org/ +# +#export DOCUMENT_ROOT=${datadir}/hibachi +export DOCUMENT_ROOT=$(pwd) + +# +# The executable. +# +#hibachi=${sbindir}/hibachi +hibachi=`dirname $0`/hibachi + +####################################################################### +# Required for most CGI scripts. +####################################################################### + +# +# Your host name or IP address. Ideally this should be the server-name +# used in self-referencing URLs. +# +export SERVER_NAME=127.0.0.1 + +# +# My web server name and version +# +export SERVER_SOFTWARE='hibachi/1.0' + +# +# Predefined environment space for the request method. +# +export REQUEST_METHOD='1234' + +# +# Predefined environment space for remote address of a request. +# +export REMOTE_ADDR='123.123.123.123' + +# +# Predefined environment space for upload Content-Length. +# +export CONTENT_LENGTH='123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for upload Content-Type. +# Look at the Apache mime.types file, there are some long ones. +# +export CONTENT_TYPE='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for cookies. A single cookie can actually +# be a maximum of 4096 bytes in size, but here we only handle shorter ones. +# +export HTTP_COOKIE='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for the absolute path of the script +# to be processed. Required by PHP/CGI in order to find the script. +# This variable is not part of the CGI/1.1 Specification. +# +export SCRIPT_FILENAME='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Hibachi does support the entire CGI/1.1 specification. +# +export GATEWAY_INTERFACE='CGI/0.0' + +# +# We cannot support the following common CGI environment variables +# as specified in the draft 3 of a proposed Internet Standard +# due to space limitations, but since the draft has expired and +# on hold, there is a lot of lee way: +# +# AUTH_TYPE (MUST) HTTP_ACCEPT (MAY) +# HTTP_REFERER (MAY) PATH_INFO (MUST) +# PATH_TRANSLATED (SHOULD) REMOTE_HOST (SHOULD) +# REMOTE_IDENT (MAY) REMOTE_USER (SHOULD) +# SCRIPT_NAME (MUST) SERVER_PROTOCOL (MUST) +# + +####################################################################### +# Nothing to configure below this point. +####################################################################### + +# +# Start the web server. +# +exec ${hibachi} + +####################################################################### +# Beyond here be dragons... +####################################################################### diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh.in b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0ead27778 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi-start.sh.in @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# +# hibachi-start.sh +# +# Limited implementation of RFC 2616 and CGI/1.1. +# +# Public Domain 2002, 2004 by Anthony Howe. All rights released. +# +# usage: +# +# hibachi-start.sh & +# + +####################################################################### +# Do NOT modify the following section if you are security conscious. +####################################################################### + +# +# Reset internal field separator to space, tab, newline. +# Not 100% effective if the environment we inherited has +# already played silly buggers with IFS like "IFS='S'". +# +# Use #!/usr/bin/env -i /bin/sh on shells that support +# option passing and #! lines longer than 32 bytes to +# guarantee a clean environment. +# +IFS=' +' + +SED=$(which sed) + +# +# Get a clean environment to work with. This works for all +# Bourne like shells under most Unix like environments. +# +# Cleaning out the environment on Cygwin prevents hibachi from +# starting and would appear there is some Windows/Cygwin specific +# information maintained and required here. +# +if ! expr `uname` : 'CYGWIN.*' >/dev/null; then + unset $(env | $SED -e '/!::/d' -e 's/^\([^=]*\).*/\1/') +fi + +# +# Path of safe executables. +# +export PATH='/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin' + +# +# Disable any environment file. +# +unset ENV + +# +# Disable cd shortcuts. +# +unset CDPATH + +####################################################################### +# Minimum required for serving static files. +####################################################################### + +prefix=@prefix@ +exec_prefix=@exec_prefix@ + +datadir=@datadir@ +sysconfdir=@sysconfdir@ +sharedstatedir=@sharedstatedir@ +localstatedir=@localstatedir@ +sbindir=@sbindir@ +bindir=@bindir@ + +# +# The port to be used by the Hibachi web server. +# +# This is NOT normally a server parameter, but information about the +# client connection, but since Hibachi only listens on one port, we +# assume to know what the incoming port is and listen on that. Also +# for the purpose of demonstration, we can't bind to a privileged +# port. +# +export SERVER_PORT=@enable_port@ + +# +# The root of the Hibachi document tree. Virtual hosts +# are implemented as subdirectories from this location. +# +# For example, to setup virtual hosts by name or IP: +# +# /usr/local/share/hibachi/ +# localhost/ +# index.html +# ... +# 127.0.0.1 -> localhost/ +# +# www.ioccc.org/ +# index.html +# ... +# 64.81.251.233 -> www.ioccc.org/ +# +#export DOCUMENT_ROOT=${datadir}/hibachi +export DOCUMENT_ROOT=$(pwd) + +# +# The executable. +# +#hibachi=${sbindir}/@PACKAGE_NAME@ +hibachi=`dirname $0`/@PACKAGE_NAME@ + +####################################################################### +# Required for most CGI scripts. +####################################################################### + +# +# Your host name or IP address. Ideally this should be the server-name +# used in self-referencing URLs. +# +export SERVER_NAME=127.0.0.1 + +# +# My web server name and version +# +export SERVER_SOFTWARE='@PACKAGE_NAME@/@PACKAGE_VERSION@' + +# +# Predefined environment space for the request method. +# +export REQUEST_METHOD='1234' + +# +# Predefined environment space for remote address of a request. +# +export REMOTE_ADDR='123.123.123.123' + +# +# Predefined environment space for upload Content-Length. +# +export CONTENT_LENGTH='123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for upload Content-Type. +# Look at the Apache mime.types file, there are some long ones. +# +export CONTENT_TYPE='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for cookies. A single cookie can actually +# be a maximum of 4096 bytes in size, but here we only handle shorter ones. +# +export HTTP_COOKIE='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Predefined environment space for the absolute path of the script +# to be processed. Required by PHP/CGI in order to find the script. +# This variable is not part of the CGI/1.1 Specification. +# +export SCRIPT_FILENAME='123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.' + +# +# Hibachi does support the entire CGI/1.1 specification. +# +export GATEWAY_INTERFACE='CGI/0.0' + +# +# We cannot support the following common CGI environment variables +# as specified in the draft 3 of a proposed Internet Standard +# due to space limitations, but since the draft has expired and +# on hold, there is a lot of lee way: +# +# AUTH_TYPE (MUST) HTTP_ACCEPT (MAY) +# HTTP_REFERER (MAY) PATH_INFO (MUST) +# PATH_TRANSLATED (SHOULD) REMOTE_HOST (SHOULD) +# REMOTE_IDENT (MAY) REMOTE_USER (SHOULD) +# SCRIPT_NAME (MUST) SERVER_PROTOCOL (MUST) +# + +####################################################################### +# Nothing to configure below this point. +####################################################################### + +# +# Start the web server. +# +exec ${hibachi} + +####################################################################### +# Beyond here be dragons... +####################################################################### diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi.c b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e0fac7a0f --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/hibachi.c @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +#define B break; +#define Q if( +#define R return +#define V getenv( +#define T "DOCUMENT_ROOT" +#define S snprintf( +#define C strcspn(u, +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#define Z 8192 +char r[Z], q[Z], l[Z], w[Z], *o, *m = "404 Not Found", *e = "500 Error"; +void +X(int t, char *u, long j) +{ + j = S + q, Z, + "HTTP/1.0 %s\r\nContent-Length: %ld\r\n\r\n%s", + u, j ? j : C ""), j ? "" : u + ); + send(t, q, j, 0); +} +void +A(char *i, char *j) +{ + char *u; + Q (u = strstr(o, i + 5))) + sscanf(u + C ":") + 1, j, V i)); +} +int +main(int c, char **p) +{ + int f, t, i; + struct stat g; + struct sockaddr_in a; + char *v, *u; + Q (v = V "SERVER_PORT")) == 0) { + R 4; + } + i = (int) strtol(v, 0, 10); + a.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); + a.sin_port = htons((unsigned short) i); + a.sin_family = AF_INET; + Q (f = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP)) < 0) { + R 5; + } + Q bind(f, (void *) &a, sizeof a)) { + R 6; + } + Q listen(f, 10)) { + R 7; + } + for ( ; ; close(t)) { + for ( ; waitpid(0, 0, WNOHANG) > 0; ) + ; + i = sizeof a; + Q (t = accept(f, (void *) &a, &i)) < 0) + continue; + Q fork()) + continue; + for (f = i = 0; f < 2 && i < Z; i++) { + Q recv(t, r + i, 1, 0) <= 0) + R 1; + Q r[i] == '\n') + f++; + Q r[i] == ':') + f = 0; + Q f) + r[i] = r[i] == '-' ? '_' : toupper(r[i]); + } + Q Z <= i) + B + r[i] = 0; + Q *r != 'G' && *r != 'H' && r[2] != 'S') { + X(t, "501 Unsupported", 0); + B + } + *l = 0; + Q (v = strstr(r, "HOST:"))) + sscanf(v+5, " %255[^:\r\n]", l); + S w, Z, T "=%s/%s", V T), l); + putenv(w); + u = r + 4 + (*r != 'G'); + Q *u != '/' || strstr(u, "../")) { + X(t, m, 0); + B + } + u[i = C " ")] = 0; + o = u + i + 1; + i = C "?"); + Q u[i]) { + S q, Z, "QUERY_STRING=%s", u+i+1); + putenv(q); + u[i] = 0; + } + S l, Z, "SCRIPT_FILENAME=%s%s", w+14, u); + v = l+16; + Q stat(v, &g) < 0) { + X(t, m, 0); + B + } + Q S_ISDIR(g.st_mode)) { + struct dirent *d; + DIR *D = opendir(v); + for ( ; (d = readdir(D)); ) { + Q !strncmp(d->d_name, "index.", 6)) { + strncat(v, d->d_name, Z-16); + stat(v, &g); + B + } + } + closedir(D); + Q d == 0) { + X(t, m, 0); + B + } + } + Q *r != 'H') { + Q g.st_mode & 0111) { + putenv(l); + sscanf(r, "%4s", V "REQUEST_METHOD")); + sscanf(inet_ntoa(a.sin_addr), "%15s", V "REMOTE_ADDR")); + A("HTTP_COOKIE", "%*[ \t]%80[^\r\n]"); + A("CONTENT_LENGTH", "%20s"); + A("CONTENT_TYPE", "%60s"); + dup2(t, 0); + dup2(t, 1); + Q system(v)) + X(t, e, 0); + B + } + Q (f = open(v, O_RDONLY)) < 0) { + X(t, e, 0); + B + } + } + X(t, "200 OK", g.st_size); + Q *r != 'H') { + for ( ; 0 < (i = read(f, r, Z)); ) + send(t, r, i, 0); + } + B + } + shutdown(t, SHUT_WR); + R 0; +} diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-OBFUSCATED.TXT b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-OBFUSCATED.TXT new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7f381ce16 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-OBFUSCATED.TXT @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +CHANGES +------- + +The major number changes for such things as code rewrites, changes in +syntax, and/or dramatic changes in functionality. The minor number +changes for corrections, enhancements, etc. made to the code. There +is no set schedule for releases. + +--TODO-- + + +--1.0-- + + Initial release. Submission to the IOCCC 2004. + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-SPOILER.TXT b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-SPOILER.TXT new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5b0a30e96 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/CHANGES-SPOILER.TXT @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +CHANGES +------- + +The major number changes for such things as code rewrites, changes in +syntax, and/or dramatic changes in functionality. The minor number +changes for corrections, enhancements, etc. made to the code. There +is no set schedule for releases. + +--TODO-- + + + Figure out why Links browser doesn't work. + +--1.0-- + + Initial release. Submission to the IOCCC 2004. + +--0.8-- + + + Add support for SCRIPT_FILENAME for PHP/CGI. + + + Restructured directories. + + + Added autoconf configure.in script and friends. + +--0.7-- + + ! Replaced print() macro by expansion in status(). Only used in one + place. This also fixes a macro expansion bug in status(). + + ! status() now correctly passes the size of the status response + headers to send(). + + ! Fixed transform.sed which incorrectly transform Host: header string + into h:. + + + Experimented with configure.in and makefile.in. Not really necessary + and the macros tests required in the source exceed the size limit. + + +--0.6-- + + ! Renamed error() to status(). Set content-length to that of the + response message or static file. + + + Added more details comments with citiations of relavent paragraphs + from RFC 2616 and the CGI/1.1 specification. + + ! Enlarged header parsing buffer from 4KB to 8KB. + + ! Changed parsing of request CRLF to allow for just LF. + + + Fold case of request headers to lower case, because of problem with + Lynx not specifying headers as they appear in RFC 2616. + +--0.5-- + + + First attempt static file web server, with virtual host support. + + + Added support for CGI/1.1 specification, in particular "nph" CGIs + with a selected set of necessary environment variables. + + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/cygwin-icon.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/cygwin-icon.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2b81cdbb Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/cygwin-icon.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/freebsd.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/freebsd.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..73a0c531f Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/freebsd.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hibachi-256-oc-nc-300x150.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hibachi-256-oc-nc-300x150.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..963da77d4 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hibachi-256-oc-nc-300x150.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hot-coal-edge-110-indent.png b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hot-coal-edge-110-indent.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38d55f1b0 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/hot-coal-edge-110-indent.png differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/logosml.256.png b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/logosml.256.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..53e48e550 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/logosml.256.png differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/php-small-trans-light.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/php-small-trans-light.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0dda8c080 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/php-small-trans-light.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/powered-by-hibachi-150x75.png b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/powered-by-hibachi-150x75.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..37b478b6a Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/powered-by-hibachi-150x75.png differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/rectangle_power_perl.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/rectangle_power_perl.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5c99cd688 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/rectangle_power_perl.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/sun_logo.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/sun_logo.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..faf51c8a2 Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/sun_logo.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/win.gif b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/win.gif new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4b1683a0a Binary files /dev/null and b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/Img/win.gif differ diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/index.html b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/index.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..57a56dce1 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,432 @@ + + + + +Snert . Com - Software - Hibachi + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +HIBACHI/1.0 Web Server + + + +
+ + + +
+
+ [hih-BAH-chee] +
+
+ Japanese for "fire bowl", a hibachi is just that - a small + (generally cast-iron) container made for holding fuel + (usually charcoal). A grill that sits on top of the bowl + is used to cook various foods. Hibachis come in square, + oblong and round models. Because of their compact size, + they're completely portable. + +

- + + epicurious.com food dictionary +

+
+ + +

Description

+ +

+HIBACHI is a simple, small, and secure web server with virtual +host and CGI support. It is a limited implementation of RFC 2616 +and the CGI/1.1 Specification. +HIBACHI was written as an entry for the +International Obfuscated C Code Contest and works +for any Unix variant including the Cygwin +environment for Windows. +

+

+HIBACHI supports dynamic web content through the use of the +Common Gateway Interface (CGI) specification. +Just about any scripting or programming language can be used, such as a POSIX shell, +Perl, +PHP, +Python, and/or +Ruby. +Existing CGI scripts can be used with little or no modification. +Hibachi executes all CGI scripts as though they were "nph" prefixed, which is to say that it is +the script's responsibility to send the HTTP status line and necessary headers direct to the client. +

+ +

+Virtual host support is implemented as subdirectories of the HIBACHI +document tree, where the directory name is the domain name publish in a URL. For example to setup +a virtual host by name or IP for http://www.ioccc.org/, assuming the HIBACHI +document tree is rooted at /usr/local/share/hibachi, then: +

+ +
+/usr/local/share/hibachi/
+	www.ioccc.org/
+		index.html
+		...
+	64.81.251.233 -> www.ioccc.org/
+
+ +

+HIBACHI is ideal +for special floppy-Linux distributions, like +Leka, which can be used for rescue, firewall, +demo, or dedicated servers. In theory, with some modifications, +HIBACHI and a script interpreter, like PHP, could also be +bundled with CDROMS that require a means of presenting dynamic web pages. +

+ + +

Features

+ +
    +
  • Supports virtual hosts.
    • +
  • Supports all MIME types.
    • +
  • Supports Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts and programs.
    • +
  • Supports multiple index.* file types, ie. index.html, index.php, index.pl
    • +
  • Supports subset of RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 methods GET, HEAD, and POST.
    • +
  • Simple & straight forward configuration using environment variables.
    • +
  • Portability across Unix-like environments, ie. Cygwin, FreeBSD, Linux, SunOS.
    • +
  • Known to work with Lynx, Mozilla, Opera, and Internet Explorer web browsers.
    • +
  • Is a dedicated process-forking server that does not use inetd.
    • +
  • Is secure against relative path file snooping.
    • +
  • Is secure against directory searches.
    • +
  • ~155 lines of source, 1940 bytes long by IOCCC 2004 rules, ~6KB compiled & stripped on FreeBSD.
    • +
  • Superior & smaller than micro_httpd from ACME.
    • +
  • And has a really cool animated logo too.
    • +
+ + + + +

Installation

+
    +

  1. +Download: +

    + +
    + + + + + + + + + + + +
    Hibachi-1.0 Obfuscatedmd5sumChange Log
    Hibachi-1.0 Spoilermd5sumChange Log
    +
    +
    2. + +
  2. +

    +Unpack and build the executable: +

    + +
    +tar -zxf hibachi-1.0.tgz
    +cd hibachi-1.0
    +./configure
    +make +
    +
    3. + +
+ + +

Usage

+ +

+First read and configure the file hibachi-start.sh. In most cases the +defaults settings should be fine for testing. Start the server in +the background, and perform the initial test (assuming that SERVER_PORT was +not altered in hibachi-start.sh): +

+ +
+./hibachi-start.sh &
+lynx http://localhost:8008/
+
+ +

+To stop the server: +

+ +
+kill %1
+
+ +

+To access this documentation and examples from the Internet, create symbolic links for the +host name and/or IP pointing to the «localhost» directory. For example, replace the IP and host +name addresses below with that of the machine running +HIBACHI: +

+ +
+ln -s localhost 64.81.251.233
+ln -s localhost www.ioccc.org
+
+ +

+HIBACHI can server multiple +web sites from the same machine simply by creating content directories with the same +name as the URL domain names within the document root tree. Domain and/or IP aliases are simply symbolic links +to content directories. There is never any need to restart HIBACHI +when web sites are published or aliases added. + +Assuming the server is running and that port 8008 is not blocked by any firewall, +you should be able to access the server from the Internet using an IP or host name URL similar to:

+

+ +
+http://64.81.251.233:8008/
+http://www.ioccc.org:8008/
+
+ + +

+Port 8008 (http-alt) was chosen as the default port for demonstration purposes, +since its an alternative HTTP port that does not require special privileges and +is rarely in use. +Of course, HIBACHI could be run as a standard +web server on port 80, but this would require that it be installed by +the system administrator, contrary to IOCCC rules. +

+ + +

CGI Examples

+ +

+The following tests and examples are available to demonstrate various +aspects of the CGI support: +

+ +
+
POSIX Shell Example
+
+These CGI scripts perform some basic tests on the handling of GET and POST requests, +cookies, and the passing of environment variables to CGI scripts. These CGI scripts +assume that /bin/sh is a POSIX compliant shell and the +standard set of POSIX utilities are available. Should work for all Unix variants +and Cygwin. + +
+ +
Perl Example
+
+Powered by Perl +This example queries the Yahoo web site for a stock quote to insert into a web page. +This example requires a browser with JavaScript support and +should work for all Unix variants and Cygwin, when Perl is installed. +
+ +
PHP Example
+
+Powered by PHP +This PHP example generates a calendar complete with ISO 8601:2000 week numbers. + + +

+The Windows PHP CGI binary distribution from the +PHP web site does not work within the Cygwin +environment. Instead, download the source distribution and build the PHP CGI and CLI versions from scratch +from within Cygwin. +The following commands were used to build: + +

+# Without this link, the configure script has problems with Cygwin.
+ln -s /bin/gcc /bin/cc
+
+CFLAGS=-O ./configure \
+--with-config-file-path=/usr/local/etc:/etc \
+--enable-discard-path \
+--disable-xml \
+--without-pear \
+--enable-sockets \
+--enable-bcmath \
+--enable-ftp \
+--enable-dba \
+--with-inifile
+
+make
+make install
+
+# Install both the CGI and CLI (though the CLI is not used here).
+mv /usr/local/bin/php /usr/local/bin/php.cgi.exe
+make install-cli
+mv /usr/local/bin/php /usr/local/bin/php.exe
+
+cp php.ini-recommended /etc/php.ini
+
+
+

+The php.ini file should specify "output_buffering = 4096" so that PHP scripts have a chance to +modify the response status and headers before the body is sent. Also set "cgi.rfc2616_headers = 1". +Click here to display the PHP Info configuration. +

+
+ + +
Ruby Example
+
+This example validates and/or generates Luhn check-digits. +Should work for all Unix variants and Cygwin, +when Ruby is installed. +
+
+ + +

Portability

+ +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ FreeBSD +     + 4.8 +
+ Linux + + Cobalt Qube 1, RedHat Linux 5.1, gcc 2.7.2 +
+ Sun Microsystems Logo + + 5.8 +
+Cygwin Unix Emulation + Microsoft Windows + + Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP Pro SP1 +
with Cygwin, gcc 2.95.3-5 +
+
+ + + +

License

+ +

+In accordance with the +International Obfuscated C Code Contest +this is an original work and placed in the public domain. +

+ + + + +

Disclaimer

+

+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDE "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, +INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY +AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO WAY SHALL THE +AUTHOR OR LICENSEE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, +OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF +SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS +INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN +CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) +ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED +OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +

+ + + +

Support

+

+Free support is limited, based on the author's availability, though +enhancements requests and problem reports are welcome (see logo above). +

+ + +     + + +
+ +Powered by Hibachi +
+ + +
+Public Domain 2004 by + +Anthony C Howe. +
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + + + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/reference/rfc2616.html b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/reference/rfc2616.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f4bda2133 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/reference/rfc2616.html @@ -0,0 +1,9754 @@ + + + + +RFC 2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1) + + + + + + +

RFC 2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1)

