Format and typo fix 2001/README.md

2001/README.md

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ systems the Makefile needs to be changed.  See the Makefile for details.
 
 Read over the Makefile for compile/build issues.  Your system may
 require certain changes (add or remove a library, add or remove a
-#define).
+`#define` i.e. the `-D` flag).
 
 Some ANSI C compilers are not quite as good as they should be.  If
 yours is lacking, you may need to compile using gcc instead of your
@@ -32,60 +32,57 @@ local compiler.
 There were some outstanding entries that did not win.  Unfortunately
 some very good entries lost because they:
 
-    + depended too much on non-portable side effects in expressions;
+- depended too much on non-portable side effects in expressions;
-    + depended too much on a particular byte order;
+- depended too much on a particular byte order;
-    + required the use of a special script, data file or pseudo-machine
+- required the use of a special script, data file or pseudo-machine
-      language that was not supplied with the entry.
+  language that was not supplied with the entry.
 
 We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit
 them for the next IOCCC.
 
-We believe you will be impressed with this year's winners.  The Best of Show
+We believe you will be impressed with this year's winners.  The [Best of
-is a fine example of obfuscation.  But don't ignore the other winners!
+Show](ollinger/README.md) is a fine example of obfuscation.  But don't ignore
-There are games, programs that speak, ones that compile code and one that
+the other winners!  There are games, programs that speak, ones that compile code
-might run binaries you already have!
+and [one that might run binaries you already have](2001/anonymous/README.md).
 
-The Worst Abuse of the Rules is technically allowed by the rules.  This year
+The [Best/Worst Abuse of the Rules](bellard/README.md) is technically allowed by the
-we awarded it again, but don't assume you can get away with using the same
+[rules](rules.txt).  This year we awarded it again, but don't assume you can get
-technique next time ... :-)
+away with using the same technique next time ... :-)
 
 This year there were several repeat winners.  This is understating the
-achievement a little - one person has won 8 times before!  (Please note that
+achievement a little - [one
-judging is done completely anonymously).
+person](https://www.ioccc.org/winners.html#Brian_Westley) has won 8 times
+before! (Please note that judging is done completely anonymously.)
 
 
-Why has it taken so long to post the winning source?
+## Why has it taken so long to post the winning source?
-----------------------------------------------------
 
-This is somewhat my (Simon Cooper) fault.  I do apologize to the IOCCC
+This is somewhat my (Simon Cooper's) fault.  I do apologize to the IOCCC
 community for this!  Judging does take quite a lot of time, and I
 over-committed myself several times this year.  Without divulging too much,
 we do look at and work out what every entry does.
 
 
-Final Comments
+## Final Comments
---------------
 
 Please send us comments and suggestions what we have expressed above.
 Also include anything else that you would like to see in future contests.
 Send such email to:
 
-	questions@ioccc.org
+```
+questions@ioccc.org
+```
 
 If you use, distribute or publish these entries in some way, please drop
 us a line.  We enjoy seeing who, where and how the contest is used.
 
-You must include the words ``ioccc question'' in the subject of your email
+You must include the words 'ioccc question' in the subject of your email
 message when sending email to the judges.
 
 If you have problems with any of the entries, AND YOU HAVE A FIX, please
 email the fix (patch file or the entire changed file) to the above address.
 
-Watch:
+Watch <https://www.ioccc.org/> for news of the next contest.
-
-	https://www.ioccc.org/
-
-for news of the next contest.
 
 =-=