Format fix 1980s and 1990s README.md files
I also updated the todo.md file as I left some things out that have to be done. I only explicitly named one thing but when I go over them as a final pass I will address the things in question (some will require discussion).
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
c283440697
commit
add7268842
15 files changed
+278
-268
No files matched your search
+4
-4
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# 1995 marked the "The Twelfth International Obfuscated C Code Contest"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Look at the README.md file for the given winner for information
|
||||
Look at the README.md file for the given winning entry for information
|
||||
on how to compile and run the winning program. Look at the winning source and
|
||||
try to figure how it does what it does! You may then wish to look at the
|
||||
`Author's remarks` section for even more details.
|
||||
@@ -15,13 +14,13 @@ systems the `Makefile` needs to be changed. See the `Makefile` for details.
|
||||
|
||||
Read over the `Makefile` for compile/build issues. Your system may
|
||||
require certain changes (add or remove a library, add or remove a
|
||||
`#define`).
|
||||
`#define` i.e. the `-D` flag).
|
||||
|
||||
This year [Sriram Srinivasan](http://www.malhar.net/sriram/) joined the judging.
|
||||
|
||||
The moderator of
|
||||
[comp.unix.wizards](https://groups.google.com/g/comp.unix.wizards) did not feel
|
||||
that the IOCCC was "wizardly" enough to be posted to comp.unix.wizards - we will
|
||||
that the IOCCC was "wizardly" enough to be posted to comp.unix.wizards so we will
|
||||
no longer post the winners to this newsgroup - we'll let you the reader decide
|
||||
for yourself the wizardry of these entries.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -60,6 +59,7 @@ Send such email to:
|
||||
...!{sun,pacbell,uunet,pyramid}!hoptoad!judges
|
||||
judges@toad.com
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If you use, distribute or publish these entries in some way, please drop
|
||||
us a line. We enjoy seeing who, where and how the contest is used.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user