+Highlights: +
    +
  • Supported: + +
    • +
    +
  • Loose Interpretation +
      +
    • 10.5.4 503 Service Unavailable
      +     Interpret "refuse the connection" as drop it without giving a reason. +
      • +
    +
    • +
    +
  • SHOULD weakened to OPTIONAL: +
      +
    • 4.3 Message Body, paragraph 4
      • +
    • 7.2.1 Type, paragraph 3
      • +
    +
    • +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group                                      R. Fielding
+Request for Comments: 2616                                   UC Irvine
+Obsoletes: 2068                                              J. Gettys
+Category: Standards Track                                   Compaq/W3C
+                                                              J. Mogul
+                                                                Compaq
+                                                            H. Frystyk
+                                                               W3C/MIT
+                                                           L. Masinter
+                                                                 Xerox
+                                                              P. Leach
+                                                             Microsoft
+                                                        T. Berners-Lee
+                                                               W3C/MIT
+                                                             June 1999
+
+
+                Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.
+
+Abstract
+
+   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level
+   protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information
+   systems. It is a generic, stateless, protocol which can be used for
+   many tasks beyond its use for hypertext, such as name servers and
+   distributed object management systems, through extension of its
+   request methods, error codes and headers [47]. A feature of HTTP is
+   the typing and negotiation of data representation, allowing systems
+   to be built independently of the data being transferred.
+
+   HTTP has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information
+   initiative since 1990. This specification defines the protocol
+   referred to as "HTTP/1.1", and is an update to RFC 2068 [33].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 1]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+   1   Introduction ...................................................7
+   1.1    Purpose......................................................7
+   1.2   Requirements .................................................8
+   1.3   Terminology ..................................................8
+   1.4   Overall Operation ...........................................12
+   2   Notational Conventions and Generic Grammar ....................14
+   2.1   Augmented BNF ...............................................14
+   2.2   Basic Rules .................................................15
+   3   Protocol Parameters ...........................................17
+   3.1   HTTP Version ................................................17
+   3.2   Uniform Resource Identifiers ................................18
+   3.2.1    General Syntax ...........................................19
+   3.2.2    http URL .................................................19
+   3.2.3    URI Comparison ...........................................20
+   3.3   Date/Time Formats ...........................................20
+   3.3.1    Full Date ................................................20
+   3.3.2    Delta Seconds ............................................21
+   3.4   Character Sets ..............................................21
+   3.4.1    Missing Charset ..........................................22
+   3.5   Content Codings .............................................23
+   3.6   Transfer Codings ............................................24
+   3.6.1    Chunked Transfer Coding ..................................25
+   3.7   Media Types .................................................26
+   3.7.1    Canonicalization and Text Defaults .......................27
+   3.7.2    Multipart Types ..........................................27
+   3.8   Product Tokens ..............................................28
+   3.9   Quality Values ..............................................29
+   3.10  Language Tags ...............................................29
+   3.11  Entity Tags .................................................30
+   3.12  Range Units .................................................30
+   4   HTTP Message ..................................................31
+   4.1   Message Types ...............................................31
+   4.2   Message Headers .............................................31
+   4.3   Message Body ................................................32
+   4.4   Message Length ..............................................33
+   4.5   General Header Fields .......................................34
+   5   Request .......................................................35
+   5.1   Request-Line ................................................35
+   5.1.1    Method ...................................................36
+   5.1.2    Request-URI ..............................................36
+   5.2   The Resource Identified by a Request ........................38
+   5.3   Request Header Fields .......................................38
+   6   Response ......................................................39
+   6.1   Status-Line .................................................39
+   6.1.1    Status Code and Reason Phrase ............................39
+   6.2   Response Header Fields ......................................41
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 2]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   7   Entity ........................................................42
+   7.1   Entity Header Fields ........................................42
+   7.2   Entity Body .................................................43
+   7.2.1    Type .....................................................43
+   7.2.2    Entity Length ............................................43
+   8   Connections ...................................................44
+   8.1   Persistent Connections ......................................44
+   8.1.1    Purpose ..................................................44
+   8.1.2    Overall Operation ........................................45
+   8.1.3    Proxy Servers ............................................46
+   8.1.4    Practical Considerations .................................46
+   8.2   Message Transmission Requirements ...........................47
+   8.2.1    Persistent Connections and Flow Control ..................47
+   8.2.2    Monitoring Connections for Error Status Messages .........48
+   8.2.3    Use of the 100 (Continue) Status .........................48
+   8.2.4    Client Behavior if Server Prematurely Closes Connection ..50
+   9   Method Definitions ............................................51
+   9.1   Safe and Idempotent Methods .................................51
+   9.1.1    Safe Methods .............................................51
+   9.1.2    Idempotent Methods .......................................51
+   9.2   OPTIONS .....................................................52
+   9.3   GET .........................................................53
+   9.4   HEAD ........................................................54
+   9.5   POST ........................................................54
+   9.6   PUT .........................................................55
+   9.7   DELETE ......................................................56
+   9.8   TRACE .......................................................56
+   9.9   CONNECT .....................................................57
+   10   Status Code Definitions ......................................57
+   10.1  Informational 1xx ...........................................57
+   10.1.1   100 Continue .............................................58
+   10.1.2   101 Switching Protocols ..................................58
+   10.2  Successful 2xx ..............................................58
+   10.2.1   200 OK ...................................................58
+   10.2.2   201 Created ..............................................59
+   10.2.3   202 Accepted .............................................59
+   10.2.4   203 Non-Authoritative Information ........................59
+   10.2.5   204 No Content ...........................................60
+   10.2.6   205 Reset Content ........................................60
+   10.2.7   206 Partial Content ......................................60
+   10.3  Redirection 3xx .............................................61
+   10.3.1   300 Multiple Choices .....................................61
+   10.3.2   301 Moved Permanently ....................................62
+   10.3.3   302 Found ................................................62
+   10.3.4   303 See Other ............................................63
+   10.3.5   304 Not Modified .........................................63
+   10.3.6   305 Use Proxy ............................................64
+   10.3.7   306 (Unused) .............................................64
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 3]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   10.3.8   307 Temporary Redirect ...................................65
+   10.4  Client Error 4xx ............................................65
+   10.4.1    400 Bad Request .........................................65
+   10.4.2    401 Unauthorized ........................................66
+   10.4.3    402 Payment Required ....................................66
+   10.4.4    403 Forbidden ...........................................66
+   10.4.5    404 Not Found ...........................................66
+   10.4.6    405 Method Not Allowed ..................................66
+   10.4.7    406 Not Acceptable ......................................67
+   10.4.8    407 Proxy Authentication Required .......................67
+   10.4.9    408 Request Timeout .....................................67
+   10.4.10   409 Conflict ............................................67
+   10.4.11   410 Gone ................................................68
+   10.4.12   411 Length Required .....................................68
+   10.4.13   412 Precondition Failed .................................68
+   10.4.14   413 Request Entity Too Large ............................69
+   10.4.15   414 Request-URI Too Long ................................69
+   10.4.16   415 Unsupported Media Type ..............................69
+   10.4.17   416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable .....................69
+   10.4.18   417 Expectation Failed ..................................70
+   10.5  Server Error 5xx ............................................70
+   10.5.1   500 Internal Server Error ................................70
+   10.5.2   501 Not Implemented ......................................70
+   10.5.3   502 Bad Gateway ..........................................70
+   10.5.4   503 Service Unavailable ..................................70
+   10.5.5   504 Gateway Timeout ......................................71
+   10.5.6   505 HTTP Version Not Supported ...........................71
+   11   Access Authentication ........................................71
+   12   Content Negotiation ..........................................71
+   12.1  Server-driven Negotiation ...................................72
+   12.2  Agent-driven Negotiation ....................................73
+   12.3  Transparent Negotiation .....................................74
+   13   Caching in HTTP ..............................................74
+   13.1.1   Cache Correctness ........................................75
+   13.1.2   Warnings .................................................76
+   13.1.3   Cache-control Mechanisms .................................77
+   13.1.4   Explicit User Agent Warnings .............................78
+   13.1.5   Exceptions to the Rules and Warnings .....................78
+   13.1.6   Client-controlled Behavior ...............................79
+   13.2  Expiration Model ............................................79
+   13.2.1   Server-Specified Expiration ..............................79
+   13.2.2   Heuristic Expiration .....................................80
+   13.2.3   Age Calculations .........................................80
+   13.2.4   Expiration Calculations ..................................83
+   13.2.5   Disambiguating Expiration Values .........................84
+   13.2.6   Disambiguating Multiple Responses ........................84
+   13.3  Validation Model ............................................85
+   13.3.1   Last-Modified Dates ......................................86
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 4]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   13.3.2   Entity Tag Cache Validators ..............................86
+   13.3.3   Weak and Strong Validators ...............................86
+   13.3.4   Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates.89
+   13.3.5   Non-validating Conditionals ..............................90
+   13.4  Response Cacheability .......................................91
+   13.5  Constructing Responses From Caches ..........................92
+   13.5.1   End-to-end and Hop-by-hop Headers ........................92
+   13.5.2   Non-modifiable Headers ...................................92
+   13.5.3   Combining Headers ........................................94
+   13.5.4   Combining Byte Ranges ....................................95
+   13.6  Caching Negotiated Responses ................................95
+   13.7  Shared and Non-Shared Caches ................................96
+   13.8  Errors or Incomplete Response Cache Behavior ................97
+   13.9  Side Effects of GET and HEAD ................................97
+   13.10   Invalidation After Updates or Deletions ...................97
+   13.11   Write-Through Mandatory ...................................98
+   13.12   Cache Replacement .........................................99
+   13.13   History Lists .............................................99
+   14   Header Field Definitions ....................................100
+   14.1  Accept .....................................................100
+   14.2  Accept-Charset .............................................102
+   14.3  Accept-Encoding ............................................102
+   14.4  Accept-Language ............................................104
+   14.5  Accept-Ranges ..............................................105
+   14.6  Age ........................................................106
+   14.7  Allow ......................................................106
+   14.8  Authorization ..............................................107
+   14.9  Cache-Control ..............................................108
+   14.9.1   What is Cacheable .......................................109
+   14.9.2   What May be Stored by Caches ............................110
+   14.9.3   Modifications of the Basic Expiration Mechanism .........111
+   14.9.4   Cache Revalidation and Reload Controls ..................113
+   14.9.5   No-Transform Directive ..................................115
+   14.9.6   Cache Control Extensions ................................116
+   14.10   Connection ...............................................117
+   14.11   Content-Encoding .........................................118
+   14.12   Content-Language .........................................118
+   14.13   Content-Length ...........................................119
+   14.14   Content-Location .........................................120
+   14.15   Content-MD5 ..............................................121
+   14.16   Content-Range ............................................122
+   14.17   Content-Type .............................................124
+   14.18   Date .....................................................124
+   14.18.1   Clockless Origin Server Operation ......................125
+   14.19   ETag .....................................................126
+   14.20   Expect ...................................................126
+   14.21   Expires ..................................................127
+   14.22   From .....................................................128
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 5]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   14.23   Host .....................................................128
+   14.24   If-Match .................................................129
+   14.25   If-Modified-Since ........................................130
+   14.26   If-None-Match ............................................132
+   14.27   If-Range .................................................133
+   14.28   If-Unmodified-Since ......................................134
+   14.29   Last-Modified ............................................134
+   14.30   Location .................................................135
+   14.31   Max-Forwards .............................................136
+   14.32   Pragma ...................................................136
+   14.33   Proxy-Authenticate .......................................137
+   14.34   Proxy-Authorization ......................................137
+   14.35   Range ....................................................138
+   14.35.1    Byte Ranges ...........................................138
+   14.35.2    Range Retrieval Requests ..............................139
+   14.36   Referer ..................................................140
+   14.37   Retry-After ..............................................141
+   14.38   Server ...................................................141
+   14.39   TE .......................................................142
+   14.40   Trailer ..................................................143
+   14.41  Transfer-Encoding..........................................143
+   14.42   Upgrade ..................................................144
+   14.43   User-Agent ...............................................145
+   14.44   Vary .....................................................145
+   14.45   Via ......................................................146
+   14.46   Warning ..................................................148
+   14.47   WWW-Authenticate .........................................150
+   15 Security Considerations .......................................150
+   15.1      Personal Information....................................151
+   15.1.1   Abuse of Server Log Information .........................151
+   15.1.2   Transfer of Sensitive Information .......................151
+   15.1.3   Encoding Sensitive Information in URI's .................152
+   15.1.4   Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers ..............152
+   15.2  Attacks Based On File and Path Names .......................153
+   15.3  DNS Spoofing ...............................................154
+   15.4  Location Headers and Spoofing ..............................154
+   15.5  Content-Disposition Issues .................................154
+   15.6  Authentication Credentials and Idle Clients ................155
+   15.7  Proxies and Caching ........................................155
+   15.7.1    Denial of Service Attacks on Proxies....................156
+   16   Acknowledgments .............................................156
+   17   References ..................................................158
+   18   Authors' Addresses ..........................................162
+   19   Appendices ..................................................164
+   19.1  Internet Media Type message/http and application/http ......164
+   19.2  Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges ...................165
+   19.3  Tolerant Applications ......................................166
+   19.4  Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities ....167
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 6]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   19.4.1   MIME-Version ............................................167
+   19.4.2   Conversion to Canonical Form ............................167
+   19.4.3   Conversion of Date Formats ..............................168
+   19.4.4   Introduction of Content-Encoding ........................168
+   19.4.5   No Content-Transfer-Encoding ............................168
+   19.4.6   Introduction of Transfer-Encoding .......................169
+   19.4.7   MHTML and Line Length Limitations .......................169
+   19.5  Additional Features ........................................169
+   19.5.1   Content-Disposition .....................................170
+   19.6  Compatibility with Previous Versions .......................170
+   19.6.1   Changes from HTTP/1.0 ...................................171
+   19.6.2   Compatibility with HTTP/1.0 Persistent Connections ......172
+   19.6.3   Changes from RFC 2068 ...................................172
+   20   Index .......................................................175
+   21   Full Copyright Statement ....................................176
+
+1 Introduction
+
+1.1 Purpose
+
+   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level
+   protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information
+   systems. HTTP has been in use by the World-Wide Web global
+   information initiative since 1990. The first version of HTTP,
+   referred to as HTTP/0.9, was a simple protocol for raw data transfer
+   across the Internet. HTTP/1.0, as defined by RFC 1945 [6], improved
+   the protocol by allowing messages to be in the format of MIME-like
+   messages, containing metainformation about the data transferred and
+   modifiers on the request/response semantics. However, HTTP/1.0 does
+   not sufficiently take into consideration the effects of hierarchical
+   proxies, caching, the need for persistent connections, or virtual
+   hosts. In addition, the proliferation of incompletely-implemented
+   applications calling themselves "HTTP/1.0" has necessitated a
+   protocol version change in order for two communicating applications
+   to determine each other's true capabilities.
+
+   This specification defines the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1".
+   This protocol includes more stringent requirements than HTTP/1.0 in
+   order to ensure reliable implementation of its features.
+
+   Practical information systems require more functionality than simple
+   retrieval, including search, front-end update, and annotation. HTTP
+   allows an open-ended set of methods and headers that indicate the
+   purpose of a request [47]. It builds on the discipline of reference
+   provided by the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) [3], as a location
+   (URL) [4] or name (URN) [20], for indicating the resource to which a
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 7]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   method is to be applied. Messages are passed in a format similar to
+   that used by Internet mail [9] as defined by the Multipurpose
+   Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) [7].
+
+   HTTP is also used as a generic protocol for communication between
+   user agents and proxies/gateways to other Internet systems, including
+   those supported by the SMTP [16], NNTP [13], FTP [18], Gopher [2],
+   and WAIS [10] protocols. In this way, HTTP allows basic hypermedia
+   access to resources available from diverse applications.
+
+1.2 Requirements
+
+   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [34].
+
+   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
+   of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements for the protocols it
+   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the MUST or REQUIRED
+   level and all the SHOULD level requirements for its protocols is said
+   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the MUST
+   level requirements but not all the SHOULD level requirements for its
+   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
+
+1.3 Terminology
+
+   This specification uses a number of terms to refer to the roles
+   played by participants in, and objects of, the HTTP communication.
+
+   connection
+      A transport layer virtual circuit established between two programs
+      for the purpose of communication.
+
+   message
+      The basic unit of HTTP communication, consisting of a structured
+      sequence of octets matching the syntax defined in section 4 and
+      transmitted via the connection.
+
+   request
+      An HTTP request message, as defined in section 5.
+
+   response
+      An HTTP response message, as defined in section 6.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 8]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   resource
+      A network data object or service that can be identified by a URI,
+      as defined in section 3.2. Resources may be available in multiple
+      representations (e.g. multiple languages, data formats, size, and
+      resolutions) or vary in other ways.
+
+   entity
+      The information transferred as the payload of a request or
+      response. An entity consists of metainformation in the form of
+      entity-header fields and content in the form of an entity-body, as
+      described in section 7.
+
+   representation
+      An entity included with a response that is subject to content
+      negotiation, as described in section 12. There may exist multiple
+      representations associated with a particular response status.
+
+   content negotiation
+      The mechanism for selecting the appropriate representation when
+      servicing a request, as described in section 12. The
+      representation of entities in any response can be negotiated
+      (including error responses).
+
+   variant
+      A resource may have one, or more than one, representation(s)
+      associated with it at any given instant. Each of these
+      representations is termed a `varriant'.  Use of the term `variant'
+      does not necessarily imply that the resource is subject to content
+      negotiation.
+
+   client
+      A program that establishes connections for the purpose of sending
+      requests.
+
+   user agent
+      The client which initiates a request. These are often browsers,
+      editors, spiders (web-traversing robots), or other end user tools.
+
+   server
+      An application program that accepts connections in order to
+      service requests by sending back responses. Any given program may
+      be capable of being both a client and a server; our use of these
+      terms refers only to the role being performed by the program for a
+      particular connection, rather than to the program's capabilities
+      in general. Likewise, any server may act as an origin server,
+      proxy, gateway, or tunnel, switching behavior based on the nature
+      of each request.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 9]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   origin server
+      The server on which a given resource resides or is to be created.
+
+   proxy
+      An intermediary program which acts as both a server and a client
+      for the purpose of making requests on behalf of other clients.
+      Requests are serviced internally or by passing them on, with
+      possible translation, to other servers. A proxy MUST implement
+      both the client and server requirements of this specification. A
+      "transparent proxy" is a proxy that does not modify the request or
+      response beyond what is required for proxy authentication and
+      identification. A "non-transparent proxy" is a proxy that modifies
+      the request or response in order to provide some added service to
+      the user agent, such as group annotation services, media type
+      transformation, protocol reduction, or anonymity filtering. Except
+      where either transparent or non-transparent behavior is explicitly
+      stated, the HTTP proxy requirements apply to both types of
+      proxies.
+
+   gateway
+      A server which acts as an intermediary for some other server.
+      Unlike a proxy, a gateway receives requests as if it were the
+      origin server for the requested resource; the requesting client
+      may not be aware that it is communicating with a gateway.
+
+   tunnel
+      An intermediary program which is acting as a blind relay between
+      two connections. Once active, a tunnel is not considered a party
+      to the HTTP communication, though the tunnel may have been
+      initiated by an HTTP request. The tunnel ceases to exist when both
+      ends of the relayed connections are closed.
+
+   cache
+      A program's local store of response messages and the subsystem
+      that controls its message storage, retrieval, and deletion. A
+      cache stores cacheable responses in order to reduce the response
+      time and network bandwidth consumption on future, equivalent
+      requests. Any client or server may include a cache, though a cache
+      cannot be used by a server that is acting as a tunnel.
+
+   cacheable
+      A response is cacheable if a cache is allowed to store a copy of
+      the response message for use in answering subsequent requests. The
+      rules for determining the cacheability of HTTP responses are
+      defined in section 13. Even if a resource is cacheable, there may
+      be additional constraints on whether a cache can use the cached
+      copy for a particular request.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 10]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   first-hand
+      A response is first-hand if it comes directly and without
+      unnecessary delay from the origin server, perhaps via one or more
+      proxies. A response is also first-hand if its validity has just
+      been checked directly with the origin server.
+
+   explicit expiration time
+      The time at which the origin server intends that an entity should
+      no longer be returned by a cache without further validation.
+
+   heuristic expiration time
+      An expiration time assigned by a cache when no explicit expiration
+      time is available.
+
+   age
+      The age of a response is the time since it was sent by, or
+      successfully validated with, the origin server.
+
+   freshness lifetime
+      The length of time between the generation of a response and its
+      expiration time.
+
+   fresh
+      A response is fresh if its age has not yet exceeded its freshness
+      lifetime.
+
+   stale
+      A response is stale if its age has passed its freshness lifetime.
+
+   semantically transparent
+      A cache behaves in a "semantically transparent" manner, with
+      respect to a particular response, when its use affects neither the
+      requesting client nor the origin server, except to improve
+      performance. When a cache is semantically transparent, the client
+      receives exactly the same response (except for hop-by-hop headers)
+      that it would have received had its request been handled directly
+      by the origin server.
+
+   validator
+      A protocol element (e.g., an entity tag or a Last-Modified time)
+      that is used to find out whether a cache entry is an equivalent
+      copy of an entity.
+
+   upstream/downstream
+      Upstream and downstream describe the flow of a message: all
+      messages flow from upstream to downstream.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 11]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   inbound/outbound
+      Inbound and outbound refer to the request and response paths for
+      messages: "inbound" means "traveling toward the origin server",
+      and "outbound" means "traveling toward the user agent"
+
+1.4 Overall Operation
+
+   The HTTP protocol is a request/response protocol. A client sends a
+   request to the server in the form of a request method, URI, and
+   protocol version, followed by a MIME-like message containing request
+   modifiers, client information, and possible body content over a
+   connection with a server. The server responds with a status line,
+   including the message's protocol version and a success or error code,
+   followed by a MIME-like message containing server information, entity
+   metainformation, and possible entity-body content. The relationship
+   between HTTP and MIME is described in appendix 19.4.
+
+   Most HTTP communication is initiated by a user agent and consists of
+   a request to be applied to a resource on some origin server. In the
+   simplest case, this may be accomplished via a single connection (v)
+   between the user agent (UA) and the origin server (O).
+
+          request chain ------------------------>
+       UA -------------------v------------------- O
+          <----------------------- response chain
+
+   A more complicated situation occurs when one or more intermediaries
+   are present in the request/response chain. There are three common
+   forms of intermediary: proxy, gateway, and tunnel. A proxy is a
+   forwarding agent, receiving requests for a URI in its absolute form,
+   rewriting all or part of the message, and forwarding the reformatted
+   request toward the server identified by the URI. A gateway is a
+   receiving agent, acting as a layer above some other server(s) and, if
+   necessary, translating the requests to the underlying server's
+   protocol. A tunnel acts as a relay point between two connections
+   without changing the messages; tunnels are used when the
+   communication needs to pass through an intermediary (such as a
+   firewall) even when the intermediary cannot understand the contents
+   of the messages.
+
+          request chain -------------------------------------->
+       UA -----v----- A -----v----- B -----v----- C -----v----- O
+          <------------------------------------- response chain
+
+   The figure above shows three intermediaries (A, B, and C) between the
+   user agent and origin server. A request or response message that
+   travels the whole chain will pass through four separate connections.
+   This distinction is important because some HTTP communication options
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 12]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   may apply only to the connection with the nearest, non-tunnel
+   neighbor, only to the end-points of the chain, or to all connections
+   along the chain. Although the diagram is linear, each participant may
+   be engaged in multiple, simultaneous communications. For example, B
+   may be receiving requests from many clients other than A, and/or
+   forwarding requests to servers other than C, at the same time that it
+   is handling A's request.
+
+   Any party to the communication which is not acting as a tunnel may
+   employ an internal cache for handling requests. The effect of a cache
+   is that the request/response chain is shortened if one of the
+   participants along the chain has a cached response applicable to that
+   request. The following illustrates the resulting chain if B has a
+   cached copy of an earlier response from O (via C) for a request which
+   has not been cached by UA or A.
+
+          request chain ---------->
+       UA -----v----- A -----v----- B - - - - - - C - - - - - - O
+          <--------- response chain
+
+   Not all responses are usefully cacheable, and some requests may
+   contain modifiers which place special requirements on cache behavior.
+   HTTP requirements for cache behavior and cacheable responses are
+   defined in section 13.
+
+   In fact, there are a wide variety of architectures and configurations
+   of caches and proxies currently being experimented with or deployed
+   across the World Wide Web. These systems include national hierarchies
+   of proxy caches to save transoceanic bandwidth, systems that
+   broadcast or multicast cache entries, organizations that distribute
+   subsets of cached data via CD-ROM, and so on. HTTP systems are used
+   in corporate intranets over high-bandwidth links, and for access via
+   PDAs with low-power radio links and intermittent connectivity. The
+   goal of HTTP/1.1 is to support the wide diversity of configurations
+   already deployed while introducing protocol constructs that meet the
+   needs of those who build web applications that require high
+   reliability and, failing that, at least reliable indications of
+   failure.
+
+   HTTP communication usually takes place over TCP/IP connections. The
+   default port is TCP 80 [19], but other ports can be used. This does
+   not preclude HTTP from being implemented on top of any other protocol
+   on the Internet, or on other networks. HTTP only presumes a reliable
+   transport; any protocol that provides such guarantees can be used;
+   the mapping of the HTTP/1.1 request and response structures onto the
+   transport data units of the protocol in question is outside the scope
+   of this specification.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 13]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   In HTTP/1.0, most implementations used a new connection for each
+   request/response exchange. In HTTP/1.1, a connection may be used for
+   one or more request/response exchanges, although connections may be
+   closed for a variety of reasons (see section 8.1).
+
+2 Notational Conventions and Generic Grammar
+
+2.1 Augmented BNF
+
+   All of the mechanisms specified in this document are described in
+   both prose and an augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) similar to that
+   used by RFC 822 [9]. Implementors will need to be familiar with the
+   notation in order to understand this specification. The augmented BNF
+   includes the following constructs:
+
+   name = definition
+      The name of a rule is simply the name itself (without any
+      enclosing "<" and ">") and is separated from its definition by the
+      equal "=" character. White space is only significant in that
+      indentation of continuation lines is used to indicate a rule
+      definition that spans more than one line. Certain basic rules are
+      in uppercase, such as SP, LWS, HT, CRLF, DIGIT, ALPHA, etc. Angle
+      brackets are used within definitions whenever their presence will
+      facilitate discerning the use of rule names.
+
+   "literal"
+      Quotation marks surround literal text. Unless stated otherwise,
+      the text is case-insensitive.
+
+   rule1 | rule2
+      Elements separated by a bar ("|") are alternatives, e.g., "yes |
+      no" will accept yes or no.
+
+   (rule1 rule2)
+      Elements enclosed in parentheses are treated as a single element.
+      Thus, "(elem (foo | bar) elem)" allows the token sequences "elem
+      foo elem" and "elem bar elem".
+
+   *rule
+      The character "*" preceding an element indicates repetition. The
+      full form is "<n>*<m>element" indicating at least <n> and at most
+      <m> occurrences of element. Default values are 0 and infinity so
+      that "*(element)" allows any number, including zero; "1*element"
+      requires at least one; and "1*2element" allows one or two.
+
+   [rule]
+      Square brackets enclose optional elements; "[foo bar]" is
+      equivalent to "*1(foo bar)".
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 14]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   N rule
+      Specific repetition: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to
+      "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is, exactly <n> occurrences of (element).
+      Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three
+      alphabetic characters.
+
+   #rule
+      A construct "#" is defined, similar to "*", for defining lists of
+      elements. The full form is "<n>#<m>element" indicating at least
+      <n> and at most <m> elements, each separated by one or more commas
+      (",") and OPTIONAL linear white space (LWS). This makes the usual
+      form of lists very easy; a rule such as
+         ( *LWS element *( *LWS "," *LWS element ))
+      can be shown as
+         1#element
+      Wherever this construct is used, null elements are allowed, but do
+      not contribute to the count of elements present. That is,
+      "(element), , (element) " is permitted, but counts as only two
+      elements. Therefore, where at least one element is required, at
+      least one non-null element MUST be present. Default values are 0
+      and infinity so that "#element" allows any number, including zero;
+      "1#element" requires at least one; and "1#2element" allows one or
+      two.
+
+   ; comment
+      A semi-colon, set off some distance to the right of rule text,
+      starts a comment that continues to the end of line. This is a
+      simple way of including useful notes in parallel with the
+      specifications.
+
+   implied *LWS
+      The grammar described by this specification is word-based. Except
+      where noted otherwise, linear white space (LWS) can be included
+      between any two adjacent words (token or quoted-string), and
+      between adjacent words and separators, without changing the
+      interpretation of a field. At least one delimiter (LWS and/or
+
+      separators) MUST exist between any two tokens (for the definition
+      of "token" below), since they would otherwise be interpreted as a
+      single token.
+
+2.2 Basic Rules
+
+   The following rules are used throughout this specification to
+   describe basic parsing constructs. The US-ASCII coded character set
+   is defined by ANSI X3.4-1986 [21].
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 15]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+       OCTET          = <any 8-bit sequence of data>
+       CHAR           = <any US-ASCII character (octets 0 - 127)>
+       UPALPHA        = <any US-ASCII uppercase letter "A".."Z">
+       LOALPHA        = <any US-ASCII lowercase letter "a".."z">
+       ALPHA          = UPALPHA | LOALPHA
+       DIGIT          = <any US-ASCII digit "0".."9">
+       CTL            = <any US-ASCII control character
+                        (octets 0 - 31) and DEL (127)>
+       CR             = <US-ASCII CR, carriage return (13)>
+       LF             = <US-ASCII LF, linefeed (10)>
+       SP             = <US-ASCII SP, space (32)>
+       HT             = <US-ASCII HT, horizontal-tab (9)>
+       <">            = <US-ASCII double-quote mark (34)>
+
+   HTTP/1.1 defines the sequence CR LF as the end-of-line marker for all
+   protocol elements except the entity-body (see appendix 19.3 for
+   tolerant applications). The end-of-line marker within an entity-body
+   is defined by its associated media type, as described in section 3.7.
+
+       CRLF           = CR LF
+
+   HTTP/1.1 header field values can be folded onto multiple lines if the
+   continuation line begins with a space or horizontal tab. All linear
+   white space, including folding, has the same semantics as SP. A
+   recipient MAY replace any linear white space with a single SP before
+   interpreting the field value or forwarding the message downstream.
+
+       LWS            = [CRLF] 1*( SP | HT )
+
+   The TEXT rule is only used for descriptive field contents and values
+   that are not intended to be interpreted by the message parser. Words
+   of *TEXT MAY contain characters from character sets other than ISO-
+   8859-1 [22] only when encoded according to the rules of RFC 2047
+   [14].
+
+       TEXT           = <any OCTET except CTLs,
+                        but including LWS>
+
+   A CRLF is allowed in the definition of TEXT only as part of a header
+   field continuation. It is expected that the folding LWS will be
+   replaced with a single SP before interpretation of the TEXT value.
+
+   Hexadecimal numeric characters are used in several protocol elements.
+
+       HEX            = "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F"
+                      | "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f" | DIGIT
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 16]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Many HTTP/1.1 header field values consist of words separated by LWS
+   or special characters. These special characters MUST be in a quoted
+   string to be used within a parameter value (as defined in section
+   3.6).
+
+       token          = 1*<any CHAR except CTLs or separators>
+       separators     = "(" | ")" | "<" | ">" | "@"
+                      | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <">
+                      | "/" | "[" | "]" | "?" | "="
+                      | "{" | "}" | SP | HT
+
+   Comments can be included in some HTTP header fields by surrounding
+   the comment text with parentheses. Comments are only allowed in
+   fields containing "comment" as part of their field value definition.
+   In all other fields, parentheses are considered part of the field
+   value.
+
+       comment        = "(" *( ctext | quoted-pair | comment ) ")"
+       ctext          = <any TEXT excluding "(" and ")">
+
+   A string of text is parsed as a single word if it is quoted using
+   double-quote marks.
+
+       quoted-string  = ( <"> *(qdtext | quoted-pair ) <"> )
+       qdtext         = <any TEXT except <">>
+
+   The backslash character ("\") MAY be used as a single-character
+   quoting mechanism only within quoted-string and comment constructs.
+
+       quoted-pair    = "\" CHAR
+
+3 Protocol Parameters
+
+3.1 HTTP Version
+
+   HTTP uses a "<major>.<minor>" numbering scheme to indicate versions
+   of the protocol. The protocol versioning policy is intended to allow
+   the sender to indicate the format of a message and its capacity for
+   understanding further HTTP communication, rather than the features
+   obtained via that communication. No change is made to the version
+   number for the addition of message components which do not affect
+   communication behavior or which only add to extensible field values.
+   The <minor> number is incremented when the changes made to the
+   protocol add features which do not change the general message parsing
+   algorithm, but which may add to the message semantics and imply
+   additional capabilities of the sender. The <major> number is
+   incremented when the format of a message within the protocol is
+   changed. See RFC 2145 [36] for a fuller explanation.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 17]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The version of an HTTP message is indicated by an HTTP-Version field
+   in the first line of the message.
+
+       HTTP-Version   = "HTTP" "/" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT
+
+   Note that the major and minor numbers MUST be treated as separate
+   integers and that each MAY be incremented higher than a single digit.
+   Thus, HTTP/2.4 is a lower version than HTTP/2.13, which in turn is
+   lower than HTTP/12.3. Leading zeros MUST be ignored by recipients and
+   MUST NOT be sent.
+
+   An application that sends a request or response message that includes
+   HTTP-Version of "HTTP/1.1" MUST be at least conditionally compliant
+   with this specification. Applications that are at least conditionally
+   compliant with this specification SHOULD use an HTTP-Version of
+   "HTTP/1.1" in their messages, and MUST do so for any message that is
+   not compatible with HTTP/1.0. For more details on when to send
+   specific HTTP-Version values, see RFC 2145 [36].
+
+   The HTTP version of an application is the highest HTTP version for
+   which the application is at least conditionally compliant.
+
+   Proxy and gateway applications need to be careful when forwarding
+   messages in protocol versions different from that of the application.
+   Since the protocol version indicates the protocol capability of the
+   sender, a proxy/gateway MUST NOT send a message with a version
+   indicator which is greater than its actual version. If a higher
+   version request is received, the proxy/gateway MUST either downgrade
+   the request version, or respond with an error, or switch to tunnel
+   behavior.
+
+   Due to interoperability problems with HTTP/1.0 proxies discovered
+   since the publication of RFC 2068[33], caching proxies MUST, gateways
+   MAY, and tunnels MUST NOT upgrade the request to the highest version
+   they support. The proxy/gateway's response to that request MUST be in
+   the same major version as the request.
+
+      Note: Converting between versions of HTTP may involve modification
+      of header fields required or forbidden by the versions involved.
+
+3.2 Uniform Resource Identifiers
+
+   URIs have been known by many names: WWW addresses, Universal Document
+   Identifiers, Universal Resource Identifiers [3], and finally the
+   combination of Uniform Resource Locators (URL) [4] and Names (URN)
+   [20]. As far as HTTP is concerned, Uniform Resource Identifiers are
+   simply formatted strings which identify--via name, location, or any
+   other characteristic--a resource.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 18]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+3.2.1 General Syntax
+
+   URIs in HTTP can be represented in absolute form or relative to some
+   known base URI [11], depending upon the context of their use. The two
+   forms are differentiated by the fact that absolute URIs always begin
+   with a scheme name followed by a colon. For definitive information on
+   URL syntax and semantics, see "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI):
+   Generic Syntax and Semantics," RFC 2396 [42] (which replaces RFCs
+   1738 [4] and RFC 1808 [11]). This specification adopts the
+   definitions of "URI-reference", "absoluteURI", "relativeURI", "port",
+   "host","abs_path", "rel_path", and "authority" from that
+   specification.
+
+   The HTTP protocol does not place any a priori limit on the length of
+   a URI. Servers MUST be able to handle the URI of any resource they
+   serve, and SHOULD be able to handle URIs of unbounded length if they
+   provide GET-based forms that could generate such URIs. A server
+   SHOULD return 414 (Request-URI Too Long) status if a URI is longer
+   than the server can handle (see section 10.4.15).
+
+      Note: Servers ought to be cautious about depending on URI lengths
+      above 255 bytes, because some older client or proxy
+      implementations might not properly support these lengths.
+
+3.2.2 http URL
+
+   The "http" scheme is used to locate network resources via the HTTP
+   protocol. This section defines the scheme-specific syntax and
+   semantics for http URLs.
+
+   http_URL = "http:" "//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path [ "?" query ]]
+
+   If the port is empty or not given, port 80 is assumed. The semantics
+   are that the identified resource is located at the server listening
+   for TCP connections on that port of that host, and the Request-URI
+   for the resource is abs_path (section 5.1.2). The use of IP addresses
+   in URLs SHOULD be avoided whenever possible (see RFC 1900 [24]). If
+   the abs_path is not present in the URL, it MUST be given as "/" when
+   used as a Request-URI for a resource (section 5.1.2). If a proxy
+   receives a host name which is not a fully qualified domain name, it
+   MAY add its domain to the host name it received. If a proxy receives
+   a fully qualified domain name, the proxy MUST NOT change the host
+   name.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 19]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+3.2.3 URI Comparison
+
+   When comparing two URIs to decide if they match or not, a client
+   SHOULD use a case-sensitive octet-by-octet comparison of the entire
+   URIs, with these exceptions:
+
+      - A port that is empty or not given is equivalent to the default
+        port for that URI-reference;
+
+        - Comparisons of host names MUST be case-insensitive;
+
+        - Comparisons of scheme names MUST be case-insensitive;
+
+        - An empty abs_path is equivalent to an abs_path of "/".
+
+   Characters other than those in the "reserved" and "unsafe" sets (see
+   RFC 2396 [42]) are equivalent to their ""%" HEX HEX" encoding.
+
+   For example, the following three URIs are equivalent:
+
+      http://abc.com:80/~smith/home.html
+      http://ABC.com/%7Esmith/home.html
+      http://ABC.com:/%7esmith/home.html
+
+3.3 Date/Time Formats
+
+3.3.1 Full Date
+
+   HTTP applications have historically allowed three different formats
+   for the representation of date/time stamps:
+
+      Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT  ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
+      Sunday, 06-Nov-94 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 850, obsoleted by RFC 1036
+      Sun Nov  6 08:49:37 1994       ; ANSI C's asctime() format
+
+   The first format is preferred as an Internet standard and represents
+   a fixed-length subset of that defined by RFC 1123 [8] (an update to
+   RFC 822 [9]). The second format is in common use, but is based on the
+   obsolete RFC 850 [12] date format and lacks a four-digit year.
+   HTTP/1.1 clients and servers that parse the date value MUST accept
+   all three formats (for compatibility with HTTP/1.0), though they MUST
+   only generate the RFC 1123 format for representing HTTP-date values
+   in header fields. See section 19.3 for further information.
+
+      Note: Recipients of date values are encouraged to be robust in
+      accepting date values that may have been sent by non-HTTP
+      applications, as is sometimes the case when retrieving or posting
+      messages via proxies/gateways to SMTP or NNTP.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 20]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   All HTTP date/time stamps MUST be represented in Greenwich Mean Time
+   (GMT), without exception. For the purposes of HTTP, GMT is exactly
+   equal to UTC (Coordinated Universal Time). This is indicated in the
+   first two formats by the inclusion of "GMT" as the three-letter
+   abbreviation for time zone, and MUST be assumed when reading the
+   asctime format. HTTP-date is case sensitive and MUST NOT include
+   additional LWS beyond that specifically included as SP in the
+   grammar.
+
+       HTTP-date    = rfc1123-date | rfc850-date | asctime-date
+       rfc1123-date = wkday "," SP date1 SP time SP "GMT"
+       rfc850-date  = weekday "," SP date2 SP time SP "GMT"
+       asctime-date = wkday SP date3 SP time SP 4DIGIT
+       date1        = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
+                      ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
+       date2        = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
+                      ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82)
+       date3        = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT ))
+                      ; month day (e.g., Jun  2)
+       time         = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT
+                      ; 00:00:00 - 23:59:59
+       wkday        = "Mon" | "Tue" | "Wed"
+                    | "Thu" | "Fri" | "Sat" | "Sun"
+       weekday      = "Monday" | "Tuesday" | "Wednesday"
+                    | "Thursday" | "Friday" | "Saturday" | "Sunday"
+       month        = "Jan" | "Feb" | "Mar" | "Apr"
+                    | "May" | "Jun" | "Jul" | "Aug"
+                    | "Sep" | "Oct" | "Nov" | "Dec"
+
+      Note: HTTP requirements for the date/time stamp format apply only
+      to their usage within the protocol stream. Clients and servers are
+      not required to use these formats for user presentation, request
+      logging, etc.
+
+3.3.2 Delta Seconds
+
+   Some HTTP header fields allow a time value to be specified as an
+   integer number of seconds, represented in decimal, after the time
+   that the message was received.
+
+       delta-seconds  = 1*DIGIT
+
+3.4 Character Sets
+
+   HTTP uses the same definition of the term "character set" as that
+   described for MIME:
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 21]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The term "character set" is used in this document to refer to a
+   method used with one or more tables to convert a sequence of octets
+   into a sequence of characters. Note that unconditional conversion in
+   the other direction is not required, in that not all characters may
+   be available in a given character set and a character set may provide
+   more than one sequence of octets to represent a particular character.
+   This definition is intended to allow various kinds of character
+   encoding, from simple single-table mappings such as US-ASCII to
+   complex table switching methods such as those that use ISO-2022's
+   techniques. However, the definition associated with a MIME character
+   set name MUST fully specify the mapping to be performed from octets
+   to characters. In particular, use of external profiling information
+   to determine the exact mapping is not permitted.
+
+      Note: This use of the term "character set" is more commonly
+      referred to as a "character encoding." However, since HTTP and
+      MIME share the same registry, it is important that the terminology
+      also be shared.
+
+   HTTP character sets are identified by case-insensitive tokens. The
+   complete set of tokens is defined by the IANA Character Set registry
+   [19].
+
+       charset = token
+
+   Although HTTP allows an arbitrary token to be used as a charset
+   value, any token that has a predefined value within the IANA
+   Character Set registry [19] MUST represent the character set defined
+   by that registry. Applications SHOULD limit their use of character
+   sets to those defined by the IANA registry.
+
+   Implementors should be aware of IETF character set requirements [38]
+   [41].
+
+3.4.1 Missing Charset
+
+   Some HTTP/1.0 software has interpreted a Content-Type header without
+   charset parameter incorrectly to mean "recipient should guess."
+   Senders wishing to defeat this behavior MAY include a charset
+   parameter even when the charset is ISO-8859-1 and SHOULD do so when
+   it is known that it will not confuse the recipient.
+
+   Unfortunately, some older HTTP/1.0 clients did not deal properly with
+   an explicit charset parameter. HTTP/1.1 recipients MUST respect the
+   charset label provided by the sender; and those user agents that have
+   a provision to "guess" a charset MUST use the charset from the
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 22]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   content-type field if they support that charset, rather than the
+   recipient's preference, when initially displaying a document. See
+   section 3.7.1.
+
+3.5 Content Codings
+
+   Content coding values indicate an encoding transformation that has
+   been or can be applied to an entity. Content codings are primarily
+   used to allow a document to be compressed or otherwise usefully
+   transformed without losing the identity of its underlying media type
+   and without loss of information. Frequently, the entity is stored in
+   coded form, transmitted directly, and only decoded by the recipient.
+
+       content-coding   = token
+
+   All content-coding values are case-insensitive. HTTP/1.1 uses
+   content-coding values in the Accept-Encoding (section 14.3) and
+   Content-Encoding (section 14.11) header fields. Although the value
+   describes the content-coding, what is more important is that it
+   indicates what decoding mechanism will be required to remove the
+   encoding.
+
+   The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) acts as a registry for
+   content-coding value tokens. Initially, the registry contains the
+   following tokens:
+
+   gzip An encoding format produced by the file compression program
+        "gzip" (GNU zip) as described in RFC 1952 [25]. This format is a
+        Lempel-Ziv coding (LZ77) with a 32 bit CRC.
+
+   compress
+        The encoding format produced by the common UNIX file compression
+        program "compress". This format is an adaptive Lempel-Ziv-Welch
+        coding (LZW).
+
+        Use of program names for the identification of encoding formats
+        is not desirable and is discouraged for future encodings. Their
+        use here is representative of historical practice, not good
+        design. For compatibility with previous implementations of HTTP,
+        applications SHOULD consider "x-gzip" and "x-compress" to be
+        equivalent to "gzip" and "compress" respectively.
+
+   deflate
+        The "zlib" format defined in RFC 1950 [31] in combination with
+        the "deflate" compression mechanism described in RFC 1951 [29].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 23]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   identity
+        The default (identity) encoding; the use of no transformation
+        whatsoever. This content-coding is used only in the Accept-
+        Encoding header, and SHOULD NOT be used in the Content-Encoding
+        header.
+
+   New content-coding value tokens SHOULD be registered; to allow
+   interoperability between clients and servers, specifications of the
+   content coding algorithms needed to implement a new value SHOULD be
+   publicly available and adequate for independent implementation, and
+   conform to the purpose of content coding defined in this section.
+
+3.6 Transfer Codings
+
+   Transfer-coding values are used to indicate an encoding
+   transformation that has been, can be, or may need to be applied to an
+   entity-body in order to ensure "safe transport" through the network.
+   This differs from a content coding in that the transfer-coding is a
+   property of the message, not of the original entity.
+
+       transfer-coding         = "chunked" | transfer-extension
+       transfer-extension      = token *( ";" parameter )
+
+   Parameters are in  the form of attribute/value pairs.
+
+       parameter               = attribute "=" value
+       attribute               = token
+       value                   = token | quoted-string
+
+   All transfer-coding values are case-insensitive. HTTP/1.1 uses
+   transfer-coding values in the TE header field (section 14.39) and in
+   the Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41).
+
+   Whenever a transfer-coding is applied to a message-body, the set of
+   transfer-codings MUST include "chunked", unless the message is
+   terminated by closing the connection. When the "chunked" transfer-
+   coding is used, it MUST be the last transfer-coding applied to the
+   message-body. The "chunked" transfer-coding MUST NOT be applied more
+   than once to a message-body. These rules allow the recipient to
+   determine the transfer-length of the message (section 4.4).
+
+   Transfer-codings are analogous to the Content-Transfer-Encoding
+   values of MIME [7], which were designed to enable safe transport of
+   binary data over a 7-bit transport service. However, safe transport
+   has a different focus for an 8bit-clean transfer protocol. In HTTP,
+   the only unsafe characteristic of message-bodies is the difficulty in
+   determining the exact body length (section 7.2.2), or the desire to
+   encrypt data over a shared transport.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 24]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) acts as a registry for
+   transfer-coding value tokens. Initially, the registry contains the
+   following tokens: "chunked" (section 3.6.1), "identity" (section
+   3.6.2), "gzip" (section 3.5), "compress" (section 3.5), and "deflate"
+   (section 3.5).
+
+   New transfer-coding value tokens SHOULD be registered in the same way
+   as new content-coding value tokens (section 3.5).
+
+   A server which receives an entity-body with a transfer-coding it does
+   not understand SHOULD return 501 (Unimplemented), and close the
+   connection. A server MUST NOT send transfer-codings to an HTTP/1.0
+   client.
+
+3.6.1 Chunked Transfer Coding
+
+   The chunked encoding modifies the body of a message in order to
+   transfer it as a series of chunks, each with its own size indicator,
+   followed by an OPTIONAL trailer containing entity-header fields. This
+   allows dynamically produced content to be transferred along with the
+   information necessary for the recipient to verify that it has
+   received the full message.
+
+       Chunked-Body   = *chunk
+                        last-chunk
+                        trailer
+                        CRLF
+
+       chunk          = chunk-size [ chunk-extension ] CRLF
+                        chunk-data CRLF
+       chunk-size     = 1*HEX
+       last-chunk     = 1*("0") [ chunk-extension ] CRLF
+
+       chunk-extension= *( ";" chunk-ext-name [ "=" chunk-ext-val ] )
+       chunk-ext-name = token
+       chunk-ext-val  = token | quoted-string
+       chunk-data     = chunk-size(OCTET)
+       trailer        = *(entity-header CRLF)
+
+   The chunk-size field is a string of hex digits indicating the size of
+   the chunk. The chunked encoding is ended by any chunk whose size is
+   zero, followed by the trailer, which is terminated by an empty line.
+
+   The trailer allows the sender to include additional HTTP header
+   fields at the end of the message. The Trailer header field can be
+   used to indicate which header fields are included in a trailer (see
+   section 14.40).
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 25]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   A server using chunked transfer-coding in a response MUST NOT use the
+   trailer for any header fields unless at least one of the following is
+   true:
+
+   a)the request included a TE header field that indicates "trailers" is
+     acceptable in the transfer-coding of the  response, as described in
+     section 14.39; or,
+
+   b)the server is the origin server for the response, the trailer
+     fields consist entirely of optional metadata, and the recipient
+     could use the message (in a manner acceptable to the origin server)
+     without receiving this metadata.  In other words, the origin server
+     is willing to accept the possibility that the trailer fields might
+     be silently discarded along the path to the client.
+
+   This requirement prevents an interoperability failure when the
+   message is being received by an HTTP/1.1 (or later) proxy and
+   forwarded to an HTTP/1.0 recipient. It avoids a situation where
+   compliance with the protocol would have necessitated a possibly
+   infinite buffer on the proxy.
+
+   An example process for decoding a Chunked-Body is presented in
+   appendix 19.4.6.
+
+   All HTTP/1.1 applications MUST be able to receive and decode the
+   "chunked" transfer-coding, and MUST ignore chunk-extension extensions
+   they do not understand.
+
+3.7 Media Types
+
+   HTTP uses Internet Media Types [17] in the Content-Type (section
+   14.17) and Accept (section 14.1) header fields in order to provide
+   open and extensible data typing and type negotiation.
+
+       media-type     = type "/" subtype *( ";" parameter )
+       type           = token
+       subtype        = token
+
+   Parameters MAY follow the type/subtype in the form of attribute/value
+   pairs (as defined in section 3.6).
+
+   The type, subtype, and parameter attribute names are case-
+   insensitive. Parameter values might or might not be case-sensitive,
+   depending on the semantics of the parameter name. Linear white space
+   (LWS) MUST NOT be used between the type and subtype, nor between an
+   attribute and its value. The presence or absence of a parameter might
+   be significant to the processing of a media-type, depending on its
+   definition within the media type registry.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 26]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Note that some older HTTP applications do not recognize media type
+   parameters. When sending data to older HTTP applications,
+   implementations SHOULD only use media type parameters when they are
+   required by that type/subtype definition.
+
+   Media-type values are registered with the Internet Assigned Number
+   Authority (IANA [19]). The media type registration process is
+   outlined in RFC 1590 [17]. Use of non-registered media types is
+   discouraged.
+
+3.7.1 Canonicalization and Text Defaults
+
+   Internet media types are registered with a canonical form. An
+   entity-body transferred via HTTP messages MUST be represented in the
+   appropriate canonical form prior to its transmission except for
+   "text" types, as defined in the next paragraph.
+
+   When in canonical form, media subtypes of the "text" type use CRLF as
+   the text line break. HTTP relaxes this requirement and allows the
+   transport of text media with plain CR or LF alone representing a line
+   break when it is done consistently for an entire entity-body. HTTP
+   applications MUST accept CRLF, bare CR, and bare LF as being
+   representative of a line break in text media received via HTTP. In
+   addition, if the text is represented in a character set that does not
+   use octets 13 and 10 for CR and LF respectively, as is the case for
+   some multi-byte character sets, HTTP allows the use of whatever octet
+   sequences are defined by that character set to represent the
+   equivalent of CR and LF for line breaks. This flexibility regarding
+   line breaks applies only to text media in the entity-body; a bare CR
+   or LF MUST NOT be substituted for CRLF within any of the HTTP control
+   structures (such as header fields and multipart boundaries).
+
+   If an entity-body is encoded with a content-coding, the underlying
+   data MUST be in a form defined above prior to being encoded.
+
+   The "charset" parameter is used with some media types to define the
+   character set (section 3.4) of the data. When no explicit charset
+   parameter is provided by the sender, media subtypes of the "text"
+   type are defined to have a default charset value of "ISO-8859-1" when
+   received via HTTP. Data in character sets other than "ISO-8859-1" or
+   its subsets MUST be labeled with an appropriate charset value. See
+   section 3.4.1 for compatibility problems.
+
+3.7.2 Multipart Types
+
+   MIME provides for a number of "multipart" types -- encapsulations of
+   one or more entities within a single message-body. All multipart
+   types share a common syntax, as defined in section 5.1.1 of RFC 2046
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 27]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   [40], and MUST include a boundary parameter as part of the media type
+   value. The message body is itself a protocol element and MUST
+   therefore use only CRLF to represent line breaks between body-parts.
+   Unlike in RFC 2046, the epilogue of any multipart message MUST be
+   empty; HTTP applications MUST NOT transmit the epilogue (even if the
+   original multipart contains an epilogue). These restrictions exist in
+   order to preserve the self-delimiting nature of a multipart message-
+   body, wherein the "end" of the message-body is indicated by the
+   ending multipart boundary.
+
+   In general, HTTP treats a multipart message-body no differently than
+   any other media type: strictly as payload. The one exception is the
+   "multipart/byteranges" type (appendix 19.2) when it appears in a 206
+   (Partial Content) response, which will be interpreted by some HTTP
+   caching mechanisms as described in sections 13.5.4 and 14.16. In all
+   other cases, an HTTP user agent SHOULD follow the same or similar
+   behavior as a MIME user agent would upon receipt of a multipart type.
+   The MIME header fields within each body-part of a multipart message-
+   body do not have any significance to HTTP beyond that defined by
+   their MIME semantics.
+
+   In general, an HTTP user agent SHOULD follow the same or similar
+   behavior as a MIME user agent would upon receipt of a multipart type.
+   If an application receives an unrecognized multipart subtype, the
+   application MUST treat it as being equivalent to "multipart/mixed".
+
+      Note: The "multipart/form-data" type has been specifically defined
+      for carrying form data suitable for processing via the POST
+      request method, as described in RFC 1867 [15].
+
+3.8 Product Tokens
+
+   Product tokens are used to allow communicating applications to
+   identify themselves by software name and version. Most fields using
+   product tokens also allow sub-products which form a significant part
+   of the application to be listed, separated by white space. By
+   convention, the products are listed in order of their significance
+   for identifying the application.
+
+       product         = token ["/" product-version]
+       product-version = token
+
+   Examples:
+
+       User-Agent: CERN-LineMode/2.15 libwww/2.17b3
+       Server: Apache/0.8.4
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 28]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Product tokens SHOULD be short and to the point. They MUST NOT be
+   used for advertising or other non-essential information. Although any
+   token character MAY appear in a product-version, this token SHOULD
+   only be used for a version identifier (i.e., successive versions of
+   the same product SHOULD only differ in the product-version portion of
+   the product value).
+
+3.9 Quality Values
+
+   HTTP content negotiation (section 12) uses short "floating point"
+   numbers to indicate the relative importance ("weight") of various
+   negotiable parameters.  A weight is normalized to a real number in
+   the range 0 through 1, where 0 is the minimum and 1 the maximum
+   value. If a parameter has a quality value of 0, then content with
+   this parameter is `not acceptable' for the client. HTTP/1.1
+   applications MUST NOT generate more than three digits after the
+   decimal point. User configuration of these values SHOULD also be
+   limited in this fashion.
+
+       qvalue         = ( "0" [ "." 0*3DIGIT ] )
+                      | ( "1" [ "." 0*3("0") ] )
+
+   "Quality values" is a misnomer, since these values merely represent
+   relative degradation in desired quality.
+
+3.10 Language Tags
+
+   A language tag identifies a natural language spoken, written, or
+   otherwise conveyed by human beings for communication of information
+   to other human beings. Computer languages are explicitly excluded.
+   HTTP uses language tags within the Accept-Language and Content-
+   Language fields.
+
+   The syntax and registry of HTTP language tags is the same as that
+   defined by RFC 1766 [1]. In summary, a language tag is composed of 1
+   or more parts: A primary language tag and a possibly empty series of
+   subtags:
+
+        language-tag  = primary-tag *( "-" subtag )
+        primary-tag   = 1*8ALPHA
+        subtag        = 1*8ALPHA
+
+   White space is not allowed within the tag and all tags are case-
+   insensitive. The name space of language tags is administered by the
+   IANA. Example tags include:
+
+       en, en-US, en-cockney, i-cherokee, x-pig-latin
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 29]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   where any two-letter primary-tag is an ISO-639 language abbreviation
+   and any two-letter initial subtag is an ISO-3166 country code. (The
+   last three tags above are not registered tags; all but the last are
+   examples of tags which could be registered in future.)
+
+3.11 Entity Tags
+
+   Entity tags are used for comparing two or more entities from the same
+   requested resource. HTTP/1.1 uses entity tags in the ETag (section
+   14.19), If-Match (section 14.24), If-None-Match (section 14.26), and
+   If-Range (section 14.27) header fields. The definition of how they
+   are used and compared as cache validators is in section 13.3.3. An
+   entity tag consists of an opaque quoted string, possibly prefixed by
+   a weakness indicator.
+
+      entity-tag = [ weak ] opaque-tag
+      weak       = "W/"
+      opaque-tag = quoted-string
+
+   A "strong entity tag" MAY be shared by two entities of a resource
+   only if they are equivalent by octet equality.
+
+   A "weak entity tag," indicated by the "W/" prefix, MAY be shared by
+   two entities of a resource only if the entities are equivalent and
+   could be substituted for each other with no significant change in
+   semantics. A weak entity tag can only be used for weak comparison.
+
+   An entity tag MUST be unique across all versions of all entities
+   associated with a particular resource. A given entity tag value MAY
+   be used for entities obtained by requests on different URIs. The use
+   of the same entity tag value in conjunction with entities obtained by
+   requests on different URIs does not imply the equivalence of those
+   entities.
+
+3.12 Range Units
+
+   HTTP/1.1 allows a client to request that only part (a range of) the
+   response entity be included within the response. HTTP/1.1 uses range
+   units in the Range (section 14.35) and Content-Range (section 14.16)
+   header fields. An entity can be broken down into subranges according
+   to various structural units.
+
+      range-unit       = bytes-unit | other-range-unit
+      bytes-unit       = "bytes"
+      other-range-unit = token
+
+   The only range unit defined by HTTP/1.1 is "bytes". HTTP/1.1
+   implementations MAY ignore ranges specified using other units.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 30]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   HTTP/1.1 has been designed to allow implementations of applications
+   that do not depend on knowledge of ranges.
+
+4 HTTP Message
+
+4.1 Message Types
+
+   HTTP messages consist of requests from client to server and responses
+   from server to client.
+
+       HTTP-message   = Request | Response     ; HTTP/1.1 messages
+
+   Request (section 5) and Response (section 6) messages use the generic
+   message format of RFC 822 [9] for transferring entities (the payload
+   of the message). Both types of message consist of a start-line, zero
+   or more header fields (also known as "headers"), an empty line (i.e.,
+   a line with nothing preceding the CRLF) indicating the end of the
+   header fields, and possibly a message-body.
+
+        generic-message = start-line
+                          *(message-header CRLF)
+                          CRLF
+                          [ message-body ]
+        start-line      = Request-Line | Status-Line
+
+   In the interest of robustness, servers SHOULD ignore any empty
+   line(s) received where a Request-Line is expected. In other words, if
+   the server is reading the protocol stream at the beginning of a
+   message and receives a CRLF first, it should ignore the CRLF.
+
+   Certain buggy HTTP/1.0 client implementations generate extra CRLF's
+   after a POST request. To restate what is explicitly forbidden by the
+   BNF, an HTTP/1.1 client MUST NOT preface or follow a request with an
+   extra CRLF.
+
+4.2 Message Headers
+
+   HTTP header fields, which include general-header (section 4.5),
+   request-header (section 5.3), response-header (section 6.2), and
+   entity-header (section 7.1) fields, follow the same generic format as
+   that given in section 3.1 of RFC 822 [9]. Each header field consists
+   of a name followed by a colon (":") and the field value. Field names
+   are case-insensitive. The field value MAY be preceded by any amount
+   of LWS, though a single SP is preferred. Header fields can be
+   extended over multiple lines by preceding each extra line with at
+   least one SP or HT. Applications ought to follow "common form", where
+   one is known or indicated, when generating HTTP constructs, since
+   there might exist some implementations that fail to accept anything
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 31]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   beyond the common forms.
+
+       message-header = field-name ":" [ field-value ]
+       field-name     = token
+       field-value    = *( field-content | LWS )
+       field-content  = <the OCTETs making up the field-value
+                        and consisting of either *TEXT or combinations
+                        of token, separators, and quoted-string>
+
+   The field-content does not include any leading or trailing LWS:
+   linear white space occurring before the first non-whitespace
+   character of the field-value or after the last non-whitespace
+   character of the field-value. Such leading or trailing LWS MAY be
+   removed without changing the semantics of the field value. Any LWS
+   that occurs between field-content MAY be replaced with a single SP
+   before interpreting the field value or forwarding the message
+   downstream.
+
+   The order in which header fields with differing field names are
+   received is not significant. However, it is "good practice" to send
+   general-header fields first, followed by request-header or response-
+   header fields, and ending with the entity-header fields.
+
+   Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be
+   present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that
+   header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)].
+   It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one
+   "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of the
+   message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each
+   separated by a comma. The order in which header fields with the same
+   field-name are received is therefore significant to the
+   interpretation of the combined field value, and thus a proxy MUST NOT
+   change the order of these field values when a message is forwarded.
+
+4.3 Message Body
+
+   The message-body (if any) of an HTTP message is used to carry the
+   entity-body associated with the request or response. The message-body
+   differs from the entity-body only when a transfer-coding has been
+   applied, as indicated by the Transfer-Encoding header field (section
+   14.41).
+
+       message-body = entity-body
+                    | <entity-body encoded as per Transfer-Encoding>
+
+   Transfer-Encoding MUST be used to indicate any transfer-codings
+   applied by an application to ensure safe and proper transfer of the
+   message. Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 32]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   entity, and thus MAY be added or removed by any application along the
+   request/response chain. (However, section 3.6 places restrictions on
+   when certain transfer-codings may be used.)
+
+   The rules for when a message-body is allowed in a message differ for
+   requests and responses.
+
+   The presence of a message-body in a request is signaled by the
+   inclusion of a Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding header field in
+   the request's message-headers. A message-body MUST NOT be included in
+   a request if the specification of the request method (section 5.1.1)
+   does not allow sending an entity-body in requests. A server SHOULD
+   read and forward a message-body on any request; if the request method
+   does not include defined semantics for an entity-body, then the
+   message-body SHOULD be ignored when handling the request.
+
+   For response messages, whether or not a message-body is included with
