diff --git a/2018/README.md b/2018/README.md index 6b01ccb88..a76c892f6 100644 --- a/2018/README.md +++ b/2018/README.md @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ and 22 (one third of 666). Rule 22, now known as "Catch 22" states: ``` - | 22) Your source code, data files, remarks and program output must NOT - | identify the authors of your code. The judges STRONGLY prefer to - | not know who is submitting entries to the IOCCC. + 22) Your source code, data files, remarks and program output must NOT + identify the authors of your code. The judges STRONGLY prefer to + not know who is submitting entries to the IOCCC. - | The "Peter Honeyman is exempt" guideline also applies to this rule. - | Identifying yourself, in an obvious way in your code, data, remarks - | or program output, unless you are Peter Honeyman or pretending - | to be Peter Honeyman, will be grounds for disqualification of your entry. + The "Peter Honeyman is exempt" guideline also applies to this rule. + Identifying yourself, in an obvious way in your code, data, remarks + or program output, unless you are Peter Honeyman or pretending + to be Peter Honeyman, will be grounds for disqualification of your entry. ``` A number of other entries were based on [iocccsize.c](iocccsize.c), making @@ -79,7 +79,9 @@ derivative works rather than original works. Still other entries were too large, violating the first line of rule 2: -> 2) The size of your program source must be <= 4096 bytes in length. +``` + 2) The size of your program source must be <= 4096 bytes in length. +``` While these entries might have passed under the 2053 limit for iocccsize, they were larger than <= 4096 bytes, sometimes by an order or magnitude. diff --git a/2018/index.html b/2018/index.html index 2965f5bef..2a277c481 100644 --- a/2018/index.html +++ b/2018/index.html @@ -178,22 +178,18 @@ It is something completely different.

would have been much higher had some people paid attention to rules 2 and 22 (one third of 666).

Rule 22, now known as “Catch 22” states:

-
    |  22) Your source code, data files, remarks and program output must NOT
-    |      identify the authors of your code.  The judges STRONGLY prefer to
-    |      not know who is submitting entries to the IOCCC.
+
    22) Your source code, data files, remarks and program output must NOT
+        identify the authors of your code.  The judges STRONGLY prefer to
+        not know who is submitting entries to the IOCCC.
 
-    |      The "Peter Honeyman is exempt" guideline also applies to this rule.
-    |      Identifying yourself, in an obvious way in your code, data, remarks
-    |      or program output, unless you are Peter Honeyman or pretending
-    |      to be Peter Honeyman, will be grounds for disqualification of your entry.

+        The "Peter Honeyman is exempt" guideline also applies to this rule.
+        Identifying yourself, in an obvious way in your code, data, remarks
+        or program output, unless you are Peter Honeyman or pretending
+        to be Peter Honeyman, will be grounds for disqualification of your entry.

A number of other entries were based on iocccsize.c, making derivative works rather than original works.

Still other entries were too large, violating the first line of rule 2:

-
-
    -
  1. The size of your program source must be <= 4096 bytes in length.
    2. -
-
+
    2) The size of your program source must be <= 4096 bytes in length.

While these entries might have passed under the 2053 limit for iocccsize, they were larger than <= 4096 bytes, sometimes by an order or magnitude.

We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit