fix internal links in entry index.html from 1984 thru 2012

2001/anonymous/README.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 ```
 
 The programs that this program is supposed to act on,
-[anonymous.ten.c](anonymous.ten.c) and [anonymous.bed.c](anonymous.bed.c),
+[anonymous.ten.c](%%REPO_URL%%/2001/anonymous/anonymous.ten.c) and [anonymous.bed.c](%%REPO_URL%%/2001/anonymous/anonymous.bed.c),
 compiled with `make`, MUST be compiled as 32-bit ELF binaries. In the case that
 this fails these programs will be compiled as 64-bit binaries as alternate code,
 `anonymous.ten.alt` and `anonymous.bed.alt`, ELF or otherwise. However trying to
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ set to) and run it directly.
 What happens if the x86 program has already been modified by this program? The
 judges' remarks below might give you a hint!
 
-What happens if you try it on another file like [anonymous.c](anonymous.c)? Can
+What happens if you try it on another file like [anonymous.c](%%REPO_URL%%/2001/anonymous/anonymous.c)? Can
 you recompile it okay? What if you run it on `anonymous` itself? Can you run the
 program successfully after it without recompiling?
 
@@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ In short, please consider this a full disclaimer for any bug that may
 turn up - yes the program is unsafe, but it's pretty cool anyway.
 
 Despite all this, the translator is not exclusively limited to running the
-[anonymous.ten](anonymous.ten.c) program.  Other trivial **_x86_** programs may
+[anonymous.ten](%%REPO_URL%%/2001/anonymous/anonymous.ten.c) program.  Other trivial **_x86_** programs may
 run on the translator \- and I have successfully run a wide range of "Hello
 World" programs, including one of last year's IOCCC entries,
-[tomx](../../2000/tomx/tomx.c).
+[tomx](2001/anonymous/2000/tomx/tomx.c).
 
 
 ### Complete Program
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ new set of switches, and the call to `execv(3)` asks for the newly compiled
 program to be executed.  I would point out that almost every other entry to this
 competition also require a C compiler (well, the published winning entries at any rate,
 and I recognize that a few don't).  There is little real difference between this
-program and one like last year's entry [dhyang](../../2000/dhyang/dhyang.c); both are
+program and one like last year's entry [dhyang](%%REPO_URL%%/2000/dhyang/dhyang.c); both are
 just C programs that generate C code as their output.
 
 Enjoy and thanks!

2001/anonymous/index.html

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Location: <a href="../../location.html#GB">GB</a> - <em>United Kingdom of Great
 <h2 id="to-build">To build:</h2>
 <pre><code>    make</code></pre>
 <p>The programs that this program is supposed to act on,
-<a href="anonymous.ten.c">anonymous.ten.c</a> and <a href="anonymous.bed.c">anonymous.bed.c</a>,
+<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2001/anonymous/anonymous.ten.c">anonymous.ten.c</a> and <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2001/anonymous/anonymous.bed.c">anonymous.bed.c</a>,
 compiled with <code>make</code>, MUST be compiled as 32-bit ELF binaries. In the case that
 this fails these programs will be compiled as 64-bit binaries as alternate code,
 <code>anonymous.ten.alt</code> and <code>anonymous.bed.alt</code>, ELF or otherwise. However trying to
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ whatever your system will compile them as).</p>
 set to) and run it directly.</p>
 <p>What happens if the x86 program has already been modified by this program? The
 judges’ remarks below might give you a hint!</p>
-<p>What happens if you try it on another file like <a href="anonymous.c">anonymous.c</a>? Can
+<p>What happens if you try it on another file like <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2001/anonymous/anonymous.c">anonymous.c</a>? Can
 you recompile it okay? What if you run it on <code>anonymous</code> itself? Can you run the
 program successfully after it without recompiling?</p>
 <h2 id="alternate-code">Alternate code:</h2>
@@ -295,10 +295,10 @@ can only pass up to 3 parameters to the target library function, etc.</p>
 <p>In short, please consider this a full disclaimer for any bug that may
 turn up - yes the program is unsafe, but it’s pretty cool anyway.</p>
 <p>Despite all this, the translator is not exclusively limited to running the
-<a href="anonymous.ten.c">anonymous.ten</a> program. Other trivial <strong><em>x86</em></strong> programs may
+<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2001/anonymous/anonymous.ten.c">anonymous.ten</a> program. Other trivial <strong><em>x86</em></strong> programs may
 run on the translator - and I have successfully run a wide range of “Hello
 World” programs, including one of last year’s IOCCC entries,
-<a href="../../2000/tomx/tomx.c">tomx</a>.</p>
+<a href="2001/anonymous/2000/tomx/tomx.c">tomx</a>.</p>
 <h3 id="complete-program">Complete Program</h3>
 <p>The fact that the program makes calls to <code>system(3)</code> and <code>execv(3)</code> may imply that
 it is not a complete program in its own right, as it relies on other programs.
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ new set of switches, and the call to <code>execv(3)</code> asks for the newly co
 program to be executed. I would point out that almost every other entry to this
 competition also require a C compiler (well, the published winning entries at any rate,
 and I recognize that a few don’t). There is little real difference between this
-program and one like last year’s entry <a href="../../2000/dhyang/dhyang.c">dhyang</a>; both are
+program and one like last year’s entry <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/2000/dhyang/dhyang.c">dhyang</a>; both are
 just C programs that generate C code as their output.</p>
 <p>Enjoy and thanks!</p>
 <!--