+   a message is dependent on both the request method and the response
+   status code (section 6.1.1). All responses to the HEAD request method
+   MUST NOT include a message-body, even though the presence of entity-
+   header fields might lead one to believe they do. All 1xx
+   (informational), 204 (no content), and 304 (not modified) responses
+   MUST NOT include a message-body. All other responses do include a
+   message-body, although it MAY be of zero length.
+
+4.4 Message Length
+
+   The transfer-length of a message is the length of the message-body as
+   it appears in the message; that is, after any transfer-codings have
+   been applied. When a message-body is included with a message, the
+   transfer-length of that body is determined by one of the following
+   (in order of precedence):
+
+   1.Any response message which "MUST NOT" include a message-body (such
+     as the 1xx, 204, and 304 responses and any response to a HEAD
+     request) is always terminated by the first empty line after the
+     header fields, regardless of the entity-header fields present in
+     the message.
+
+   2.If a Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41) is present and
+     has any value other than "identity", then the transfer-length is
+     defined by use of the "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6),
+     unless the message is terminated by closing the connection.
+
+   3.If a Content-Length header field (section 14.13) is present, its
+     decimal value in OCTETs represents both the entity-length and the
+     transfer-length. The Content-Length header field MUST NOT be sent
+     if these two lengths are different (i.e., if a Transfer-Encoding
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 33]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+     header field is present). If a message is received with both a
+     Transfer-Encoding header field and a Content-Length header field,
+     the latter MUST be ignored.
+
+   4.If the message uses the media type "multipart/byteranges", and the
+     ransfer-length is not otherwise specified, then this self-
+     elimiting media type defines the transfer-length. This media type
+     UST NOT be used unless the sender knows that the recipient can arse
+     it; the presence in a request of a Range header with ultiple byte-
+     range specifiers from a 1.1 client implies that the lient can parse
+     multipart/byteranges responses.
+
+       A range header might be forwarded by a 1.0 proxy that does not
+       understand multipart/byteranges; in this case the server MUST
+       delimit the message using methods defined in items 1,3 or 5 of
+       this section.
+
+   5.By the server closing the connection. (Closing the connection
+     cannot be used to indicate the end of a request body, since that
+     would leave no possibility for the server to send back a response.)
+
+   For compatibility with HTTP/1.0 applications, HTTP/1.1 requests
+   containing a message-body MUST include a valid Content-Length header
+   field unless the server is known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant. If a
+   request contains a message-body and a Content-Length is not given,
+   the server SHOULD respond with 400 (bad request) if it cannot
+   determine the length of the message, or with 411 (length required) if
+   it wishes to insist on receiving a valid Content-Length.
+
+   All HTTP/1.1 applications that receive entities MUST accept the
+   "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6), thus allowing this mechanism
+   to be used for messages when the message length cannot be determined
+   in advance.
+
+   Messages MUST NOT include both a Content-Length header field and a
+   non-identity transfer-coding. If the message does include a non-
+   identity transfer-coding, the Content-Length MUST be ignored.
+
+   When a Content-Length is given in a message where a message-body is
+   allowed, its field value MUST exactly match the number of OCTETs in
+   the message-body. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an
+   invalid length is received and detected.
+
+4.5 General Header Fields
+
+   There are a few header fields which have general applicability for
+   both request and response messages, but which do not apply to the
+   entity being transferred. These header fields apply only to the
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 34]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   message being transmitted.
+
+       general-header = Cache-Control            ; section 14.9
+                      | Connection               ; section 14.10
+                      | Date                     ; section 14.18
+                      | Pragma                   ; section 14.32
+                      | Trailer                  ; section 14.40
+                      | Transfer-Encoding        ; section 14.41
+                      | Upgrade                  ; section 14.42
+                      | Via                      ; section 14.45
+                      | Warning                  ; section 14.46
+
+   General-header field names can be extended reliably only in
+   combination with a change in the protocol version. However, new or
+   experimental header fields may be given the semantics of general
+   header fields if all parties in the communication recognize them to
+   be general-header fields. Unrecognized header fields are treated as
+   entity-header fields.
+
+5 Request
+
+   A request message from a client to a server includes, within the
+   first line of that message, the method to be applied to the resource,
+   the identifier of the resource, and the protocol version in use.
+
+        Request       = Request-Line              ; section 5.1
+                        *(( general-header        ; section 4.5
+                         | request-header         ; section 5.3
+                         | entity-header ) CRLF)  ; section 7.1
+                        CRLF
+                        [ message-body ]          ; section 4.3
+
+5.1 Request-Line
+
+   The Request-Line begins with a method token, followed by the
+   Request-URI and the protocol version, and ending with CRLF. The
+   elements are separated by SP characters. No CR or LF is allowed
+   except in the final CRLF sequence.
+
+        Request-Line   = Method SP Request-URI SP HTTP-Version CRLF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 35]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+5.1.1 Method
+
+   The Method  token indicates the method to be performed on the
+   resource identified by the Request-URI. The method is case-sensitive.
+
+       Method         = "OPTIONS"                ; section 9.2
+                      | "GET"                    ; section 9.3
+                      | "HEAD"                   ; section 9.4
+                      | "POST"                   ; section 9.5
+                      | "PUT"                    ; section 9.6
+                      | "DELETE"                 ; section 9.7
+                      | "TRACE"                  ; section 9.8
+                      | "CONNECT"                ; section 9.9
+                      | extension-method
+       extension-method = token
+
+   The list of methods allowed by a resource can be specified in an
+   Allow header field (section 14.7). The return code of the response
+   always notifies the client whether a method is currently allowed on a
+   resource, since the set of allowed methods can change dynamically. An
+   origin server SHOULD return the status code 405 (Method Not Allowed)
+   if the method is known by the origin server but not allowed for the
+   requested resource, and 501 (Not Implemented) if the method is
+   unrecognized or not implemented by the origin server. The methods GET
+   and HEAD MUST be supported by all general-purpose servers. All other
+   methods are OPTIONAL; however, if the above methods are implemented,
+   they MUST be implemented with the same semantics as those specified
+   in section 9.
+
+5.1.2 Request-URI
+
+   The Request-URI is a Uniform Resource Identifier (section 3.2) and
+   identifies the resource upon which to apply the request.
+
+       Request-URI    = "*" | absoluteURI | abs_path | authority
+
+   The four options for Request-URI are dependent on the nature of the
+   request. The asterisk "*" means that the request does not apply to a
+   particular resource, but to the server itself, and is only allowed
+   when the method used does not necessarily apply to a resource. One
+   example would be
+
+       OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
+
+   The absoluteURI form is REQUIRED when the request is being made to a
+   proxy. The proxy is requested to forward the request or service it
+   from a valid cache, and return the response. Note that the proxy MAY
+   forward the request on to another proxy or directly to the server
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 36]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   specified by the absoluteURI. In order to avoid request loops, a
+   proxy MUST be able to recognize all of its server names, including
+   any aliases, local variations, and the numeric IP address. An example
+   Request-Line would be:
+
+       GET http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TheProject.html HTTP/1.1
+
+   To allow for transition to absoluteURIs in all requests in future
+   versions of HTTP, all HTTP/1.1 servers MUST accept the absoluteURI
+   form in requests, even though HTTP/1.1 clients will only generate
+   them in requests to proxies.
+
+   The authority form is only used by the CONNECT method (section 9.9).
+
+   The most common form of Request-URI is that used to identify a
+   resource on an origin server or gateway. In this case the absolute
+   path of the URI MUST be transmitted (see section 3.2.1, abs_path) as
+   the Request-URI, and the network location of the URI (authority) MUST
+   be transmitted in a Host header field. For example, a client wishing
+   to retrieve the resource above directly from the origin server would
+   create a TCP connection to port 80 of the host "www.w3.org" and send
+   the lines:
+
+       GET /pub/WWW/TheProject.html HTTP/1.1
+       Host: www.w3.org
+
+   followed by the remainder of the Request. Note that the absolute path
+   cannot be empty; if none is present in the original URI, it MUST be
+   given as "/" (the server root).
+
+   The Request-URI is transmitted in the format specified in section
+   3.2.1. If the Request-URI is encoded using the "% HEX HEX" encoding
+   [42], the origin server MUST decode the Request-URI in order to
+   properly interpret the request. Servers SHOULD respond to invalid
+   Request-URIs with an appropriate status code.
+
+   A transparent proxy MUST NOT rewrite the "abs_path" part of the
+   received Request-URI when forwarding it to the next inbound server,
+   except as noted above to replace a null abs_path with "/".
+
+      Note: The "no rewrite" rule prevents the proxy from changing the
+      meaning of the request when the origin server is improperly using
+      a non-reserved URI character for a reserved purpose.  Implementors
+      should be aware that some pre-HTTP/1.1 proxies have been known to
+      rewrite the Request-URI.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 37]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
+
+   The exact resource identified by an Internet request is determined by
+   examining both the Request-URI and the Host header field.
+
+   An origin server that does not allow resources to differ by the
+   requested host MAY ignore the Host header field value when
+   determining the resource identified by an HTTP/1.1 request. (But see
+   section 19.6.1.1 for other requirements on Host support in HTTP/1.1.)
+
+   An origin server that does differentiate resources based on the host
+   requested (sometimes referred to as virtual hosts or vanity host
+   names) MUST use the following rules for determining the requested
+   resource on an HTTP/1.1 request:
+
+   1. If Request-URI is an absoluteURI, the host is part of the
+     Request-URI. Any Host header field value in the request MUST be
+     ignored.
+
+   2. If the Request-URI is not an absoluteURI, and the request includes
+     a Host header field, the host is determined by the Host header
+     field value.
+
+   3. If the host as determined by rule 1 or 2 is not a valid host on
+     the server, the response MUST be a 400 (Bad Request) error message.
+
+   Recipients of an HTTP/1.0 request that lacks a Host header field MAY
+   attempt to use heuristics (e.g., examination of the URI path for
+   something unique to a particular host) in order to determine what
+   exact resource is being requested.
+
+5.3 Request Header Fields
+
+   The request-header fields allow the client to pass additional
+   information about the request, and about the client itself, to the
+   server. These fields act as request modifiers, with semantics
+   equivalent to the parameters on a programming language method
+   invocation.
+
+       request-header = Accept                   ; section 14.1
+                      | Accept-Charset           ; section 14.2
+                      | Accept-Encoding          ; section 14.3
+                      | Accept-Language          ; section 14.4
+                      | Authorization            ; section 14.8
+                      | Expect                   ; section 14.20
+                      | From                     ; section 14.22
+                      | Host                     ; section 14.23
+                      | If-Match                 ; section 14.24
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 38]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+                      | If-Modified-Since        ; section 14.25
+                      | If-None-Match            ; section 14.26
+                      | If-Range                 ; section 14.27
+                      | If-Unmodified-Since      ; section 14.28
+                      | Max-Forwards             ; section 14.31
+                      | Proxy-Authorization      ; section 14.34
+                      | Range                    ; section 14.35
+                      | Referer                  ; section 14.36
+                      | TE                       ; section 14.39
+                      | User-Agent               ; section 14.43
+
+   Request-header field names can be extended reliably only in
+   combination with a change in the protocol version. However, new or
+   experimental header fields MAY be given the semantics of request-
+   header fields if all parties in the communication recognize them to
+   be request-header fields. Unrecognized header fields are treated as
+   entity-header fields.
+
+6 Response
+
+   After receiving and interpreting a request message, a server responds
+   with an HTTP response message.
+
+       Response      = Status-Line               ; section 6.1
+                       *(( general-header        ; section 4.5
+                        | response-header        ; section 6.2
+                        | entity-header ) CRLF)  ; section 7.1
+                       CRLF
+                       [ message-body ]          ; section 7.2
+
+6.1 Status-Line
+
+   The first line of a Response message is the Status-Line, consisting
+   of the protocol version followed by a numeric status code and its
+   associated textual phrase, with each element separated by SP
+   characters. No CR or LF is allowed except in the final CRLF sequence.
+
+       Status-Line = HTTP-Version SP Status-Code SP Reason-Phrase CRLF
+
+6.1.1 Status Code and Reason Phrase
+
+   The Status-Code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the
+   attempt to understand and satisfy the request. These codes are fully
+   defined in section 10. The Reason-Phrase is intended to give a short
+   textual description of the Status-Code. The Status-Code is intended
+   for use by automata and the Reason-Phrase is intended for the human
+   user. The client is not required to examine or display the Reason-
+   Phrase.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 39]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The first digit of the Status-Code defines the class of response. The
+   last two digits do not have any categorization role. There are 5
+   values for the first digit:
+
+      - 1xx: Informational - Request received, continuing process
+
+      - 2xx: Success - The action was successfully received,
+        understood, and accepted
+
+      - 3xx: Redirection - Further action must be taken in order to
+        complete the request
+
+      - 4xx: Client Error - The request contains bad syntax or cannot
+        be fulfilled
+
+      - 5xx: Server Error - The server failed to fulfill an apparently
+        valid request
+
+   The individual values of the numeric status codes defined for
+   HTTP/1.1, and an example set of corresponding Reason-Phrase's, are
+   presented below. The reason phrases listed here are only
+   recommendations -- they MAY be replaced by local equivalents without
+   affecting the protocol.
+
+      Status-Code    =
+            "100"  ; section 10.1.1: Continue
+          | "101"  ; section 10.1.2: Switching Protocols
+          | "200"  ; section 10.2.1: OK
+          | "201"  ; section 10.2.2: Created
+          | "202"  ; section 10.2.3: Accepted
+          | "203"  ; section 10.2.4: Non-Authoritative Information
+          | "204"  ; section 10.2.5: No Content
+          | "205"  ; section 10.2.6: Reset Content
+          | "206"  ; section 10.2.7: Partial Content
+          | "300"  ; section 10.3.1: Multiple Choices
+          | "301"  ; section 10.3.2: Moved Permanently
+          | "302"  ; section 10.3.3: Found
+          | "303"  ; section 10.3.4: See Other
+          | "304"  ; section 10.3.5: Not Modified
+          | "305"  ; section 10.3.6: Use Proxy
+          | "307"  ; section 10.3.8: Temporary Redirect
+          | "400"  ; section 10.4.1: Bad Request
+          | "401"  ; section 10.4.2: Unauthorized
+          | "402"  ; section 10.4.3: Payment Required
+          | "403"  ; section 10.4.4: Forbidden
+          | "404"  ; section 10.4.5: Not Found
+          | "405"  ; section 10.4.6: Method Not Allowed
+          | "406"  ; section 10.4.7: Not Acceptable
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 40]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+          | "407"  ; section 10.4.8: Proxy Authentication Required
+          | "408"  ; section 10.4.9: Request Time-out
+          | "409"  ; section 10.4.10: Conflict
+          | "410"  ; section 10.4.11: Gone
+          | "411"  ; section 10.4.12: Length Required
+          | "412"  ; section 10.4.13: Precondition Failed
+          | "413"  ; section 10.4.14: Request Entity Too Large
+          | "414"  ; section 10.4.15: Request-URI Too Large
+          | "415"  ; section 10.4.16: Unsupported Media Type
+          | "416"  ; section 10.4.17: Requested range not satisfiable
+          | "417"  ; section 10.4.18: Expectation Failed
+          | "500"  ; section 10.5.1: Internal Server Error
+          | "501"  ; section 10.5.2: Not Implemented
+          | "502"  ; section 10.5.3: Bad Gateway
+          | "503"  ; section 10.5.4: Service Unavailable
+          | "504"  ; section 10.5.5: Gateway Time-out
+          | "505"  ; section 10.5.6: HTTP Version not supported
+          | extension-code
+
+      extension-code = 3DIGIT
+      Reason-Phrase  = *<TEXT, excluding CR, LF>
+
+   HTTP status codes are extensible. HTTP applications are not required
+   to understand the meaning of all registered status codes, though such
+   understanding is obviously desirable. However, applications MUST
+   understand the class of any status code, as indicated by the first
+   digit, and treat any unrecognized response as being equivalent to the
+   x00 status code of that class, with the exception that an
+   unrecognized response MUST NOT be cached. For example, if an
+   unrecognized status code of 431 is received by the client, it can
+   safely assume that there was something wrong with its request and
+   treat the response as if it had received a 400 status code. In such
+   cases, user agents SHOULD present to the user the entity returned
+   with the response, since that entity is likely to include human-
+   readable information which will explain the unusual status.
+
+6.2 Response Header Fields
+
+   The response-header fields allow the server to pass additional
+   information about the response which cannot be placed in the Status-
+   Line. These header fields give information about the server and about
+   further access to the resource identified by the Request-URI.
+
+       response-header = Accept-Ranges           ; section 14.5
+                       | Age                     ; section 14.6
+                       | ETag                    ; section 14.19
+                       | Location                ; section 14.30
+                       | Proxy-Authenticate      ; section 14.33
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 41]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+                       | Retry-After             ; section 14.37
+                       | Server                  ; section 14.38
+                       | Vary                    ; section 14.44
+                       | WWW-Authenticate        ; section 14.47
+
+   Response-header field names can be extended reliably only in
+   combination with a change in the protocol version. However, new or
+   experimental header fields MAY be given the semantics of response-
+   header fields if all parties in the communication recognize them to
+   be response-header fields. Unrecognized header fields are treated as
+   entity-header fields.
+
+7 Entity
+
+   Request and Response messages MAY transfer an entity if not otherwise
+   restricted by the request method or response status code. An entity
+   consists of entity-header fields and an entity-body, although some
+   responses will only include the entity-headers.
+
+   In this section, both sender and recipient refer to either the client
+   or the server, depending on who sends and who receives the entity.
+
+7.1 Entity Header Fields
+
+   Entity-header fields define metainformation about the entity-body or,
+   if no body is present, about the resource identified by the request.
+   Some of this metainformation is OPTIONAL; some might be REQUIRED by
+   portions of this specification.
+
+       entity-header  = Allow                    ; section 14.7
+                      | Content-Encoding         ; section 14.11
+                      | Content-Language         ; section 14.12
+                      | Content-Length           ; section 14.13
+                      | Content-Location         ; section 14.14
+                      | Content-MD5              ; section 14.15
+                      | Content-Range            ; section 14.16
+                      | Content-Type             ; section 14.17
+                      | Expires                  ; section 14.21
+                      | Last-Modified            ; section 14.29
+                      | extension-header
+
+       extension-header = message-header
+
+   The extension-header mechanism allows additional entity-header fields
+   to be defined without changing the protocol, but these fields cannot
+   be assumed to be recognizable by the recipient. Unrecognized header
+   fields SHOULD be ignored by the recipient and MUST be forwarded by
+   transparent proxies.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 42]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+7.2 Entity Body
+
+   The entity-body (if any) sent with an HTTP request or response is in
+   a format and encoding defined by the entity-header fields.
+
+       entity-body    = *OCTET
+
+   An entity-body is only present in a message when a message-body is
+   present, as described in section 4.3. The entity-body is obtained
+   from the message-body by decoding any Transfer-Encoding that might
+   have been applied to ensure safe and proper transfer of the message.
+
+7.2.1 Type
+
+   When an entity-body is included with a message, the data type of that
+   body is determined via the header fields Content-Type and Content-
+   Encoding. These define a two-layer, ordered encoding model:
+
+       entity-body := Content-Encoding( Content-Type( data ) )
+
+   Content-Type specifies the media type of the underlying data.
+   Content-Encoding may be used to indicate any additional content
+   codings applied to the data, usually for the purpose of data
+   compression, that are a property of the requested resource. There is
+   no default encoding.
+
+   Any HTTP/1.1 message containing an entity-body SHOULD include a
+   Content-Type header field defining the media type of that body. If
+   and only if the media type is not given by a Content-Type field, the
+   recipient MAY attempt to guess the media type via inspection of its
+   content and/or the name extension(s) of the URI used to identify the
+   resource. If the media type remains unknown, the recipient SHOULD
+   treat it as type "application/octet-stream".
+
+7.2.2 Entity Length
+
+   The entity-length of a message is the length of the message-body
+   before any transfer-codings have been applied. section 4.4 defines
+   how the transfer-length of a message-body is determined.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 43]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+8 Connections
+
+8.1 Persistent Connections
+
+8.1.1 Purpose
+
+   Prior to persistent connections, a separate TCP connection was
+   established to fetch each URL, increasing the load on HTTP servers
+   and causing congestion on the Internet. The use of inline images and
+   other associated data often require a client to make multiple
+   requests of the same server in a short amount of time. Analysis of
+   these performance problems and results from a prototype
+   implementation are available [26] [30]. Implementation experience and
+   measurements of actual HTTP/1.1 (RFC 2068) implementations show good
+   results [39]. Alternatives have also been explored, for example,
+   T/TCP [27].
+
+   Persistent HTTP connections have a number of advantages:
+
+      - By opening and closing fewer TCP connections, CPU time is saved
+        in routers and hosts (clients, servers, proxies, gateways,
+        tunnels, or caches), and memory used for TCP protocol control
+        blocks can be saved in hosts.
+
+      - HTTP requests and responses can be pipelined on a connection.
+        Pipelining allows a client to make multiple requests without
+        waiting for each response, allowing a single TCP connection to
+        be used much more efficiently, with much lower elapsed time.
+
+      - Network congestion is reduced by reducing the number of packets
+        caused by TCP opens, and by allowing TCP sufficient time to
+        determine the congestion state of the network.
+
+      - Latency on subsequent requests is reduced since there is no time
+        spent in TCP's connection opening handshake.
+
+      - HTTP can evolve more gracefully, since errors can be reported
+        without the penalty of closing the TCP connection. Clients using
+        future versions of HTTP might optimistically try a new feature,
+        but if communicating with an older server, retry with old
+        semantics after an error is reported.
+
+   HTTP implementations SHOULD implement persistent connections.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 44]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+8.1.2 Overall Operation
+
+   A significant difference between HTTP/1.1 and earlier versions of
+   HTTP is that persistent connections are the default behavior of any
+   HTTP connection. That is, unless otherwise indicated, the client
+   SHOULD assume that the server will maintain a persistent connection,
+   even after error responses from the server.
+
+   Persistent connections provide a mechanism by which a client and a
+   server can signal the close of a TCP connection. This signaling takes
+   place using the Connection header field (section 14.10). Once a close
+   has been signaled, the client MUST NOT send any more requests on that
+   connection.
+
+8.1.2.1 Negotiation
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 server MAY assume that a HTTP/1.1 client intends to
+   maintain a persistent connection unless a Connection header including
+   the connection-token "close" was sent in the request. If the server
+   chooses to close the connection immediately after sending the
+   response, it SHOULD send a Connection header including the
+   connection-token close.
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 client MAY expect a connection to remain open, but would
+   decide to keep it open based on whether the response from a server
+   contains a Connection header with the connection-token close. In case
+   the client does not want to maintain a connection for more than that
+   request, it SHOULD send a Connection header including the
+   connection-token close.
+
+   If either the client or the server sends the close token in the
+   Connection header, that request becomes the last one for the
+   connection.
+
+   Clients and servers SHOULD NOT assume that a persistent connection is
+   maintained for HTTP versions less than 1.1 unless it is explicitly
+   signaled. See section 19.6.2 for more information on backward
+   compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients.
+
+   In order to remain persistent, all messages on the connection MUST
+   have a self-defined message length (i.e., one not defined by closure
+   of the connection), as described in section 4.4.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 45]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+8.1.2.2 Pipelining
+
+   A client that supports persistent connections MAY "pipeline" its
+   requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each
+   response). A server MUST send its responses to those requests in the
+   same order that the requests were received.
+
+   Clients which assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately
+   after connection establishment SHOULD be prepared to retry their
+   connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does
+   such a retry, it MUST NOT pipeline before it knows the connection is
+   persistent. Clients MUST also be prepared to resend their requests if
+   the server closes the connection before sending all of the
+   corresponding responses.
+
+   Clients SHOULD NOT pipeline requests using non-idempotent methods or
+   non-idempotent sequences of methods (see section 9.1.2). Otherwise, a
+   premature termination of the transport connection could lead to
+   indeterminate results. A client wishing to send a non-idempotent
+   request SHOULD wait to send that request until it has received the
+   response status for the previous request.
+
+8.1.3 Proxy Servers
+
+   It is especially important that proxies correctly implement the
+   properties of the Connection header field as specified in section
+   14.10.
+
+   The proxy server MUST signal persistent connections separately with
+   its clients and the origin servers (or other proxy servers) that it
+   connects to. Each persistent connection applies to only one transport
+   link.
+
+   A proxy server MUST NOT establish a HTTP/1.1 persistent connection
+   with an HTTP/1.0 client (but see RFC 2068 [33] for information and
+   discussion of the problems with the Keep-Alive header implemented by
+   many HTTP/1.0 clients).
+
+8.1.4 Practical Considerations
+
+   Servers will usually have some time-out value beyond which they will
+   no longer maintain an inactive connection. Proxy servers might make
+   this a higher value since it is likely that the client will be making
+   more connections through the same server. The use of persistent
+   connections places no requirements on the length (or existence) of
+   this time-out for either the client or the server.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 46]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   When a client or server wishes to time-out it SHOULD issue a graceful
+   close on the transport connection. Clients and servers SHOULD both
+   constantly watch for the other side of the transport close, and
+   respond to it as appropriate. If a client or server does not detect
+   the other side's close promptly it could cause unnecessary resource
+   drain on the network.
+
+   A client, server, or proxy MAY close the transport connection at any
+   time. For example, a client might have started to send a new request
+   at the same time that the server has decided to close the "idle"
+   connection. From the server's point of view, the connection is being
+   closed while it was idle, but from the client's point of view, a
+   request is in progress.
+
+   This means that clients, servers, and proxies MUST be able to recover
+   from asynchronous close events. Client software SHOULD reopen the
+   transport connection and retransmit the aborted sequence of requests
+   without user interaction so long as the request sequence is
+   idempotent (see section 9.1.2). Non-idempotent methods or sequences
+   MUST NOT be automatically retried, although user agents MAY offer a
+   human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by
+   user-agent software with semantic understanding of the application
+   MAY substitute for user confirmation. The automatic retry SHOULD NOT
+   be repeated if the second sequence of requests fails.
+
+   Servers SHOULD always respond to at least one request per connection,
+   if at all possible. Servers SHOULD NOT close a connection in the
+   middle of transmitting a response, unless a network or client failure
+   is suspected.
+
+   Clients that use persistent connections SHOULD limit the number of
+   simultaneous connections that they maintain to a given server. A
+   single-user client SHOULD NOT maintain more than 2 connections with
+   any server or proxy. A proxy SHOULD use up to 2*N connections to
+   another server or proxy, where N is the number of simultaneously
+   active users. These guidelines are intended to improve HTTP response
+   times and avoid congestion.
+
+8.2 Message Transmission Requirements
+
+8.2.1 Persistent Connections and Flow Control
+
+   HTTP/1.1 servers SHOULD maintain persistent connections and use TCP's
+   flow control mechanisms to resolve temporary overloads, rather than
+   terminating connections with the expectation that clients will retry.
+   The latter technique can exacerbate network congestion.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 47]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+8.2.2 Monitoring Connections for Error Status Messages
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 (or later) client sending a message-body SHOULD monitor
+   the network connection for an error status while it is transmitting
+   the request. If the client sees an error status, it SHOULD
+   immediately cease transmitting the body. If the body is being sent
+   using a "chunked" encoding (section 3.6), a zero length chunk and
+   empty trailer MAY be used to prematurely mark the end of the message.
+   If the body was preceded by a Content-Length header, the client MUST
+   close the connection.
+
+8.2.3 Use of the 100 (Continue) Status
+
+   The purpose of the 100 (Continue) status (see section 10.1.1) is to
+   allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body
+   to determine if the origin server is willing to accept the request
+   (based on the request headers) before the client sends the request
+   body. In some cases, it might either be inappropriate or highly
+   inefficient for the client to send the body if the server will reject
+   the message without looking at the body.
+
+   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 clients:
+
+      - If a client will wait for a 100 (Continue) response before
+        sending the request body, it MUST send an Expect request-header
+        field (section 14.20) with the "100-continue" expectation.
+
+      - A client MUST NOT send an Expect request-header field (section
+        14.20) with the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend
+        to send a request body.
+
+   Because of the presence of older implementations, the protocol allows
+   ambiguous situations in which a client may send "Expect: 100-
+   continue" without receiving either a 417 (Expectation Failed) status
+   or a 100 (Continue) status. Therefore, when a client sends this
+   header field to an origin server (possibly via a proxy) from which it
+   has never seen a 100 (Continue) status, the client SHOULD NOT wait
+   for an indefinite period before sending the request body.
+
+   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 origin servers:
+
+      - Upon receiving a request which includes an Expect request-header
+        field with the "100-continue" expectation, an origin server MUST
+        either respond with 100 (Continue) status and continue to read
+        from the input stream, or respond with a final status code. The
+        origin server MUST NOT wait for the request body before sending
+        the 100 (Continue) response. If it responds with a final status
+        code, it MAY close the transport connection or it MAY continue
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 48]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+        to read and discard the rest of the request.  It MUST NOT
+        perform the requested method if it returns a final status code.
+
+      - An origin server SHOULD NOT send a 100 (Continue) response if
+        the request message does not include an Expect request-header
+        field with the "100-continue" expectation, and MUST NOT send a
+        100 (Continue) response if such a request comes from an HTTP/1.0
+        (or earlier) client. There is an exception to this rule: for
+        compatibility with RFC 2068, a server MAY send a 100 (Continue)
+        status in response to an HTTP/1.1 PUT or POST request that does
+        not include an Expect request-header field with the "100-
+        continue" expectation. This exception, the purpose of which is
+        to minimize any client processing delays associated with an
+        undeclared wait for 100 (Continue) status, applies only to
+        HTTP/1.1 requests, and not to requests with any other HTTP-
+        version value.
+
+      - An origin server MAY omit a 100 (Continue) response if it has
+        already received some or all of the request body for the
+        corresponding request.
+
+      - An origin server that sends a 100 (Continue) response MUST
+        ultimately send a final status code, once the request body is
+        received and processed, unless it terminates the transport
+        connection prematurely.
+
+      - If an origin server receives a request that does not include an
+        Expect request-header field with the "100-continue" expectation,
+        the request includes a request body, and the server responds
+        with a final status code before reading the entire request body
+        from the transport connection, then the server SHOULD NOT close
+        the transport connection until it has read the entire request,
+        or until the client closes the connection. Otherwise, the client
+        might not reliably receive the response message. However, this
+        requirement is not be construed as preventing a server from
+        defending itself against denial-of-service attacks, or from
+        badly broken client implementations.
+
+   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 proxies:
+
+      - If a proxy receives a request that includes an Expect request-
+        header field with the "100-continue" expectation, and the proxy
+        either knows that the next-hop server complies with HTTP/1.1 or
+        higher, or does not know the HTTP version of the next-hop
+        server, it MUST forward the request, including the Expect header
+        field.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 49]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - If the proxy knows that the version of the next-hop server is
+        HTTP/1.0 or lower, it MUST NOT forward the request, and it MUST
+        respond with a 417 (Expectation Failed) status.
+
+      - Proxies SHOULD maintain a cache recording the HTTP version
+        numbers received from recently-referenced next-hop servers.
+
+      - A proxy MUST NOT forward a 100 (Continue) response if the
+        request message was received from an HTTP/1.0 (or earlier)
+        client and did not include an Expect request-header field with
+        the "100-continue" expectation. This requirement overrides the
+        general rule for forwarding of 1xx responses (see section 10.1).
+
+8.2.4 Client Behavior if Server Prematurely Closes Connection
+
+   If an HTTP/1.1 client sends a request which includes a request body,
+   but which does not include an Expect request-header field with the
+   "100-continue" expectation, and if the client is not directly
+   connected to an HTTP/1.1 origin server, and if the client sees the
+   connection close before receiving any status from the server, the
+   client SHOULD retry the request.  If the client does retry this
+   request, it MAY use the following "binary exponential backoff"
+   algorithm to be assured of obtaining a reliable response:
+
+      1. Initiate a new connection to the server
+
+      2. Transmit the request-headers
+
+      3. Initialize a variable R to the estimated round-trip time to the
+         server (e.g., based on the time it took to establish the
+         connection), or to a constant value of 5 seconds if the round-
+         trip time is not available.
+
+      4. Compute T = R * (2**N), where N is the number of previous
+         retries of this request.
+
+      5. Wait either for an error response from the server, or for T
+         seconds (whichever comes first)
+
+      6. If no error response is received, after T seconds transmit the
+         body of the request.
+
+      7. If client sees that the connection is closed prematurely,
+         repeat from step 1 until the request is accepted, an error
+         response is received, or the user becomes impatient and
+         terminates the retry process.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 50]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If at any point an error status is received, the client
+
+      - SHOULD NOT continue and
+
+      - SHOULD close the connection if it has not completed sending the
+        request message.
+
+9 Method Definitions
+
+   The set of common methods for HTTP/1.1 is defined below. Although
+   this set can be expanded, additional methods cannot be assumed to
+   share the same semantics for separately extended clients and servers.
+
+   The Host request-header field (section 14.23) MUST accompany all
+   HTTP/1.1 requests.
+
+9.1 Safe and Idempotent Methods
+
+9.1.1 Safe Methods
+
+   Implementors should be aware that the software represents the user in
+   their interactions over the Internet, and should be careful to allow
+   the user to be aware of any actions they might take which may have an
+   unexpected significance to themselves or others.
+
+   In particular, the convention has been established that the GET and
+   HEAD methods SHOULD NOT have the significance of taking an action
+   other than retrieval. These methods ought to be considered "safe".
+   This allows user agents to represent other methods, such as POST, PUT
+   and DELETE, in a special way, so that the user is made aware of the
+   fact that a possibly unsafe action is being requested.
+
+   Naturally, it is not possible to ensure that the server does not
+   generate side-effects as a result of performing a GET request; in
+   fact, some dynamic resources consider that a feature. The important
+   distinction here is that the user did not request the side-effects,
+   so therefore cannot be held accountable for them.
+
+9.1.2 Idempotent Methods
+
+   Methods can also have the property of "idempotence" in that (aside
+   from error or expiration issues) the side-effects of N > 0 identical
+   requests is the same as for a single request. The methods GET, HEAD,
+   PUT and DELETE share this property. Also, the methods OPTIONS and
+   TRACE SHOULD NOT have side effects, and so are inherently idempotent.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 51]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   However, it is possible that a sequence of several requests is non-
+   idempotent, even if all of the methods executed in that sequence are
+   idempotent. (A sequence is idempotent if a single execution of the
+   entire sequence always yields a result that is not changed by a
+   reexecution of all, or part, of that sequence.) For example, a
+   sequence is non-idempotent if its result depends on a value that is
+   later modified in the same sequence.
+
+   A sequence that never has side effects is idempotent, by definition
+   (provided that no concurrent operations are being executed on the
+   same set of resources).
+
+9.2 OPTIONS
+
+   The OPTIONS method represents a request for information about the
+   communication options available on the request/response chain
+   identified by the Request-URI. This method allows the client to
+   determine the options and/or requirements associated with a resource,
+   or the capabilities of a server, without implying a resource action
+   or initiating a resource retrieval.
+
+   Responses to this method are not cacheable.
+
+   If the OPTIONS request includes an entity-body (as indicated by the
+   presence of Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding), then the media type
+   MUST be indicated by a Content-Type field. Although this
+   specification does not define any use for such a body, future
+   extensions to HTTP might use the OPTIONS body to make more detailed
+   queries on the server. A server that does not support such an
+   extension MAY discard the request body.
+
+   If the Request-URI is an asterisk ("*"), the OPTIONS request is
+   intended to apply to the server in general rather than to a specific
+   resource. Since a server's communication options typically depend on
+   the resource, the "*" request is only useful as a "ping" or "no-op"
+   type of method; it does nothing beyond allowing the client to test
+   the capabilities of the server. For example, this can be used to test
+   a proxy for HTTP/1.1 compliance (or lack thereof).
+
+   If the Request-URI is not an asterisk, the OPTIONS request applies
+   only to the options that are available when communicating with that
+   resource.
+
+   A 200 response SHOULD include any header fields that indicate
+   optional features implemented by the server and applicable to that
+   resource (e.g., Allow), possibly including extensions not defined by
+   this specification. The response body, if any, SHOULD also include
+   information about the communication options. The format for such a
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 52]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   body is not defined by this specification, but might be defined by
+   future extensions to HTTP. Content negotiation MAY be used to select
+   the appropriate response format. If no response body is included, the
+   response MUST include a Content-Length field with a field-value of
+   "0".
+
+   The Max-Forwards request-header field MAY be used to target a
+   specific proxy in the request chain. When a proxy receives an OPTIONS
+   request on an absoluteURI for which request forwarding is permitted,
+   the proxy MUST check for a Max-Forwards field. If the Max-Forwards
+   field-value is zero ("0"), the proxy MUST NOT forward the message;
+   instead, the proxy SHOULD respond with its own communication options.
+   If the Max-Forwards field-value is an integer greater than zero, the
+   proxy MUST decrement the field-value when it forwards the request. If
+   no Max-Forwards field is present in the request, then the forwarded
+   request MUST NOT include a Max-Forwards field.
+
+9.3 GET
+
+   The GET method means retrieve whatever information (in the form of an
+   entity) is identified by the Request-URI. If the Request-URI refers
+   to a data-producing process, it is the produced data which shall be
+   returned as the entity in the response and not the source text of the
+   process, unless that text happens to be the output of the process.
+
+   The semantics of the GET method change to a "conditional GET" if the
+   request message includes an If-Modified-Since, If-Unmodified-Since,
+   If-Match, If-None-Match, or If-Range header field. A conditional GET
+   method requests that the entity be transferred only under the
+   circumstances described by the conditional header field(s). The
+   conditional GET method is intended to reduce unnecessary network
+   usage by allowing cached entities to be refreshed without requiring
+   multiple requests or transferring data already held by the client.
+
+   The semantics of the GET method change to a "partial GET" if the
+   request message includes a Range header field. A partial GET requests
+   that only part of the entity be transferred, as described in section
+   14.35. The partial GET method is intended to reduce unnecessary
+   network usage by allowing partially-retrieved entities to be
+   completed without transferring data already held by the client.
+
+   The response to a GET request is cacheable if and only if it meets
+   the requirements for HTTP caching described in section 13.
+
+   See section 15.1.3 for security considerations when used for forms.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 53]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+9.4 HEAD
+
+   The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT
+   return a message-body in the response. The metainformation contained
+   in the HTTP headers in response to a HEAD request SHOULD be identical
+   to the information sent in response to a GET request. This method can
+   be used for obtaining metainformation about the entity implied by the
+   request without transferring the entity-body itself. This method is
+   often used for testing hypertext links for validity, accessibility,
+   and recent modification.
+
+   The response to a HEAD request MAY be cacheable in the sense that the
+   information contained in the response MAY be used to update a
+   previously cached entity from that resource. If the new field values
+   indicate that the cached entity differs from the current entity (as
+   would be indicated by a change in Content-Length, Content-MD5, ETag
+   or Last-Modified), then the cache MUST treat the cache entry as
+   stale.
+
+9.5 POST
+
+   The POST method is used to request that the origin server accept the
+   entity enclosed in the request as a new subordinate of the resource
+   identified by the Request-URI in the Request-Line. POST is designed
+   to allow a uniform method to cover the following functions:
+
+      - Annotation of existing resources;
+
+      - Posting a message to a bulletin board, newsgroup, mailing list,
+        or similar group of articles;
+
+      - Providing a block of data, such as the result of submitting a
+        form, to a data-handling process;
+
+      - Extending a database through an append operation.
+
+   The actual function performed by the POST method is determined by the
+   server and is usually dependent on the Request-URI. The posted entity
+   is subordinate to that URI in the same way that a file is subordinate
+   to a directory containing it, a news article is subordinate to a
+   newsgroup to which it is posted, or a record is subordinate to a
+   database.
+
+   The action performed by the POST method might not result in a
+   resource that can be identified by a URI. In this case, either 200
+   (OK) or 204 (No Content) is the appropriate response status,
+   depending on whether or not the response includes an entity that
+   describes the result.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 54]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If a resource has been created on the origin server, the response
+   SHOULD be 201 (Created) and contain an entity which describes the
+   status of the request and refers to the new resource, and a Location
+   header (see section 14.30).
+
+   Responses to this method are not cacheable, unless the response
+   includes appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields. However,
+   the 303 (See Other) response can be used to direct the user agent to
+   retrieve a cacheable resource.
+
+   POST requests MUST obey the message transmission requirements set out
+   in section 8.2.
+
+   See section 15.1.3 for security considerations.
+
+9.6 PUT
+
+   The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the
+   supplied Request-URI. If the Request-URI refers to an already
+   existing resource, the enclosed entity SHOULD be considered as a
+   modified version of the one residing on the origin server. If the
+   Request-URI does not point to an existing resource, and that URI is
+   capable of being defined as a new resource by the requesting user
+   agent, the origin server can create the resource with that URI. If a
+   new resource is created, the origin server MUST inform the user agent
+   via the 201 (Created) response. If an existing resource is modified,
+   either the 200 (OK) or 204 (No Content) response codes SHOULD be sent
+   to indicate successful completion of the request. If the resource
+   could not be created or modified with the Request-URI, an appropriate
+   error response SHOULD be given that reflects the nature of the
+   problem. The recipient of the entity MUST NOT ignore any Content-*
+   (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does not understand or implement
+   and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.
+
+   If the request passes through a cache and the Request-URI identifies
+   one or more currently cached entities, those entries SHOULD be
+   treated as stale. Responses to this method are not cacheable.
+
+   The fundamental difference between the POST and PUT requests is
+   reflected in the different meaning of the Request-URI. The URI in a
+   POST request identifies the resource that will handle the enclosed
+   entity. That resource might be a data-accepting process, a gateway to
+   some other protocol, or a separate entity that accepts annotations.
+   In contrast, the URI in a PUT request identifies the entity enclosed
+   with the request -- the user agent knows what URI is intended and the
+   server MUST NOT attempt to apply the request to some other resource.
+   If the server desires that the request be applied to a different URI,
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 55]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   it MUST send a 301 (Moved Permanently) response; the user agent MAY
+   then make its own decision regarding whether or not to redirect the
+   request.
+
+   A single resource MAY be identified by many different URIs. For
+   example, an article might have a URI for identifying "the current
+   version" which is separate from the URI identifying each particular
+   version. In this case, a PUT request on a general URI might result in
+   several other URIs being defined by the origin server.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 does not define how a PUT method affects the state of an
+   origin server.
+
+   PUT requests MUST obey the message transmission requirements set out
+   in section 8.2.
+
+   Unless otherwise specified for a particular entity-header, the
+   entity-headers in the PUT request SHOULD be applied to the resource
+   created or modified by the PUT.
+
+9.7 DELETE
+
+   The DELETE method requests that the origin server delete the resource
+   identified by the Request-URI. This method MAY be overridden by human
+   intervention (or other means) on the origin server. The client cannot
+   be guaranteed that the operation has been carried out, even if the
+   status code returned from the origin server indicates that the action
+   has been completed successfully. However, the server SHOULD NOT
+   indicate success unless, at the time the response is given, it
+   intends to delete the resource or move it to an inaccessible
+   location.
+
+   A successful response SHOULD be 200 (OK) if the response includes an
+   entity describing the status, 202 (Accepted) if the action has not
+   yet been enacted, or 204 (No Content) if the action has been enacted
+   but the response does not include an entity.
+
+   If the request passes through a cache and the Request-URI identifies
+   one or more currently cached entities, those entries SHOULD be
+   treated as stale. Responses to this method are not cacheable.
+
+9.8 TRACE
+
+   The TRACE method is used to invoke a remote, application-layer loop-
+   back of the request message. The final recipient of the request
+   SHOULD reflect the message received back to the client as the
+   entity-body of a 200 (OK) response. The final recipient is either the
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 56]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   origin server or the first proxy or gateway to receive a Max-Forwards
+   value of zero (0) in the request (see section 14.31). A TRACE request
+   MUST NOT include an entity.
+
+   TRACE allows the client to see what is being received at the other
+   end of the request chain and use that data for testing or diagnostic
+   information. The value of the Via header field (section 14.45) is of
+   particular interest, since it acts as a trace of the request chain.
+   Use of the Max-Forwards header field allows the client to limit the
+   length of the request chain, which is useful for testing a chain of
+   proxies forwarding messages in an infinite loop.
+
+   If the request is valid, the response SHOULD contain the entire
+   request message in the entity-body, with a Content-Type of
+   "message/http". Responses to this method MUST NOT be cached.
+
+9.9 CONNECT
+
+   This specification reserves the method name CONNECT for use with a
+   proxy that can dynamically switch to being a tunnel (e.g. SSL
+   tunneling [44]).
+
+10 Status Code Definitions
+
+   Each Status-Code is described below, including a description of which
+   method(s) it can follow and any metainformation required in the
+   response.
+
+10.1 Informational 1xx
+
+   This class of status code indicates a provisional response,
+   consisting only of the Status-Line and optional headers, and is
+   terminated by an empty line. There are no required headers for this
+   class of status code. Since HTTP/1.0 did not define any 1xx status
+   codes, servers MUST NOT send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 client
+   except under experimental conditions.
+
+   A client MUST be prepared to accept one or more 1xx status responses
+   prior to a regular response, even if the client does not expect a 100
+   (Continue) status message. Unexpected 1xx status responses MAY be
+   ignored by a user agent.
+
+   Proxies MUST forward 1xx responses, unless the connection between the
+   proxy and its client has been closed, or unless the proxy itself
+   requested the generation of the 1xx response. (For example, if a
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 57]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   proxy adds a "Expect: 100-continue" field when it forwards a request,
+   then it need not forward the corresponding 100 (Continue)
+   response(s).)
+
+10.1.1 100 Continue
+
+   The client SHOULD continue with its request. This interim response is
+   used to inform the client that the initial part of the request has
+   been received and has not yet been rejected by the server. The client
+   SHOULD continue by sending the remainder of the request or, if the
+   request has already been completed, ignore this response. The server
+   MUST send a final response after the request has been completed. See
+   section 8.2.3 for detailed discussion of the use and handling of this
+   status code.
+
+10.1.2 101 Switching Protocols
+
+   The server understands and is willing to comply with the client's
+   request, via the Upgrade message header field (section 14.42), for a
+   change in the application protocol being used on this connection. The
+   server will switch protocols to those defined by the response's
+   Upgrade header field immediately after the empty line which
+   terminates the 101 response.
+
+   The protocol SHOULD be switched only when it is advantageous to do
+   so. For example, switching to a newer version of HTTP is advantageous
+   over older versions, and switching to a real-time, synchronous
+   protocol might be advantageous when delivering resources that use
+   such features.
+
+10.2 Successful 2xx
+
+   This class of status code indicates that the client's request was
+   successfully received, understood, and accepted.
+
+10.2.1 200 OK
+
+   The request has succeeded. The information returned with the response
+   is dependent on the method used in the request, for example:
+
+   GET    an entity corresponding to the requested resource is sent in
+          the response;
+
+   HEAD   the entity-header fields corresponding to the requested
+          resource are sent in the response without any message-body;
+
+   POST   an entity describing or containing the result of the action;
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 58]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   TRACE  an entity containing the request message as received by the
+          end server.
+
+10.2.2 201 Created
+
+   The request has been fulfilled and resulted in a new resource being
+   created. The newly created resource can be referenced by the URI(s)
+   returned in the entity of the response, with the most specific URI
+   for the resource given by a Location header field. The response
+   SHOULD include an entity containing a list of resource
+   characteristics and location(s) from which the user or user agent can
+   choose the one most appropriate. The entity format is specified by
+   the media type given in the Content-Type header field. The origin
+   server MUST create the resource before returning the 201 status code.
+   If the action cannot be carried out immediately, the server SHOULD
+   respond with 202 (Accepted) response instead.
+
+   A 201 response MAY contain an ETag response header field indicating
+   the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant just
+   created, see section 14.19.
+
+10.2.3 202 Accepted
+
+   The request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has
+   not been completed.  The request might or might not eventually be
+   acted upon, as it might be disallowed when processing actually takes
+   place. There is no facility for re-sending a status code from an
+   asynchronous operation such as this.
+
+   The 202 response is intentionally non-committal. Its purpose is to
+   allow a server to accept a request for some other process (perhaps a
+   batch-oriented process that is only run once per day) without
+   requiring that the user agent's connection to the server persist
+   until the process is completed. The entity returned with this
+   response SHOULD include an indication of the request's current status
+   and either a pointer to a status monitor or some estimate of when the
+   user can expect the request to be fulfilled.
+
+10.2.4 203 Non-Authoritative Information
+
+   The returned metainformation in the entity-header is not the
+   definitive set as available from the origin server, but is gathered
+   from a local or a third-party copy. The set presented MAY be a subset
+   or superset of the original version. For example, including local
+   annotation information about the resource might result in a superset
+   of the metainformation known by the origin server. Use of this
+   response code is not required and is only appropriate when the
+   response would otherwise be 200 (OK).
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 59]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.2.5 204 No Content
+
+   The server has fulfilled the request but does not need to return an
+   entity-body, and might want to return updated metainformation. The
+   response MAY include new or updated metainformation in the form of
+   entity-headers, which if present SHOULD be associated with the
+   requested variant.
+
+   If the client is a user agent, it SHOULD NOT change its document view
+   from that which caused the request to be sent. This response is
+   primarily intended to allow input for actions to take place without
+   causing a change to the user agent's active document view, although
+   any new or updated metainformation SHOULD be applied to the document
+   currently in the user agent's active view.
+
+   The 204 response MUST NOT include a message-body, and thus is always
+   terminated by the first empty line after the header fields.
+
+10.2.6 205 Reset Content
+
+   The server has fulfilled the request and the user agent SHOULD reset
+   the document view which caused the request to be sent. This response
+   is primarily intended to allow input for actions to take place via
+   user input, followed by a clearing of the form in which the input is
+   given so that the user can easily initiate another input action. The
+   response MUST NOT include an entity.
+
+10.2.7 206 Partial Content
+
+   The server has fulfilled the partial GET request for the resource.
+   The request MUST have included a Range header field (section 14.35)
+   indicating the desired range, and MAY have included an If-Range
+   header field (section 14.27) to make the request conditional.
+
+   The response MUST include the following header fields:
+
+      - Either a Content-Range header field (section 14.16) indicating
+        the range included with this response, or a multipart/byteranges
+        Content-Type including Content-Range fields for each part. If a
+        Content-Length header field is present in the response, its
+        value MUST match the actual number of OCTETs transmitted in the
+        message-body.
+
+      - Date
+
+      - ETag and/or Content-Location, if the header would have been sent
+        in a 200 response to the same request
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 60]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - Expires, Cache-Control, and/or Vary, if the field-value might
+        differ from that sent in any previous response for the same
+        variant
+
+   If the 206 response is the result of an If-Range request that used a
+   strong cache validator (see section 13.3.3), the response SHOULD NOT
+   include other entity-headers. If the response is the result of an
+   If-Range request that used a weak validator, the response MUST NOT
+   include other entity-headers; this prevents inconsistencies between
+   cached entity-bodies and updated headers. Otherwise, the response
+   MUST include all of the entity-headers that would have been returned
+   with a 200 (OK) response to the same request.
+
+   A cache MUST NOT combine a 206 response with other previously cached
+   content if the ETag or Last-Modified headers do not match exactly,
+   see 13.5.4.
+
+   A cache that does not support the Range and Content-Range headers
+   MUST NOT cache 206 (Partial) responses.
+
+10.3 Redirection 3xx
+
+   This class of status code indicates that further action needs to be
+   taken by the user agent in order to fulfill the request.  The action
+   required MAY be carried out by the user agent without interaction
+   with the user if and only if the method used in the second request is
+   GET or HEAD. A client SHOULD detect infinite redirection loops, since
+   such loops generate network traffic for each redirection.
+
+      Note: previous versions of this specification recommended a
+      maximum of five redirections. Content developers should be aware
+      that there might be clients that implement such a fixed
+      limitation.
+
+10.3.1 300 Multiple Choices
+
+   The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of
+   representations, each with its own specific location, and agent-
+   driven negotiation information (section 12) is being provided so that
+   the user (or user agent) can select a preferred representation and
+   redirect its request to that location.
+
+   Unless it was a HEAD request, the response SHOULD include an entity
+   containing a list of resource characteristics and location(s) from
+   which the user or user agent can choose the one most appropriate. The
+   entity format is specified by the media type given in the Content-
+   Type header field. Depending upon the format and the capabilities of
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 61]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   the user agent, selection of the most appropriate choice MAY be
+   performed automatically. However, this specification does not define
+   any standard for such automatic selection.
+
+   If the server has a preferred choice of representation, it SHOULD
+   include the specific URI for that representation in the Location
+   field; user agents MAY use the Location field value for automatic
+   redirection. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.
+
+10.3.2 301 Moved Permanently
+
+   The requested resource has been assigned a new permanent URI and any
+   future references to this resource SHOULD use one of the returned
+   URIs.  Clients with link editing capabilities ought to automatically
+   re-link references to the Request-URI to one or more of the new
+   references returned by the server, where possible. This response is
+   cacheable unless indicated otherwise.
+
+   The new permanent URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
+   response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the
+   response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to
+   the new URI(s).
+
+   If the 301 status code is received in response to a request other
+   than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the
+   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
+   change the conditions under which the request was issued.
+
+      Note: When automatically redirecting a POST request after
+      receiving a 301 status code, some existing HTTP/1.0 user agents
+      will erroneously change it into a GET request.
+
+10.3.3 302 Found
+
+   The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI.
+   Since the redirection might be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD
+   continue to use the Request-URI for future requests.  This response
+   is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header
+   field.
+
+   The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
+   response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the
+   response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to
+   the new URI(s).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 62]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If the 302 status code is received in response to a request other
+   than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the
+   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
+   change the conditions under which the request was issued.
+
+      Note: RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 specify that the client is not allowed
+      to change the method on the redirected request.  However, most
+      existing user agent implementations treat 302 as if it were a 303
+      response, performing a GET on the Location field-value regardless
+      of the original request method. The status codes 303 and 307 have
+      been added for servers that wish to make unambiguously clear which
+      kind of reaction is expected of the client.
+
+10.3.4 303 See Other
+
+   The response to the request can be found under a different URI and
+   SHOULD be retrieved using a GET method on that resource. This method
+   exists primarily to allow the output of a POST-activated script to
+   redirect the user agent to a selected resource. The new URI is not a
+   substitute reference for the originally requested resource. The 303
+   response MUST NOT be cached, but the response to the second
+   (redirected) request might be cacheable.
+
+   The different URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
+   response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the
+   response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to
+   the new URI(s).
+
+      Note: Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand the 303
+      status. When interoperability with such clients is a concern, the
+      302 status code may be used instead, since most user agents react
+      to a 302 response as described here for 303.
+
+10.3.5 304 Not Modified
+
+   If the client has performed a conditional GET request and access is
+   allowed, but the document has not been modified, the server SHOULD
+   respond with this status code. The 304 response MUST NOT contain a
+   message-body, and thus is always terminated by the first empty line
+   after the header fields.
+
+   The response MUST include the following header fields:
+
+      - Date, unless its omission is required by section 14.18.1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 63]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If a clockless origin server obeys these rules, and proxies and
+   clients add their own Date to any response received without one (as
+   already specified by [RFC 2068], section 14.19), caches will operate
+   correctly.
+
+      - ETag and/or Content-Location, if the header would have been sent
+        in a 200 response to the same request
+
+      - Expires, Cache-Control, and/or Vary, if the field-value might
+        differ from that sent in any previous response for the same
+        variant
+
+   If the conditional GET used a strong cache validator (see section
+   13.3.3), the response SHOULD NOT include other entity-headers.
+   Otherwise (i.e., the conditional GET used a weak validator), the
+   response MUST NOT include other entity-headers; this prevents
+   inconsistencies between cached entity-bodies and updated headers.
+
+   If a 304 response indicates an entity not currently cached, then the
+   cache MUST disregard the response and repeat the request without the
+   conditional.
+
+   If a cache uses a received 304 response to update a cache entry, the
+   cache MUST update the entry to reflect any new field values given in
+   the response.
+
+10.3.6 305 Use Proxy
+
+   The requested resource MUST be accessed through the proxy given by
+   the Location field. The Location field gives the URI of the proxy.
+   The recipient is expected to repeat this single request via the
+   proxy. 305 responses MUST only be generated by origin servers.
+
+      Note: RFC 2068 was not clear that 305 was intended to redirect a
+      single request, and to be generated by origin servers only.  Not
+      observing these limitations has significant security consequences.
+
+10.3.7 306 (Unused)
+
+   The 306 status code was used in a previous version of the
+   specification, is no longer used, and the code is reserved.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 64]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.3.8 307 Temporary Redirect
+
+   The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI.
+   Since the redirection MAY be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD
+   continue to use the Request-URI for future requests.  This response
+   is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header
+   field.
+
+   The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
+   response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the
+   response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to
+   the new URI(s) , since many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not
+   understand the 307 status. Therefore, the note SHOULD contain the
+   information necessary for a user to repeat the original request on
+   the new URI.
+
+   If the 307 status code is received in response to a request other
+   than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the
+   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
+   change the conditions under which the request was issued.
+
+10.4 Client Error 4xx
+
+   The 4xx class of status code is intended for cases in which the
+   client seems to have erred. Except when responding to a HEAD request,
+   the server SHOULD include an entity containing an explanation of the
+   error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent
+   condition. These status codes are applicable to any request method.
+   User agents SHOULD display any included entity to the user.
+
+   If the client is sending data, a server implementation using TCP
+   SHOULD be careful to ensure that the client acknowledges receipt of
+   the packet(s) containing the response, before the server closes the
+   input connection. If the client continues sending data to the server
+   after the close, the server's TCP stack will send a reset packet to
+   the client, which may erase the client's unacknowledged input buffers
+   before they can be read and interpreted by the HTTP application.
+
+10.4.1 400 Bad Request
+
+   The request could not be understood by the server due to malformed
+   syntax. The client SHOULD NOT repeat the request without
+   modifications.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 65]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.4.2 401 Unauthorized
+
+   The request requires user authentication. The response MUST include a
+   WWW-Authenticate header field (section 14.47) containing a challenge
+   applicable to the requested resource. The client MAY repeat the
+   request with a suitable Authorization header field (section 14.8). If
+   the request already included Authorization credentials, then the 401
+   response indicates that authorization has been refused for those
+   credentials. If the 401 response contains the same challenge as the
+   prior response, and the user agent has already attempted
+   authentication at least once, then the user SHOULD be presented the
+   entity that was given in the response, since that entity might
+   include relevant diagnostic information. HTTP access authentication
+   is explained in "HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access
+   Authentication" [43].
+
+10.4.3 402 Payment Required
+
+   This code is reserved for future use.
+
+10.4.4 403 Forbidden
+
+   The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
+   Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated.
+   If the request method was not HEAD and the server wishes to make
+   public why the request has not been fulfilled, it SHOULD describe the
+   reason for the refusal in the entity.  If the server does not wish to
+   make this information available to the client, the status code 404
+   (Not Found) can be used instead.
+
+10.4.5 404 Not Found
+
+   The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No
+   indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or
+   permanent. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server
+   knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old
+   resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
+   This status code is commonly used when the server does not wish to
+   reveal exactly why the request has been refused, or when no other
+   response is applicable.
+
+10.4.6 405 Method Not Allowed
+
+   The method specified in the Request-Line is not allowed for the
+   resource identified by the Request-URI. The response MUST include an
+   Allow header containing a list of valid methods for the requested
+   resource.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 66]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.4.7 406 Not Acceptable
+
+   The resource identified by the request is only capable of generating
+   response entities which have content characteristics not acceptable
+   according to the accept headers sent in the request.
+
+   Unless it was a HEAD request, the response SHOULD include an entity
+   containing a list of available entity characteristics and location(s)
+   from which the user or user agent can choose the one most
+   appropriate. The entity format is specified by the media type given
+   in the Content-Type header field. Depending upon the format and the
+   capabilities of the user agent, selection of the most appropriate
+   choice MAY be performed automatically. However, this specification
+   does not define any standard for such automatic selection.
+
+      Note: HTTP/1.1 servers are allowed to return responses which are
+      not acceptable according to the accept headers sent in the
+      request. In some cases, this may even be preferable to sending a
+      406 response. User agents are encouraged to inspect the headers of
+      an incoming response to determine if it is acceptable.
+
+   If the response could be unacceptable, a user agent SHOULD
+   temporarily stop receipt of more data and query the user for a
+   decision on further actions.
+
+10.4.8 407 Proxy Authentication Required
+
+   This code is similar to 401 (Unauthorized), but indicates that the
+   client must first authenticate itself with the proxy. The proxy MUST
+   return a Proxy-Authenticate header field (section 14.33) containing a
+   challenge applicable to the proxy for the requested resource. The
+   client MAY repeat the request with a suitable Proxy-Authorization
+   header field (section 14.34). HTTP access authentication is explained
+   in "HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication"
+   [43].
+
+10.4.9 408 Request Timeout
+
+   The client did not produce a request within the time that the server
+   was prepared to wait. The client MAY repeat the request without
+   modifications at any later time.
+
+10.4.10 409 Conflict
+
+   The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current
+   state of the resource. This code is only allowed in situations where
+   it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict
+   and resubmit the request. The response body SHOULD include enough
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 67]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   information for the user to recognize the source of the conflict.
+   Ideally, the response entity would include enough information for the
+   user or user agent to fix the problem; however, that might not be
+   possible and is not required.
+
+   Conflicts are most likely to occur in response to a PUT request. For
+   example, if versioning were being used and the entity being PUT
+   included changes to a resource which conflict with those made by an
+   earlier (third-party) request, the server might use the 409 response
+   to indicate that it can't complete the request. In this case, the
+   response entity would likely contain a list of the differences
+   between the two versions in a format defined by the response
+   Content-Type.
+
+10.4.11 410 Gone
+
+   The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no
+   forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be
+   considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD
+   delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the
+   server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not
+   the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be
+   used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.
+
+   The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web
+   maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is
+   intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that
+   remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for
+   limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to
+   individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not
+   necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as "gone" or
+   to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the
+   discretion of the server owner.
+
+10.4.12 411 Length Required
+
+   The server refuses to accept the request without a defined Content-
+   Length. The client MAY repeat the request if it adds a valid
+   Content-Length header field containing the length of the message-body
+   in the request message.
+
+10.4.13 412 Precondition Failed
+
+   The precondition given in one or more of the request-header fields
+   evaluated to false when it was tested on the server. This response
+   code allows the client to place preconditions on the current resource
+   metainformation (header field data) and thus prevent the requested
+   method from being applied to a resource other than the one intended.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 68]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.4.14 413 Request Entity Too Large
+
+   The server is refusing to process a request because the request
+   entity is larger than the server is willing or able to process. The
+   server MAY close the connection to prevent the client from continuing
+   the request.
+
+   If the condition is temporary, the server SHOULD include a Retry-
+   After header field to indicate that it is temporary and after what
+   time the client MAY try again.
+
+10.4.15 414 Request-URI Too Long
+
+   The server is refusing to service the request because the Request-URI
+   is longer than the server is willing to interpret. This rare
+   condition is only likely to occur when a client has improperly
+   converted a POST request to a GET request with long query
+   information, when the client has descended into a URI "black hole" of
+   redirection (e.g., a redirected URI prefix that points to a suffix of
+   itself), or when the server is under attack by a client attempting to
+   exploit security holes present in some servers using fixed-length
+   buffers for reading or manipulating the Request-URI.
+
+10.4.16 415 Unsupported Media Type
+
+   The server is refusing to service the request because the entity of
+   the request is in a format not supported by the requested resource
+   for the requested method.
+
+10.4.17 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
+
+   A server SHOULD return a response with this status code if a request
+   included a Range request-header field (section 14.35), and none of
+   the range-specifier values in this field overlap the current extent
+   of the selected resource, and the request did not include an If-Range
+   request-header field. (For byte-ranges, this means that the first-
+   byte-pos of all of the byte-range-spec values were greater than the
+   current length of the selected resource.)
+
+   When this status code is returned for a byte-range request, the
+   response SHOULD include a Content-Range entity-header field
+   specifying the current length of the selected resource (see section
+   14.16). This response MUST NOT use the multipart/byteranges content-
+   type.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 69]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.4.18 417 Expectation Failed
+
+   The expectation given in an Expect request-header field (see section
+   14.20) could not be met by this server, or, if the server is a proxy,
+   the server has unambiguous evidence that the request could not be met
+   by the next-hop server.
+
+10.5 Server Error 5xx
+
+   Response status codes beginning with the digit "5" indicate cases in
+   which the server is aware that it has erred or is incapable of
+   performing the request. Except when responding to a HEAD request, the
+   server SHOULD include an entity containing an explanation of the
+   error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent
+   condition. User agents SHOULD display any included entity to the
+   user. These response codes are applicable to any request method.
+
+10.5.1 500 Internal Server Error
+
+   The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it
+   from fulfilling the request.
+
+10.5.2 501 Not Implemented
+
+   The server does not support the functionality required to fulfill the
+   request. This is the appropriate response when the server does not
+   recognize the request method and is not capable of supporting it for
+   any resource.
+
+10.5.3 502 Bad Gateway
+
+   The server, while acting as a gateway or proxy, received an invalid
+   response from the upstream server it accessed in attempting to
+   fulfill the request.
+
+10.5.4 503 Service Unavailable
+
+   The server is currently unable to handle the request due to a
+   temporary overloading or maintenance of the server. The implication
+   is that this is a temporary condition which will be alleviated after
+   some delay. If known, the length of the delay MAY be indicated in a
+   Retry-After header. If no Retry-After is given, the client SHOULD
+   handle the response as it would for a 500 response.
+
+     Note: The existence of the 503 status code does not imply that a
+     server must use it when becoming overloaded. Some servers may wish
+     to simply refuse the connection.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 70]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+10.5.5 504 Gateway Timeout
+
+   The server, while acting as a gateway or proxy, did not receive a
+   timely response from the upstream server specified by the URI (e.g.
+   HTTP, FTP, LDAP) or some other auxiliary server (e.g. DNS) it needed
+   to access in attempting to complete the request.
+
+      Note: Note to implementors: some deployed proxies are known to
+      return 400 or 500 when DNS lookups time out.
+
+10.5.6 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
+
+   The server does not support, or refuses to support, the HTTP protocol
+   version that was used in the request message. The server is
+   indicating that it is unable or unwilling to complete the request
+   using the same major version as the client, as described in section
+   3.1, other than with this error message. The response SHOULD contain
+   an entity describing why that version is not supported and what other
+   protocols are supported by that server.
+
+11 Access Authentication
+
+   HTTP provides several OPTIONAL challenge-response authentication
+   mechanisms which can be used by a server to challenge a client
+   request and by a client to provide authentication information. The
+   general framework for access authentication, and the specification of
+   "basic" and "digest" authentication, are specified in "HTTP
+   Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" [43]. This
+   specification adopts the definitions of "challenge" and "credentials"
+   from that specification.
+
+12 Content Negotiation
+
+   Most HTTP responses include an entity which contains information for
+   interpretation by a human user. Naturally, it is desirable to supply
+   the user with the "best available" entity corresponding to the
+   request. Unfortunately for servers and caches, not all users have the
+   same preferences for what is "best," and not all user agents are
+   equally capable of rendering all entity types. For that reason, HTTP
+   has provisions for several mechanisms for "content negotiation" --
+   the process of selecting the best representation for a given response
+   when there are multiple representations available.
+
+      Note: This is not called "format negotiation" because the
+      alternate representations may be of the same media type, but use
+      different capabilities of that type, be in different languages,
+      etc.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 71]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Any response containing an entity-body MAY be subject to negotiation,
+   including error responses.
+
+   There are two kinds of content negotiation which are possible in
+   HTTP: server-driven and agent-driven negotiation. These two kinds of
+   negotiation are orthogonal and thus may be used separately or in
+   combination. One method of combination, referred to as transparent
+   negotiation, occurs when a cache uses the agent-driven negotiation
+   information provided by the origin server in order to provide
+   server-driven negotiation for subsequent requests.
+
+12.1 Server-driven Negotiation
+
+   If the selection of the best representation for a response is made by
+   an algorithm located at the server, it is called server-driven
+   negotiation. Selection is based on the available representations of
+   the response (the dimensions over which it can vary; e.g. language,
+   content-coding, etc.) and the contents of particular header fields in
+   the request message or on other information pertaining to the request
+   (such as the network address of the client).
+
+   Server-driven negotiation is advantageous when the algorithm for
+   selecting from among the available representations is difficult to
+   describe to the user agent, or when the server desires to send its
+   "best guess" to the client along with the first response (hoping to
+   avoid the round-trip delay of a subsequent request if the "best
+   guess" is good enough for the user). In order to improve the server's
+   guess, the user agent MAY include request header fields (Accept,
+   Accept-Language, Accept-Encoding, etc.) which describe its
+   preferences for such a response.
+
+   Server-driven negotiation has disadvantages:
+
+      1. It is impossible for the server to accurately determine what
+         might be "best" for any given user, since that would require
+         complete knowledge of both the capabilities of the user agent
+         and the intended use for the response (e.g., does the user want
+         to view it on screen or print it on paper?).
+
+      2. Having the user agent describe its capabilities in every
+         request can be both very inefficient (given that only a small
+         percentage of responses have multiple representations) and a
+         potential violation of the user's privacy.
+
+      3. It complicates the implementation of an origin server and the
+         algorithms for generating responses to a request.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 72]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      4. It may limit a public cache's ability to use the same response
+         for multiple user's requests.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 includes the following request-header fields for enabling
+   server-driven negotiation through description of user agent
+   capabilities and user preferences: Accept (section 14.1), Accept-
+   Charset (section 14.2), Accept-Encoding (section 14.3), Accept-
+   Language (section 14.4), and User-Agent (section 14.43). However, an
+   origin server is not limited to these dimensions and MAY vary the
+   response based on any aspect of the request, including information
+   outside the request-header fields or within extension header fields
+   not defined by this specification.
+
+   The Vary  header field can be used to express the parameters the
+   server uses to select a representation that is subject to server-
+   driven negotiation. See section 13.6 for use of the Vary header field
+   by caches and section 14.44 for use of the Vary header field by
+   servers.
+
+12.2 Agent-driven Negotiation
+
+   With agent-driven negotiation, selection of the best representation
+   for a response is performed by the user agent after receiving an
+   initial response from the origin server. Selection is based on a list
+   of the available representations of the response included within the
+   header fields or entity-body of the initial response, with each
+   representation identified by its own URI. Selection from among the
+   representations may be performed automatically (if the user agent is
+   capable of doing so) or manually by the user selecting from a
+   generated (possibly hypertext) menu.
+
+   Agent-driven negotiation is advantageous when the response would vary
+   over commonly-used dimensions (such as type, language, or encoding),
+   when the origin server is unable to determine a user agent's
+   capabilities from examining the request, and generally when public
+   caches are used to distribute server load and reduce network usage.
+
+   Agent-driven negotiation suffers from the disadvantage of needing a
+   second request to obtain the best alternate representation. This
+   second request is only efficient when caching is used. In addition,
+   this specification does not define any mechanism for supporting
+   automatic selection, though it also does not prevent any such
+   mechanism from being developed as an extension and used within
+   HTTP/1.1.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 73]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   HTTP/1.1 defines the 300 (Multiple Choices) and 406 (Not Acceptable)
+   status codes for enabling agent-driven negotiation when the server is
+   unwilling or unable to provide a varying response using server-driven
+   negotiation.
+
+12.3 Transparent Negotiation
+
+   Transparent negotiation is a combination of both server-driven and
+   agent-driven negotiation. When a cache is supplied with a form of the
+   list of available representations of the response (as in agent-driven
+   negotiation) and the dimensions of variance are completely understood
+   by the cache, then the cache becomes capable of performing server-
+   driven negotiation on behalf of the origin server for subsequent
+   requests on that resource.
+
+   Transparent negotiation has the advantage of distributing the
+   negotiation work that would otherwise be required of the origin
+   server and also removing the second request delay of agent-driven
+   negotiation when the cache is able to correctly guess the right
+   response.
+
+   This specification does not define any mechanism for transparent
+   negotiation, though it also does not prevent any such mechanism from
+   being developed as an extension that could be used within HTTP/1.1.
+
+13 Caching in HTTP
+
+   HTTP is typically used for distributed information systems, where
+   performance can be improved by the use of response caches. The
+   HTTP/1.1 protocol includes a number of elements intended to make
+   caching work as well as possible. Because these elements are
+   inextricable from other aspects of the protocol, and because they
+   interact with each other, it is useful to describe the basic caching
+   design of HTTP separately from the detailed descriptions of methods,
+   headers, response codes, etc.
+
+   Caching would be useless if it did not significantly improve
+   performance. The goal of caching in HTTP/1.1 is to eliminate the need
+   to send requests in many cases, and to eliminate the need to send
+   full responses in many other cases. The former reduces the number of
+   network round-trips required for many operations; we use an
+   "expiration" mechanism for this purpose (see section 13.2). The
+   latter reduces network bandwidth requirements; we use a "validation"
+   mechanism for this purpose (see section 13.3).
+
+   Requirements for performance, availability, and disconnected
+   operation require us to be able to relax the goal of semantic
+   transparency. The HTTP/1.1 protocol allows origin servers, caches,
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 74]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   and clients to explicitly reduce transparency when necessary.
+   However, because non-transparent operation may confuse non-expert
+   users, and might be incompatible with certain server applications
+   (such as those for ordering merchandise), the protocol requires that
+   transparency be relaxed
+
+      - only by an explicit protocol-level request when relaxed by
+        client or origin server
+
+      - only with an explicit warning to the end user when relaxed by
+        cache or client
+
+   Therefore, the HTTP/1.1 protocol provides these important elements:
+
+      1. Protocol features that provide full semantic transparency when
+         this is required by all parties.
+
+      2. Protocol features that allow an origin server or user agent to
+         explicitly request and control non-transparent operation.
+
+      3. Protocol features that allow a cache to attach warnings to
+         responses that do not preserve the requested approximation of
+         semantic transparency.
+
+   A basic principle is that it must be possible for the clients to
+   detect any potential relaxation of semantic transparency.
+
+      Note: The server, cache, or client implementor might be faced with
+      design decisions not explicitly discussed in this specification.
+      If a decision might affect semantic transparency, the implementor
+      ought to err on the side of maintaining transparency unless a
+      careful and complete analysis shows significant benefits in
+      breaking transparency.
+
+13.1.1 Cache Correctness
+
+   A correct cache MUST respond to a request with the most up-to-date
+   response held by the cache that is appropriate to the request (see
+   sections 13.2.5, 13.2.6, and 13.12) which meets one of the following
+   conditions:
+
+      1. It has been checked for equivalence with what the origin server
+         would have returned by revalidating the response with the
+         origin server (section 13.3);
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 75]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      2. It is "fresh enough" (see section 13.2). In the default case,
+         this means it meets the least restrictive freshness requirement
+         of the client, origin server, and cache (see section 14.9); if
+         the origin server so specifies, it is the freshness requirement
+         of the origin server alone.
+
+         If a stored response is not "fresh enough" by the most
+         restrictive freshness requirement of both the client and the
+         origin server, in carefully considered circumstances the cache
+         MAY still return the response with the appropriate Warning
+         header (see section 13.1.5 and 14.46), unless such a response
+         is prohibited (e.g., by a "no-store" cache-directive, or by a
+         "no-cache" cache-request-directive; see section 14.9).
+
+      3. It is an appropriate 304 (Not Modified), 305 (Proxy Redirect),
+         or error (4xx or 5xx) response message.
+
+   If the cache can not communicate with the origin server, then a
+   correct cache SHOULD respond as above if the response can be
+   correctly served from the cache; if not it MUST return an error or
+   warning indicating that there was a communication failure.
+
+   If a cache receives a response (either an entire response, or a 304
+   (Not Modified) response) that it would normally forward to the
+   requesting client, and the received response is no longer fresh, the
+   cache SHOULD forward it to the requesting client without adding a new
+   Warning (but without removing any existing Warning headers). A cache
+   SHOULD NOT attempt to revalidate a response simply because that
+   response became stale in transit; this might lead to an infinite
+   loop. A user agent that receives a stale response without a Warning
+   MAY display a warning indication to the user.
+
+13.1.2 Warnings
+
+   Whenever a cache returns a response that is neither first-hand nor
+   "fresh enough" (in the sense of condition 2 in section 13.1.1), it
+   MUST attach a warning to that effect, using a Warning general-header.
+   The Warning header and the currently defined warnings are described
+   in section 14.46. The warning allows clients to take appropriate
+   action.
+
+   Warnings MAY be used for other purposes, both cache-related and
+   otherwise. The use of a warning, rather than an error status code,
+   distinguish these responses from true failures.
+
+   Warnings are assigned three digit warn-codes. The first digit
+   indicates whether the Warning MUST or MUST NOT be deleted from a
+   stored cache entry after a successful revalidation:
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 76]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   1xx  Warnings that describe the freshness or revalidation status of
+     the response, and so MUST be deleted after a successful
+     revalidation. 1XX warn-codes MAY be generated by a cache only when
+     validating a cached entry. It MUST NOT be generated by clients.
+
+   2xx  Warnings that describe some aspect of the entity body or entity
+     headers that is not rectified by a revalidation (for example, a
+     lossy compression of the entity bodies) and which MUST NOT be
+     deleted after a successful revalidation.
+
+   See section 14.46 for the definitions of the codes themselves.
+
+   HTTP/1.0 caches will cache all Warnings in responses, without
+   deleting the ones in the first category. Warnings in responses that
+   are passed to HTTP/1.0 caches carry an extra warning-date field,
+   which prevents a future HTTP/1.1 recipient from believing an
+   erroneously cached Warning.
+
+   Warnings also carry a warning text. The text MAY be in any
+   appropriate natural language (perhaps based on the client's Accept
+   headers), and include an OPTIONAL indication of what character set is
+   used.
+
+   Multiple warnings MAY be attached to a response (either by the origin
+   server or by a cache), including multiple warnings with the same code
+   number. For example, a server might provide the same warning with
+   texts in both English and Basque.
+
+   When multiple warnings are attached to a response, it might not be
+   practical or reasonable to display all of them to the user. This
+   version of HTTP does not specify strict priority rules for deciding
+   which warnings to display and in what order, but does suggest some
+   heuristics.
+
+13.1.3 Cache-control Mechanisms
+
+   The basic cache mechanisms in HTTP/1.1 (server-specified expiration
+   times and validators) are implicit directives to caches. In some
+   cases, a server or client might need to provide explicit directives
+   to the HTTP caches. We use the Cache-Control header for this purpose.
+
+   The Cache-Control header allows a client or server to transmit a
+   variety of directives in either requests or responses. These
+   directives typically override the default caching algorithms. As a
+   general rule, if there is any apparent conflict between header
+   values, the most restrictive interpretation is applied (that is, the
+   one that is most likely to preserve semantic transparency). However,
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 77]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   in some cases, cache-control directives are explicitly specified as
+   weakening the approximation of semantic transparency (for example,
+   "max-stale" or "public").
+
+   The cache-control directives are described in detail in section 14.9.
+
+13.1.4 Explicit User Agent Warnings
+
+   Many user agents make it possible for users to override the basic
+   caching mechanisms. For example, the user agent might allow the user
+   to specify that cached entities (even explicitly stale ones) are
+   never validated. Or the user agent might habitually add "Cache-
+   Control: max-stale=3600" to every request. The user agent SHOULD NOT
+   default to either non-transparent behavior, or behavior that results
+   in abnormally ineffective caching, but MAY be explicitly configured
+   to do so by an explicit action of the user.
+
+   If the user has overridden the basic caching mechanisms, the user
+   agent SHOULD explicitly indicate to the user whenever this results in
+   the display of information that might not meet the server's
+   transparency requirements (in particular, if the displayed entity is
+   known to be stale). Since the protocol normally allows the user agent
+   to determine if responses are stale or not, this indication need only
+   be displayed when this actually happens. The indication need not be a
+   dialog box; it could be an icon (for example, a picture of a rotting
+   fish) or some other indicator.
+
+   If the user has overridden the caching mechanisms in a way that would
+   abnormally reduce the effectiveness of caches, the user agent SHOULD
+   continually indicate this state to the user (for example, by a
+   display of a picture of currency in flames) so that the user does not
+   inadvertently consume excess resources or suffer from excessive
+   latency.
+
+13.1.5 Exceptions to the Rules and Warnings
+
+   In some cases, the operator of a cache MAY choose to configure it to
+   return stale responses even when not requested by clients. This
+   decision ought not be made lightly, but may be necessary for reasons
+   of availability or performance, especially when the cache is poorly
+   connected to the origin server. Whenever a cache returns a stale
+   response, it MUST mark it as such (using a Warning header) enabling
+   the client software to alert the user that there might be a potential
+   problem.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 78]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   It also allows the user agent to take steps to obtain a first-hand or
+   fresh response. For this reason, a cache SHOULD NOT return a stale
+   response if the client explicitly requests a first-hand or fresh one,
+   unless it is impossible to comply for technical or policy reasons.
+
+13.1.6 Client-controlled Behavior
+
+   While the origin server (and to a lesser extent, intermediate caches,
+   by their contribution to the age of a response) are the primary
+   source of expiration information, in some cases the client might need
+   to control a cache's decision about whether to return a cached
+   response without validating it. Clients do this using several
+   directives of the Cache-Control header.
+
+   A client's request MAY specify the maximum age it is willing to
+   accept of an unvalidated response; specifying a value of zero forces
+   the cache(s) to revalidate all responses. A client MAY also specify
+   the minimum time remaining before a response expires. Both of these
+   options increase constraints on the behavior of caches, and so cannot
+   further relax the cache's approximation of semantic transparency.
+
+   A client MAY also specify that it will accept stale responses, up to
+   some maximum amount of staleness. This loosens the constraints on the
+   caches, and so might violate the origin server's specified
+   constraints on semantic transparency, but might be necessary to
+   support disconnected operation, or high availability in the face of
+   poor connectivity.
+
+13.2 Expiration Model
+
+13.2.1 Server-Specified Expiration
+
+   HTTP caching works best when caches can entirely avoid making
+   requests to the origin server. The primary mechanism for avoiding
+   requests is for an origin server to provide an explicit expiration
+   time in the future, indicating that a response MAY be used to satisfy
+   subsequent requests. In other words, a cache can return a fresh
+   response without first contacting the server.
+
+   Our expectation is that servers will assign future explicit
+   expiration times to responses in the belief that the entity is not
+   likely to change, in a semantically significant way, before the
+   expiration time is reached. This normally preserves semantic
+   transparency, as long as the server's expiration times are carefully
+   chosen.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 79]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The expiration mechanism applies only to responses taken from a cache
+   and not to first-hand responses forwarded immediately to the
+   requesting client.
+
+   If an origin server wishes to force a semantically transparent cache
+   to validate every request, it MAY assign an explicit expiration time
+   in the past. This means that the response is always stale, and so the
+   cache SHOULD validate it before using it for subsequent requests. See
+   section 14.9.4 for a more restrictive way to force revalidation.
+
+   If an origin server wishes to force any HTTP/1.1 cache, no matter how
+   it is configured, to validate every request, it SHOULD use the "must-
+   revalidate" cache-control directive (see section 14.9).
+
+   Servers specify explicit expiration times using either the Expires
+   header, or the max-age directive of the Cache-Control header.
+
+   An expiration time cannot be used to force a user agent to refresh
+   its display or reload a resource; its semantics apply only to caching
+   mechanisms, and such mechanisms need only check a resource's
+   expiration status when a new request for that resource is initiated.
+   See section 13.13 for an explanation of the difference between caches
+   and history mechanisms.
+
+13.2.2 Heuristic Expiration
+
+   Since origin servers do not always provide explicit expiration times,
+   HTTP caches typically assign heuristic expiration times, employing
+   algorithms that use other header values (such as the Last-Modified
+   time) to estimate a plausible expiration time. The HTTP/1.1
+   specification does not provide specific algorithms, but does impose
+   worst-case constraints on their results. Since heuristic expiration
+   times might compromise semantic transparency, they ought to used
+   cautiously, and we encourage origin servers to provide explicit
+   expiration times as much as possible.
+
+13.2.3 Age Calculations
+
+   In order to know if a cached entry is fresh, a cache needs to know if
+   its age exceeds its freshness lifetime. We discuss how to calculate
+   the latter in section 13.2.4; this section describes how to calculate
+   the age of a response or cache entry.
+
+   In this discussion, we use the term "now" to mean "the current value
+   of the clock at the host performing the calculation." Hosts that use
+   HTTP, but especially hosts running origin servers and caches, SHOULD
+   use NTP [28] or some similar protocol to synchronize their clocks to
+   a globally accurate time standard.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 80]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   HTTP/1.1 requires origin servers to send a Date header, if possible,
+   with every response, giving the time at which the response was
+   generated (see section 14.18). We use the term "date_value" to denote
+   the value of the Date header, in a form appropriate for arithmetic
+   operations.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 uses the Age response-header to convey the estimated age of
+   the response message when obtained from a cache. The Age field value
+   is the cache's estimate of the amount of time since the response was
+   generated or revalidated by the origin server.
+
+   In essence, the Age value is the sum of the time that the response
+   has been resident in each of the caches along the path from the
+   origin server, plus the amount of time it has been in transit along
+   network paths.
+
+   We use the term "age_value" to denote the value of the Age header, in
+   a form appropriate for arithmetic operations.
+
+   A response's age can be calculated in two entirely independent ways:
+
+      1. now minus date_value, if the local clock is reasonably well
+         synchronized to the origin server's clock. If the result is
+         negative, the result is replaced by zero.
+
+      2. age_value, if all of the caches along the response path
+         implement HTTP/1.1.
+
+   Given that we have two independent ways to compute the age of a
+   response when it is received, we can combine these as
+
+       corrected_received_age = max(now - date_value, age_value)
+
+   and as long as we have either nearly synchronized clocks or all-
+   HTTP/1.1 paths, one gets a reliable (conservative) result.
+
+   Because of network-imposed delays, some significant interval might
+   pass between the time that a server generates a response and the time
+   it is received at the next outbound cache or client. If uncorrected,
+   this delay could result in improperly low ages.
+
+   Because the request that resulted in the returned Age value must have
+   been initiated prior to that Age value's generation, we can correct
+   for delays imposed by the network by recording the time at which the
+   request was initiated. Then, when an Age value is received, it MUST
+   be interpreted relative to the time the request was initiated, not
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 81]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   the time that the response was received. This algorithm results in
+   conservative behavior no matter how much delay is experienced. So, we
+   compute:
+
+      corrected_initial_age = corrected_received_age
+                            + (now - request_time)
+
+   where "request_time" is the time (according to the local clock) when
+   the request that elicited this response was sent.
+
+   Summary of age calculation algorithm, when a cache receives a
+   response:
+
+      /*
+       * age_value
+       *      is the value of Age: header received by the cache with
+       *              this response.
+       * date_value
+       *      is the value of the origin server's Date: header
+       * request_time
+       *      is the (local) time when the cache made the request
+       *              that resulted in this cached response
+       * response_time
+       *      is the (local) time when the cache received the
+       *              response
+       * now
+       *      is the current (local) time
+       */
+
+      apparent_age = max(0, response_time - date_value);
+      corrected_received_age = max(apparent_age, age_value);
+      response_delay = response_time - request_time;
+      corrected_initial_age = corrected_received_age + response_delay;
+      resident_time = now - response_time;
+      current_age   = corrected_initial_age + resident_time;
+
+   The current_age of a cache entry is calculated by adding the amount
+   of time (in seconds) since the cache entry was last validated by the
+   origin server to the corrected_initial_age. When a response is
+   generated from a cache entry, the cache MUST include a single Age
+   header field in the response with a value equal to the cache entry's
+   current_age.
+
+   The presence of an Age header field in a response implies that a
+   response is not first-hand. However, the converse is not true, since
+   the lack of an Age header field in a response does not imply that the
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 82]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   response is first-hand unless all caches along the request path are
+   compliant with HTTP/1.1 (i.e., older HTTP caches did not implement
+   the Age header field).
+
+13.2.4 Expiration Calculations
+
+   In order to decide whether a response is fresh or stale, we need to
+   compare its freshness lifetime to its age. The age is calculated as
+   described in section 13.2.3; this section describes how to calculate
+   the freshness lifetime, and to determine if a response has expired.
+   In the discussion below, the values can be represented in any form
+   appropriate for arithmetic operations.
+
+   We use the term "expires_value" to denote the value of the Expires
+   header. We use the term "max_age_value" to denote an appropriate
+   value of the number of seconds carried by the "max-age" directive of
+   the Cache-Control header in a response (see section 14.9.3).
+
+   The max-age directive takes priority over Expires, so if max-age is
+   present in a response, the calculation is simply:
+
+      freshness_lifetime = max_age_value
+
+   Otherwise, if Expires is present in the response, the calculation is:
+
+      freshness_lifetime = expires_value - date_value
+
+   Note that neither of these calculations is vulnerable to clock skew,
+   since all of the information comes from the origin server.
+
+   If none of Expires, Cache-Control: max-age, or Cache-Control: s-
+   maxage (see section 14.9.3) appears in the response, and the response
+   does not include other restrictions on caching, the cache MAY compute
+   a freshness lifetime using a heuristic. The cache MUST attach Warning
+   113 to any response whose age is more than 24 hours if such warning
+   has not already been added.
+
+   Also, if the response does have a Last-Modified time, the heuristic
+   expiration value SHOULD be no more than some fraction of the interval
+   since that time. A typical setting of this fraction might be 10%.
+
+   The calculation to determine if a response has expired is quite
+   simple:
+
+      response_is_fresh = (freshness_lifetime > current_age)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 83]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.2.5 Disambiguating Expiration Values
+
+   Because expiration values are assigned optimistically, it is possible
+   for two caches to contain fresh values for the same resource that are
+   different.
+
+   If a client performing a retrieval receives a non-first-hand response
+   for a request that was already fresh in its own cache, and the Date
+   header in its existing cache entry is newer than the Date on the new
+   response, then the client MAY ignore the response. If so, it MAY
+   retry the request with a "Cache-Control: max-age=0" directive (see
+   section 14.9), to force a check with the origin server.
+
+   If a cache has two fresh responses for the same representation with
+   different validators, it MUST use the one with the more recent Date
+   header. This situation might arise because the cache is pooling
+   responses from other caches, or because a client has asked for a
+   reload or a revalidation of an apparently fresh cache entry.
+
+13.2.6 Disambiguating Multiple Responses
+
+   Because a client might be receiving responses via multiple paths, so
+   that some responses flow through one set of caches and other
+   responses flow through a different set of caches, a client might
+   receive responses in an order different from that in which the origin
+   server sent them. We would like the client to use the most recently
+   generated response, even if older responses are still apparently
+   fresh.
+
+   Neither the entity tag nor the expiration value can impose an
+   ordering on responses, since it is possible that a later response
+   intentionally carries an earlier expiration time. The Date values are
+   ordered to a granularity of one second.
+
+   When a client tries to revalidate a cache entry, and the response it
+   receives contains a Date header that appears to be older than the one
+   for the existing entry, then the client SHOULD repeat the request
+   unconditionally, and include
+
+       Cache-Control: max-age=0
+
+   to force any intermediate caches to validate their copies directly
+   with the origin server, or
+
+       Cache-Control: no-cache
+
+   to force any intermediate caches to obtain a new copy from the origin
+   server.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 84]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If the Date values are equal, then the client MAY use either response
+   (or MAY, if it is being extremely prudent, request a new response).
+   Servers MUST NOT depend on clients being able to choose
+   deterministically between responses generated during the same second,
+   if their expiration times overlap.
+
+13.3 Validation Model
+
+   When a cache has a stale entry that it would like to use as a
+   response to a client's request, it first has to check with the origin
+   server (or possibly an intermediate cache with a fresh response) to
+   see if its cached entry is still usable. We call this "validating"
+   the cache entry. Since we do not want to have to pay the overhead of
+   retransmitting the full response if the cached entry is good, and we
+   do not want to pay the overhead of an extra round trip if the cached
+   entry is invalid, the HTTP/1.1 protocol supports the use of
+   conditional methods.
+
+   The key protocol features for supporting conditional methods are
+   those concerned with "cache validators." When an origin server
+   generates a full response, it attaches some sort of validator to it,
+   which is kept with the cache entry. When a client (user agent or
+   proxy cache) makes a conditional request for a resource for which it
+   has a cache entry, it includes the associated validator in the
+   request.
+
+   The server then checks that validator against the current validator
+   for the entity, and, if they match (see section 13.3.3), it responds
+   with a special status code (usually, 304 (Not Modified)) and no
+   entity-body. Otherwise, it returns a full response (including
+   entity-body). Thus, we avoid transmitting the full response if the
+   validator matches, and we avoid an extra round trip if it does not
+   match.
+
+   In HTTP/1.1, a conditional request looks exactly the same as a normal
+   request for the same resource, except that it carries a special
+   header (which includes the validator) that implicitly turns the
+   method (usually, GET) into a conditional.
+
+   The protocol includes both positive and negative senses of cache-
+   validating conditions. That is, it is possible to request either that
+   a method be performed if and only if a validator matches or if and
+   only if no validators match.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 85]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      Note: a response that lacks a validator may still be cached, and
+      served from cache until it expires, unless this is explicitly
+      prohibited by a cache-control directive. However, a cache cannot
+      do a conditional retrieval if it does not have a validator for the
+      entity, which means it will not be refreshable after it expires.
+
+13.3.1 Last-Modified Dates
+
+   The Last-Modified entity-header field value is often used as a cache
+   validator. In simple terms, a cache entry is considered to be valid
+   if the entity has not been modified since the Last-Modified value.
+
+13.3.2 Entity Tag Cache Validators
+
+   The ETag response-header field value, an entity tag, provides for an
+   "opaque" cache validator. This might allow more reliable validation
+   in situations where it is inconvenient to store modification dates,
+   where the one-second resolution of HTTP date values is not
+   sufficient, or where the origin server wishes to avoid certain
+   paradoxes that might arise from the use of modification dates.
+
+   Entity Tags are described in section 3.11. The headers used with
+   entity tags are described in sections 14.19, 14.24, 14.26 and 14.44.
+
+13.3.3 Weak and Strong Validators
+
+   Since both origin servers and caches will compare two validators to
+   decide if they represent the same or different entities, one normally
+   would expect that if the entity (the entity-body or any entity-
+   headers) changes in any way, then the associated validator would
+   change as well. If this is true, then we call this validator a
+   "strong validator."
+
+   However, there might be cases when a server prefers to change the
+   validator only on semantically significant changes, and not when
+   insignificant aspects of the entity change. A validator that does not
+   always change when the resource changes is a "weak validator."
+
+   Entity tags are normally "strong validators," but the protocol
+   provides a mechanism to tag an entity tag as "weak." One can think of
+   a strong validator as one that changes whenever the bits of an entity
+   changes, while a weak value changes whenever the meaning of an entity
+   changes. Alternatively, one can think of a strong validator as part
+   of an identifier for a specific entity, while a weak validator is
+   part of an identifier for a set of semantically equivalent entities.
+
+      Note: One example of a strong validator is an integer that is
+      incremented in stable storage every time an entity is changed.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 86]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      An entity's modification time, if represented with one-second
+      resolution, could be a weak validator, since it is possible that
+      the resource might be modified twice during a single second.
+
+      Support for weak validators is optional. However, weak validators
+      allow for more efficient caching of equivalent objects; for
+      example, a hit counter on a site is probably good enough if it is
+      updated every few days or weeks, and any value during that period
+      is likely "good enough" to be equivalent.
+
+   A "use" of a validator is either when a client generates a request
+   and includes the validator in a validating header field, or when a
+   server compares two validators.
+
+   Strong validators are usable in any context. Weak validators are only
+   usable in contexts that do not depend on exact equality of an entity.
+   For example, either kind is usable for a conditional GET of a full
+   entity. However, only a strong validator is usable for a sub-range
+   retrieval, since otherwise the client might end up with an internally
+   inconsistent entity.
+
+   Clients MAY issue simple (non-subrange) GET requests with either weak
+   validators or strong validators. Clients MUST NOT use weak validators
+   in other forms of request.
+
+   The only function that the HTTP/1.1 protocol defines on validators is
+   comparison. There are two validator comparison functions, depending
+   on whether the comparison context allows the use of weak validators
+   or not:
+
+      - The strong comparison function: in order to be considered equal,
+        both validators MUST be identical in every way, and both MUST
+        NOT be weak.
+
+      - The weak comparison function: in order to be considered equal,
+        both validators MUST be identical in every way, but either or
+        both of them MAY be tagged as "weak" without affecting the
+        result.
+
+   An entity tag is strong unless it is explicitly tagged as weak.
+   section 3.11 gives the syntax for entity tags.
+
+   A Last-Modified time, when used as a validator in a request, is
+   implicitly weak unless it is possible to deduce that it is strong,
+   using the following rules:
+
+      - The validator is being compared by an origin server to the
+        actual current validator for the entity and,
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 87]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - That origin server reliably knows that the associated entity did
+        not change twice during the second covered by the presented
+        validator.
+
+   or
+
+      - The validator is about to be used by a client in an If-
+        Modified-Since or If-Unmodified-Since header, because the client
+        has a cache entry for the associated entity, and
+
+      - That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time
+        when the origin server sent the original response, and
+
+      - The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before
+        the Date value.
+
+   or
+
+      - The validator is being compared by an intermediate cache to the
+        validator stored in its cache entry for the entity, and
+
+      - That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time
+        when the origin server sent the original response, and
+
+      - The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before
+        the Date value.
+
+   This method relies on the fact that if two different responses were
+   sent by the origin server during the same second, but both had the
+   same Last-Modified time, then at least one of those responses would
+   have a Date value equal to its Last-Modified time. The arbitrary 60-
+   second limit guards against the possibility that the Date and Last-
+   Modified values are generated from different clocks, or at somewhat
+   different times during the preparation of the response. An
+   implementation MAY use a value larger than 60 seconds, if it is
+   believed that 60 seconds is too short.
+
+   If a client wishes to perform a sub-range retrieval on a value for
+   which it has only a Last-Modified time and no opaque validator, it
+   MAY do this only if the Last-Modified time is strong in the sense
+   described here.
+
+   A cache or origin server receiving a conditional request, other than
+   a full-body GET request, MUST use the strong comparison function to
+   evaluate the condition.
+
+   These rules allow HTTP/1.1 caches and clients to safely perform sub-
+   range retrievals on values that have been obtained from HTTP/1.0
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 88]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   servers.
+
+13.3.4 Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates
+
+   We adopt a set of rules and recommendations for origin servers,
+   clients, and caches regarding when various validator types ought to
+   be used, and for what purposes.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 origin servers:
+
+      - SHOULD send an entity tag validator unless it is not feasible to
+        generate one.
+
+      - MAY send a weak entity tag instead of a strong entity tag, if
+        performance considerations support the use of weak entity tags,
+        or if it is unfeasible to send a strong entity tag.
+
+      - SHOULD send a Last-Modified value if it is feasible to send one,
+        unless the risk of a breakdown in semantic transparency that
+        could result from using this date in an If-Modified-Since header
+        would lead to serious problems.
+
+   In other words, the preferred behavior for an HTTP/1.1 origin server
+   is to send both a strong entity tag and a Last-Modified value.
+
+   In order to be legal, a strong entity tag MUST change whenever the
+   associated entity value changes in any way. A weak entity tag SHOULD
+   change whenever the associated entity changes in a semantically
+   significant way.
+
+      Note: in order to provide semantically transparent caching, an
+      origin server must avoid reusing a specific strong entity tag
+      value for two different entities, or reusing a specific weak
+      entity tag value for two semantically different entities. Cache
+      entries might persist for arbitrarily long periods, regardless of
+      expiration times, so it might be inappropriate to expect that a
+      cache will never again attempt to validate an entry using a
+      validator that it obtained at some point in the past.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 clients:
+
+      - If an entity tag has been provided by the origin server, MUST
+        use that entity tag in any cache-conditional request (using If-
+        Match or If-None-Match).
+
+      - If only a Last-Modified value has been provided by the origin
+        server, SHOULD use that value in non-subrange cache-conditional
+        requests (using If-Modified-Since).
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 89]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - If only a Last-Modified value has been provided by an HTTP/1.0
+        origin server, MAY use that value in subrange cache-conditional
+        requests (using If-Unmodified-Since:). The user agent SHOULD
+        provide a way to disable this, in case of difficulty.
+
+      - If both an entity tag and a Last-Modified value have been
+        provided by the origin server, SHOULD use both validators in
+        cache-conditional requests. This allows both HTTP/1.0 and
+        HTTP/1.1 caches to respond appropriately.
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 origin server, upon receiving a conditional request that
+   includes both a Last-Modified date (e.g., in an If-Modified-Since or
+   If-Unmodified-Since header field) and one or more entity tags (e.g.,
+   in an If-Match, If-None-Match, or If-Range header field) as cache
+   validators, MUST NOT return a response status of 304 (Not Modified)
+   unless doing so is consistent with all of the conditional header
+   fields in the request.
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 caching proxy, upon receiving a conditional request that
+   includes both a Last-Modified date and one or more entity tags as
+   cache validators, MUST NOT return a locally cached response to the
+   client unless that cached response is consistent with all of the
+   conditional header fields in the request.
+
+      Note: The general principle behind these rules is that HTTP/1.1
+      servers and clients should transmit as much non-redundant
+      information as is available in their responses and requests.
+      HTTP/1.1 systems receiving this information will make the most
+      conservative assumptions about the validators they receive.
+
+      HTTP/1.0 clients and caches will ignore entity tags. Generally,
+      last-modified values received or used by these systems will
+      support transparent and efficient caching, and so HTTP/1.1 origin
+      servers should provide Last-Modified values. In those rare cases
+      where the use of a Last-Modified value as a validator by an
+      HTTP/1.0 system could result in a serious problem, then HTTP/1.1
+      origin servers should not provide one.
+
+13.3.5 Non-validating Conditionals
+
+   The principle behind entity tags is that only the service author
+   knows the semantics of a resource well enough to select an
+   appropriate cache validation mechanism, and the specification of any
+   validator comparison function more complex than byte-equality would
+   open up a can of worms. Thus, comparisons of any other headers
+   (except Last-Modified, for compatibility with HTTP/1.0) are never
+   used for purposes of validating a cache entry.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 90]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.4 Response Cacheability
+
+   Unless specifically constrained by a cache-control (section 14.9)
+   directive, a caching system MAY always store a successful response
+   (see section 13.8) as a cache entry, MAY return it without validation
+   if it is fresh, and MAY return it after successful validation. If
+   there is neither a cache validator nor an explicit expiration time
+   associated with a response, we do not expect it to be cached, but
+   certain caches MAY violate this expectation (for example, when little
+   or no network connectivity is available). A client can usually detect
+   that such a response was taken from a cache by comparing the Date
+   header to the current time.
+
+      Note: some HTTP/1.0 caches are known to violate this expectation
+      without providing any Warning.
+
+   However, in some cases it might be inappropriate for a cache to
+   retain an entity, or to return it in response to a subsequent
+   request. This might be because absolute semantic transparency is
+   deemed necessary by the service author, or because of security or
+   privacy considerations. Certain cache-control directives are
+   therefore provided so that the server can indicate that certain
+   resource entities, or portions thereof, are not to be cached
+   regardless of other considerations.
+
+   Note that section 14.8 normally prevents a shared cache from saving
+   and returning a response to a previous request if that request
+   included an Authorization header.
+
+   A response received with a status code of 200, 203, 206, 300, 301 or
+   410 MAY be stored by a cache and used in reply to a subsequent
+   request, subject to the expiration mechanism, unless a cache-control
+   directive prohibits caching. However, a cache that does not support
+   the Range and Content-Range headers MUST NOT cache 206 (Partial
+   Content) responses.
+
+   A response received with any other status code (e.g. status codes 302
+   and 307) MUST NOT be returned in a reply to a subsequent request
+   unless there are cache-control directives or another header(s) that
+   explicitly allow it. For example, these include the following: an
+   Expires header (section 14.21); a "max-age", "s-maxage",  "must-
+   revalidate", "proxy-revalidate", "public" or "private" cache-control
+   directive (section 14.9).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 91]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.5 Constructing Responses From Caches
+
+   The purpose of an HTTP cache is to store information received in
+   response to requests for use in responding to future requests. In
+   many cases, a cache simply returns the appropriate parts of a
+   response to the requester. However, if the cache holds a cache entry
+   based on a previous response, it might have to combine parts of a new
+   response with what is held in the cache entry.
+
+13.5.1 End-to-end and Hop-by-hop Headers
+
+   For the purpose of defining the behavior of caches and non-caching
+   proxies, we divide HTTP headers into two categories:
+
+      - End-to-end headers, which are  transmitted to the ultimate
+        recipient of a request or response. End-to-end headers in
+        responses MUST be stored as part of a cache entry and MUST be
+        transmitted in any response formed from a cache entry.
+
+      - Hop-by-hop headers, which are meaningful only for a single
+        transport-level connection, and are not stored by caches or
+        forwarded by proxies.
+
+   The following HTTP/1.1 headers are hop-by-hop headers:
+
+      - Connection
+      - Keep-Alive
+      - Proxy-Authenticate
+      - Proxy-Authorization
+      - TE
+      - Trailers
+      - Transfer-Encoding
+      - Upgrade
+
+   All other headers defined by HTTP/1.1 are end-to-end headers.
+
+   Other hop-by-hop headers MUST be listed in a Connection header,
+   (section 14.10) to be introduced into HTTP/1.1 (or later).
+
+13.5.2 Non-modifiable Headers
+
+   Some features of the HTTP/1.1 protocol, such as Digest
+   Authentication, depend on the value of certain end-to-end headers. A
+   transparent proxy SHOULD NOT modify an end-to-end header unless the
+   definition of that header requires or specifically allows that.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 92]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   A transparent proxy MUST NOT modify any of the following fields in a
+   request or response, and it MUST NOT add any of these fields if not
+   already present:
+
+      - Content-Location
+
+      - Content-MD5
+
+      - ETag
+
+      - Last-Modified
+
+   A transparent proxy MUST NOT modify any of the following fields in a
+   response:
+
+      - Expires
+
+   but it MAY add any of these fields if not already present. If an
+   Expires header is added, it MUST be given a field-value identical to
+   that of the Date header in that response.
+
+   A  proxy MUST NOT modify or add any of the following fields in a
+   message that contains the no-transform cache-control directive, or in
+   any request:
+
+      - Content-Encoding
+
+      - Content-Range
+
+      - Content-Type
+
+   A non-transparent proxy MAY modify or add these fields to a message
+   that does not include no-transform, but if it does so, it MUST add a
+   Warning 214 (Transformation applied) if one does not already appear
+   in the message (see section 14.46).
+
+      Warning: unnecessary modification of end-to-end headers might
+      cause authentication failures if stronger authentication
+      mechanisms are introduced in later versions of HTTP. Such
+      authentication mechanisms MAY rely on the values of header fields
+      not listed here.
+
+   The Content-Length field of a request or response is added or deleted
+   according to the rules in section 4.4. A transparent proxy MUST
+   preserve the entity-length (section 7.2.2) of the entity-body,
+   although it MAY change the transfer-length (section 4.4).
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 93]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.5.3 Combining Headers
+
+   When a cache makes a validating request to a server, and the server
+   provides a 304 (Not Modified) response or a 206 (Partial Content)
+   response, the cache then constructs a response to send to the
+   requesting client.
+
+   If the status code is 304 (Not Modified), the cache uses the entity-
+   body stored in the cache entry as the entity-body of this outgoing
+   response. If the status code is 206 (Partial Content) and the ETag or
+   Last-Modified headers match exactly, the cache MAY combine the
+   contents stored in the cache entry with the new contents received in
+   the response and use the result as the entity-body of this outgoing
+   response, (see 13.5.4).
+
+   The end-to-end headers stored in the cache entry are used for the
+   constructed response, except that
+
+      - any stored Warning headers with warn-code 1xx (see section
+        14.46) MUST be deleted from the cache entry and the forwarded
+        response.
+
+      - any stored Warning headers with warn-code 2xx MUST be retained
+        in the cache entry and the forwarded response.
+
+      - any end-to-end headers provided in the 304 or 206 response MUST
+        replace the corresponding headers from the cache entry.
+
+   Unless the cache decides to remove the cache entry, it MUST also
+   replace the end-to-end headers stored with the cache entry with
+   corresponding headers received in the incoming response, except for
+   Warning headers as described immediately above. If a header field-
+   name in the incoming response matches more than one header in the
+   cache entry, all such old headers MUST be replaced.
+
+   In other words, the set of end-to-end headers received in the
+   incoming response overrides all corresponding end-to-end headers
+   stored with the cache entry (except for stored Warning headers with
+   warn-code 1xx, which are deleted even if not overridden).
+
+      Note: this rule allows an origin server to use a 304 (Not
+      Modified) or a 206 (Partial Content) response to update any header
+      associated with a previous response for the same entity or sub-
+      ranges thereof, although it might not always be meaningful or
+      correct to do so. This rule does not allow an origin server to use
+      a 304 (Not Modified) or a 206 (Partial Content) response to
+      entirely delete a header that it had provided with a previous
+      response.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 94]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.5.4 Combining Byte Ranges
+
+   A response might transfer only a subrange of the bytes of an entity-
+   body, either because the request included one or more Range
+   specifications, or because a connection was broken prematurely. After
+   several such transfers, a cache might have received several ranges of
+   the same entity-body.
+
+   If a cache has a stored non-empty set of subranges for an entity, and
+   an incoming response transfers another subrange, the cache MAY
+   combine the new subrange with the existing set if both the following
+   conditions are met:
+
+      - Both the incoming response and the cache entry have a cache
+        validator.
+
+      - The two cache validators match using the strong comparison
+        function (see section 13.3.3).
+
+   If either requirement is not met, the cache MUST use only the most
+   recent partial response (based on the Date values transmitted with
+   every response, and using the incoming response if these values are
+   equal or missing), and MUST discard the other partial information.
+
+13.6 Caching Negotiated Responses
+
+   Use of server-driven content negotiation (section 12.1), as indicated
+   by the presence of a Vary header field in a response, alters the
+   conditions and procedure by which a cache can use the response for
+   subsequent requests. See section 14.44 for use of the Vary header
+   field by servers.
+
+   A server SHOULD use the Vary header field to inform a cache of what
+   request-header fields were used to select among multiple
+   representations of a cacheable response subject to server-driven
+   negotiation. The set of header fields named by the Vary field value
+   is known as the "selecting" request-headers.
+
+   When the cache receives a subsequent request whose Request-URI
+   specifies one or more cache entries including a Vary header field,
+   the cache MUST NOT use such a cache entry to construct a response to
+   the new request unless all of the selecting request-headers present
+   in the new request match the corresponding stored request-headers in
+   the original request.
+
+   The selecting request-headers from two requests are defined to match
+   if and only if the selecting request-headers in the first request can
+   be transformed to the selecting request-headers in the second request
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 95]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   by adding or removing linear white space (LWS) at places where this
+   is allowed by the corresponding BNF, and/or combining multiple
+   message-header fields with the same field name following the rules
+   about message headers in section 4.2.
+
+   A Vary header field-value of "*" always fails to match and subsequent
+   requests on that resource can only be properly interpreted by the
+   origin server.
+
+   If the selecting request header fields for the cached entry do not
+   match the selecting request header fields of the new request, then
+   the cache MUST NOT use a cached entry to satisfy the request unless
+   it first relays the new request to the origin server in a conditional
+   request and the server responds with 304 (Not Modified), including an
+   entity tag or Content-Location that indicates the entity to be used.
+
+   If an entity tag was assigned to a cached representation, the
+   forwarded request SHOULD be conditional and include the entity tags
+   in an If-None-Match header field from all its cache entries for the
+   resource. This conveys to the server the set of entities currently
+   held by the cache, so that if any one of these entities matches the
+   requested entity, the server can use the ETag header field in its 304
+   (Not Modified) response to tell the cache which entry is appropriate.
+   If the entity-tag of the new response matches that of an existing
+   entry, the new response SHOULD be used to update the header fields of
+   the existing entry, and the result MUST be returned to the client.
+
+   If any of the existing cache entries contains only partial content
+   for the associated entity, its entity-tag SHOULD NOT be included in
+   the If-None-Match header field unless the request is for a range that
+   would be fully satisfied by that entry.
+
+   If a cache receives a successful response whose Content-Location
+   field matches that of an existing cache entry for the same Request-
+   ]URI, whose entity-tag differs from that of the existing entry, and
+   whose Date is more recent than that of the existing entry, the
+   existing entry SHOULD NOT be returned in response to future requests
+   and SHOULD be deleted from the cache.
+
+13.7 Shared and Non-Shared Caches
+
+   For reasons of security and privacy, it is necessary to make a
+   distinction between "shared" and "non-shared" caches. A non-shared
+   cache is one that is accessible only to a single user. Accessibility
+   in this case SHOULD be enforced by appropriate security mechanisms.
+   All other caches are considered to be "shared." Other sections of
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 96]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   this specification place certain constraints on the operation of
+   shared caches in order to prevent loss of privacy or failure of
+   access controls.
+
+13.8 Errors or Incomplete Response Cache Behavior
+
+   A cache that receives an incomplete response (for example, with fewer
+   bytes of data than specified in a Content-Length header) MAY store
+   the response. However, the cache MUST treat this as a partial
+   response. Partial responses MAY be combined as described in section
+   13.5.4; the result might be a full response or might still be
+   partial. A cache MUST NOT return a partial response to a client
+   without explicitly marking it as such, using the 206 (Partial
+   Content) status code. A cache MUST NOT return a partial response
+   using a status code of 200 (OK).
+
+   If a cache receives a 5xx response while attempting to revalidate an
+   entry, it MAY either forward this response to the requesting client,
+   or act as if the server failed to respond. In the latter case, it MAY
+   return a previously received response unless the cached entry
+   includes the "must-revalidate" cache-control directive (see section
+   14.9).
+
+13.9 Side Effects of GET and HEAD
+
+   Unless the origin server explicitly prohibits the caching of their
+   responses, the application of GET and HEAD methods to any resources
+   SHOULD NOT have side effects that would lead to erroneous behavior if
+   these responses are taken from a cache. They MAY still have side
+   effects, but a cache is not required to consider such side effects in
+   its caching decisions. Caches are always expected to observe an
+   origin server's explicit restrictions on caching.
+
+   We note one exception to this rule: since some applications have
+   traditionally used GETs and HEADs with query URLs (those containing a
+   "?" in the rel_path part) to perform operations with significant side
+   effects, caches MUST NOT treat responses to such URIs as fresh unless
+   the server provides an explicit expiration time. This specifically
+   means that responses from HTTP/1.0 servers for such URIs SHOULD NOT
+   be taken from a cache. See section 9.1.1 for related information.
+
+13.10 Invalidation After Updates or Deletions
+
+   The effect of certain methods performed on a resource at the origin
+   server might cause one or more existing cache entries to become non-
+   transparently invalid. That is, although they might continue to be
+   "fresh," they do not accurately reflect what the origin server would
+   return for a new request on that resource.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 97]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   There is no way for the HTTP protocol to guarantee that all such
+   cache entries are marked invalid. For example, the request that
+   caused the change at the origin server might not have gone through
+   the proxy where a cache entry is stored. However, several rules help
+   reduce the likelihood of erroneous behavior.
+
+   In this section, the phrase "invalidate an entity" means that the
+   cache will either remove all instances of that entity from its
+   storage, or will mark these as "invalid" and in need of a mandatory
+   revalidation before they can be returned in response to a subsequent
+   request.
+
+   Some HTTP methods MUST cause a cache to invalidate an entity. This is
+   either the entity referred to by the Request-URI, or by the Location
+   or Content-Location headers (if present). These methods are:
+
+      - PUT
+
+      - DELETE
+
+      - POST
+
+   In order to prevent denial of service attacks, an invalidation based
+   on the URI in a Location or Content-Location header MUST only be
+   performed if the host part is the same as in the Request-URI.
+
+   A cache that passes through requests for methods it does not
+   understand SHOULD invalidate any entities referred to by the
+   Request-URI.
+
+13.11 Write-Through Mandatory
+
+   All methods that might be expected to cause modifications to the
+   origin server's resources MUST be written through to the origin
+   server. This currently includes all methods except for GET and HEAD.
+   A cache MUST NOT reply to such a request from a client before having
+   transmitted the request to the inbound server, and having received a
+   corresponding response from the inbound server. This does not prevent
+   a proxy cache from sending a 100 (Continue) response before the
+   inbound server has sent its final reply.
+
+   The alternative (known as "write-back" or "copy-back" caching) is not
+   allowed in HTTP/1.1, due to the difficulty of providing consistent
+   updates and the problems arising from server, cache, or network
+   failure prior to write-back.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 98]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+13.12 Cache Replacement
+
+   If a new cacheable (see sections 14.9.2, 13.2.5, 13.2.6 and 13.8)
+   response is received from a resource while any existing responses for
+   the same resource are cached, the cache SHOULD use the new response
+   to reply to the current request. It MAY insert it into cache storage
+   and MAY, if it meets all other requirements, use it to respond to any
+   future requests that would previously have caused the old response to
+   be returned. If it inserts the new response into cache storage  the
+   rules in section 13.5.3 apply.
+
+      Note: a new response that has an older Date header value than
+      existing cached responses is not cacheable.
+
+13.13 History Lists
+
+   User agents often have history mechanisms, such as "Back" buttons and
+   history lists, which can be used to redisplay an entity retrieved
+   earlier in a session.
+
+   History mechanisms and caches are different. In particular history
+   mechanisms SHOULD NOT try to show a semantically transparent view of
+   the current state of a resource. Rather, a history mechanism is meant
+   to show exactly what the user saw at the time when the resource was
+   retrieved.
+
+   By default, an expiration time does not apply to history mechanisms.
+   If the entity is still in storage, a history mechanism SHOULD display
+   it even if the entity has expired, unless the user has specifically
+   configured the agent to refresh expired history documents.
+
+   This is not to be construed to prohibit the history mechanism from
+   telling the user that a view might be stale.
+
+      Note: if history list mechanisms unnecessarily prevent users from
+      viewing stale resources, this will tend to force service authors
+      to avoid using HTTP expiration controls and cache controls when
+      they would otherwise like to. Service authors may consider it
+      important that users not be presented with error messages or
+      warning messages when they use navigation controls (such as BACK)
+      to view previously fetched resources. Even though sometimes such
+      resources ought not to cached, or ought to expire quickly, user
+      interface considerations may force service authors to resort to
+      other means of preventing caching (e.g. "once-only" URLs) in order
+      not to suffer the effects of improperly functioning history
+      mechanisms.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 99]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14 Header Field Definitions
+
+   This section defines the syntax and semantics of all standard
+   HTTP/1.1 header fields. For entity-header fields, both sender and
+   recipient refer to either the client or the server, depending on who
+   sends and who receives the entity.
+
+14.1 Accept
+
+   The Accept request-header field can be used to specify certain media
+   types which are acceptable for the response. Accept headers can be
+   used to indicate that the request is specifically limited to a small
+   set of desired types, as in the case of a request for an in-line
+   image.
+
+       Accept         = "Accept" ":"
+                        #( media-range [ accept-params ] )
+
+       media-range    = ( "*/*"
+                        | ( type "/" "*" )
+                        | ( type "/" subtype )
+                        ) *( ";" parameter )
+       accept-params  = ";" "q" "=" qvalue *( accept-extension )
+       accept-extension = ";" token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ]
+
+   The asterisk "*" character is used to group media types into ranges,
+   with "*/*" indicating all media types and "type/*" indicating all
+   subtypes of that type. The media-range MAY include media type
+   parameters that are applicable to that range.
+
+   Each media-range MAY be followed by one or more accept-params,
+   beginning with the "q" parameter for indicating a relative quality
+   factor. The first "q" parameter (if any) separates the media-range
+   parameter(s) from the accept-params. Quality factors allow the user
+   or user agent to indicate the relative degree of preference for that
+   media-range, using the qvalue scale from 0 to 1 (section 3.9). The
+   default value is q=1.
+
+      Note: Use of the "q" parameter name to separate media type
+      parameters from Accept extension parameters is due to historical
+      practice. Although this prevents any media type parameter named
+      "q" from being used with a media range, such an event is believed
+      to be unlikely given the lack of any "q" parameters in the IANA
+      media type registry and the rare usage of any media type
+      parameters in Accept. Future media types are discouraged from
+      registering any parameter named "q".
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 100]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The example
+
+       Accept: audio/*; q=0.2, audio/basic
+
+   SHOULD be interpreted as "I prefer audio/basic, but send me any audio
+   type if it is the best available after an 80% mark-down in quality."
+
+   If no Accept header field is present, then it is assumed that the
+   client accepts all media types. If an Accept header field is present,
+   and if the server cannot send a response which is acceptable
+   according to the combined Accept field value, then the server SHOULD
+   send a 406 (not acceptable) response.
+
+   A more elaborate example is
+
+       Accept: text/plain; q=0.5, text/html,
+               text/x-dvi; q=0.8, text/x-c
+
+   Verbally, this would be interpreted as "text/html and text/x-c are
+   the preferred media types, but if they do not exist, then send the
+   text/x-dvi entity, and if that does not exist, send the text/plain
+   entity."
+
+   Media ranges can be overridden by more specific media ranges or
+   specific media types. If more than one media range applies to a given
+   type, the most specific reference has precedence. For example,
+
+       Accept: text/*, text/html, text/html;level=1, */*
+
+   have the following precedence:
+
+       1) text/html;level=1
+       2) text/html
+       3) text/*
+       4) */*
+
+   The media type quality factor associated with a given type is
+   determined by finding the media range with the highest precedence
+   which matches that type. For example,
+
+       Accept: text/*;q=0.3, text/html;q=0.7, text/html;level=1,
+               text/html;level=2;q=0.4, */*;q=0.5
+
+   would cause the following values to be associated:
+
+       text/html;level=1         = 1
+       text/html                 = 0.7
+       text/plain                = 0.3
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 101]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+       image/jpeg                = 0.5
+       text/html;level=2         = 0.4
+       text/html;level=3         = 0.7
+
+      Note: A user agent might be provided with a default set of quality
+      values for certain media ranges. However, unless the user agent is
+      a closed system which cannot interact with other rendering agents,
+      this default set ought to be configurable by the user.
+
+14.2 Accept-Charset
+
+   The Accept-Charset request-header field can be used to indicate what
+   character sets are acceptable for the response. This field allows
+   clients capable of understanding more comprehensive or special-
+   purpose character sets to signal that capability to a server which is
+   capable of representing documents in those character sets.
+
+      Accept-Charset = "Accept-Charset" ":"
+              1#( ( charset | "*" )[ ";" "q" "=" qvalue ] )
+
+
+   Character set values are described in section 3.4. Each charset MAY
+   be given an associated quality value which represents the user's
+   preference for that charset. The default value is q=1. An example is
+
+      Accept-Charset: iso-8859-5, unicode-1-1;q=0.8
+
+   The special value "*", if present in the Accept-Charset field,
+   matches every character set (including ISO-8859-1) which is not
+   mentioned elsewhere in the Accept-Charset field. If no "*" is present
+   in an Accept-Charset field, then all character sets not explicitly
+   mentioned get a quality value of 0, except for ISO-8859-1, which gets
+   a quality value of 1 if not explicitly mentioned.
+
+   If no Accept-Charset header is present, the default is that any
+   character set is acceptable. If an Accept-Charset header is present,
+   and if the server cannot send a response which is acceptable
+   according to the Accept-Charset header, then the server SHOULD send
+   an error response with the 406 (not acceptable) status code, though
+   the sending of an unacceptable response is also allowed.
+
+14.3 Accept-Encoding
+
+   The Accept-Encoding request-header field is similar to Accept, but
+   restricts the content-codings (section 3.5) that are acceptable in
+   the response.
+
+       Accept-Encoding  = "Accept-Encoding" ":"
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 102]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+                          1#( codings [ ";" "q" "=" qvalue ] )
+       codings          = ( content-coding | "*" )
+
+   Examples of its use are:
+
+       Accept-Encoding: compress, gzip
+       Accept-Encoding:
+       Accept-Encoding: *
+       Accept-Encoding: compress;q=0.5, gzip;q=1.0
+       Accept-Encoding: gzip;q=1.0, identity; q=0.5, *;q=0
+
+   A server tests whether a content-coding is acceptable, according to
+   an Accept-Encoding field, using these rules:
+
+      1. If the content-coding is one of the content-codings listed in
+         the Accept-Encoding field, then it is acceptable, unless it is
+         accompanied by a qvalue of 0. (As defined in section 3.9, a
+         qvalue of 0 means "not acceptable.")
+
+      2. The special "*" symbol in an Accept-Encoding field matches any
+         available content-coding not explicitly listed in the header
+         field.
+
+      3. If multiple content-codings are acceptable, then the acceptable
+         content-coding with the highest non-zero qvalue is preferred.
+
+      4. The "identity" content-coding is always acceptable, unless
+         specifically refused because the Accept-Encoding field includes
+         "identity;q=0", or because the field includes "*;q=0" and does
+         not explicitly include the "identity" content-coding. If the
+         Accept-Encoding field-value is empty, then only the "identity"
+         encoding is acceptable.
+
+   If an Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, and if the
+   server cannot send a response which is acceptable according to the
+   Accept-Encoding header, then the server SHOULD send an error response
+   with the 406 (Not Acceptable) status code.
+
+   If no Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, the server MAY
+   assume that the client will accept any content coding. In this case,
+   if "identity" is one of the available content-codings, then the
+   server SHOULD use the "identity" content-coding, unless it has
+   additional information that a different content-coding is meaningful
+   to the client.
+
+      Note: If the request does not include an Accept-Encoding field,
+      and if the "identity" content-coding is unavailable, then
+      content-codings commonly understood by HTTP/1.0 clients (i.e.,
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 103]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      "gzip" and "compress") are preferred; some older clients
+      improperly display messages sent with other content-codings.  The
+      server might also make this decision based on information about
+      the particular user-agent or client.
+
+      Note: Most HTTP/1.0 applications do not recognize or obey qvalues
+      associated with content-codings. This means that qvalues will not
+      work and are not permitted with x-gzip or x-compress.
+
+14.4 Accept-Language
+
+   The Accept-Language request-header field is similar to Accept, but
+   restricts the set of natural languages that are preferred as a
+   response to the request. Language tags are defined in section 3.10.
+
+       Accept-Language = "Accept-Language" ":"
+                         1#( language-range [ ";" "q" "=" qvalue ] )
+       language-range  = ( ( 1*8ALPHA *( "-" 1*8ALPHA ) ) | "*" )
+
+   Each language-range MAY be given an associated quality value which
+   represents an estimate of the user's preference for the languages
+   specified by that range. The quality value defaults to "q=1". For
+   example,
+
+       Accept-Language: da, en-gb;q=0.8, en;q=0.7
+
+   would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and
+   other types of English." A language-range matches a language-tag if
+   it exactly equals the tag, or if it exactly equals a prefix of the
+   tag such that the first tag character following the prefix is "-".
+   The special range "*", if present in the Accept-Language field,
+   matches every tag not matched by any other range present in the
+   Accept-Language field.
+
+      Note: This use of a prefix matching rule does not imply that
+      language tags are assigned to languages in such a way that it is
+      always true that if a user understands a language with a certain
+      tag, then this user will also understand all languages with tags
+      for which this tag is a prefix. The prefix rule simply allows the
+      use of prefix tags if this is the case.
+
+   The language quality factor assigned to a language-tag by the
+   Accept-Language field is the quality value of the longest language-
+   range in the field that matches the language-tag. If no language-
+   range in the field matches the tag, the language quality factor
+   assigned is 0. If no Accept-Language header is present in the
+   request, the server
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 104]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   SHOULD assume that all languages are equally acceptable. If an
+   Accept-Language header is present, then all languages which are
+   assigned a quality factor greater than 0 are acceptable.
+
+   It might be contrary to the privacy expectations of the user to send
+   an Accept-Language header with the complete linguistic preferences of
+   the user in every request. For a discussion of this issue, see
+   section 15.1.4.
+
+   As intelligibility is highly dependent on the individual user, it is
+   recommended that client applications make the choice of linguistic
+   preference available to the user. If the choice is not made
+   available, then the Accept-Language header field MUST NOT be given in
+   the request.
+
+      Note: When making the choice of linguistic preference available to
+      the user, we remind implementors of  the fact that users are not
+      familiar with the details of language matching as described above,
+      and should provide appropriate guidance. As an example, users
+      might assume that on selecting "en-gb", they will be served any
+      kind of English document if British English is not available. A
+      user agent might suggest in such a case to add "en" to get the
+      best matching behavior.
+
+14.5 Accept-Ranges
+
+      The Accept-Ranges response-header field allows the server to
+      indicate its acceptance of range requests for a resource:
+
+          Accept-Ranges     = "Accept-Ranges" ":" acceptable-ranges
+          acceptable-ranges = 1#range-unit | "none"
+
+      Origin servers that accept byte-range requests MAY send
+
+          Accept-Ranges: bytes
+
+      but are not required to do so. Clients MAY generate byte-range
+      requests without having received this header for the resource
+      involved. Range units are defined in section 3.12.
+
+      Servers that do not accept any kind of range request for a
+      resource MAY send
+
+          Accept-Ranges: none
+
+      to advise the client not to attempt a range request.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 105]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.6 Age
+
+      The Age response-header field conveys the sender's estimate of the
+      amount of time since the response (or its revalidation) was
+      generated at the origin server. A cached response is "fresh" if
+      its age does not exceed its freshness lifetime. Age values are
+      calculated as specified in section 13.2.3.
+
+           Age = "Age" ":" age-value
+           age-value = delta-seconds
+
+      Age values are non-negative decimal integers, representing time in
+      seconds.
+
+      If a cache receives a value larger than the largest positive
+      integer it can represent, or if any of its age calculations
+      overflows, it MUST transmit an Age header with a value of
+      2147483648 (2^31). An HTTP/1.1 server that includes a cache MUST
+      include an Age header field in every response generated from its
+      own cache. Caches SHOULD use an arithmetic type of at least 31
+      bits of range.
+
+14.7 Allow
+
+      The Allow entity-header field lists the set of methods supported
+      by the resource identified by the Request-URI. The purpose of this
+      field is strictly to inform the recipient of valid methods
+      associated with the resource. An Allow header field MUST be
+      present in a 405 (Method Not Allowed) response.
+
+          Allow   = "Allow" ":" #Method
+
+      Example of use:
+
+          Allow: GET, HEAD, PUT
+
+      This field cannot prevent a client from trying other methods.
+      However, the indications given by the Allow header field value
+      SHOULD be followed. The actual set of allowed methods is defined
+      by the origin server at the time of each request.
+
+      The Allow header field MAY be provided with a PUT request to
+      recommend the methods to be supported by the new or modified
+      resource. The server is not required to support these methods and
+      SHOULD include an Allow header in the response giving the actual
+      supported methods.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 106]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      A proxy MUST NOT modify the Allow header field even if it does not
+      understand all the methods specified, since the user agent might
+      have other means of communicating with the origin server.
+
+14.8 Authorization
+
+      A user agent that wishes to authenticate itself with a server--
+      usually, but not necessarily, after receiving a 401 response--does
+      so by including an Authorization request-header field with the
+      request.  The Authorization field value consists of credentials
+      containing the authentication information of the user agent for
+      the realm of the resource being requested.
+
+          Authorization  = "Authorization" ":" credentials
+
+      HTTP access authentication is described in "HTTP Authentication:
+      Basic and Digest Access Authentication" [43]. If a request is
+      authenticated and a realm specified, the same credentials SHOULD
+      be valid for all other requests within this realm (assuming that
+      the authentication scheme itself does not require otherwise, such
+      as credentials that vary according to a challenge value or using
+      synchronized clocks).
+
+      When a shared cache (see section 13.7) receives a request
+      containing an Authorization field, it MUST NOT return the
+      corresponding response as a reply to any other request, unless one
+      of the following specific exceptions holds:
+
+      1. If the response includes the "s-maxage" cache-control
+         directive, the cache MAY use that response in replying to a
+         subsequent request. But (if the specified maximum age has
+         passed) a proxy cache MUST first revalidate it with the origin
+         server, using the request-headers from the new request to allow
+         the origin server to authenticate the new request. (This is the
+         defined behavior for s-maxage.) If the response includes "s-
+         maxage=0", the proxy MUST always revalidate it before re-using
+         it.
+
+      2. If the response includes the "must-revalidate" cache-control
+         directive, the cache MAY use that response in replying to a
+         subsequent request. But if the response is stale, all caches
+         MUST first revalidate it with the origin server, using the
+         request-headers from the new request to allow the origin server
+         to authenticate the new request.
+
+      3. If the response includes the "public" cache-control directive,
+         it MAY be returned in reply to any subsequent request.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 107]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.9 Cache-Control
+
+   The Cache-Control general-header field is used to specify directives
+   that MUST be obeyed by all caching mechanisms along the
+   request/response chain. The directives specify behavior intended to
+   prevent caches from adversely interfering with the request or
+   response. These directives typically override the default caching
+   algorithms. Cache directives are unidirectional in that the presence
+   of a directive in a request does not imply that the same directive is
+   to be given in the response.
+
+      Note that HTTP/1.0 caches might not implement Cache-Control and
+      might only implement Pragma: no-cache (see section 14.32).
+
+   Cache directives MUST be passed through by a proxy or gateway
+   application, regardless of their significance to that application,
+   since the directives might be applicable to all recipients along the
+   request/response chain. It is not possible to specify a cache-
+   directive for a specific cache.
+
+    Cache-Control   = "Cache-Control" ":" 1#cache-directive
+
+    cache-directive = cache-request-directive
+         | cache-response-directive
+
+    cache-request-directive =
+           "no-cache"                          ; section 14.9.1
+         | "no-store"                          ; section 14.9.2
+         | "max-age" "=" delta-seconds         ; section 14.9.3, 14.9.4
+         | "max-stale" [ "=" delta-seconds ]   ; section 14.9.3
+         | "min-fresh" "=" delta-seconds       ; section 14.9.3
+         | "no-transform"                      ; section 14.9.5
+         | "only-if-cached"                    ; section 14.9.4
+         | cache-extension                     ; section 14.9.6
+
+     cache-response-directive =
+           "public"                               ; section 14.9.1
+         | "private" [ "=" <"> 1#field-name <"> ] ; section 14.9.1
+         | "no-cache" [ "=" <"> 1#field-name <"> ]; section 14.9.1
+         | "no-store"                             ; section 14.9.2
+         | "no-transform"                         ; section 14.9.5
+         | "must-revalidate"                      ; section 14.9.4
+         | "proxy-revalidate"                     ; section 14.9.4
+         | "max-age" "=" delta-seconds            ; section 14.9.3
+         | "s-maxage" "=" delta-seconds           ; section 14.9.3
+         | cache-extension                        ; section 14.9.6
+
+    cache-extension = token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ]
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 108]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   When a directive appears without any 1#field-name parameter, the
+   directive applies to the entire request or response. When such a
+   directive appears with a 1#field-name parameter, it applies only to
+   the named field or fields, and not to the rest of the request or
+   response. This mechanism supports extensibility; implementations of
+   future versions of the HTTP protocol might apply these directives to
+   header fields not defined in HTTP/1.1.
+
+   The cache-control directives can be broken down into these general
+   categories:
+
+      - Restrictions on what are cacheable; these may only be imposed by
+        the origin server.
+
+      - Restrictions on what may be stored by a cache; these may be
+        imposed by either the origin server or the user agent.
+
+      - Modifications of the basic expiration mechanism; these may be
+        imposed by either the origin server or the user agent.
+
+      - Controls over cache revalidation and reload; these may only be
+        imposed by a user agent.
+
+      - Control over transformation of entities.
+
+      - Extensions to the caching system.
+
+14.9.1 What is Cacheable
+
+   By default, a response is cacheable if the requirements of the
+   request method, request header fields, and the response status
+   indicate that it is cacheable. section 13.4 summarizes these defaults
+   for cacheability. The following Cache-Control response directives
+   allow an origin server to override the default cacheability of a
+   response:
+
+   public
+      Indicates that the response MAY be cached by any cache, even if it
+      would normally be non-cacheable or cacheable only within a non-
+      shared cache. (See also Authorization, section 14.8, for
+      additional details.)
+
+   private
+      Indicates that all or part of the response message is intended for
+      a single user and MUST NOT be cached by a shared cache. This
+      allows an origin server to state that the specified parts of the
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 109]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      response are intended for only one user and are not a valid
+      response for requests by other users. A private (non-shared) cache
+      MAY cache the response.
+
+       Note: This usage of the word private only controls where the
+       response may be cached, and cannot ensure the privacy of the
+       message content.
+
+   no-cache
+       If the no-cache directive does not specify a field-name, then a
+      cache MUST NOT use the response to satisfy a subsequent request
+      without successful revalidation with the origin server. This
+      allows an origin server to prevent caching even by caches that
+      have been configured to return stale responses to client requests.
+
+      If the no-cache directive does specify one or more field-names,
+      then a cache MAY use the response to satisfy a subsequent request,
+      subject to any other restrictions on caching. However, the
+      specified field-name(s) MUST NOT be sent in the response to a
+      subsequent request without successful revalidation with the origin
+      server. This allows an origin server to prevent the re-use of
+      certain header fields in a response, while still allowing caching
+      of the rest of the response.
+
+       Note: Most HTTP/1.0 caches will not recognize or obey this
+       directive.
+
+14.9.2 What May be Stored by Caches
+
+   no-store
+      The purpose of the no-store directive is to prevent the
+      inadvertent release or retention of sensitive information (for
+      example, on backup tapes). The no-store directive applies to the
+      entire message, and MAY be sent either in a response or in a
+      request. If sent in a request, a cache MUST NOT store any part of
+      either this request or any response to it. If sent in a response,
+      a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this response or the
+      request that elicited it. This directive applies to both non-
+      shared and shared caches. "MUST NOT store" in this context means
+      that the cache MUST NOT intentionally store the information in
+      non-volatile storage, and MUST make a best-effort attempt to
+      remove the information from volatile storage as promptly as
+      possible after forwarding it.
+
+      Even when this directive is associated with a response, users
+      might explicitly store such a response outside of the caching
+      system (e.g., with a "Save As" dialog). History buffers MAY store
+      such responses as part of their normal operation.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 110]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      The purpose of this directive is to meet the stated requirements
+      of certain users and service authors who are concerned about
+      accidental releases of information via unanticipated accesses to
+      cache data structures. While the use of this directive might
+      improve privacy in some cases, we caution that it is NOT in any
+      way a reliable or sufficient mechanism for ensuring privacy. In
+      particular, malicious or compromised caches might not recognize or
+      obey this directive, and communications networks might be
+      vulnerable to eavesdropping.
+
+14.9.3 Modifications of the Basic Expiration Mechanism
+
+   The expiration time of an entity MAY be specified by the origin
+   server using the Expires header (see section 14.21). Alternatively,
+   it MAY be specified using the max-age directive in a response. When
+   the max-age cache-control directive is present in a cached response,
+   the response is stale if its current age is greater than the age
+   value given (in seconds) at the time of a new request for that
+   resource. The max-age directive on a response implies that the
+   response is cacheable (i.e., "public") unless some other, more
+   restrictive cache directive is also present.
+
+   If a response includes both an Expires header and a max-age
+   directive, the max-age directive overrides the Expires header, even
+   if the Expires header is more restrictive. This rule allows an origin
+   server to provide, for a given response, a longer expiration time to
+   an HTTP/1.1 (or later) cache than to an HTTP/1.0 cache. This might be
+   useful if certain HTTP/1.0 caches improperly calculate ages or
+   expiration times, perhaps due to desynchronized clocks.
+
+   Many HTTP/1.0 cache implementations will treat an Expires value that
+   is less than or equal to the response Date value as being equivalent
+   to the Cache-Control response directive "no-cache". If an HTTP/1.1
+   cache receives such a response, and the response does not include a
+   Cache-Control header field, it SHOULD consider the response to be
+   non-cacheable in order to retain compatibility with HTTP/1.0 servers.
+
+       Note: An origin server might wish to use a relatively new HTTP
+       cache control feature, such as the "private" directive, on a
+       network including older caches that do not understand that
+       feature. The origin server will need to combine the new feature
+       with an Expires field whose value is less than or equal to the
+       Date value. This will prevent older caches from improperly
+       caching the response.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 111]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   s-maxage
+       If a response includes an s-maxage directive, then for a shared
+       cache (but not for a private cache), the maximum age specified by
+       this directive overrides the maximum age specified by either the
+       max-age directive or the Expires header. The s-maxage directive
+       also implies the semantics of the proxy-revalidate directive (see
+       section 14.9.4), i.e., that the shared cache must not use the
+       entry after it becomes stale to respond to a subsequent request
+       without first revalidating it with the origin server. The s-
+       maxage directive is always ignored by a private cache.
+
+   Note that most older caches, not compliant with this specification,
+   do not implement any cache-control directives. An origin server
+   wishing to use a cache-control directive that restricts, but does not
+   prevent, caching by an HTTP/1.1-compliant cache MAY exploit the
+   requirement that the max-age directive overrides the Expires header,
+   and the fact that pre-HTTP/1.1-compliant caches do not observe the
+   max-age directive.
+
+   Other directives allow a user agent to modify the basic expiration
+   mechanism. These directives MAY be specified on a request:
+
+   max-age
+      Indicates that the client is willing to accept a response whose
+      age is no greater than the specified time in seconds. Unless max-
+      stale directive is also included, the client is not willing to
+      accept a stale response.
+
+   min-fresh
+      Indicates that the client is willing to accept a response whose
+      freshness lifetime is no less than its current age plus the
+      specified time in seconds. That is, the client wants a response
+      that will still be fresh for at least the specified number of
+      seconds.
+
+   max-stale
+      Indicates that the client is willing to accept a response that has
+      exceeded its expiration time. If max-stale is assigned a value,
+      then the client is willing to accept a response that has exceeded
+      its expiration time by no more than the specified number of
+      seconds. If no value is assigned to max-stale, then the client is
+      willing to accept a stale response of any age.
+
+   If a cache returns a stale response, either because of a max-stale
+   directive on a request, or because the cache is configured to
+   override the expiration time of a response, the cache MUST attach a
+   Warning header to the stale response, using Warning 110 (Response is
+   stale).
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 112]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   A cache MAY be configured to return stale responses without
+   validation, but only if this does not conflict with any "MUST"-level
+   requirements concerning cache validation (e.g., a "must-revalidate"
+   cache-control directive).
+
+   If both the new request and the cached entry include "max-age"
+   directives, then the lesser of the two values is used for determining
+   the freshness of the cached entry for that request.
+
+14.9.4 Cache Revalidation and Reload Controls
+
+   Sometimes a user agent might want or need to insist that a cache
+   revalidate its cache entry with the origin server (and not just with
+   the next cache along the path to the origin server), or to reload its
+   cache entry from the origin server. End-to-end revalidation might be
+   necessary if either the cache or the origin server has overestimated
+   the expiration time of the cached response. End-to-end reload may be
+   necessary if the cache entry has become corrupted for some reason.
+
+   End-to-end revalidation may be requested either when the client does
+   not have its own local cached copy, in which case we call it
+   "unspecified end-to-end revalidation", or when the client does have a
+   local cached copy, in which case we call it "specific end-to-end
+   revalidation."
+
+   The client can specify these three kinds of action using Cache-
+   Control request directives:
+
+   End-to-end reload
+      The request includes a "no-cache" cache-control directive or, for
+      compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients, "Pragma: no-cache". Field
+      names MUST NOT be included with the no-cache directive in a
+      request. The server MUST NOT use a cached copy when responding to
+      such a request.
+
+   Specific end-to-end revalidation
+      The request includes a "max-age=0" cache-control directive, which
+      forces each cache along the path to the origin server to
+      revalidate its own entry, if any, with the next cache or server.
+      The initial request includes a cache-validating conditional with
+      the client's current validator.
+
+   Unspecified end-to-end revalidation
+      The request includes "max-age=0" cache-control directive, which
+      forces each cache along the path to the origin server to
+      revalidate its own entry, if any, with the next cache or server.
+      The initial request does not include a cache-validating
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 113]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      conditional; the first cache along the path (if any) that holds a
+      cache entry for this resource includes a cache-validating
+      conditional with its current validator.
+
+   max-age
+      When an intermediate cache is forced, by means of a max-age=0
+      directive, to revalidate its own cache entry, and the client has
+      supplied its own validator in the request, the supplied validator
+      might differ from the validator currently stored with the cache
+      entry. In this case, the cache MAY use either validator in making
+      its own request without affecting semantic transparency.
+
+      However, the choice of validator might affect performance. The
+      best approach is for the intermediate cache to use its own
+      validator when making its request. If the server replies with 304
+      (Not Modified), then the cache can return its now validated copy
+      to the client with a 200 (OK) response. If the server replies with
+      a new entity and cache validator, however, the intermediate cache
+      can compare the returned validator with the one provided in the
+      client's request, using the strong comparison function. If the
+      client's validator is equal to the origin server's, then the
+      intermediate cache simply returns 304 (Not Modified). Otherwise,
+      it returns the new entity with a 200 (OK) response.
+
+      If a request includes the no-cache directive, it SHOULD NOT
+      include min-fresh, max-stale, or max-age.
+
+   only-if-cached
+      In some cases, such as times of extremely poor network
+      connectivity, a client may want a cache to return only those
+      responses that it currently has stored, and not to reload or
+      revalidate with the origin server. To do this, the client may
+      include the only-if-cached directive in a request. If it receives
+      this directive, a cache SHOULD either respond using a cached entry
+      that is consistent with the other constraints of the request, or
+      respond with a 504 (Gateway Timeout) status. However, if a group
+      of caches is being operated as a unified system with good internal
+      connectivity, such a request MAY be forwarded within that group of
+      caches.
+
+   must-revalidate
+      Because a cache MAY be configured to ignore a server's specified
+      expiration time, and because a client request MAY include a max-
+      stale directive (which has a similar effect), the protocol also
+      includes a mechanism for the origin server to require revalidation
+      of a cache entry on any subsequent use. When the must-revalidate
+      directive is present in a response received by a cache, that cache
+      MUST NOT use the entry after it becomes stale to respond to a
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 114]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      subsequent request without first revalidating it with the origin
+      server. (I.e., the cache MUST do an end-to-end revalidation every
+      time, if, based solely on the origin server's Expires or max-age
+      value, the cached response is stale.)
+
+      The must-revalidate directive is necessary to support reliable
+      operation for certain protocol features. In all circumstances an
+      HTTP/1.1 cache MUST obey the must-revalidate directive; in
+      particular, if the cache cannot reach the origin server for any
+      reason, it MUST generate a 504 (Gateway Timeout) response.
+
+      Servers SHOULD send the must-revalidate directive if and only if
+      failure to revalidate a request on the entity could result in
+      incorrect operation, such as a silently unexecuted financial
+      transaction. Recipients MUST NOT take any automated action that
+      violates this directive, and MUST NOT automatically provide an
+      unvalidated copy of the entity if revalidation fails.
+
+      Although this is not recommended, user agents operating under
+      severe connectivity constraints MAY violate this directive but, if
+      so, MUST explicitly warn the user that an unvalidated response has
+      been provided. The warning MUST be provided on each unvalidated
+      access, and SHOULD require explicit user confirmation.
+
+   proxy-revalidate
+      The proxy-revalidate directive has the same meaning as the must-
+      revalidate directive, except that it does not apply to non-shared
+      user agent caches. It can be used on a response to an
+      authenticated request to permit the user's cache to store and
+      later return the response without needing to revalidate it (since
+      it has already been authenticated once by that user), while still
+      requiring proxies that service many users to revalidate each time
+      (in order to make sure that each user has been authenticated).
+      Note that such authenticated responses also need the public cache
+      control directive in order to allow them to be cached at all.
+
+14.9.5 No-Transform Directive
+
+   no-transform
+      Implementors of intermediate caches (proxies) have found it useful
+      to convert the media type of certain entity bodies. A non-
+      transparent proxy might, for example, convert between image
+      formats in order to save cache space or to reduce the amount of
+      traffic on a slow link.
+
+      Serious operational problems occur, however, when these
+      transformations are applied to entity bodies intended for certain
+      kinds of applications. For example, applications for medical
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 115]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      imaging, scientific data analysis and those using end-to-end
+      authentication, all depend on receiving an entity body that is bit
+      for bit identical to the original entity-body.
+
+      Therefore, if a message includes the no-transform directive, an
+      intermediate cache or proxy MUST NOT change those headers that are
+      listed in section 13.5.2 as being subject to the no-transform
+      directive. This implies that the cache or proxy MUST NOT change
+      any aspect of the entity-body that is specified by these headers,
+      including the value of the entity-body itself.
+
+14.9.6 Cache Control Extensions
+
+   The Cache-Control header field can be extended through the use of one
+   or more cache-extension tokens, each with an optional assigned value.
+   Informational extensions (those which do not require a change in
+   cache behavior) MAY be added without changing the semantics of other
+   directives. Behavioral extensions are designed to work by acting as
+   modifiers to the existing base of cache directives. Both the new
+   directive and the standard directive are supplied, such that
+   applications which do not understand the new directive will default
+   to the behavior specified by the standard directive, and those that
+   understand the new directive will recognize it as modifying the
+   requirements associated with the standard directive. In this way,
+   extensions to the cache-control directives can be made without
+   requiring changes to the base protocol.
+
+   This extension mechanism depends on an HTTP cache obeying all of the
+   cache-control directives defined for its native HTTP-version, obeying
+   certain extensions, and ignoring all directives that it does not
+   understand.
+
+   For example, consider a hypothetical new response directive called
+   community which acts as a modifier to the private directive. We
+   define this new directive to mean that, in addition to any non-shared
+   cache, any cache which is shared only by members of the community
+   named within its value may cache the response. An origin server
+   wishing to allow the UCI community to use an otherwise private
+   response in their shared cache(s) could do so by including
+
+       Cache-Control: private, community="UCI"
+
+   A cache seeing this header field will act correctly even if the cache
+   does not understand the community cache-extension, since it will also
+   see and understand the private directive and thus default to the safe
+   behavior.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 116]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Unrecognized cache-directives MUST be ignored; it is assumed that any
+   cache-directive likely to be unrecognized by an HTTP/1.1 cache will
+   be combined with standard directives (or the response's default
+   cacheability) such that the cache behavior will remain minimally
+   correct even if the cache does not understand the extension(s).
+
+14.10 Connection
+
+   The Connection general-header field allows the sender to specify
+   options that are desired for that particular connection and MUST NOT
+   be communicated by proxies over further connections.
+
+   The Connection header has the following grammar:
+
+       Connection = "Connection" ":" 1#(connection-token)
+       connection-token  = token
+
+   HTTP/1.1 proxies MUST parse the Connection header field before a
+   message is forwarded and, for each connection-token in this field,
+   remove any header field(s) from the message with the same name as the
+   connection-token. Connection options are signaled by the presence of
+   a connection-token in the Connection header field, not by any
+   corresponding additional header field(s), since the additional header
+   field may not be sent if there are no parameters associated with that
+   connection option.
+
+   Message headers listed in the Connection header MUST NOT include
+   end-to-end headers, such as Cache-Control.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 defines the "close" connection option for the sender to
+   signal that the connection will be closed after completion of the
+   response. For example,
+
+       Connection: close
+
+   in either the request or the response header fields indicates that
+   the connection SHOULD NOT be considered `persistent' (section 8.1)
+   after the current request/response is complete.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 applications that do not support persistent connections MUST
+   include the "close" connection option in every message.
+
+   A system receiving an HTTP/1.0 (or lower-version) message that
+   includes a Connection header MUST, for each connection-token in this
+   field, remove and ignore any header field(s) from the message with
+   the same name as the connection-token. This protects against mistaken
+   forwarding of such header fields by pre-HTTP/1.1 proxies. See section
+   19.6.2.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 117]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.11 Content-Encoding
+
+   The Content-Encoding entity-header field is used as a modifier to the
+   media-type. When present, its value indicates what additional content
+   codings have been applied to the entity-body, and thus what decoding
+   mechanisms must be applied in order to obtain the media-type
+   referenced by the Content-Type header field. Content-Encoding is
+   primarily used to allow a document to be compressed without losing
+   the identity of its underlying media type.
+
+       Content-Encoding  = "Content-Encoding" ":" 1#content-coding
+
+   Content codings are defined in section 3.5. An example of its use is
+
+       Content-Encoding: gzip
+
+   The content-coding is a characteristic of the entity identified by
+   the Request-URI. Typically, the entity-body is stored with this
+   encoding and is only decoded before rendering or analogous usage.
+   However, a non-transparent proxy MAY modify the content-coding if the
+   new coding is known to be acceptable to the recipient, unless the
+   "no-transform" cache-control directive is present in the message.
+
+   If the content-coding of an entity is not "identity", then the
+   response MUST include a Content-Encoding entity-header (section
+   14.11) that lists the non-identity content-coding(s) used.
+
+   If the content-coding of an entity in a request message is not
+   acceptable to the origin server, the server SHOULD respond with a
+   status code of 415 (Unsupported Media Type).
+
+   If multiple encodings have been applied to an entity, the content
+   codings MUST be listed in the order in which they were applied.
+   Additional information about the encoding parameters MAY be provided
+   by other entity-header fields not defined by this specification.
+
+14.12 Content-Language
+
+   The Content-Language entity-header field describes the natural
+   language(s) of the intended audience for the enclosed entity. Note
+   that this might not be equivalent to all the languages used within
+   the entity-body.
+
+       Content-Language  = "Content-Language" ":" 1#language-tag
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 118]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Language tags are defined in section 3.10. The primary purpose of
+   Content-Language is to allow a user to identify and differentiate
+   entities according to the user's own preferred language. Thus, if the
+   body content is intended only for a Danish-literate audience, the
+   appropriate field is
+
+       Content-Language: da
+
+   If no Content-Language is specified, the default is that the content
+   is intended for all language audiences. This might mean that the
+   sender does not consider it to be specific to any natural language,
+   or that the sender does not know for which language it is intended.
+
+   Multiple languages MAY be listed for content that is intended for
+   multiple audiences. For example, a rendition of the "Treaty of
+   Waitangi," presented simultaneously in the original Maori and English
+   versions, would call for
+
+       Content-Language: mi, en
+
+   However, just because multiple languages are present within an entity
+   does not mean that it is intended for multiple linguistic audiences.
+   An example would be a beginner's language primer, such as "A First
+   Lesson in Latin," which is clearly intended to be used by an
+   English-literate audience. In this case, the Content-Language would
+   properly only include "en".
+
+   Content-Language MAY be applied to any media type -- it is not
+   limited to textual documents.
+
+14.13 Content-Length
+
+   The Content-Length entity-header field indicates the size of the
+   entity-body, in decimal number of OCTETs, sent to the recipient or,
+   in the case of the HEAD method, the size of the entity-body that
+   would have been sent had the request been a GET.
+
+       Content-Length    = "Content-Length" ":" 1*DIGIT
+
+   An example is
+
+       Content-Length: 3495
+
+   Applications SHOULD use this field to indicate the transfer-length of
+   the message-body, unless this is prohibited by the rules in section
+   4.4.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 119]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Any Content-Length greater than or equal to zero is a valid value.
+   Section 4.4 describes how to determine the length of a message-body
+   if a Content-Length is not given.
+
+   Note that the meaning of this field is significantly different from
+   the corresponding definition in MIME, where it is an optional field
+   used within the "message/external-body" content-type. In HTTP, it
+   SHOULD be sent whenever the message's length can be determined prior
+   to being transferred, unless this is prohibited by the rules in
+   section 4.4.
+
+14.14 Content-Location
+
+   The Content-Location entity-header field MAY be used to supply the
+   resource location for the entity enclosed in the message when that
+   entity is accessible from a location separate from the requested
+   resource's URI. A server SHOULD provide a Content-Location for the
+   variant corresponding to the response entity; especially in the case
+   where a resource has multiple entities associated with it, and those
+   entities actually have separate locations by which they might be
+   individually accessed, the server SHOULD provide a Content-Location
+   for the particular variant which is returned.
+
+       Content-Location = "Content-Location" ":"
+                         ( absoluteURI | relativeURI )
+
+   The value of Content-Location also defines the base URI for the
+   entity.
+
+   The Content-Location value is not a replacement for the original
+   requested URI; it is only a statement of the location of the resource
+   corresponding to this particular entity at the time of the request.
+   Future requests MAY specify the Content-Location URI as the request-
+   URI if the desire is to identify the source of that particular
+   entity.
+
+   A cache cannot assume that an entity with a Content-Location
+   different from the URI used to retrieve it can be used to respond to
+   later requests on that Content-Location URI. However, the Content-
+   Location can be used to differentiate between multiple entities
+   retrieved from a single requested resource, as described in section
+   13.6.
+
+   If the Content-Location is a relative URI, the relative URI is
+   interpreted relative to the Request-URI.
+
+   The meaning of the Content-Location header in PUT or POST requests is
+   undefined; servers are free to ignore it in those cases.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 120]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.15 Content-MD5
+
+   The Content-MD5 entity-header field, as defined in RFC 1864 [23], is
+   an MD5 digest of the entity-body for the purpose of providing an
+   end-to-end message integrity check (MIC) of the entity-body. (Note: a
+   MIC is good for detecting accidental modification of the entity-body
+   in transit, but is not proof against malicious attacks.)
+
+        Content-MD5   = "Content-MD5" ":" md5-digest
+        md5-digest   = <base64 of 128 bit MD5 digest as per RFC 1864>
+
+   The Content-MD5 header field MAY be generated by an origin server or
+   client to function as an integrity check of the entity-body. Only
+   origin servers or clients MAY generate the Content-MD5 header field;
+   proxies and gateways MUST NOT generate it, as this would defeat its
+   value as an end-to-end integrity check. Any recipient of the entity-
+   body, including gateways and proxies, MAY check that the digest value
+   in this header field matches that of the entity-body as received.
+
+   The MD5 digest is computed based on the content of the entity-body,
+   including any content-coding that has been applied, but not including
+   any transfer-encoding applied to the message-body. If the message is
+   received with a transfer-encoding, that encoding MUST be removed
+   prior to checking the Content-MD5 value against the received entity.
+
+   This has the result that the digest is computed on the octets of the
+   entity-body exactly as, and in the order that, they would be sent if
+   no transfer-encoding were being applied.
+
+   HTTP extends RFC 1864 to permit the digest to be computed for MIME
+   composite media-types (e.g., multipart/* and message/rfc822), but
+   this does not change how the digest is computed as defined in the
+   preceding paragraph.
+
+   There are several consequences of this. The entity-body for composite
+   types MAY contain many body-parts, each with its own MIME and HTTP
+   headers (including Content-MD5, Content-Transfer-Encoding, and
+   Content-Encoding headers). If a body-part has a Content-Transfer-
+   Encoding or Content-Encoding header, it is assumed that the content
+   of the body-part has had the encoding applied, and the body-part is
+   included in the Content-MD5 digest as is -- i.e., after the
+   application. The Transfer-Encoding header field is not allowed within
+   body-parts.
+
+   Conversion of all line breaks to CRLF MUST NOT be done before
+   computing or checking the digest: the line break convention used in
+   the text actually transmitted MUST be left unaltered when computing
+   the digest.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 121]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      Note: while the definition of Content-MD5 is exactly the same for
+      HTTP as in RFC 1864 for MIME entity-bodies, there are several ways
+      in which the application of Content-MD5 to HTTP entity-bodies
+      differs from its application to MIME entity-bodies. One is that
+      HTTP, unlike MIME, does not use Content-Transfer-Encoding, and
+      does use Transfer-Encoding and Content-Encoding. Another is that
+      HTTP more frequently uses binary content types than MIME, so it is
+      worth noting that, in such cases, the byte order used to compute
+      the digest is the transmission byte order defined for the type.
+      Lastly, HTTP allows transmission of text types with any of several
+      line break conventions and not just the canonical form using CRLF.
+
+14.16 Content-Range
+
+   The Content-Range entity-header is sent with a partial entity-body to
+   specify where in the full entity-body the partial body should be
+   applied. Range units are defined in section 3.12.
+
+       Content-Range = "Content-Range" ":" content-range-spec
+
+       content-range-spec      = byte-content-range-spec
+       byte-content-range-spec = bytes-unit SP
+                                 byte-range-resp-spec "/"
+                                 ( instance-length | "*" )
+
+       byte-range-resp-spec = (first-byte-pos "-" last-byte-pos)
+                                      | "*"
+       instance-length           = 1*DIGIT
+
+   The header SHOULD indicate the total length of the full entity-body,
+   unless this length is unknown or difficult to determine. The asterisk
+   "*" character means that the instance-length is unknown at the time
+   when the response was generated.
+
+   Unlike byte-ranges-specifier values (see section 14.35.1), a byte-
+   range-resp-spec MUST only specify one range, and MUST contain
+   absolute byte positions for both the first and last byte of the
+   range.
+
+   A byte-content-range-spec with a byte-range-resp-spec whose last-
+   byte-pos value is less than its first-byte-pos value, or whose
+   instance-length value is less than or equal to its last-byte-pos
+   value, is invalid. The recipient of an invalid byte-content-range-
+   spec MUST ignore it and any content transferred along with it.
+
+   A server sending a response with status code 416 (Requested range not
+   satisfiable) SHOULD include a Content-Range field with a byte-range-
+   resp-spec of "*". The instance-length specifies the current length of
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 122]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   the selected resource. A response with status code 206 (Partial
+   Content) MUST NOT include a Content-Range field with a byte-range-
+   resp-spec of "*".
+
+   Examples of byte-content-range-spec values, assuming that the entity
+   contains a total of 1234 bytes:
+
+      . The first 500 bytes:
+       bytes 0-499/1234
+
+      . The second 500 bytes:
+       bytes 500-999/1234
+
+      . All except for the first 500 bytes:
+       bytes 500-1233/1234
+
+      . The last 500 bytes:
+       bytes 734-1233/1234
+
+   When an HTTP message includes the content of a single range (for
+   example, a response to a request for a single range, or to a request
+   for a set of ranges that overlap without any holes), this content is
+   transmitted with a Content-Range header, and a Content-Length header
+   showing the number of bytes actually transferred. For example,
+
+       HTTP/1.1 206 Partial content
+       Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:25:24 GMT
+       Last-Modified: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:58:08 GMT
+       Content-Range: bytes 21010-47021/47022
+       Content-Length: 26012
+       Content-Type: image/gif
+
+   When an HTTP message includes the content of multiple ranges (for
+   example, a response to a request for multiple non-overlapping
+   ranges), these are transmitted as a multipart message. The multipart
+   media type used for this purpose is "multipart/byteranges" as defined
+   in appendix 19.2. See appendix 19.6.3 for a compatibility issue.
+
+   A response to a request for a single range MUST NOT be sent using the
+   multipart/byteranges media type.  A response to a request for
+   multiple ranges, whose result is a single range, MAY be sent as a
+   multipart/byteranges media type with one part. A client that cannot
+   decode a multipart/byteranges message MUST NOT ask for multiple
+   byte-ranges in a single request.
+
+   When a client requests multiple byte-ranges in one request, the
+   server SHOULD return them in the order that they appeared in the
+   request.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 123]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If the server ignores a byte-range-spec because it is syntactically
+   invalid, the server SHOULD treat the request as if the invalid Range
+   header field did not exist. (Normally, this means return a 200
+   response containing the full entity).
+
+   If the server receives a request (other than one including an If-
+   Range request-header field) with an unsatisfiable Range request-
+   header field (that is, all of whose byte-range-spec values have a
+   first-byte-pos value greater than the current length of the selected
+   resource), it SHOULD return a response code of 416 (Requested range
+   not satisfiable) (section 10.4.17).
+
+      Note: clients cannot depend on servers to send a 416 (Requested
+      range not satisfiable) response instead of a 200 (OK) response for
+      an unsatisfiable Range request-header, since not all servers
+      implement this request-header.
+
+14.17 Content-Type
+
+   The Content-Type entity-header field indicates the media type of the
+   entity-body sent to the recipient or, in the case of the HEAD method,
+   the media type that would have been sent had the request been a GET.
+
+       Content-Type   = "Content-Type" ":" media-type
+
+   Media types are defined in section 3.7. An example of the field is
+
+       Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-4
+
+   Further discussion of methods for identifying the media type of an
+   entity is provided in section 7.2.1.
+
+14.18 Date
+
+   The Date general-header field represents the date and time at which
+   the message was originated, having the same semantics as orig-date in
+   RFC 822. The field value is an HTTP-date, as described in section
+   3.3.1; it MUST be sent in RFC 1123 [8]-date format.
+
+       Date  = "Date" ":" HTTP-date
+
+   An example is
+
+       Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 08:12:31 GMT
+
+   Origin servers MUST include a Date header field in all responses,
+   except in these cases:
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 124]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      1. If the response status code is 100 (Continue) or 101 (Switching
+         Protocols), the response MAY include a Date header field, at
+         the server's option.
+
+      2. If the response status code conveys a server error, e.g. 500
+         (Internal Server Error) or 503 (Service Unavailable), and it is
+         inconvenient or impossible to generate a valid Date.
+
+      3. If the server does not have a clock that can provide a
+         reasonable approximation of the current time, its responses
+         MUST NOT include a Date header field. In this case, the rules
+         in section 14.18.1 MUST be followed.
+
+   A received message that does not have a Date header field MUST be
+   assigned one by the recipient if the message will be cached by that
+   recipient or gatewayed via a protocol which requires a Date. An HTTP
+   implementation without a clock MUST NOT cache responses without
+   revalidating them on every use. An HTTP cache, especially a shared
+   cache, SHOULD use a mechanism, such as NTP [28], to synchronize its
+   clock with a reliable external standard.
+
+   Clients SHOULD only send a Date header field in messages that include
+   an entity-body, as in the case of the PUT and POST requests, and even
+   then it is optional. A client without a clock MUST NOT send a Date
+   header field in a request.
+
+   The HTTP-date sent in a Date header SHOULD NOT represent a date and
+   time subsequent to the generation of the message. It SHOULD represent
+   the best available approximation of the date and time of message
+   generation, unless the implementation has no means of generating a
+   reasonably accurate date and time. In theory, the date ought to
+   represent the moment just before the entity is generated. In
+   practice, the date can be generated at any time during the message
+   origination without affecting its semantic value.
+
+14.18.1 Clockless Origin Server Operation
+
+   Some origin server implementations might not have a clock available.
+   An origin server without a clock MUST NOT assign Expires or Last-
+   Modified values to a response, unless these values were associated
+   with the resource by a system or user with a reliable clock. It MAY
+   assign an Expires value that is known, at or before server
+   configuration time, to be in the past (this allows "pre-expiration"
+   of responses without storing separate Expires values for each
+   resource).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 125]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.19 ETag
+
+   The ETag response-header field provides the current value of the
+   entity tag for the requested variant. The headers used with entity
+   tags are described in sections 14.24, 14.26 and 14.44. The entity tag
+   MAY be used for comparison with other entities from the same resource
+   (see section 13.3.3).
+
+      ETag = "ETag" ":" entity-tag
+
+   Examples:
+
+      ETag: "xyzzy"
+      ETag: W/"xyzzy"
+      ETag: ""
+
+14.20 Expect
+
+   The Expect request-header field is used to indicate that particular
+   server behaviors are required by the client.
+
+      Expect       =  "Expect" ":" 1#expectation
+
+      expectation  =  "100-continue" | expectation-extension
+      expectation-extension =  token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string )
+                               *expect-params ]
+      expect-params =  ";" token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ]
+
+
+   A server that does not understand or is unable to comply with any of
+   the expectation values in the Expect field of a request MUST respond
+   with appropriate error status. The server MUST respond with a 417
+   (Expectation Failed) status if any of the expectations cannot be met
+   or, if there are other problems with the request, some other 4xx
+   status.
+
+   This header field is defined with extensible syntax to allow for
+   future extensions. If a server receives a request containing an
+   Expect field that includes an expectation-extension that it does not
+   support, it MUST respond with a 417 (Expectation Failed) status.
+
+   Comparison of expectation values is case-insensitive for unquoted
+   tokens (including the 100-continue token), and is case-sensitive for
+   quoted-string expectation-extensions.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 126]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The Expect mechanism is hop-by-hop: that is, an HTTP/1.1 proxy MUST
+   return a 417 (Expectation Failed) status if it receives a request
+   with an expectation that it cannot meet. However, the Expect
+   request-header itself is end-to-end; it MUST be forwarded if the
+   request is forwarded.
+
+   Many older HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1 applications do not understand the
+   Expect header.
+
+   See section 8.2.3 for the use of the 100 (continue) status.
+
+14.21 Expires
+
+   The Expires entity-header field gives the date/time after which the
+   response is considered stale. A stale cache entry may not normally be
+   returned by a cache (either a proxy cache or a user agent cache)
+   unless it is first validated with the origin server (or with an
+   intermediate cache that has a fresh copy of the entity). See section
+   13.2 for further discussion of the expiration model.
+
+   The presence of an Expires field does not imply that the original
+   resource will change or cease to exist at, before, or after that
+   time.
+
+   The format is an absolute date and time as defined by HTTP-date in
+   section 3.3.1; it MUST be in RFC 1123 date format:
+
+      Expires = "Expires" ":" HTTP-date
+
+   An example of its use is
+
+      Expires: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT
+
+      Note: if a response includes a Cache-Control field with the max-
+      age directive (see section 14.9.3), that directive overrides the
+      Expires field.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 clients and caches MUST treat other invalid date formats,
+   especially including the value "0", as in the past (i.e., "already
+   expired").
+
+   To mark a response as "already expired," an origin server sends an
+   Expires date that is equal to the Date header value. (See the rules
+   for expiration calculations in section 13.2.4.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 127]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   To mark a response as "never expires," an origin server sends an
+   Expires date approximately one year from the time the response is
+   sent. HTTP/1.1 servers SHOULD NOT send Expires dates more than one
+   year in the future.
+
+   The presence of an Expires header field with a date value of some
+   time in the future on a response that otherwise would by default be
+   non-cacheable indicates that the response is cacheable, unless
+   indicated otherwise by a Cache-Control header field (section 14.9).
+
+14.22 From
+
+   The From request-header field, if given, SHOULD contain an Internet
+   e-mail address for the human user who controls the requesting user
+   agent. The address SHOULD be machine-usable, as defined by "mailbox"
+   in RFC 822 [9] as updated by RFC 1123 [8]:
+
+       From   = "From" ":" mailbox
+
+   An example is:
+
+       From: webmaster@w3.org
+
+   This header field MAY be used for logging purposes and as a means for
+   identifying the source of invalid or unwanted requests. It SHOULD NOT
+   be used as an insecure form of access protection. The interpretation
+   of this field is that the request is being performed on behalf of the
+   person given, who accepts responsibility for the method performed. In
+   particular, robot agents SHOULD include this header so that the
+   person responsible for running the robot can be contacted if problems
+   occur on the receiving end.
+
+   The Internet e-mail address in this field MAY be separate from the
+   Internet host which issued the request. For example, when a request
+   is passed through a proxy the original issuer's address SHOULD be
+   used.
+
+   The client SHOULD NOT send the From header field without the user's
+   approval, as it might conflict with the user's privacy interests or
+   their site's security policy. It is strongly recommended that the
+   user be able to disable, enable, and modify the value of this field
+   at any time prior to a request.
+
+14.23 Host
+
+   The Host request-header field specifies the Internet host and port
+   number of the resource being requested, as obtained from the original
+   URI given by the user or referring resource (generally an HTTP URL,
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 128]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   as described in section 3.2.2). The Host field value MUST represent
+   the naming authority of the origin server or gateway given by the
+   original URL. This allows the origin server or gateway to
+   differentiate between internally-ambiguous URLs, such as the root "/"
+   URL of a server for multiple host names on a single IP address.
+
+       Host = "Host" ":" host [ ":" port ] ; section 3.2.2
+
+   A "host" without any trailing port information implies the default
+   port for the service requested (e.g., "80" for an HTTP URL). For
+   example, a request on the origin server for
+   <http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/> would properly include:
+
+       GET /pub/WWW/ HTTP/1.1
+       Host: www.w3.org
+
+   A client MUST include a Host header field in all HTTP/1.1 request
+   messages . If the requested URI does not include an Internet host
+   name for the service being requested, then the Host header field MUST
+   be given with an empty value. An HTTP/1.1 proxy MUST ensure that any
+   request message it forwards does contain an appropriate Host header
+   field that identifies the service being requested by the proxy. All
+   Internet-based HTTP/1.1 servers MUST respond with a 400 (Bad Request)
+   status code to any HTTP/1.1 request message which lacks a Host header
+   field.
+
+   See sections 5.2 and 19.6.1.1 for other requirements relating to
+   Host.
+
+14.24 If-Match
+
+   The If-Match request-header field is used with a method to make it
+   conditional. A client that has one or more entities previously
+   obtained from the resource can verify that one of those entities is
+   current by including a list of their associated entity tags in the
+   If-Match header field. Entity tags are defined in section 3.11. The
+   purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached
+   information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead. It is also
+   used, on updating requests, to prevent inadvertent modification of
+   the wrong version of a resource. As a special case, the value "*"
+   matches any current entity of the resource.
+
+       If-Match = "If-Match" ":" ( "*" | 1#entity-tag )
+
+   If any of the entity tags match the entity tag of the entity that
+   would have been returned in the response to a similar GET request
+   (without the If-Match header) on that resource, or if "*" is given
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 129]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   and any current entity exists for that resource, then the server MAY
+   perform the requested method as if the If-Match header field did not
+   exist.
+
+   A server MUST use the strong comparison function (see section 13.3.3)
+   to compare the entity tags in If-Match.
+
+   If none of the entity tags match, or if "*" is given and no current
+   entity exists, the server MUST NOT perform the requested method, and
+   MUST return a 412 (Precondition Failed) response. This behavior is
+   most useful when the client wants to prevent an updating method, such
+   as PUT, from modifying a resource that has changed since the client
+   last retrieved it.
+
+   If the request would, without the If-Match header field, result in
+   anything other than a 2xx or 412 status, then the If-Match header
+   MUST be ignored.
+
+   The meaning of "If-Match: *" is that the method SHOULD be performed
+   if the representation selected by the origin server (or by a cache,
+   possibly using the Vary mechanism, see section 14.44) exists, and
+   MUST NOT be performed if the representation does not exist.
+
+   A request intended to update a resource (e.g., a PUT) MAY include an
+   If-Match header field to signal that the request method MUST NOT be
+   applied if the entity corresponding to the If-Match value (a single
+   entity tag) is no longer a representation of that resource. This
+   allows the user to indicate that they do not wish the request to be
+   successful if the resource has been changed without their knowledge.
+   Examples:
+
+       If-Match: "xyzzy"
+       If-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz"
+       If-Match: *
+
+   The result of a request having both an If-Match header field and
+   either an If-None-Match or an If-Modified-Since header fields is
+   undefined by this specification.
+
+14.25 If-Modified-Since
+
+   The If-Modified-Since request-header field is used with a method to
+   make it conditional: if the requested variant has not been modified
+   since the time specified in this field, an entity will not be
+   returned from the server; instead, a 304 (not modified) response will
+   be returned without any message-body.
+
+       If-Modified-Since = "If-Modified-Since" ":" HTTP-date
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 130]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   An example of the field is:
+
+       If-Modified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT
+
+   A GET method with an If-Modified-Since header and no Range header
+   requests that the identified entity be transferred only if it has
+   been modified since the date given by the If-Modified-Since header.
+   The algorithm for determining this includes the following cases:
+
+      a) If the request would normally result in anything other than a
+         200 (OK) status, or if the passed If-Modified-Since date is
+         invalid, the response is exactly the same as for a normal GET.
+         A date which is later than the server's current time is
+         invalid.
+
+      b) If the variant has been modified since the If-Modified-Since
+         date, the response is exactly the same as for a normal GET.
+
+      c) If the variant has not been modified since a valid If-
+         Modified-Since date, the server SHOULD return a 304 (Not
+         Modified) response.
+
+   The purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached
+   information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead.
+
+      Note: The Range request-header field modifies the meaning of If-
+      Modified-Since; see section 14.35 for full details.
+
+      Note: If-Modified-Since times are interpreted by the server, whose
+      clock might not be synchronized with the client.
+
+      Note: When handling an If-Modified-Since header field, some
+      servers will use an exact date comparison function, rather than a
+      less-than function, for deciding whether to send a 304 (Not
+      Modified) response. To get best results when sending an If-
+      Modified-Since header field for cache validation, clients are
+      advised to use the exact date string received in a previous Last-
+      Modified header field whenever possible.
+
+      Note: If a client uses an arbitrary date in the If-Modified-Since
+      header instead of a date taken from the Last-Modified header for
+      the same request, the client should be aware of the fact that this
+      date is interpreted in the server's understanding of time. The
+      client should consider unsynchronized clocks and rounding problems
+      due to the different encodings of time between the client and
+      server. This includes the possibility of race conditions if the
+      document has changed between the time it was first requested and
+      the If-Modified-Since date of a subsequent request, and the
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 131]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      possibility of clock-skew-related problems if the If-Modified-
+      Since date is derived from the client's clock without correction
+      to the server's clock. Corrections for different time bases
+      between client and server are at best approximate due to network
+      latency.
+
+   The result of a request having both an If-Modified-Since header field
+   and either an If-Match or an If-Unmodified-Since header fields is
+   undefined by this specification.
+
+14.26 If-None-Match
+
+   The If-None-Match request-header field is used with a method to make
+   it conditional. A client that has one or more entities previously
+   obtained from the resource can verify that none of those entities is
+   current by including a list of their associated entity tags in the
+   If-None-Match header field. The purpose of this feature is to allow
+   efficient updates of cached information with a minimum amount of
+   transaction overhead. It is also used to prevent a method (e.g. PUT)
+   from inadvertently modifying an existing resource when the client
+   believes that the resource does not exist.
+
+   As a special case, the value "*" matches any current entity of the
+   resource.
+
+       If-None-Match = "If-None-Match" ":" ( "*" | 1#entity-tag )
+
+   If any of the entity tags match the entity tag of the entity that
+   would have been returned in the response to a similar GET request
+   (without the If-None-Match header) on that resource, or if "*" is
+   given and any current entity exists for that resource, then the
+   server MUST NOT perform the requested method, unless required to do
+   so because the resource's modification date fails to match that
+   supplied in an If-Modified-Since header field in the request.
+   Instead, if the request method was GET or HEAD, the server SHOULD
+   respond with a 304 (Not Modified) response, including the cache-
+   related header fields (particularly ETag) of one of the entities that
+   matched. For all other request methods, the server MUST respond with
+   a status of 412 (Precondition Failed).
+
+   See section 13.3.3 for rules on how to determine if two entities tags
+   match. The weak comparison function can only be used with GET or HEAD
+   requests.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 132]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If none of the entity tags match, then the server MAY perform the
+   requested method as if the If-None-Match header field did not exist,
+   but MUST also ignore any If-Modified-Since header field(s) in the
+   request. That is, if no entity tags match, then the server MUST NOT
+   return a 304 (Not Modified) response.
+
+   If the request would, without the If-None-Match header field, result
+   in anything other than a 2xx or 304 status, then the If-None-Match
+   header MUST be ignored. (See section 13.3.4 for a discussion of
+   server behavior when both If-Modified-Since and If-None-Match appear
+   in the same request.)
+
+   The meaning of "If-None-Match: *" is that the method MUST NOT be
+   performed if the representation selected by the origin server (or by
+   a cache, possibly using the Vary mechanism, see section 14.44)
+   exists, and SHOULD be performed if the representation does not exist.
+   This feature is intended to be useful in preventing races between PUT
+   operations.
+
+   Examples:
+
+       If-None-Match: "xyzzy"
+       If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy"
+       If-None-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz"
+       If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy", W/"r2d2xxxx", W/"c3piozzzz"
+       If-None-Match: *
+
+   The result of a request having both an If-None-Match header field and
+   either an If-Match or an If-Unmodified-Since header fields is
+   undefined by this specification.
+
+14.27 If-Range
+
+   If a client has a partial copy of an entity in its cache, and wishes
+   to have an up-to-date copy of the entire entity in its cache, it
+   could use the Range request-header with a conditional GET (using
+   either or both of If-Unmodified-Since and If-Match.) However, if the
+   condition fails because the entity has been modified, the client
+   would then have to make a second request to obtain the entire current
+   entity-body.
+
+   The If-Range header allows a client to "short-circuit" the second
+   request. Informally, its meaning is `if the entity is unchanged, send
+   me the part(s) that I am missing; otherwise, send me the entire new
+   entity'.
+
+        If-Range = "If-Range" ":" ( entity-tag | HTTP-date )
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 133]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If the client has no entity tag for an entity, but does have a Last-
+   Modified date, it MAY use that date in an If-Range header. (The
+   server can distinguish between a valid HTTP-date and any form of
+   entity-tag by examining no more than two characters.) The If-Range
+   header SHOULD only be used together with a Range header, and MUST be
+   ignored if the request does not include a Range header, or if the
+   server does not support the sub-range operation.
+
+   If the entity tag given in the If-Range header matches the current
+   entity tag for the entity, then the server SHOULD provide the
+   specified sub-range of the entity using a 206 (Partial content)
+   response. If the entity tag does not match, then the server SHOULD
+   return the entire entity using a 200 (OK) response.
+
+14.28 If-Unmodified-Since
+
+   The If-Unmodified-Since request-header field is used with a method to
+   make it conditional. If the requested resource has not been modified
+   since the time specified in this field, the server SHOULD perform the
+   requested operation as if the If-Unmodified-Since header were not
+   present.
+
+   If the requested variant has been modified since the specified time,
+   the server MUST NOT perform the requested operation, and MUST return
+   a 412 (Precondition Failed).
+
+      If-Unmodified-Since = "If-Unmodified-Since" ":" HTTP-date
+
+   An example of the field is:
+
+       If-Unmodified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT
+
+   If the request normally (i.e., without the If-Unmodified-Since
+   header) would result in anything other than a 2xx or 412 status, the
+   If-Unmodified-Since header SHOULD be ignored.
+
+   If the specified date is invalid, the header is ignored.
+
+   The result of a request having both an If-Unmodified-Since header
+   field and either an If-None-Match or an If-Modified-Since header
+   fields is undefined by this specification.
+
+14.29 Last-Modified
+
+   The Last-Modified entity-header field indicates the date and time at
+   which the origin server believes the variant was last modified.
+
+       Last-Modified  = "Last-Modified" ":" HTTP-date
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 134]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   An example of its use is
+
+       Last-Modified: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 12:45:26 GMT
+
+   The exact meaning of this header field depends on the implementation
+   of the origin server and the nature of the original resource. For
+   files, it may be just the file system last-modified time. For
+   entities with dynamically included parts, it may be the most recent
+   of the set of last-modify times for its component parts. For database
+   gateways, it may be the last-update time stamp of the record. For
+   virtual objects, it may be the last time the internal state changed.
+
+   An origin server MUST NOT send a Last-Modified date which is later
+   than the server's time of message origination. In such cases, where
+   the resource's last modification would indicate some time in the
+   future, the server MUST replace that date with the message
+   origination date.
+
+   An origin server SHOULD obtain the Last-Modified value of the entity
+   as close as possible to the time that it generates the Date value of
+   its response. This allows a recipient to make an accurate assessment
+   of the entity's modification time, especially if the entity changes
+   near the time that the response is generated.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 servers SHOULD send Last-Modified whenever feasible.
+
+14.30 Location
+
+   The Location response-header field is used to redirect the recipient
+   to a location other than the Request-URI for completion of the
+   request or identification of a new resource. For 201 (Created)
+   responses, the Location is that of the new resource which was created
+   by the request. For 3xx responses, the location SHOULD indicate the
+   server's preferred URI for automatic redirection to the resource. The
+   field value consists of a single absolute URI.
+
+       Location       = "Location" ":" absoluteURI
+
+   An example is:
+
+       Location: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/People.html
+
+      Note: The Content-Location header field (section 14.14) differs
+      from Location in that the Content-Location identifies the original
+      location of the entity enclosed in the request. It is therefore
+      possible for a response to contain header fields for both Location
+      and Content-Location. Also see section 13.10 for cache
+      requirements of some methods.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 135]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.31 Max-Forwards
+
+   The Max-Forwards request-header field provides a mechanism with the
+   TRACE (section 9.8) and OPTIONS (section 9.2) methods to limit the
+   number of proxies or gateways that can forward the request to the
+   next inbound server. This can be useful when the client is attempting
+   to trace a request chain which appears to be failing or looping in
+   mid-chain.
+
+       Max-Forwards   = "Max-Forwards" ":" 1*DIGIT
+
+   The Max-Forwards value is a decimal integer indicating the remaining
+   number of times this request message may be forwarded.
+
+   Each proxy or gateway recipient of a TRACE or OPTIONS request
+   containing a Max-Forwards header field MUST check and update its
+   value prior to forwarding the request. If the received value is zero
+   (0), the recipient MUST NOT forward the request; instead, it MUST
+   respond as the final recipient. If the received Max-Forwards value is
+   greater than zero, then the forwarded message MUST contain an updated
+   Max-Forwards field with a value decremented by one (1).
+
+   The Max-Forwards header field MAY be ignored for all other methods
+   defined by this specification and for any extension methods for which
+   it is not explicitly referred to as part of that method definition.
+
+14.32 Pragma
+
+   The Pragma general-header field is used to include implementation-
+   specific directives that might apply to any recipient along the
+   request/response chain. All pragma directives specify optional
+   behavior from the viewpoint of the protocol; however, some systems
+   MAY require that behavior be consistent with the directives.
+
+       Pragma            = "Pragma" ":" 1#pragma-directive
+       pragma-directive  = "no-cache" | extension-pragma
+       extension-pragma  = token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ]
+
+   When the no-cache directive is present in a request message, an
+   application SHOULD forward the request toward the origin server even
+   if it has a cached copy of what is being requested. This pragma
+   directive has the same semantics as the no-cache cache-directive (see
+   section 14.9) and is defined here for backward compatibility with
+   HTTP/1.0. Clients SHOULD include both header fields when a no-cache
+   request is sent to a server not known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 136]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Pragma directives MUST be passed through by a proxy or gateway
+   application, regardless of their significance to that application,
+   since the directives might be applicable to all recipients along the
+   request/response chain. It is not possible to specify a pragma for a
+   specific recipient; however, any pragma directive not relevant to a
+   recipient SHOULD be ignored by that recipient.
+
+   HTTP/1.1 caches SHOULD treat "Pragma: no-cache" as if the client had
+   sent "Cache-Control: no-cache". No new Pragma directives will be
+   defined in HTTP.
+
+      Note: because the meaning of "Pragma: no-cache as a response
+      header field is not actually specified, it does not provide a
+      reliable replacement for "Cache-Control: no-cache" in a response
+
+14.33 Proxy-Authenticate
+
+   The Proxy-Authenticate response-header field MUST be included as part
+   of a 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) response. The field value
+   consists of a challenge that indicates the authentication scheme and
+   parameters applicable to the proxy for this Request-URI.
+
+       Proxy-Authenticate  = "Proxy-Authenticate" ":" 1#challenge
+
+   The HTTP access authentication process is described in "HTTP
+   Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" [43]. Unlike
+   WWW-Authenticate, the Proxy-Authenticate header field applies only to
+   the current connection and SHOULD NOT be passed on to downstream
+   clients. However, an intermediate proxy might need to obtain its own
+   credentials by requesting them from the downstream client, which in
+   some circumstances will appear as if the proxy is forwarding the
+   Proxy-Authenticate header field.
+
+14.34 Proxy-Authorization
+
+   The Proxy-Authorization request-header field allows the client to
+   identify itself (or its user) to a proxy which requires
+   authentication. The Proxy-Authorization field value consists of
+   credentials containing the authentication information of the user
+   agent for the proxy and/or realm of the resource being requested.
+
+       Proxy-Authorization     = "Proxy-Authorization" ":" credentials
+
+   The HTTP access authentication process is described in "HTTP
+   Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" [43] . Unlike
+   Authorization, the Proxy-Authorization header field applies only to
+   the next outbound proxy that demanded authentication using the Proxy-
+   Authenticate field. When multiple proxies are used in a chain, the
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 137]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Proxy-Authorization header field is consumed by the first outbound
+   proxy that was expecting to receive credentials. A proxy MAY relay
+   the credentials from the client request to the next proxy if that is
+   the mechanism by which the proxies cooperatively authenticate a given
+   request.
+
+14.35 Range
+
+14.35.1 Byte Ranges
+
+   Since all HTTP entities are represented in HTTP messages as sequences
+   of bytes, the concept of a byte range is meaningful for any HTTP
+   entity. (However, not all clients and servers need to support byte-
+   range operations.)
+
+   Byte range specifications in HTTP apply to the sequence of bytes in
+   the entity-body (not necessarily the same as the message-body).
+
+   A byte range operation MAY specify a single range of bytes, or a set
+   of ranges within a single entity.
+
+       ranges-specifier = byte-ranges-specifier
+       byte-ranges-specifier = bytes-unit "=" byte-range-set
+       byte-range-set  = 1#( byte-range-spec | suffix-byte-range-spec )
+       byte-range-spec = first-byte-pos "-" [last-byte-pos]
+       first-byte-pos  = 1*DIGIT
+       last-byte-pos   = 1*DIGIT
+
+   The first-byte-pos value in a byte-range-spec gives the byte-offset
+   of the first byte in a range. The last-byte-pos value gives the
+   byte-offset of the last byte in the range; that is, the byte
+   positions specified are inclusive. Byte offsets start at zero.
+
+   If the last-byte-pos value is present, it MUST be greater than or
+   equal to the first-byte-pos in that byte-range-spec, or the byte-
+   range-spec is syntactically invalid. The recipient of a byte-range-
+   set that includes one or more syntactically invalid byte-range-spec
+   values MUST ignore the header field that includes that byte-range-
+   set.
+
+   If the last-byte-pos value is absent, or if the value is greater than
+   or equal to the current length of the entity-body, last-byte-pos is
+   taken to be equal to one less than the current length of the entity-
+   body in bytes.
+
+   By its choice of last-byte-pos, a client can limit the number of
+   bytes retrieved without knowing the size of the entity.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 138]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+       suffix-byte-range-spec = "-" suffix-length
+       suffix-length = 1*DIGIT
+
+   A suffix-byte-range-spec is used to specify the suffix of the
+   entity-body, of a length given by the suffix-length value. (That is,
+   this form specifies the last N bytes of an entity-body.) If the
+   entity is shorter than the specified suffix-length, the entire
+   entity-body is used.
+
+   If a syntactically valid byte-range-set includes at least one byte-
+   range-spec whose first-byte-pos is less than the current length of
+   the entity-body, or at least one suffix-byte-range-spec with a non-
+   zero suffix-length, then the byte-range-set is satisfiable.
+   Otherwise, the byte-range-set is unsatisfiable. If the byte-range-set
+   is unsatisfiable, the server SHOULD return a response with a status
+   of 416 (Requested range not satisfiable). Otherwise, the server
+   SHOULD return a response with a status of 206 (Partial Content)
+   containing the satisfiable ranges of the entity-body.
+
+   Examples of byte-ranges-specifier values (assuming an entity-body of
+   length 10000):
+
+      - The first 500 bytes (byte offsets 0-499, inclusive):  bytes=0-
+        499
+
+      - The second 500 bytes (byte offsets 500-999, inclusive):
+        bytes=500-999
+
+      - The final 500 bytes (byte offsets 9500-9999, inclusive):
+        bytes=-500
+
+      - Or bytes=9500-
+
+      - The first and last bytes only (bytes 0 and 9999):  bytes=0-0,-1
+
+      - Several legal but not canonical specifications of the second 500
+        bytes (byte offsets 500-999, inclusive):
+         bytes=500-600,601-999
+         bytes=500-700,601-999
+
+14.35.2 Range Retrieval Requests
+
+   HTTP retrieval requests using conditional or unconditional GET
+   methods MAY request one or more sub-ranges of the entity, instead of
+   the entire entity, using the Range request header, which applies to
+   the entity returned as the result of the request:
+
+      Range = "Range" ":" ranges-specifier
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 139]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   A server MAY ignore the Range header. However, HTTP/1.1 origin
+   servers and intermediate caches ought to support byte ranges when
+   possible, since Range supports efficient recovery from partially
+   failed transfers, and supports efficient partial retrieval of large
+   entities.
+
+   If the server supports the Range header and the specified range or
+   ranges are appropriate for the entity:
+
+      - The presence of a Range header in an unconditional GET modifies
+        what is returned if the GET is otherwise successful. In other
+        words, the response carries a status code of 206 (Partial
+        Content) instead of 200 (OK).
+
+      - The presence of a Range header in a conditional GET (a request
+        using one or both of If-Modified-Since and If-None-Match, or
+        one or both of If-Unmodified-Since and If-Match) modifies what
+        is returned if the GET is otherwise successful and the
+        condition is true. It does not affect the 304 (Not Modified)
+        response returned if the conditional is false.
+
+   In some cases, it might be more appropriate to use the If-Range
+   header (see section 14.27) in addition to the Range header.
+
+   If a proxy that supports ranges receives a Range request, forwards
+   the request to an inbound server, and receives an entire entity in
+   reply, it SHOULD only return the requested range to its client. It
+   SHOULD store the entire received response in its cache if that is
+   consistent with its cache allocation policies.
+
+14.36 Referer
+
+   The Referer[sic] request-header field allows the client to specify,
+   for the server's benefit, the address (URI) of the resource from
+   which the Request-URI was obtained (the "referrer", although the
+   header field is misspelled.) The Referer request-header allows a
+   server to generate lists of back-links to resources for interest,
+   logging, optimized caching, etc. It also allows obsolete or mistyped
+   links to be traced for maintenance. The Referer field MUST NOT be
+   sent if the Request-URI was obtained from a source that does not have
+   its own URI, such as input from the user keyboard.
+
+       Referer        = "Referer" ":" ( absoluteURI | relativeURI )
+
+   Example:
+
+       Referer: http://www.w3.org/hypertext/DataSources/Overview.html
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 140]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If the field value is a relative URI, it SHOULD be interpreted
+   relative to the Request-URI. The URI MUST NOT include a fragment. See
+   section 15.1.3 for security considerations.
+
+14.37 Retry-After
+
+   The Retry-After response-header field can be used with a 503 (Service
+   Unavailable) response to indicate how long the service is expected to
+   be unavailable to the requesting client. This field MAY also be used
+   with any 3xx (Redirection) response to indicate the minimum time the
+   user-agent is asked wait before issuing the redirected request. The
+   value of this field can be either an HTTP-date or an integer number
+   of seconds (in decimal) after the time of the response.
+
+       Retry-After  = "Retry-After" ":" ( HTTP-date | delta-seconds )
+
+   Two examples of its use are
+
+       Retry-After: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 23:59:59 GMT
+       Retry-After: 120
+
+   In the latter example, the delay is 2 minutes.
+
+14.38 Server
+
+   The Server response-header field contains information about the
+   software used by the origin server to handle the request. The field
+   can contain multiple product tokens (section 3.8) and comments
+   identifying the server and any significant subproducts. The product
+   tokens are listed in order of their significance for identifying the
+   application.
+
+       Server         = "Server" ":" 1*( product | comment )
+
+   Example:
+
+       Server: CERN/3.0 libwww/2.17
+
+   If the response is being forwarded through a proxy, the proxy
+   application MUST NOT modify the Server response-header. Instead, it
+   SHOULD include a Via field (as described in section 14.45).
+
+      Note: Revealing the specific software version of the server might
+      allow the server machine to become more vulnerable to attacks
+      against software that is known to contain security holes. Server
+      implementors are encouraged to make this field a configurable
+      option.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 141]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+14.39 TE
+
+   The TE request-header field indicates what extension transfer-codings
+   it is willing to accept in the response and whether or not it is
+   willing to accept trailer fields in a chunked transfer-coding. Its
+   value may consist of the keyword "trailers" and/or a comma-separated
+   list of extension transfer-coding names with optional accept
+   parameters (as described in section 3.6).
+
+       TE        = "TE" ":" #( t-codings )
+       t-codings = "trailers" | ( transfer-extension [ accept-params ] )
+
+   The presence of the keyword "trailers" indicates that the client is
+   willing to accept trailer fields in a chunked transfer-coding, as
+   defined in section 3.6.1. This keyword is reserved for use with
+   transfer-coding values even though it does not itself represent a
+   transfer-coding.
+
+   Examples of its use are:
+
+       TE: deflate
+       TE:
+       TE: trailers, deflate;q=0.5
+
+   The TE header field only applies to the immediate connection.
+   Therefore, the keyword MUST be supplied within a Connection header
+   field (section 14.10) whenever TE is present in an HTTP/1.1 message.
+
+   A server tests whether a transfer-coding is acceptable, according to
+   a TE field, using these rules:
+
+      1. The "chunked" transfer-coding is always acceptable. If the
+         keyword "trailers" is listed, the client indicates that it is
+         willing to accept trailer fields in the chunked response on
+         behalf of itself and any downstream clients. The implication is
+         that, if given, the client is stating that either all
+         downstream clients are willing to accept trailer fields in the
+         forwarded response, or that it will attempt to buffer the
+         response on behalf of downstream recipients.
+
+         Note: HTTP/1.1 does not define any means to limit the size of a
+         chunked response such that a client can be assured of buffering
+         the entire response.
+
+      2. If the transfer-coding being tested is one of the transfer-
+         codings listed in the TE field, then it is acceptable unless it
+         is accompanied by a qvalue of 0. (As defined in section 3.9, a
+         qvalue of 0 means "not acceptable.")
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 142]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      3. If multiple transfer-codings are acceptable, then the
+         acceptable transfer-coding with the highest non-zero qvalue is
+         preferred.  The "chunked" transfer-coding always has a qvalue
+         of 1.
+
+   If the TE field-value is empty or if no TE field is present, the only
+   transfer-coding  is "chunked". A message with no transfer-coding is
+   always acceptable.
+
+14.40 Trailer
+
+   The Trailer general field value indicates that the given set of
+   header fields is present in the trailer of a message encoded with
+   chunked transfer-coding.
+
+       Trailer  = "Trailer" ":" 1#field-name
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 message SHOULD include a Trailer header field in a
+   message using chunked transfer-coding with a non-empty trailer. Doing
+   so allows the recipient to know which header fields to expect in the
+   trailer.
+
+   If no Trailer header field is present, the trailer SHOULD NOT include
+   any header fields. See section 3.6.1 for restrictions on the use of
+   trailer fields in a "chunked" transfer-coding.
+
+   Message header fields listed in the Trailer header field MUST NOT
+   include the following header fields:
+
+      . Transfer-Encoding
+
+      . Content-Length
+
+      . Trailer
+
+14.41 Transfer-Encoding
+
+   The Transfer-Encoding general-header field indicates what (if any)
+   type of transformation has been applied to the message body in order
+   to safely transfer it between the sender and the recipient. This
+   differs from the content-coding in that the transfer-coding is a
+   property of the message, not of the entity.
+
+     Transfer-Encoding       = "Transfer-Encoding" ":" 1#transfer-coding
+
+   Transfer-codings are defined in section 3.6. An example is:
+
+     Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 143]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   If multiple encodings have been applied to an entity, the transfer-
+   codings MUST be listed in the order in which they were applied.
+   Additional information about the encoding parameters MAY be provided
+   by other entity-header fields not defined by this specification.
+
+   Many older HTTP/1.0 applications do not understand the Transfer-
+   Encoding header.
+
+14.42 Upgrade
+
+   The Upgrade general-header allows the client to specify what
+   additional communication protocols it supports and would like to use
+   if the server finds it appropriate to switch protocols. The server
+   MUST use the Upgrade header field within a 101 (Switching Protocols)
+   response to indicate which protocol(s) are being switched.
+
+       Upgrade        = "Upgrade" ":" 1#product
+
+   For example,
+
+       Upgrade: HTTP/2.0, SHTTP/1.3, IRC/6.9, RTA/x11
+
+   The Upgrade header field is intended to provide a simple mechanism
+   for transition from HTTP/1.1 to some other, incompatible protocol. It
+   does so by allowing the client to advertise its desire to use another
+   protocol, such as a later version of HTTP with a higher major version
+   number, even though the current request has been made using HTTP/1.1.
+   This eases the difficult transition between incompatible protocols by
+   allowing the client to initiate a request in the more commonly
+   supported protocol while indicating to the server that it would like
+   to use a "better" protocol if available (where "better" is determined
+   by the server, possibly according to the nature of the method and/or
+   resource being requested).
+
+   The Upgrade header field only applies to switching application-layer
+   protocols upon the existing transport-layer connection. Upgrade
+   cannot be used to insist on a protocol change; its acceptance and use
+   by the server is optional. The capabilities and nature of the
+   application-layer communication after the protocol change is entirely
+   dependent upon the new protocol chosen, although the first action
+   after changing the protocol MUST be a response to the initial HTTP
+   request containing the Upgrade header field.
+
+   The Upgrade header field only applies to the immediate connection.
+   Therefore, the upgrade keyword MUST be supplied within a Connection
+   header field (section 14.10) whenever Upgrade is present in an
+   HTTP/1.1 message.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 144]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The Upgrade header field cannot be used to indicate a switch to a
+   protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it is more
+   appropriate to use a 301, 302, 303, or 305 redirection response.
+
+   This specification only defines the protocol name "HTTP" for use by
+   the family of Hypertext Transfer Protocols, as defined by the HTTP
+   version rules of section 3.1 and future updates to this
+   specification. Any token can be used as a protocol name; however, it
+   will only be useful if both the client and server associate the name
+   with the same protocol.
+
+14.43 User-Agent
+
+   The User-Agent request-header field contains information about the
+   user agent originating the request. This is for statistical purposes,
+   the tracing of protocol violations, and automated recognition of user
+   agents for the sake of tailoring responses to avoid particular user
+   agent limitations. User agents SHOULD include this field with
+   requests. The field can contain multiple product tokens (section 3.8)
+   and comments identifying the agent and any subproducts which form a
+   significant part of the user agent. By convention, the product tokens
+   are listed in order of their significance for identifying the
+   application.
+
+       User-Agent     = "User-Agent" ":" 1*( product | comment )
+
+   Example:
+
+       User-Agent: CERN-LineMode/2.15 libwww/2.17b3
+
+14.44 Vary
+
+   The Vary field value indicates the set of request-header fields that
+   fully determines, while the response is fresh, whether a cache is
+   permitted to use the response to reply to a subsequent request
+   without revalidation. For uncacheable or stale responses, the Vary
+   field value advises the user agent about the criteria that were used
+   to select the representation. A Vary field value of "*" implies that
+   a cache cannot determine from the request headers of a subsequent
+   request whether this response is the appropriate representation. See
+   section 13.6 for use of the Vary header field by caches.
+
+       Vary  = "Vary" ":" ( "*" | 1#field-name )
+
+   An HTTP/1.1 server SHOULD include a Vary header field with any
+   cacheable response that is subject to server-driven negotiation.
+   Doing so allows a cache to properly interpret future requests on that
+   resource and informs the user agent about the presence of negotiation
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 145]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   on that resource. A server MAY include a Vary header field with a
+   non-cacheable response that is subject to server-driven negotiation,
+   since this might provide the user agent with useful information about
+   the dimensions over which the response varies at the time of the
+   response.
+
+   A Vary field value consisting of a list of field-names signals that
+   the representation selected for the response is based on a selection
+   algorithm which considers ONLY the listed request-header field values
+   in selecting the most appropriate representation. A cache MAY assume
+   that the same selection will be made for future requests with the
+   same values for the listed field names, for the duration of time for
+   which the response is fresh.
+
+   The field-names given are not limited to the set of standard
+   request-header fields defined by this specification. Field names are
+   case-insensitive.
+
+   A Vary field value of "*" signals that unspecified parameters not
+   limited to the request-headers (e.g., the network address of the
+   client), play a role in the selection of the response representation.
+   The "*" value MUST NOT be generated by a proxy server; it may only be
+   generated by an origin server.
+
+14.45  Via
+
+   The Via general-header field MUST be used by gateways and proxies to
+   indicate the intermediate protocols and recipients between the user
+   agent and the server on requests, and between the origin server and
+   the client on responses. It is analogous to the "Received" field of
+   RFC 822 [9] and is intended to be used for tracking message forwards,
+   avoiding request loops, and identifying the protocol capabilities of
+   all senders along the request/response chain.
+
+      Via =  "Via" ":" 1#( received-protocol received-by [ comment ] )
+      received-protocol = [ protocol-name "/" ] protocol-version
+      protocol-name     = token
+      protocol-version  = token
+      received-by       = ( host [ ":" port ] ) | pseudonym
+      pseudonym         = token
+
+   The received-protocol indicates the protocol version of the message
+   received by the server or client along each segment of the
+   request/response chain. The received-protocol version is appended to
+   the Via field value when the message is forwarded so that information
+   about the protocol capabilities of upstream applications remains
+   visible to all recipients.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 146]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The protocol-name is optional if and only if it would be "HTTP". The
+   received-by field is normally the host and optional port number of a
+   recipient server or client that subsequently forwarded the message.
+   However, if the real host is considered to be sensitive information,
+   it MAY be replaced by a pseudonym. If the port is not given, it MAY
+   be assumed to be the default port of the received-protocol.
+
+   Multiple Via field values represents each proxy or gateway that has
+   forwarded the message. Each recipient MUST append its information
+   such that the end result is ordered according to the sequence of
+   forwarding applications.
+
+   Comments MAY be used in the Via header field to identify the software
+   of the recipient proxy or gateway, analogous to the User-Agent and
+   Server header fields. However, all comments in the Via field are
+   optional and MAY be removed by any recipient prior to forwarding the
+   message.
+
+   For example, a request message could be sent from an HTTP/1.0 user
+   agent to an internal proxy code-named "fred", which uses HTTP/1.1 to
+   forward the request to a public proxy at nowhere.com, which completes
+   the request by forwarding it to the origin server at www.ics.uci.edu.
+   The request received by www.ics.uci.edu would then have the following
+   Via header field:
+
+       Via: 1.0 fred, 1.1 nowhere.com (Apache/1.1)
+
+   Proxies and gateways used as a portal through a network firewall
+   SHOULD NOT, by default, forward the names and ports of hosts within
+   the firewall region. This information SHOULD only be propagated if
+   explicitly enabled. If not enabled, the received-by host of any host
+   behind the firewall SHOULD be replaced by an appropriate pseudonym
+   for that host.
+
+   For organizations that have strong privacy requirements for hiding
+   internal structures, a proxy MAY combine an ordered subsequence of
+   Via header field entries with identical received-protocol values into
+   a single such entry. For example,
+
+       Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 ethel, 1.1 fred, 1.0 lucy
+
+        could be collapsed to
+
+       Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 mertz, 1.0 lucy
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 147]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Applications SHOULD NOT combine multiple entries unless they are all
+   under the same organizational control and the hosts have already been
+   replaced by pseudonyms. Applications MUST NOT combine entries which
+   have different received-protocol values.
+
+14.46 Warning
+
+   The Warning general-header field is used to carry additional
+   information about the status or transformation of a message which
+   might not be reflected in the message. This information is typically
+   used to warn about a possible lack of semantic transparency from
+   caching operations or transformations applied to the entity body of
+   the message.
+
+   Warning headers are sent with responses using:
+
+       Warning    = "Warning" ":" 1#warning-value
+
+       warning-value = warn-code SP warn-agent SP warn-text
+                                             [SP warn-date]
+
+       warn-code  = 3DIGIT
+       warn-agent = ( host [ ":" port ] ) | pseudonym
+                       ; the name or pseudonym of the server adding
+                       ; the Warning header, for use in debugging
+       warn-text  = quoted-string
+       warn-date  = <"> HTTP-date <">
+
+   A response MAY carry more than one Warning header.
+
+   The warn-text SHOULD be in a natural language and character set that
+   is most likely to be intelligible to the human user receiving the
+   response. This decision MAY be based on any available knowledge, such
+   as the location of the cache or user, the Accept-Language field in a
+   request, the Content-Language field in a response, etc. The default
+   language is English and the default character set is ISO-8859-1.
+
+   If a character set other than ISO-8859-1 is used, it MUST be encoded
+   in the warn-text using the method described in RFC 2047 [14].
+
+   Warning headers can in general be applied to any message, however
+   some specific warn-codes are specific to caches and can only be
+   applied to response messages. New Warning headers SHOULD be added
+   after any existing Warning headers. A cache MUST NOT delete any
+   Warning header that it received with a message. However, if a cache
+   successfully validates a cache entry, it SHOULD remove any Warning
+   headers previously attached to that entry except as specified for
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 148]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   specific Warning codes. It MUST then add any Warning headers received
+   in the validating response. In other words, Warning headers are those
+   that would be attached to the most recent relevant response.
+
+   When multiple Warning headers are attached to a response, the user
+   agent ought to inform the user of as many of them as possible, in the
+   order that they appear in the response. If it is not possible to
+   inform the user of all of the warnings, the user agent SHOULD follow
+   these heuristics:
+
+      - Warnings that appear early in the response take priority over
+        those appearing later in the response.
+
+      - Warnings in the user's preferred character set take priority
+        over warnings in other character sets but with identical warn-
+        codes and warn-agents.
+
+   Systems that generate multiple Warning headers SHOULD order them with
+   this user agent behavior in mind.
+
+   Requirements for the behavior of caches with respect to Warnings are
+   stated in section 13.1.2.
+
+   This is a list of the currently-defined warn-codes, each with a
+   recommended warn-text in English, and a description of its meaning.
+
+   110 Response is stale
+     MUST be included whenever the returned response is stale.
+
+   111 Revalidation failed
+     MUST be included if a cache returns a stale response because an
+     attempt to revalidate the response failed, due to an inability to
+     reach the server.
+
+   112 Disconnected operation
+     SHOULD be included if the cache is intentionally disconnected from
+     the rest of the network for a period of time.
+
+   113 Heuristic expiration
+     MUST be included if the cache heuristically chose a freshness
+     lifetime greater than 24 hours and the response's age is greater
+     than 24 hours.
+
+   199 Miscellaneous warning
+     The warning text MAY include arbitrary information to be presented
+     to a human user, or logged. A system receiving this warning MUST
+     NOT take any automated action, besides presenting the warning to
+     the user.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 149]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   214 Transformation applied
+     MUST be added by an intermediate cache or proxy if it applies any
+     transformation changing the content-coding (as specified in the
+     Content-Encoding header) or media-type (as specified in the
+     Content-Type header) of the response, or the entity-body of the
+     response, unless this Warning code already appears in the response.
+
+   299 Miscellaneous persistent warning
+     The warning text MAY include arbitrary information to be presented
+     to a human user, or logged. A system receiving this warning MUST
+     NOT take any automated action.
+
+   If an implementation sends a message with one or more Warning headers
+   whose version is HTTP/1.0 or lower, then the sender MUST include in
+   each warning-value a warn-date that matches the date in the response.
+
+   If an implementation receives a message with a warning-value that
+   includes a warn-date, and that warn-date is different from the Date
+   value in the response, then that warning-value MUST be deleted from
+   the message before storing, forwarding, or using it. (This prevents
+   bad consequences of naive caching of Warning header fields.) If all
+   of the warning-values are deleted for this reason, the Warning header
+   MUST be deleted as well.
+
+14.47 WWW-Authenticate
+
+   The WWW-Authenticate response-header field MUST be included in 401
+   (Unauthorized) response messages. The field value consists of at
+   least one challenge that indicates the authentication scheme(s) and
+   parameters applicable to the Request-URI.
+
+       WWW-Authenticate  = "WWW-Authenticate" ":" 1#challenge
+
+   The HTTP access authentication process is described in "HTTP
+   Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" [43]. User
+   agents are advised to take special care in parsing the WWW-
+   Authenticate field value as it might contain more than one challenge,
+   or if more than one WWW-Authenticate header field is provided, the
+   contents of a challenge itself can contain a comma-separated list of
+   authentication parameters.
+
+15 Security Considerations
+
+   This section is meant to inform application developers, information
+   providers, and users of the security limitations in HTTP/1.1 as
+   described by this document. The discussion does not include
+   definitive solutions to the problems revealed, though it does make
+   some suggestions for reducing security risks.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 150]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+15.1 Personal Information
+
+   HTTP clients are often privy to large amounts of personal information
+   (e.g. the user's name, location, mail address, passwords, encryption
+   keys, etc.), and SHOULD be very careful to prevent unintentional
+   leakage of this information via the HTTP protocol to other sources.
+   We very strongly recommend that a convenient interface be provided
+   for the user to control dissemination of such information, and that
+   designers and implementors be particularly careful in this area.
+   History shows that errors in this area often create serious security
+   and/or privacy problems and generate highly adverse publicity for the
+   implementor's company.
+
+15.1.1 Abuse of Server Log Information
+
+   A server is in the position to save personal data about a user's
+   requests which might identify their reading patterns or subjects of
+   interest. This information is clearly confidential in nature and its
+   handling can be constrained by law in certain countries. People using
+   the HTTP protocol to provide data are responsible for ensuring that
+   such material is not distributed without the permission of any
+   individuals that are identifiable by the published results.
+
+15.1.2 Transfer of Sensitive Information
+
+   Like any generic data transfer protocol, HTTP cannot regulate the
+   content of the data that is transferred, nor is there any a priori
+   method of determining the sensitivity of any particular piece of
+   information within the context of any given request. Therefore,
+   applications SHOULD supply as much control over this information as
+   possible to the provider of that information. Four header fields are
+   worth special mention in this context: Server, Via, Referer and From.
+
+   Revealing the specific software version of the server might allow the
+   server machine to become more vulnerable to attacks against software
+   that is known to contain security holes. Implementors SHOULD make the
+   Server header field a configurable option.
+
+   Proxies which serve as a portal through a network firewall SHOULD
+   take special precautions regarding the transfer of header information
+   that identifies the hosts behind the firewall. In particular, they
+   SHOULD remove, or replace with sanitized versions, any Via fields
+   generated behind the firewall.
+
+   The Referer header allows reading patterns to be studied and reverse
+   links drawn. Although it can be very useful, its power can be abused
+   if user details are not separated from the information contained in
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 151]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   the Referer. Even when the personal information has been removed, the
+   Referer header might indicate a private document's URI whose
+   publication would be inappropriate.
+
+   The information sent in the From field might conflict with the user's
+   privacy interests or their site's security policy, and hence it
+   SHOULD NOT be transmitted without the user being able to disable,
+   enable, and modify the contents of the field. The user MUST be able
+   to set the contents of this field within a user preference or
+   application defaults configuration.
+
+   We suggest, though do not require, that a convenient toggle interface
+   be provided for the user to enable or disable the sending of From and
+   Referer information.
+
+   The User-Agent (section 14.43) or Server (section 14.38) header
+   fields can sometimes be used to determine that a specific client or
+   server have a particular security hole which might be exploited.
+   Unfortunately, this same information is often used for other valuable
+   purposes for which HTTP currently has no better mechanism.
+
+15.1.3 Encoding Sensitive Information in URI's
+
+   Because the source of a link might be private information or might
+   reveal an otherwise private information source, it is strongly
+   recommended that the user be able to select whether or not the
+   Referer field is sent. For example, a browser client could have a
+   toggle switch for browsing openly/anonymously, which would
+   respectively enable/disable the sending of Referer and From
+   information.
+
+   Clients SHOULD NOT include a Referer header field in a (non-secure)
+   HTTP request if the referring page was transferred with a secure
+   protocol.
+
+   Authors of services which use the HTTP protocol SHOULD NOT use GET
+   based forms for the submission of sensitive data, because this will
+   cause this data to be encoded in the Request-URI. Many existing
+   servers, proxies, and user agents will log the request URI in some
+   place where it might be visible to third parties. Servers can use
+   POST-based form submission instead
+
+15.1.4 Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers
+
+   Accept request-headers can reveal information about the user to all
+   servers which are accessed. The Accept-Language header in particular
+   can reveal information the user would consider to be of a private
+   nature, because the understanding of particular languages is often
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 152]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   strongly correlated to the membership of a particular ethnic group.
+   User agents which offer the option to configure the contents of an
+   Accept-Language header to be sent in every request are strongly
+   encouraged to let the configuration process include a message which
+   makes the user aware of the loss of privacy involved.
+
+   An approach that limits the loss of privacy would be for a user agent
+   to omit the sending of Accept-Language headers by default, and to ask
+   the user whether or not to start sending Accept-Language headers to a
+   server if it detects, by looking for any Vary response-header fields
+   generated by the server, that such sending could improve the quality
+   of service.
+
+   Elaborate user-customized accept header fields sent in every request,
+   in particular if these include quality values, can be used by servers
+   as relatively reliable and long-lived user identifiers. Such user
+   identifiers would allow content providers to do click-trail tracking,
+   and would allow collaborating content providers to match cross-server
+   click-trails or form submissions of individual users. Note that for
+   many users not behind a proxy, the network address of the host
+   running the user agent will also serve as a long-lived user
+   identifier. In environments where proxies are used to enhance
+   privacy, user agents ought to be conservative in offering accept
+   header configuration options to end users. As an extreme privacy
+   measure, proxies could filter the accept headers in relayed requests.
+   General purpose user agents which provide a high degree of header
+   configurability SHOULD warn users about the loss of privacy which can
+   be involved.
+
+15.2 Attacks Based On File and Path Names
+
+   Implementations of HTTP origin servers SHOULD be careful to restrict
+   the documents returned by HTTP requests to be only those that were
+   intended by the server administrators. If an HTTP server translates
+   HTTP URIs directly into file system calls, the server MUST take
+   special care not to serve files that were not intended to be
+   delivered to HTTP clients. For example, UNIX, Microsoft Windows, and
+   other operating systems use ".." as a path component to indicate a
+   directory level above the current one. On such a system, an HTTP
+   server MUST disallow any such construct in the Request-URI if it
+   would otherwise allow access to a resource outside those intended to
+   be accessible via the HTTP server. Similarly, files intended for
+   reference only internally to the server (such as access control
+   files, configuration files, and script code) MUST be protected from
+   inappropriate retrieval, since they might contain sensitive
+   information. Experience has shown that minor bugs in such HTTP server
+   implementations have turned into security risks.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 153]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+15.3 DNS Spoofing
+
+   Clients using HTTP rely heavily on the Domain Name Service, and are
+   thus generally prone to security attacks based on the deliberate
+   mis-association of IP addresses and DNS names. Clients need to be
+   cautious in assuming the continuing validity of an IP number/DNS name
+   association.
+
+   In particular, HTTP clients SHOULD rely on their name resolver for
+   confirmation of an IP number/DNS name association, rather than
+   caching the result of previous host name lookups. Many platforms
+   already can cache host name lookups locally when appropriate, and
+   they SHOULD be configured to do so. It is proper for these lookups to
+   be cached, however, only when the TTL (Time To Live) information
+   reported by the name server makes it likely that the cached
+   information will remain useful.
+
+   If HTTP clients cache the results of host name lookups in order to
+   achieve a performance improvement, they MUST observe the TTL
+   information reported by DNS.
+
+   If HTTP clients do not observe this rule, they could be spoofed when
+   a previously-accessed server's IP address changes. As network
+   renumbering is expected to become increasingly common [24], the
+   possibility of this form of attack will grow. Observing this
+   requirement thus reduces this potential security vulnerability.
+
+   This requirement also improves the load-balancing behavior of clients
+   for replicated servers using the same DNS name and reduces the
+   likelihood of a user's experiencing failure in accessing sites which
+   use that strategy.
+
+15.4 Location Headers and Spoofing
+
+   If a single server supports multiple organizations that do not trust
+   one another, then it MUST check the values of Location and Content-
+   Location headers in responses that are generated under control of
+   said organizations to make sure that they do not attempt to
+   invalidate resources over which they have no authority.
+
+15.5 Content-Disposition Issues
+
+   RFC 1806 [35], from which the often implemented Content-Disposition
+   (see section 19.5.1) header in HTTP is derived, has a number of very
+   serious security considerations. Content-Disposition is not part of
+   the HTTP standard, but since it is widely implemented, we are
+   documenting its use and risks for implementors. See RFC 2183 [49]
+   (which updates RFC 1806) for details.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 154]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+15.6 Authentication Credentials and Idle Clients
+
+   Existing HTTP clients and user agents typically retain authentication
+   information indefinitely. HTTP/1.1. does not provide a method for a
+   server to direct clients to discard these cached credentials. This is
+   a significant defect that requires further extensions to HTTP.
+   Circumstances under which credential caching can interfere with the
+   application's security model include but are not limited to:
+
+      - Clients which have been idle for an extended period following
+        which the server might wish to cause the client to reprompt the
+        user for credentials.
+
+      - Applications which include a session termination indication
+        (such as a `logout' or `commit' button on a page) after which
+        the server side of the application `knows' that there is no
+        further reason for the client to retain the credentials.
+
+   This is currently under separate study. There are a number of work-
+   arounds to parts of this problem, and we encourage the use of
+   password protection in screen savers, idle time-outs, and other
+   methods which mitigate the security problems inherent in this
+   problem. In particular, user agents which cache credentials are
+   encouraged to provide a readily accessible mechanism for discarding
+   cached credentials under user control.
+
+15.7 Proxies and Caching
+
+   By their very nature, HTTP proxies are men-in-the-middle, and
+   represent an opportunity for man-in-the-middle attacks. Compromise of
+   the systems on which the proxies run can result in serious security
+   and privacy problems. Proxies have access to security-related
+   information, personal information about individual users and
+   organizations, and proprietary information belonging to users and
+   content providers. A compromised proxy, or a proxy implemented or
+   configured without regard to security and privacy considerations,
+   might be used in the commission of a wide range of potential attacks.
+
+   Proxy operators should protect the systems on which proxies run as
+   they would protect any system that contains or transports sensitive
+   information. In particular, log information gathered at proxies often
+   contains highly sensitive personal information, and/or information
+   about organizations. Log information should be carefully guarded, and
+   appropriate guidelines for use developed and followed. (Section
+   15.1.1).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 155]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Caching proxies provide additional potential vulnerabilities, since
+   the contents of the cache represent an attractive target for
+   malicious exploitation. Because cache contents persist after an HTTP
+   request is complete, an attack on the cache can reveal information
+   long after a user believes that the information has been removed from
+   the network. Therefore, cache contents should be protected as
+   sensitive information.
+
+   Proxy implementors should consider the privacy and security
+   implications of their design and coding decisions, and of the
+   configuration options they provide to proxy operators (especially the
+   default configuration).
+
+   Users of a proxy need to be aware that they are no trustworthier than
+   the people who run the proxy; HTTP itself cannot solve this problem.
+
+   The judicious use of cryptography, when appropriate, may suffice to
+   protect against a broad range of security and privacy attacks. Such
+   cryptography is beyond the scope of the HTTP/1.1 specification.
+
+15.7.1 Denial of Service Attacks on Proxies
+
+   They exist. They are hard to defend against. Research continues.
+   Beware.
+
+16 Acknowledgments
+
+   This specification makes heavy use of the augmented BNF and generic
+   constructs defined by David H. Crocker for RFC 822 [9]. Similarly, it
+   reuses many of the definitions provided by Nathaniel Borenstein and
+   Ned Freed for MIME [7]. We hope that their inclusion in this
+   specification will help reduce past confusion over the relationship
+   between HTTP and Internet mail message formats.
+
+   The HTTP protocol has evolved considerably over the years. It has
+   benefited from a large and active developer community--the many
+   people who have participated on the www-talk mailing list--and it is
+   that community which has been most responsible for the success of
+   HTTP and of the World-Wide Web in general. Marc Andreessen, Robert
+   Cailliau, Daniel W. Connolly, Bob Denny, John Franks, Jean-Francois
+   Groff, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker, Hakon W. Lie, Ari Luotonen, Rob
+   McCool, Lou Montulli, Dave Raggett, Tony Sanders, and Marc
+   VanHeyningen deserve special recognition for their efforts in
+   defining early aspects of the protocol.
+
+   This document has benefited greatly from the comments of all those
+   participating in the HTTP-WG. In addition to those already mentioned,
+   the following individuals have contributed to this specification:
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 156]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+       Gary Adams                  Ross Patterson
+       Harald Tveit Alvestrand     Albert Lunde
+       Keith Ball                  John C. Mallery
+       Brian Behlendorf            Jean-Philippe Martin-Flatin
+       Paul Burchard               Mitra
+       Maurizio Codogno            David Morris
+       Mike Cowlishaw              Gavin Nicol
+       Roman Czyborra              Bill Perry
+       Michael A. Dolan            Jeffrey Perry
+       David J. Fiander            Scott Powers
+       Alan Freier                 Owen Rees
+       Marc Hedlund                Luigi Rizzo
+       Greg Herlihy                David Robinson
+       Koen Holtman                Marc Salomon
+       Alex Hopmann                Rich Salz
+       Bob Jernigan                Allan M. Schiffman
+       Shel Kaphan                 Jim Seidman
+       Rohit Khare                 Chuck Shotton
+       John Klensin                Eric W. Sink
+       Martijn Koster              Simon E. Spero
+       Alexei Kosut                Richard N. Taylor
+       David M. Kristol            Robert S. Thau
+       Daniel LaLiberte            Bill (BearHeart) Weinman
+       Ben Laurie                  Francois Yergeau
+       Paul J. Leach               Mary Ellen Zurko
+       Daniel DuBois               Josh Cohen
+
+
+   Much of the content and presentation of the caching design is due to
+   suggestions and comments from individuals including: Shel Kaphan,
+   Paul Leach, Koen Holtman, David Morris, and Larry Masinter.
+
+   Most of the specification of ranges is based on work originally done
+   by Ari Luotonen and John Franks, with additional input from Steve
+   Zilles.
+
+   Thanks to the "cave men" of Palo Alto. You know who you are.
+
+   Jim Gettys (the current editor of this document) wishes particularly
+   to thank Roy Fielding, the previous editor of this document, along
+   with John Klensin, Jeff Mogul, Paul Leach, Dave Kristol, Koen
+   Holtman, John Franks, Josh Cohen, Alex Hopmann, Scott Lawrence, and
+   Larry Masinter for their help. And thanks go particularly to Jeff
+   Mogul and Scott Lawrence for performing the "MUST/MAY/SHOULD" audit.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 157]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   The Apache Group, Anselm Baird-Smith, author of Jigsaw, and Henrik
+   Frystyk implemented RFC 2068 early, and we wish to thank them for the
+   discovery of many of the problems that this document attempts to
+   rectify.
+
+17 References
+
+   [1] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of Languages", RFC
+       1766, March 1995.
+
+   [2] Anklesaria, F., McCahill, M., Lindner, P., Johnson, D., Torrey,
+       D. and B. Alberti, "The Internet Gopher Protocol (a distributed
+       document search and retrieval protocol)", RFC 1436, March 1993.
+
+   [3] Berners-Lee, T., "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW", RFC
+       1630, June 1994.
+
+   [4] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, "Uniform Resource
+       Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.
+
+   [5] Berners-Lee, T. and D. Connolly, "Hypertext Markup Language -
+       2.0", RFC 1866, November 1995.
+
+   [6] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and H. Frystyk, "Hypertext Transfer
+       Protocol -- HTTP/1.0", RFC 1945, May 1996.
+
+   [7] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
+       Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
+       RFC 2045, November 1996.
+
+   [8] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Communication
+       Layers", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989.
+
+   [9] Crocker, D., "Standard for The Format of ARPA Internet Text
+       Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.
+
+   [10] Davis, F., Kahle, B., Morris, H., Salem, J., Shen, T., Wang, R.,
+        Sui, J., and M. Grinbaum, "WAIS Interface Protocol Prototype
+        Functional Specification," (v1.5), Thinking Machines
+        Corporation, April 1990.
+
+   [11] Fielding, R., "Relative Uniform Resource Locators", RFC 1808,
+        June 1995.
+
+   [12] Horton, M. and R. Adams, "Standard for Interchange of USENET
+        Messages", RFC 1036, December 1987.
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 158]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   [13] Kantor, B. and P. Lapsley, "Network News Transfer Protocol", RFC
+        977, February 1986.
+
+   [14] Moore, K., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part
+        Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text", RFC 2047,
+        November 1996.
+
+   [15] Nebel, E. and L. Masinter, "Form-based File Upload in HTML", RFC
+        1867, November 1995.
+
+   [16] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821,
+        August 1982.
+
+   [17] Postel, J., "Media Type Registration Procedure", RFC 1590,
+        November 1996.
+
+   [18] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", STD 9, RFC
+        959, October 1985.
+
+   [19] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC 1700,
+        October 1994.
+
+   [20] Sollins, K. and L. Masinter, "Functional Requirements for
+        Uniform Resource Names", RFC 1737, December 1994.
+
+   [21] US-ASCII. Coded Character Set - 7-Bit American Standard Code for
+        Information Interchange. Standard ANSI X3.4-1986, ANSI, 1986.
+
+   [22] ISO-8859. International Standard -- Information Processing --
+        8-bit Single-Byte Coded Graphic Character Sets --
+        Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1, ISO-8859-1:1987.
+        Part 2: Latin alphabet No. 2, ISO-8859-2, 1987.
+        Part 3: Latin alphabet No. 3, ISO-8859-3, 1988.
+        Part 4: Latin alphabet No. 4, ISO-8859-4, 1988.
+        Part 5: Latin/Cyrillic alphabet, ISO-8859-5, 1988.
+        Part 6: Latin/Arabic alphabet, ISO-8859-6, 1987.
+        Part 7: Latin/Greek alphabet, ISO-8859-7, 1987.
+        Part 8: Latin/Hebrew alphabet, ISO-8859-8, 1988.
+        Part 9: Latin alphabet No. 5, ISO-8859-9, 1990.
+
+   [23] Meyers, J. and M. Rose, "The Content-MD5 Header Field", RFC
+        1864, October 1995.
+
+   [24] Carpenter, B. and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Work", RFC
+        1900, February 1996.
+
+   [25] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version 4.3", RFC
+        1952, May 1996.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 159]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   [26] Venkata N. Padmanabhan, and Jeffrey C. Mogul. "Improving HTTP
+        Latency", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, v. 28, pp. 25-35,
+        Dec. 1995. Slightly revised version of paper in Proc. 2nd
+        International WWW Conference '94: Mosaic and the Web, Oct. 1994,
+        which is available at
+        http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/Proceedings/DDay/mogul/HTTPLat
+        ency.html.
+
+   [27] Joe Touch, John Heidemann, and Katia Obraczka. "Analysis of HTTP
+        Performance", <URL: http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/http-perf96/>,
+        ISI Research Report ISI/RR-98-463, (original report dated Aug.
+        1996), USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1998.
+
+   [28] Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification,
+        Implementation and Analysis", RFC 1305, March 1992.
+
+   [29] Deutsch, P., "DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification
+        version 1.3", RFC 1951, May 1996.
+
+   [30] S. Spero, "Analysis of HTTP Performance Problems,"
+        http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdma-release/http-prob.html.
+
+   [31] Deutsch, P. and J. Gailly, "ZLIB Compressed Data Format
+        Specification version 3.3", RFC 1950, May 1996.
+
+   [32] Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Leach, P.,
+        Luotonen, A., Sink, E. and L. Stewart, "An Extension to HTTP:
+        Digest Access Authentication", RFC 2069, January 1997.
+
+   [33] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H. and T.
+        Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC
+        2068, January 1997.
+
+   [34] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
+        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+   [35] Troost, R. and Dorner, S., "Communicating Presentation
+        Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition
+        Header", RFC 1806, June 1995.
+
+   [36] Mogul, J., Fielding, R., Gettys, J. and H. Frystyk, "Use and
+        Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers", RFC 2145, May 1997.
+        [jg639]
+
+   [37] Palme, J., "Common Internet Message Headers", RFC 2076, February
+        1997. [jg640]
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 160]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   [38] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and
+        ISO-10646", RFC 2279, January 1998. [jg641]
+
+   [39] Nielsen, H.F., Gettys, J., Baird-Smith, A., Prud'hommeaux, E.,
+        Lie, H., and C. Lilley. "Network Performance Effects of
+        HTTP/1.1, CSS1, and PNG," Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '97, Cannes
+        France, September 1997.[jg642]
+
+   [40] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
+        Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046, November
+        1996. [jg643]
+
+   [41] Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages",
+        BCP 18, RFC 2277, January 1998. [jg644]
+
+   [42] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource
+        Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax and Semantics", RFC 2396,
+        August 1998. [jg645]
+
+   [43] Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Lawrence, S.,
+        Leach, P., Luotonen, A., Sink, E. and L. Stewart, "HTTP
+        Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication", RFC
+        2617, June 1999. [jg646]
+
+   [44] Luotonen, A., "Tunneling TCP based protocols through Web proxy
+        servers," Work in Progress. [jg647]
+
+   [45] Palme, J. and A. Hopmann, "MIME E-mail Encapsulation of
+        Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)", RFC 2110, March
+        1997.
+
+   [46] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP
+        9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
+
+   [47] Masinter, L., "Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol
+        (HTCPCP/1.0)", RFC 2324, 1 April 1998.
+
+   [48] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
+        Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples",
+        RFC 2049, November 1996.
+
+   [49] Troost, R., Dorner, S. and K. Moore, "Communicating Presentation
+        Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header
+        Field", RFC 2183, August 1997.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 161]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+18 Authors' Addresses
+
+   Roy T. Fielding
+   Information and Computer Science
+   University of California, Irvine
+   Irvine, CA 92697-3425, USA
+
+   Fax: +1 (949) 824-1715
+   EMail: fielding@ics.uci.edu
+
+
+   James Gettys
+   World Wide Web Consortium
+   MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
+   545 Technology Square
+   Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
+
+   Fax: +1 (617) 258 8682
+   EMail: jg@w3.org
+
+
+   Jeffrey C. Mogul
+   Western Research Laboratory
+   Compaq Computer Corporation
+   250 University Avenue
+   Palo Alto, California, 94305, USA
+
+   EMail: mogul@wrl.dec.com
+
+
+   Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
+   World Wide Web Consortium
+   MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
+   545 Technology Square
+   Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
+
+   Fax: +1 (617) 258 8682
+   EMail: frystyk@w3.org
+
+
+   Larry Masinter
+   Xerox Corporation
+   3333 Coyote Hill Road
+   Palo Alto, CA 94034, USA
+
+   EMail: masinter@parc.xerox.com
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 162]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Paul J. Leach
+   Microsoft Corporation
+   1 Microsoft Way
+   Redmond, WA 98052, USA
+
+   EMail: paulle@microsoft.com
+
+
+   Tim Berners-Lee
+   Director, World Wide Web Consortium
+   MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
+   545 Technology Square
+   Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
+
+   Fax: +1 (617) 258 8682
+   EMail: timbl@w3.org
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 163]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+19 Appendices
+
+19.1 Internet Media Type message/http and application/http
+
+   In addition to defining the HTTP/1.1 protocol, this document serves
+   as the specification for the Internet media type "message/http" and
+   "application/http". The message/http type can be used to enclose a
+   single HTTP request or response message, provided that it obeys the
+   MIME restrictions for all "message" types regarding line length and
+   encodings. The application/http type can be used to enclose a
+   pipeline of one or more HTTP request or response messages (not
+   intermixed). The following is to be registered with IANA [17].
+
+       Media Type name:         message
+       Media subtype name:      http
+       Required parameters:     none
+       Optional parameters:     version, msgtype
+        version: The HTTP-Version number of the enclosed message
+                 (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
+                 determined from the first line of the body.
+        msgtype: The message type -- "request" or "response". If not
+                 present, the type can be determined from the first
+                 line of the body.
+       Encoding considerations: only "7bit", "8bit", or "binary" are
+                                permitted
+       Security considerations: none
+
+       Media Type name:         application
+       Media subtype name:      http
+       Required parameters:     none
+       Optional parameters:     version, msgtype
+        version: The HTTP-Version number of the enclosed messages
+                 (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
+                 determined from the first line of the body.
+        msgtype: The message type -- "request" or "response". If not
+                 present, the type can be determined from the first
+                 line of the body.
+       Encoding considerations: HTTP messages enclosed by this type
+                 are in "binary" format; use of an appropriate
+                 Content-Transfer-Encoding is required when
+                 transmitted via E-mail.
+       Security considerations: none
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 164]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+19.2 Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges
+
+   When an HTTP 206 (Partial Content) response message includes the
+   content of multiple ranges (a response to a request for multiple
+   non-overlapping ranges), these are transmitted as a multipart
+   message-body. The media type for this purpose is called
+   "multipart/byteranges".
+
+   The multipart/byteranges media type includes two or more parts, each
+   with its own Content-Type and Content-Range fields. The required
+   boundary parameter specifies the boundary string used to separate
+   each body-part.
+
+       Media Type name:         multipart
+       Media subtype name:      byteranges
+       Required parameters:     boundary
+       Optional parameters:     none
+       Encoding considerations: only "7bit", "8bit", or "binary" are
+                                permitted
+       Security considerations: none
+
+
+   For example:
+
+   HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
+   Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:25:24 GMT
+   Last-Modified: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:58:08 GMT
+   Content-type: multipart/byteranges; boundary=THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
+
+   --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
+   Content-type: application/pdf
+   Content-range: bytes 500-999/8000
+
+   ...the first range...
+   --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
+   Content-type: application/pdf
+   Content-range: bytes 7000-7999/8000
+
+   ...the second range
+   --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES--
+
+      Notes:
+
+      1) Additional CRLFs may precede the first boundary string in the
+         entity.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 165]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      2) Although RFC 2046 [40] permits the boundary string to be
+         quoted, some existing implementations handle a quoted boundary
+         string incorrectly.
+
+      3) A number of browsers and servers were coded to an early draft
+         of the byteranges specification to use a media type of
+         multipart/x-byteranges, which is almost, but not quite
+         compatible with the version documented in HTTP/1.1.
+
+19.3 Tolerant Applications
+
+   Although this document specifies the requirements for the generation
+   of HTTP/1.1 messages, not all applications will be correct in their
+   implementation. We therefore recommend that operational applications
+   be tolerant of deviations whenever those deviations can be
+   interpreted unambiguously.
+
+   Clients SHOULD be tolerant in parsing the Status-Line and servers
+   tolerant when parsing the Request-Line. In particular, they SHOULD
+   accept any amount of SP or HT characters between fields, even though
+   only a single SP is required.
+
+   The line terminator for message-header fields is the sequence CRLF.
+   However, we recommend that applications, when parsing such headers,
+   recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore the leading CR.
+
+   The character set of an entity-body SHOULD be labeled as the lowest
+   common denominator of the character codes used within that body, with
+   the exception that not labeling the entity is preferred over labeling
+   the entity with the labels US-ASCII or ISO-8859-1. See section 3.7.1
+   and 3.4.1.
+
+   Additional rules for requirements on parsing and encoding of dates
+   and other potential problems with date encodings include:
+
+      - HTTP/1.1 clients and caches SHOULD assume that an RFC-850 date
+        which appears to be more than 50 years in the future is in fact
+        in the past (this helps solve the "year 2000" problem).
+
+      - An HTTP/1.1 implementation MAY internally represent a parsed
+        Expires date as earlier than the proper value, but MUST NOT
+        internally represent a parsed Expires date as later than the
+        proper value.
+
+      - All expiration-related calculations MUST be done in GMT. The
+        local time zone MUST NOT influence the calculation or comparison
+        of an age or expiration time.
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 166]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - If an HTTP header incorrectly carries a date value with a time
+        zone other than GMT, it MUST be converted into GMT using the
+        most conservative possible conversion.
+
+19.4 Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities
+
+   HTTP/1.1 uses many of the constructs defined for Internet Mail (RFC
+   822 [9]) and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME [7]) to
+   allow entities to be transmitted in an open variety of
+   representations and with extensible mechanisms. However, RFC 2045
+   discusses mail, and HTTP has a few features that are different from
+   those described in RFC 2045. These differences were carefully chosen
+   to optimize performance over binary connections, to allow greater
+   freedom in the use of new media types, to make date comparisons
+   easier, and to acknowledge the practice of some early HTTP servers
+   and clients.
+
+   This appendix describes specific areas where HTTP differs from RFC
+   2045. Proxies and gateways to strict MIME environments SHOULD be
+   aware of these differences and provide the appropriate conversions
+   where necessary. Proxies and gateways from MIME environments to HTTP
+   also need to be aware of the differences because some conversions
+   might be required.
+
+19.4.1 MIME-Version
+
+   HTTP is not a MIME-compliant protocol. However, HTTP/1.1 messages MAY
+   include a single MIME-Version general-header field to indicate what
+   version of the MIME protocol was used to construct the message. Use
+   of the MIME-Version header field indicates that the message is in
+   full compliance with the MIME protocol (as defined in RFC 2045[7]).
+   Proxies/gateways are responsible for ensuring full compliance (where
+   possible) when exporting HTTP messages to strict MIME environments.
+
+       MIME-Version   = "MIME-Version" ":" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT
+
+   MIME version "1.0" is the default for use in HTTP/1.1. However,
+   HTTP/1.1 message parsing and semantics are defined by this document
+   and not the MIME specification.
+
+19.4.2 Conversion to Canonical Form
+
+   RFC 2045 [7] requires that an Internet mail entity be converted to
+   canonical form prior to being transferred, as described in section 4
+   of RFC 2049 [48]. section 3.7.1 of this document describes the forms
+   allowed for subtypes of the "text" media type when transmitted over
+   HTTP. RFC 2046 requires that content with a type of "text" represent
+   line breaks as CRLF and forbids the use of CR or LF outside of line
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 167]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   break sequences. HTTP allows CRLF, bare CR, and bare LF to indicate a
+   line break within text content when a message is transmitted over
+   HTTP.
+
+   Where it is possible, a proxy or gateway from HTTP to a strict MIME
+   environment SHOULD translate all line breaks within the text media
+   types described in section 3.7.1 of this document to the RFC 2049
+   canonical form of CRLF. Note, however, that this might be complicated
+   by the presence of a Content-Encoding and by the fact that HTTP
+   allows the use of some character sets which do not use octets 13 and
+   10 to represent CR and LF, as is the case for some multi-byte
+   character sets.
+
+   Implementors should note that conversion will break any cryptographic
+   checksums applied to the original content unless the original content
+   is already in canonical form. Therefore, the canonical form is
+   recommended for any content that uses such checksums in HTTP.
+
+19.4.3 Conversion of Date Formats
+
+   HTTP/1.1 uses a restricted set of date formats (section 3.3.1) to
+   simplify the process of date comparison. Proxies and gateways from
+   other protocols SHOULD ensure that any Date header field present in a
+   message conforms to one of the HTTP/1.1 formats and rewrite the date
+   if necessary.
+
+19.4.4 Introduction of Content-Encoding
+
+   RFC 2045 does not include any concept equivalent to HTTP/1.1's
+   Content-Encoding header field. Since this acts as a modifier on the
+   media type, proxies and gateways from HTTP to MIME-compliant
+   protocols MUST either change the value of the Content-Type header
+   field or decode the entity-body before forwarding the message. (Some
+   experimental applications of Content-Type for Internet mail have used
+   a media-type parameter of ";conversions=<content-coding>" to perform
+   a function equivalent to Content-Encoding. However, this parameter is
+   not part of RFC 2045.)
+
+19.4.5 No Content-Transfer-Encoding
+
+   HTTP does not use the Content-Transfer-Encoding (CTE) field of RFC
+   2045. Proxies and gateways from MIME-compliant protocols to HTTP MUST
+   remove any non-identity CTE ("quoted-printable" or "base64") encoding
+   prior to delivering the response message to an HTTP client.
+
+   Proxies and gateways from HTTP to MIME-compliant protocols are
+   responsible for ensuring that the message is in the correct format
+   and encoding for safe transport on that protocol, where "safe
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 168]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   transport" is defined by the limitations of the protocol being used.
+   Such a proxy or gateway SHOULD label the data with an appropriate
+   Content-Transfer-Encoding if doing so will improve the likelihood of
+   safe transport over the destination protocol.
+
+19.4.6 Introduction of Transfer-Encoding
+
+   HTTP/1.1 introduces the Transfer-Encoding header field (section
+   14.41). Proxies/gateways MUST remove any transfer-coding prior to
+   forwarding a message via a MIME-compliant protocol.
+
+   A process for decoding the "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6)
+   can be represented in pseudo-code as:
+
+       length := 0
+       read chunk-size, chunk-extension (if any) and CRLF
+       while (chunk-size > 0) {
+          read chunk-data and CRLF
+          append chunk-data to entity-body
+          length := length + chunk-size
+          read chunk-size and CRLF
+       }
+       read entity-header
+       while (entity-header not empty) {
+          append entity-header to existing header fields
+          read entity-header
+       }
+       Content-Length := length
+       Remove "chunked" from Transfer-Encoding
+
+19.4.7 MHTML and Line Length Limitations
+
+   HTTP implementations which share code with MHTML [45] implementations
+   need to be aware of MIME line length limitations. Since HTTP does not
+   have this limitation, HTTP does not fold long lines. MHTML messages
+   being transported by HTTP follow all conventions of MHTML, including
+   line length limitations and folding, canonicalization, etc., since
+   HTTP transports all message-bodies as payload (see section 3.7.2) and
+   does not interpret the content or any MIME header lines that might be
+   contained therein.
+
+19.5 Additional Features
+
+   RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 document protocol elements used by some
+   existing HTTP implementations, but not consistently and correctly
+   across most HTTP/1.1 applications. Implementors are advised to be
+   aware of these features, but cannot rely upon their presence in, or
+   interoperability with, other HTTP/1.1 applications. Some of these
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 169]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   describe proposed experimental features, and some describe features
+   that experimental deployment found lacking that are now addressed in
+   the base HTTP/1.1 specification.
+
+   A number of other headers, such as Content-Disposition and Title,
+   from SMTP and MIME are also often implemented (see RFC 2076 [37]).
+
+19.5.1 Content-Disposition
+
+   The Content-Disposition response-header field has been proposed as a
+   means for the origin server to suggest a default filename if the user
+   requests that the content is saved to a file. This usage is derived
+   from the definition of Content-Disposition in RFC 1806 [35].
+
+        content-disposition = "Content-Disposition" ":"
+                              disposition-type *( ";" disposition-parm )
+        disposition-type = "attachment" | disp-extension-token
+        disposition-parm = filename-parm | disp-extension-parm
+        filename-parm = "filename" "=" quoted-string
+        disp-extension-token = token
+        disp-extension-parm = token "=" ( token | quoted-string )
+
+   An example is
+
+        Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fname.ext"
+
+   The receiving user agent SHOULD NOT respect any directory path
+   information present in the filename-parm parameter, which is the only
+   parameter believed to apply to HTTP implementations at this time. The
+   filename SHOULD be treated as a terminal component only.
+
+   If this header is used in a response with the application/octet-
+   stream content-type, the implied suggestion is that the user agent
+   should not display the response, but directly enter a `save response
+   as...' dialog.
+
+   See section 15.5 for Content-Disposition security issues.
+
+19.6 Compatibility with Previous Versions
+
+   It is beyond the scope of a protocol specification to mandate
+   compliance with previous versions. HTTP/1.1 was deliberately
+   designed, however, to make supporting previous versions easy. It is
+   worth noting that, at the time of composing this specification
+   (1996), we would expect commercial HTTP/1.1 servers to:
+
+      - recognize the format of the Request-Line for HTTP/0.9, 1.0, and
+        1.1 requests;
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 170]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+      - understand any valid request in the format of HTTP/0.9, 1.0, or
+        1.1;
+
+      - respond appropriately with a message in the same major version
+        used by the client.
+
+   And we would expect HTTP/1.1 clients to:
+
+      - recognize the format of the Status-Line for HTTP/1.0 and 1.1
+        responses;
+
+      - understand any valid response in the format of HTTP/0.9, 1.0, or
+        1.1.
+
+   For most implementations of HTTP/1.0, each connection is established
+   by the client prior to the request and closed by the server after
+   sending the response. Some implementations implement the Keep-Alive
+   version of persistent connections described in section 19.7.1 of RFC
+   2068 [33].
+
+19.6.1 Changes from HTTP/1.0
+
+   This section summarizes major differences between versions HTTP/1.0
+   and HTTP/1.1.
+
+19.6.1.1 Changes to Simplify Multi-homed Web Servers and Conserve IP
+         Addresses
+
+   The requirements that clients and servers support the Host request-
+   header, report an error if the Host request-header (section 14.23) is
+   missing from an HTTP/1.1 request, and accept absolute URIs (section
+   5.1.2) are among the most important changes defined by this
+   specification.
+
+   Older HTTP/1.0 clients assumed a one-to-one relationship of IP
+   addresses and servers; there was no other established mechanism for
+   distinguishing the intended server of a request than the IP address
+   to which that request was directed. The changes outlined above will
+   allow the Internet, once older HTTP clients are no longer common, to
+   support multiple Web sites from a single IP address, greatly
+   simplifying large operational Web servers, where allocation of many
+   IP addresses to a single host has created serious problems. The
+   Internet will also be able to recover the IP addresses that have been
+   allocated for the sole purpose of allowing special-purpose domain
+   names to be used in root-level HTTP URLs. Given the rate of growth of
+   the Web, and the number of servers already deployed, it is extremely
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 171]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   important that all implementations of HTTP (including updates to
+   existing HTTP/1.0 applications) correctly implement these
+   requirements:
+
+      - Both clients and servers MUST support the Host request-header.
+
+      - A client that sends an HTTP/1.1 request MUST send a Host header.
+
+      - Servers MUST report a 400 (Bad Request) error if an HTTP/1.1
+        request does not include a Host request-header.
+
+      - Servers MUST accept absolute URIs.
+
+19.6.2 Compatibility with HTTP/1.0 Persistent Connections
+
+   Some clients and servers might wish to be compatible with some
+   previous implementations of persistent connections in HTTP/1.0
+   clients and servers. Persistent connections in HTTP/1.0 are
+   explicitly negotiated as they are not the default behavior. HTTP/1.0
+   experimental implementations of persistent connections are faulty,
+   and the new facilities in HTTP/1.1 are designed to rectify these
+   problems. The problem was that some existing 1.0 clients may be
+   sending Keep-Alive to a proxy server that doesn't understand
+   Connection, which would then erroneously forward it to the next
+   inbound server, which would establish the Keep-Alive connection and
+   result in a hung HTTP/1.0 proxy waiting for the close on the
+   response. The result is that HTTP/1.0 clients must be prevented from
+   using Keep-Alive when talking to proxies.
+
+   However, talking to proxies is the most important use of persistent
+   connections, so that prohibition is clearly unacceptable. Therefore,
+   we need some other mechanism for indicating a persistent connection
+   is desired, which is safe to use even when talking to an old proxy
+   that ignores Connection. Persistent connections are the default for
+   HTTP/1.1 messages; we introduce a new keyword (Connection: close) for
+   declaring non-persistence. See section 14.10.
+
+   The original HTTP/1.0 form of persistent connections (the Connection:
+   Keep-Alive and Keep-Alive header) is documented in RFC 2068. [33]
+
+19.6.3 Changes from RFC 2068
+
+   This specification has been carefully audited to correct and
+   disambiguate key word usage; RFC 2068 had many problems in respect to
+   the conventions laid out in RFC 2119 [34].
+
+   Clarified which error code should be used for inbound server failures
+   (e.g. DNS failures). (section 10.5.5).
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 172]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   CREATE had a race that required an Etag be sent when a resource is
+   first created. (section 10.2.2).
+
+   Content-Base was deleted from the specification: it was not
+   implemented widely, and there is no simple, safe way to introduce it
+   without a robust extension mechanism. In addition, it is used in a
+   similar, but not identical fashion in MHTML [45].
+
+   Transfer-coding and message lengths all interact in ways that
+   required fixing exactly when chunked encoding is used (to allow for
+   transfer encoding that may not be self delimiting); it was important
+   to straighten out exactly how message lengths are computed. (Sections
+   3.6, 4.4, 7.2.2, 13.5.2, 14.13, 14.16)
+
+   A content-coding of "identity" was introduced, to solve problems
+   discovered in caching. (section 3.5)
+
+   Quality Values of zero should indicate that "I don't want something"
+   to allow clients to refuse a representation. (section 3.9)
+
+   The use and interpretation of HTTP version numbers has been clarified
+   by RFC 2145. Require proxies to upgrade requests to highest protocol
+   version they support to deal with problems discovered in HTTP/1.0
+   implementations (section 3.1)
+
+   Charset wildcarding is introduced to avoid explosion of character set
+   names in accept headers. (section 14.2)
+
+   A case was missed in the Cache-Control model of HTTP/1.1; s-maxage
+   was introduced to add this missing case. (Sections 13.4, 14.8, 14.9,
+   14.9.3)
+
+   The Cache-Control: max-age directive was not properly defined for
+   responses. (section 14.9.3)
+
+   There are situations where a server (especially a proxy) does not
+   know the full length of a response but is capable of serving a
+   byterange request. We therefore need a mechanism to allow byteranges
+   with a content-range not indicating the full length of the message.
+   (section 14.16)
+
+   Range request responses would become very verbose if all meta-data
+   were always returned; by allowing the server to only send needed
+   headers in a 206 response, this problem can be avoided. (Section
+   10.2.7, 13.5.3, and 14.27)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 173]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Fix problem with unsatisfiable range requests; there are two cases:
+   syntactic problems, and range doesn't exist in the document. The 416
+   status code was needed to resolve this ambiguity needed to indicate
+   an error for a byte range request that falls outside of the actual
+   contents of a document. (section 10.4.17, 14.16)
+
+   Rewrite of message transmission requirements to make it much harder
+   for implementors to get it wrong, as the consequences of errors here
+   can have significant impact on the Internet, and to deal with the
+   following problems:
+
+      1. Changing "HTTP/1.1 or later" to "HTTP/1.1", in contexts where
+         this was incorrectly placing a requirement on the behavior of
+         an implementation of a future version of HTTP/1.x
+
+      2. Made it clear that user-agents should retry requests, not
+         "clients" in general.
+
+      3. Converted requirements for clients to ignore unexpected 100
+         (Continue) responses, and for proxies to forward 100 responses,
+         into a general requirement for 1xx responses.
+
+      4. Modified some TCP-specific language, to make it clearer that
+         non-TCP transports are possible for HTTP.
+
+      5. Require that the origin server MUST NOT wait for the request
+         body before it sends a required 100 (Continue) response.
+
+      6. Allow, rather than require, a server to omit 100 (Continue) if
+         it has already seen some of the request body.
+
+      7. Allow servers to defend against denial-of-service attacks and
+         broken clients.
+
+   This change adds the Expect header and 417 status code. The message
+   transmission requirements fixes are in sections 8.2, 10.4.18,
+   8.1.2.2, 13.11, and 14.20.
+
+   Proxies should be able to add Content-Length when appropriate.
+   (section 13.5.2)
+
+   Clean up confusion between 403 and 404 responses. (section 10.4.4,
+   10.4.5, and 10.4.11)
+
+   Warnings could be cached incorrectly, or not updated appropriately.
+   (section 13.1.2, 13.2.4, 13.5.2, 13.5.3, 14.9.3, and 14.46) Warning
+   also needed to be a general header, as PUT or other methods may have
+   need for it in requests.
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 174]
+
RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+   Transfer-coding had significant problems, particularly with
+   interactions with chunked encoding. The solution is that transfer-
+   codings become as full fledged as content-codings. This involves
+   adding an IANA registry for transfer-codings (separate from content
+   codings), a new header field (TE) and enabling trailer headers in the
+   future. Transfer encoding is a major performance benefit, so it was
+   worth fixing [39]. TE also solves another, obscure, downward
+   interoperability problem that could have occurred due to interactions
+   between authentication trailers, chunked encoding and HTTP/1.0
+   clients.(section 3.6, 3.6.1, and 14.39)
+
+   The PATCH, LINK, UNLINK methods were defined but not commonly
+   implemented in previous versions of this specification. See RFC 2068
+   [33].
+
+   The Alternates, Content-Version, Derived-From, Link, URI, Public and
+   Content-Base header fields were defined in previous versions of this
+   specification, but not commonly implemented. See RFC 2068 [33].
+
+20 Index
+
+   Please see the PostScript version of this RFC for the INDEX.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 175]
+

+RFC 2616                        HTTP/1.1                       June 1999
+
+
+21.  Full Copyright Statement
+
+   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.
+
+   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
+   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+   English.
+
+   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+   Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fielding, et al.            Standards Track                   [Page 176]
+

+
+ + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/style.css b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/style.css new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3770422a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/style.css @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +body { + padding: 0px 60px 0px 10px; +} + +.normal, p, ul { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-size: 12pt; + color: #000000; + text-align: justify; +} +.title { +/* font-family: serif; */ + font-weight: bold; + font-size: 24pt; + color: #3099ff; +} +.hibachi { + color: #b50000; + font-style: italic; +} +.small { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-size: 8pt; + color: #000000; +} +.copyright { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-size: 9pt; + color: #000000; +} +.big, h3 { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-size: 12pt; + color: #000000; +} +.large, h2 { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; + font-size: 16pt; + color: #000000; +} +.huge, h1 { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-size: 26pt; +} +.project { + text-decoration: none; + font-weight: bold; +# color: #3099ff; +} +.plain { + font-family: serif; + font-size: 14pt; + color: #000000; +} +.snert { + font-family: serif; + font-weight: bold; + font-size: 16pt; + color: #000000; + z-index: 10; +} +.serif { + font-family: serif; +} +a { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-weight: bold; + text-decoration: none; +} +a:link { +/* color: #0000ff; */ + color: #aa0000; +} +a:hover { +/* color: #000080; */ + color: #dd0000; + text-decoration: underline; +} +a:visited { +/* color: #000080; */ + color: #800000; +} +.syntax { + font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; + font-size: 11pt; + color:#000080; +} +.param { + color:#0000cc; + font-style: italic; + font-weight: normal +} + +dd { + margin: 0 20px 20px 30px; +} + +.path { + font-family: monospace; + font-weight: bold; + font-size: 10pt; +} + +.hline { + border-collapse: collapse; + border-bottom: 1px solid; + border-color: #000000; +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/index.html b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/index.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6bbfe361a --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + + +Hibachi - Stock Price Example in Perl + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +

Stock Price Fetch Example in Perl

+

+(This example requires JavaScript.) +

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+      + Exchange : CDNX
Symbol : DIR
Share Price : + +   +
Volume : + +
Last Trade : + +
+ +
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl new file mode 100755 index 000000000..40fa1604d --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +#!/usr/bin/perl +# +# yahoo-ticker.pl +# +# Copyright 1998 by Anthony Howe. All rights reserved. +# +# Usage: yahoo-ticker.pl? +# + +########################################################################## +# Nothing to be configured below this point. +########################################################################## + +use Socket; + +# WORK-AROUND 1. +# BAH! Some Perl implementations (for Windows) are not created equal. +# Force I/O flushes after each read/write operation. + +$| = 1; + +######################################################################### +# Open connection to URL. +######################################################################### + +my ($symbol) = $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'} =~ /\??(.*)/; + +# Figure out who we have to call. +#($host, $port, $path) = ($url =~ m!http://([^:/]+)(?:\:(\d*))?(/.*)!); + +$host = "finance.yahoo.com"; +$port = 80 unless defined $port; +$path = "/q?s=$symbol"; + +# Get a socket... +unless (socket(HTTP, PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, getprotobyname('tcp'))) { + print("[CGI failed ($!)]\n"); + exit(0); +} + +# ...set socket to be line buffered... +select( (select(HTTP), $| = 1)[0] ); + +# .. make the connection. +unless (connect(HTTP, sockaddr_in($port, inet_aton("$host")))) { + print("[CGI failed ($!)]\n"); + exit(0); +} + +print HTTP "GET $path HTTP/1.0\nHost: $host\n\n"; + +while () { + # Last trade price line. + if (m!>Last Trade:(\d+\.\d+)!); + } + + if (m!>Trade Time:([^<]+)!); + } + + if (m!>Volume:([^<]+)!); + } +} + +close(HTTP); + +print "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\n"; +print "Content-Type: text/javascript\n\n"; + +print "var ticker = new Array();\n"; +print "ticker['price'] = $price;\n"; +print "ticker['volume'] = \"$volume\";\n"; +print "ticker['last'] = \"$last\";\n"; + +exit 0; diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl.in b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0da9fcba4 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl.in @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +#!@perl_exe@ +# +# yahoo-ticker.pl +# +# Copyright 1998 by Anthony Howe. All rights reserved. +# +# Usage: yahoo-ticker.pl? +# + +########################################################################## +# Nothing to be configured below this point. +########################################################################## + +use Socket; + +# WORK-AROUND 1. +# BAH! Some Perl implementations (for Windows) are not created equal. +# Force I/O flushes after each read/write operation. + +$| = 1; + +######################################################################### +# Open connection to URL. +######################################################################### + +my ($symbol) = $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'} =~ /\??(.*)/; + +# Figure out who we have to call. +#($host, $port, $path) = ($url =~ m!http://([^:/]+)(?:\:(\d*))?(/.*)!); + +$host = "finance.yahoo.com"; +$port = 80 unless defined $port; +$path = "/q?s=$symbol"; + +# Get a socket... +unless (socket(HTTP, PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, getprotobyname('tcp'))) { + print("[CGI failed ($!)]\n"); + exit(0); +} + +# ...set socket to be line buffered... +select( (select(HTTP), $| = 1)[0] ); + +# .. make the connection. +unless (connect(HTTP, sockaddr_in($port, inet_aton("$host")))) { + print("[CGI failed ($!)]\n"); + exit(0); +} + +print HTTP "GET $path HTTP/1.0\nHost: $host\n\n"; + +while () { + # Last trade price line. + if (m!>Last Trade:(\d+\.\d+)!); + } + + if (m!>Trade Time:([^<]+)!); + } + + if (m!>Volume:([^<]+)!); + } +} + +close(HTTP); + +print "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\n"; +print "Content-Type: text/javascript\n\n"; + +print "var ticker = new Array();\n"; +print "ticker['price'] = $price;\n"; +print "ticker['volume'] = \"$volume\";\n"; +print "ticker['last'] = \"$last\";\n"; + +exit 0; diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/Date.php b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/Date.php new file mode 100644 index 000000000..861f036fa --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/Date.php @@ -0,0 +1,557 @@ +setTime(time()); + } + + function isLeapYear(/* year */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 1) + $year = func_get_arg(0); + else + $year = $this->date['year']; + + if ($year % 4000 == 0) + return false; + if ($year % 400 == 0) + return true; + if ($year % 100 == 0) + return false; + if ($year % 4 == 0) + return true; + return false; + } + + // + // Return the number of seconds since system epoch. + // + function getTime() + { + return $this->time; + } + + // + // Set the date / time in seconds for the object. + // + function setTime($t) + { + $this->time = $t; + $this->date = getdate($t); + } + + function getHour() + { + return $this->date['hour']; + } + + function getMinute() + { + return $this->date['minutes']; + } + + function getSecond() + { + return $this->date['seconds']; + } + + function getMonth() + { + return $this->date['mon']; + } + + function getYear() + { + return $this->date['year']; + } + + function getDayOfWeek() + { + return $this->date['wday']; + } + + function getDayOfMonth() + { + return $this->date['mday']; + } + + function getDayOfYear() + { + return $this->date['yday']; + } + + function getDaysInMonth(/* year, month */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 2) { + $year = func_get_arg(0); + $month = func_get_arg(1); + } else { + $year = $this->date['year']; + $month = $this->date['mon']; + } + + $endOfMonth = Array( + 31, + 28 + Date::isLeapYear($year), + 31, + 30, + 31, + 30, + 31, + 31, + 30, + 31, + 30, + 31 + ); + + return $endOfMonth[$month-1]; + } + + function getPreviousMonth() + { + if ($this->date['mon'] <= 1) + return 12; + + return $this->date['mon']-1; + } + + function getNextMonth() + { + if (12 <= $this->date['mon']) + return 1; + + return $this->date['mon']+1; + } + + function getFirstWeekDayOfMonth(/* year, month */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 2) { + $y = func_get_arg(0); + $m = func_get_arg(1); + } else { + $y = $this->date['year']; + $m = $this->date['mon']; + } + + // Day of the week 0..6 (Sunday..Saturday). + $weekDay = strftime("%w", mktime(0, 0, 0, $m, 1, $y)); + + // Day of the week 1..7 (Monday..Sunday). + return $weekDay == 0 ? 7 : $weekDay; + } + + function getNumberOfWeeks(/* year */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 1) + $year = func_get_arg(0); + else + $year = $this->date['year']; + + /* An ISO calendar year y is long (contains 53 weeks) if: + * + * p(y) modulo 7 = 4 + * + * or if: + * + * p(y-1) modulo 7 = 3 + * + * with: + * + * p(y) = y + floor(y/4) - floor(y/100) + floor(y/400) + * + * http://www.phys.uu.nl/~vgent/calendar/isocalendar.htm + */ + + if (($year + floor($year/4) - floor($year/100) + floor($year/400)) % 7 == 4) + return 53; + + if ((--$year + floor($year/4) - floor($year/100) + floor($year/400)) % 7 == 3) + return 53; + + return 52; + } + + /* + * Return ISO 8601:2000(E) week number. This is a work around for + * Windows, which does not support a working strftime %V format. + */ + function getWeekNumber(/* year, month, day */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 3) { + $year = func_get_arg(0); + $month = func_get_arg(1); + $day = func_get_arg(2); + } else { + $year = $this->date['year']; + $month = $this->date['mon']; + $day = $this->date['mday']; + } + + /* The week number of the current year as a decimal number, range + * 00 to 53, starting with the first Monday as the first day of + * week 01. + */ + $week = strftime("%W", mktime(0, 0, 0, $month, $day, $year)); + + /* Week days numbered 0 (Sunday) to 6 (Saturday). */ + $firstWeekDayThisYear = strftime("%w", mktime(0, 0, 0, 1, 1, $year)); + $firstWeekDayNextYear = strftime("%w", mktime(0, 0, 0, 1, 1, $year+1)); + + /* The first ISO calendar week of a year is the one that includes the + * first Thursday of that year. In other words, the first week of the + * ISO calendar year is the earliest week that contains at least four + * days of the month of January. + */ + if (1 < $firstWeekDayThisYear && $firstWeekDayThisYear < 5) { + /* The first Thursday of the current ISO year was in week zero. */ + $week++; + } + + if ($week == 53 && 1 < $firstWeekDayNextYear && $firstWeekDayNextYear < 5) { + /* The first Thursday of the following ISO year is this week. */ + $week = 1; + } + + if ($week == 0) { + /* Number of weeks last year. */ + $week = Date::getNumberOfWeeks($year-1); + } + + return $week+0; + } + + // + // Return the number seconds as of zero hour today. + // + function getDate() + { + return mktime(0, 0, 0, $this->date['mon'], $this->date['mday'], $this->date['year']); + } + + // + // Set date as of zero hour that day. + // + function setDate($year, $month, $day) + { + $this->setDateTime($year, $month, $day, 0, 0, 0); + } + + // + // Return the date / time array. + // + function getDateTime() + { + return $this->date; + } + + // + // Set the date / time for the object. + // + function setDateTime($year, $month, $day, $hour, $minute, $second) + { + $time = mktime($hour, $minute, $second, $month, $day, $year, 0); + $this->setTime($time); + } + + // + // Adjust the date / time of the object. + // + function addDateTime($year, $month, $day, $hour, $minute, $second) + { + $t = mktime( + $this->date['hour'] + $hour, + $this->date['minutes'] + $minute, + $this->date['seconds'] + $second, + $this->date['mon'] + $month, + $this->date['mday'] + $day, + $this->date['year'] + $year + ); + $this->setTime($t); + } + + // + // Return the date / time as an ISO date string. + // + function getDateISO() + { + return strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", $this->time); + } + + // + // Set the date / time of the object using an ISO date string. + // + function setDateISO($str) + { + if (!ereg('([0-9]+)-([0-9]+)-([0-9]+)', $str, $ymd)) + $ymd = array('','0','0','0'); + if (!ereg('([0-9]+):([0-9]+):([0-9]+)\+([0-9]+)', $str, $hms)) + $hms = array('','0','0','0'); + + // Assume local time, ignore timezone. + $this->setDateTime( + intval($ymd[1]), + intval($ymd[2]), + intval($ymd[3]), + intval($hms[1]), + intval($hms[2]), + intval($hms[3]) + ); + } + + function setDateMySQL($str) + { + $n = sscanf($str, "%4d%2d%2d%2d%2d%2d", $y, $m, $d, $H, $M, $S); + $this->setDateTime($y, $m, $d, $H, $M, $S); + } + + // + // Relational operations between Date vs time or Date vs Date. + // + function eq($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time == $t; + } + + function ne($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time != $t; + } + + function lt($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time < $t; + } + + function le($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time <= $t; + } + + function gt($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time > $t; + } + + function ge($t) + { + if (is_object($t)) $t = $t->getTime(); + return $this->time >= $t; + } + + /* + * $obj->getSmallCalendar() + * Date::getSmallCalendar($year, $month) + */ + function getSmallCalendar(/* [$year, $month] */) + { + if (func_num_args() == 2) { + $year = func_get_arg(0); + $month = func_get_arg(1); + } else { + $year = $this->date['year']; + $month = $this->date['mon']; + } + + $name = date('F', mktime(0,0,0,$month,1,$year)); + $weekNumber = Date::getWeekNumber($year, $month, 1); + $daysInMonth = Date::getDaysInMonth($year, $month); + $weekDay = Date::getFirstWeekDayOfMonth($year, $month) - 1; + + $thisDate = getdate(time()); + $thisDay = mktime(0, 0, 0, $thisDate['mon'], $thisDate['mday'], $thisDate['year']); + $thisWeek = Date::getWeekNumber($thisDate['year'], $thisDate['mon'], $thisDate['mday']); + + if ($year != $thisDate['year']) { + $thisWeek = 0; + } + + $rc = << + + {$name}   {$year} + + +   + Mo + Tu + We + Th + Fr + Sa + Su + + + {$weekNumber} + +EOT; + + if ($weekNumber == $thisWeek) { + $style = "smCalendarThisWeek"; + $thisDayStyle = "smCalendarThisWeek smCalendarThisDay"; + } else { + $style = $thisDayStyle = "smCalendarDay"; + } + + for ($i = 0; $i < $weekDay; $i++) { + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t \n", + $i == $thisDate['wday'] ? $thisDayStyle : $style, + $i < 5 ? "" : " smCalendarWeekend" + ); + } + + for ($i = 1; $i <= $daysInMonth; $i++, $weekDay = ($weekDay + 1) % 7) { + if (1 < $i && $weekDay == 0) { + $weekNumber = Date::getWeekNumber($year, $month, $i); + + $week = $weekNumber < 10 ? "  {$weekNumber}" : $weekNumber; + $rc .= "\n\n\t{$week}\n"; + if ($weekNumber == $thisWeek) { + $style = "smCalendarThisWeek"; + $thisDayStyle = "smCalendarThisWeek smCalendarThisDay"; + } else { + $style = $thisDayStyle = "smCalendarDay"; + } + } + + $key = sprintf("%04d-02d-02d", $year, $month, $i); + + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t%d\n", + $i == $thisDate['mday'] ? $thisDayStyle : $style, + $weekDay < 5 ? "" : " smCalendarWeekend", $i + ); + } + + for ( ; $weekDay != 0; $weekDay = ($weekDay + 1) % 7) { + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t \n", + $weekDay < 5 ? "smCalendarDay" : "smCalendarWeekend" + ); + } + + $rc .= "\n\n"; + + return $rc; + } + + /* + * $obj->getLargeCalendar($notes) + * Date::getLargeCalendar($notes, $year, $month) + */ + function getLargeCalendar(/* $notes [, $year, $month] */) + { + switch (func_num_args()) { + case 3: + $notes = func_get_arg(0); + $year = func_get_arg(1); + $month = func_get_arg(2); + break; + case 1: + $notes = func_get_arg(0); + $year = $this->date['year']; + $month = $this->date['mon']; + break; + default: + return ''; + } + + $name = date('F', mktime(0,0,0,$month,1,$year)); + $weekNumber = Date::getWeekNumber($year, $month, 1); + $daysInMonth = Date::getDaysInMonth($year, $month); + $weekDay = Date::getFirstWeekDayOfMonth($year, $month) - 1; + + $thisDate = getdate(time()); + $thisDay = mktime(0, 0, 0, $thisDate['mon'], $thisDate['mday'], $thisDate['year']); + $thisWeek = Date::getWeekNumber($thisDate['year'], $thisDate['mon'], $thisDate['mday']); + + if ($year != $thisDate['year']) { + $thisWeek = 0; + } + + $rc = << + + {$name}   {$year} + + + W + Mo + Tu + We + Th + Fr + Sa + Su + + + {$weekNumber} + +EOT; + + if ($weekNumber == $thisWeek) { + $style = "lgCalendarThisWeek"; + $thisDayStyle = "lgCalendarThisWeek lgCalendarThisDay"; + } else { + $style = $thisDayStyle = "lgCalendarDay"; + } + + for ($i = 0; $i < $weekDay; $i++) { + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t \n", + $i == $thisDate['wday'] ? $thisDayStyle : $style, + $i < 5 ? "" : " lgCalendarWeekend" + ); + } + + for ($i = 1; $i <= $daysInMonth; $i++, $weekDay = ($weekDay + 1) % 7) { + if (1 < $i && $weekDay == 0) { + $weekNumber = Date::getWeekNumber($year, $month, $i); + + $week = $weekNumber < 10 ? "  {$weekNumber}" : $weekNumber; + $rc .= "\n\n\t{$week}\n"; + if ($weekNumber == $thisWeek) { + $style = "lgCalendarThisWeek"; + $thisDayStyle = "lgCalendarThisWeek lgCalendarThisDay"; + } else { + $style = $thisDayStyle = "lgCalendarDay"; + } + } + + $key = sprintf("%04d-%02d-%02d", $year, $month, $i); + + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t%d  %s\n", + $i == $thisDate['mday'] ? $thisDayStyle : $style, + $weekDay < 5 ? "" : " lgCalendarWeekend", + $i, isset($notes[$key]) ? $notes[$key] : '' + ); + + } + + for ( ; $weekDay != 0; $weekDay = ($weekDay + 1) % 7) { + $rc .= sprintf( + "\t \n", + $weekDay < 5 ? "lgCalendarDay" : "lgCalendarWeekend" + ); + } + + $rc .= "\n\n"; + + return $rc; + } +} +?> \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index.php b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index.php new file mode 100755 index 000000000..0570215fc --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index.php @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +#!/usr/bin/php + + + + + +Hibachi - A Calendar Generator in PHP + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+ +

A Calendar Generator in PHP

+\n"); + + print("\n"); + + if ($i % 4 == 3) + print("\n"); + } +?> +
"); + print Date::getSmallCalendar($date->getYear(), $i+1); + print("
+
+ +
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index_php.in b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index_php.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4d3aa8b86 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/index_php.in @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +#!@php_exe@ + + + + + +Hibachi - A Calendar Generator in PHP + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+ +

A Calendar Generator in PHP

+\n"); + + print("\n"); + + if ($i % 4 == 3) + print("\n"); + } +?> +
"); + print Date::getSmallCalendar($date->getYear(), $i+1); + print("
+
+ +
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php new file mode 100755 index 000000000..8cd197505 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/usr/bin/php + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php.in b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..050bf3a85 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/info.php.in @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!@php_exe@ + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.html b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..546f7ff79 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.html @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + + +Hibachi - Form Processing Example in PHP + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +

Form Processing Example in PHP

+ +

This example takes the output of a form POST and reformats it from +its encoded format into human readable output suitable for sending +by email. +

+ +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ Who am I? + + +
+ What am I? + + +
+ Where am I? + + +
+   + + +
+
+ +
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php new file mode 100755 index 000000000..dd0899d92 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +#!/usr/bin/php + $value) { + if ($maxWidth < strlen($name)) + $maxWidth = strlen($name); +} + +foreach ($_POST as $name => $value) { + if ($maxWidth < strlen($name)) + $maxWidth = strlen($name); +} + +$body = ''; +$fmt = "%{$maxWidth}s: %s\n"; + +foreach ($_GET as $name => $value) { + $body .= sprintf($fmt, $name, $value); +} + +foreach ($_POST as $name => $value) { + $body .= sprintf($fmt, $name, $value); +} + +//mail($SEND_TO, $SUBJECT, $body); + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +// +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +?> + + + + +Hibachi - Form Processing Example in PHP + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +

Form Processing Example in PHP

+ +

Formatted output of web form as would be seen in an email message (without decorations). +This example does not send any actual email, though it could with some minor changes. +

+
+
+
+
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php.in b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7687a9b01 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/php/sendform.php.in @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +#!@php_exe@ + $value) { + if ($maxWidth < strlen($name)) + $maxWidth = strlen($name); +} + +foreach ($_POST as $name => $value) { + if ($maxWidth < strlen($name)) + $maxWidth = strlen($name); +} + +$body = ''; +$fmt = "%{$maxWidth}s: %s\n"; + +foreach ($_GET as $name => $value) { + $body .= sprintf($fmt, $name, $value); +} + +foreach ($_POST as $name => $value) { + $body .= sprintf($fmt, $name, $value); +} + +//mail($SEND_TO, $SUBJECT, $body); + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +// +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +?> + + + + +Hibachi - Form Processing Example in PHP + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +

Form Processing Example in PHP

+ +

Formatted output of web form as would be seen in an email message (without decorations). +This example does not send any actual email, though it could with some minor changes. +

+
+
+
+
+Return to HIBACHI + +
+ + + + + diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/LUHN.rb b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/LUHN.rb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f8a1d41ef --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/LUHN.rb @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +# +# LUHN.rb +# +# Copyright 2000, 2004 by Anthony Howe. All rights reserved. +# + +class LUHN + def LUHN.base(str, radix) + if radix < 2 then + return nil + end + + num = 0 + str.downcase! + str.each_byte do |byte| + i = "0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz".index(byte) + if i.nil? || radix <= i then + return nil + end + num = num * radix + i + end + + return num + end + + # + # Internal routine that computes the LUHN sum. + # + # The LUHN Algorithm ("mod 10 Double-Add-Double"): + # + # 1. Position from right 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 + # ------------------------------ + # Number string 4 8 9 5 1 3 1 3 + # x2 even positions 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 + # ------------------------------ + # Add odd positions & 8 +8 +1+8 +5 +2 +3 +2 +3 + # add digits of doubled + # positions + # + # Sum 40 + # + # Number is valid if sum is a multiple of 10. + # + # + # 2. Alpha-numeric ISIN U S 3 8 3 8 8 3 1 0 5 1 + # (ISO 6166) ----------------------------------------- + # base 36 digits 30 28 3 8 3 8 8 3 1 0 5 1 + # ----------------------------------------- + # consider digit string 3 0 2 8 3 8 3 8 8 3 1 0 5 1 + # & x2 even digits from 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 + # ----------------------------------------- + # 6 0 4 8 6 8 6 8 16 3 2 0 10 1 + # ----------------------------------------- + # sum the digits of 6 +0 +4 +8 +6 +8 +6 +8+1+6+3 +2 +0+1+0+1 + # + # Sum 60 + # + # Number is valid if sum is a multiple of 10. + # + def LUHN.sum(str) + if ! str.instance_of?(String) || str.length < 1 then + return nil + end + + total = 0 + even = false + str = str.reverse.downcase + + # Working right to left... + str.each_byte do |byte| + # Convert base36 digit to a base10 value. + digit36 = base(byte.chr, 36) + if digit36.nil? then + return nil + end + + # For each base10 digit of a base36 digit... + begin + digit10 = digit36 % 10 + + if even then + # Multiply even digits by 2. + digit10 <<= 1 + + # Sum digits of product. + if 10 <= digit10 then + digit10 -= 9 + end + end + + # Add digits of product to total. + total += digit10 + + # Next digit. + digit36 = (digit36 / 10).floor + + # Toggle from digit to digit. + even = !even + end while 0 < digit36 + end + + return total + end + + # + # Return true if the string of digits is valid. + # Assumes LUHN check digit is right most digit. + # + def LUHN.valid?(str) + if ! str.instance_of?(String) || str.length < 2 then + return false + end + + total = sum(str) + + return total.nil? ? false : (total % 10) == 0 + end + + # + # Return the LUHN check digit (mod 10) for the + # given string of digits; otherwise nil on error. + # + def LUHN.generate(str) + if ! str.instance_of?(String) || str.length < 1 then + return nil + end + + total = sum(str + '0') + + return total.nil? ? nil : (10 - (total % 10)) % 10 + end +end + +if $DEBUG && $0 == 'LUHN.rb' then + def generate(str, expect) + digit = LUHN.generate(str) + puts(str + "-" + digit.to_s + ' ' + (digit == expect).to_s) + end + def validate(str) + puts(str + ' ' + LUHN.valid?(str).to_s) + end + + generate('1', 8) + generate('12', 5) + generate('123', 0) + generate('A', 9) + generate('AB', 6) + + validate('AB6') +end diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index.rb b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index.rb new file mode 100755 index 000000000..e31772396 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index.rb @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +#!/usr/bin/ruby + +require 'cgi' +require ENV['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] + '/test/ruby/LUHN' + +if ENV['QUERY_STRING'].nil? then + answer = '' + numebr = '' +else + query = CGI.parse(ENV['QUERY_STRING']) + number = query['number'].to_s + + case query['action'].to_s + when 'Validate' + is_valid = LUHN.valid?(number) + answer = number + when 'Generate' + digit = LUHN.generate(number) + answer = "#{number}" + digit.to_s + is_valid = ! digit.nil? + end +end + +puts <<"EOT" +HTTP/1.0 200 OK +Content-Type: text/html + + + + + +Hibachi - Playing with LUHN checksums in Ruby + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ +

Playing with LUHN checksums in Ruby
"mod 10 Double-Add-Double"

+

Enter an alpha-numeric string like a credit card number or International Securities Identification Number (ISO 6166). + Click validate to test if the entered string is correct. Click generate to append the check digit to the string. +

+
+ +
#{ is_valid ? "Is valid." : "Is NOT valid." } +
+
+ +    + +    + +
+
+ Return to HIBACHI + +
+ +
+ + + +EOT + +exit(0) diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index_rb.in b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index_rb.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..87950ccb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/ruby/index_rb.in @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +#!@ruby_exe@ + +require 'cgi' +require ENV['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] + '/test/ruby/LUHN' + +if ENV['QUERY_STRING'].nil? then + answer = '' + numebr = '' +else + query = CGI.parse(ENV['QUERY_STRING']) + number = query['number'].to_s + + case query['action'].to_s + when 'Validate' + is_valid = LUHN.valid?(number) + answer = number + when 'Generate' + digit = LUHN.generate(number) + answer = "#{number}" + digit.to_s + is_valid = ! digit.nil? + end +end + +puts <<"EOT" +HTTP/1.0 200 OK +Content-Type: text/html + + + + + +Hibachi - Playing with LUHN checksums in Ruby + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ +

Playing with LUHN checksums in Ruby
"mod 10 Double-Add-Double"

+

Enter an alpha-numeric string like a credit card number or International Securities Identification Number (ISO 6166). + Click validate to test if the entered string is correct. Click generate to append the check digit to the string. +

+
+ +
#{ is_valid ? "Is valid." : "Is NOT valid." } +
+
+ +    + +    + +
+
+ Return to HIBACHI + +
+ +
+ + + +EOT + +exit(0) diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/dump.sh b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/dump.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..5ee810baa --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/dump.sh @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +cat <<'EOT' + + +EOT + +env | sed -e 's/^\(.[^\=]*\)=\(.*\)$/

Environment Variables

\1<\/td>\2\ <\/td><\/tr>/' + +echo "
" + + if [ "$REQUEST_METHOD" = "POST" -a X"$CONTENT_LENGTH" != X ]; then +STUFF=`dd bs=1 count=$CONTENT_LENGTH 2>/dev/null` +COUNT=`printf $STUFF | wc -c` + +cat < +

Standard Input

+
Length: $COUNT
+
$STUFF
+ +EOT + +if [ $CONTENT_LENGTH -eq $COUNT ]; then + echo "[ OK ] CONTENT_LENGTH = bytes read" +else + echo "[ BAD ] CONTENT_LENGTH != bytes read" +fi + + fi diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test0.sh b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test0.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..1a9d988fb --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test0.sh @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +cat <<'-EOT-' +HTTP/1.0 200 OK +Content-Type: text/html + + + + + +Hibachi/1.0 Shell Test 0 - Display Enviroment + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+

Results from Simple GET request

+ + +-EOT- + +if [ X"$PATH" = X'/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin' ]; then + + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$ENV" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$CDPATH" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$REQUEST_METHOD" = X'GET' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$DOCUMENT_ROOT" != X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +# Test for existance only, since the location changes. +if [ X"$SCRIPT_FILENAME" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +# Test for existance only, since the default value might change. +if [ X"$SERVER_PORT" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$SERVER_SOFTWARE" = X'hibachi/1.0' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$GATEWAY_INTERFACE" = X'CGI/0.0' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +echo "

Assertions

[ OK ] PATH
[ BAD ] PATH
[ OK ] ENV
[ BAD ] ENV
[ OK ] CDPATH
[ BAD ] CDPATH
[ OK ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ BAD ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ OK ] DOCUMENT_ROOT
[ BAD ] DOCUMENT_ROOT
[ BAD ] SCRIPT_FILENAME
[ OK ] SCRIPT_FILENAME
[ BAD ] SERVER_PORT
[ OK ] SERVER_PORT
[ OK ] SERVER_SOFTWARE
[ BAD ] SERVER_SOFTWARE
[ OK ] GATEWAY_INTERFACE
[ BAD ] GATEWAY_INTERFACE
" + +. "$DOCUMENT_ROOT/test/shell/dump.sh" + +cat <<'-EOT-' +
+
+Next Test: + +
+
+
+Return to HIBACHI +
+ + + +-EOT- + +exit 0 diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test1.sh b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test1.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..5011a353d --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test1.sh @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +cat <<'-EOT-' +HTTP/1.0 200 OK +Content-Type: text/html +Set-Cookie: cookie1=test1.sh; path=/ +Set-Cookie: cookie2=test1.sh; path=/ + + + + + +Hibachi/1.0 Shell Test 1 + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+

Results of Form GET request

+ + +-EOT- + +if [ X"$PATH" = X'/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$ENV" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$CDPATH" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$REQUEST_METHOD" = X'GET' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$QUERY_STRING" = X'example=GET+REQUEST+WITH+QUERY-STRING&garibaldi=peek-a-boo' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +echo "

Assertions

[ OK ] PATH
[ BAD ] PATH
[ OK ] ENV
[ BAD ] ENV
[ OK ] CDPATH
[ BAD ] CDPATH
[ OK ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ BAD ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ OK ] QUERY_STRING
[ BAD ] QUERY_STRING
" + +. "$DOCUMENT_ROOT/test/shell/dump.sh" + +cat <<'-EOT-' +
+
+Next Test: + + +
+
+
+Return to HIBACHI +
+ + + +-EOT- + +exit 0 diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test2.sh b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test2.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..c20ef7ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/localhost/test/shell/test2.sh @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +cat <<'-EOT-' +HTTP/1.0 200 OK +Content-Type: text/html + + + + + +Hibachi/1.0 Shell Test 2 + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+

Results of Form POST request

+ + +-EOT- + +if [ X"$PATH" = X'/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin' ]; then + + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$ENV" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$CDPATH" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$REQUEST_METHOD" = X'POST' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$QUERY_STRING" = X ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +if [ X"$HTTP_COOKIE" = X'cookie1=test1.sh; cookie2=test1.sh' -o X"$HTTP_COOKIE" = X'cookie2=test1.sh; cookie1=test1.sh' ]; then + echo "" +else + echo "" +fi + +echo "

Assertions

[ OK ] PATH
[ BAD ] PATH
[ OK ] ENV
[ BAD ] ENV
[ OK ] CDPATH
[ BAD ] CDPATH
[ OK ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ BAD ] REQUEST_METHOD
[ OK ] QUERY_STRING
[ BAD ] QUERY_STRING
[ OK ] HTTP_COOKIE
[ BAD ] HTTP_COOKIE
" + +. "$DOCUMENT_ROOT/test/shell/dump.sh" + +cat <<'-EOT-' +
+
+Return to HIBACHI +
+ + + +-EOT- + +exit 0 diff --git a/2004/hibachi/src/makefile.in b/2004/hibachi/src/makefile.in new file mode 100644 index 000000000..28554f6ff --- /dev/null +++ b/2004/hibachi/src/makefile.in @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +# +# @package_copyright@ +# +# @configure_input@ +# + +.POSIX : + +######################################################################## +### Pick one that best suits your system. +######################################################################## + +prefix = @prefix@ +exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@ + +PACKAGE = @PACKAGE_NAME@ +VERSION = @PACKAGE_VERSION@ +TARNAME = @PACKAGE_TARNAME@ +TARDIR = ../ +SRCDIR = ./ + +CC = @CC@ +CC_E = @CC_E@ +CC_O = @CC_O@ +CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ +LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@ +LIBS = @LIBS@ + +######################################################################## +### No further configuration beyond this point. +######################################################################## + +.SUFFIXES : +O = .@OBJEXT@ +E = @EXEEXT@ +.SUFFIXES : .c $O + +all: build + +build : @PACKAGE_NAME@$E + +clean : + -rm -f *.o *.obj *.i *.map *.tds *.TR2 *.ilc *.ild *.ilf *.ils *.log + -rm @PACKAGE_NAME@$E + +distclean: clean + -rm -rf autom4te.cache config.status config.log + -rm -f @PACKAGE_NAME@-start.sh makefile + -rm -f localhost/test/perl/yahoo-ticker.pl + -rm -f localhost/test/php/index.php + -rm -f localhost/test/php/info.php + -rm -f localhost/test/php/sendform.php + -rm -f localhost/test/ruby/index.rb + +@PACKAGE_NAME@$E: @PACKAGE_NAME@.c + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(CC_E) @PACKAGE_NAME@$E @PACKAGE_NAME@.c $(LIBS) +