fix some indenting issues, and bing!

This commit is contained in:
Landon Curt Noll committed 2025-11-29 23:11:20 -08:00
1 parent 21798a1005
commit d53e0deffd
3 files changed
+9 -2

No files matched your search

+3
View File
@@ -966,6 +966,7 @@ submission’s <code>Makefile</code> are supported by <strong>BOTH</strong> <cod
<p>We <strong>DISLIKE</strong> the use of obscure compiler flags, especially <p>We <strong>DISLIKE</strong> the use of obscure compiler flags, especially
if <code>gcc</code> and/or <code>clang</code> do not support it. We <strong>suggest</strong> if <code>gcc</code> and/or <code>clang</code> do not support it. We <strong>suggest</strong>
that you not use any really obscure compiler flags if you can help it.</p> that you not use any really obscure compiler flags if you can help it.</p>
<div id="nested-functions">
<p>One side effect of the above is that you cannot assume the use <p>One side effect of the above is that you cannot assume the use
of nested functions such as:</p> of nested functions such as:</p>
<pre><code> int main() { <pre><code> int main() {
@@ -974,6 +975,7 @@ of nested functions such as:</p>
} }
| please_dont_submit_this(); | please_dont_submit_this();
}</code></pre> }</code></pre>
</div>
<p>On 2012 July 20, the <a href="../judges.html">IOCCC judges</a> rescinded the encouragement of <p>On 2012 July 20, the <a href="../judges.html">IOCCC judges</a> rescinded the encouragement of
nested functions. Such constructions, while interesting and sometimes nested functions. Such constructions, while interesting and sometimes
amusing, will have to wait until they are required by a C standard that are amusing, will have to wait until they are required by a C standard that are
@@ -1392,6 +1394,7 @@ CPU, we might just try your submission on that emulator as well :-)</p>
<p>Do not fear if you’re not 100% sure of the significance of <p>Do not fear if you’re not 100% sure of the significance of
<code>2305567963945518424753102147331756070</code> as it is not of prime importance: or is <code>2305567963945518424753102147331756070</code> as it is not of prime importance: or is
it? :-)</p> it? :-)</p>
<p>With respect to <a href="#nested-functions">nested functions</a>, try <code>chkentry -b</code>.</p>
<p>Jump to: <a href="#">top</a></p> <p>Jump to: <a href="#">top</a></p>
<div id="more-information"> <div id="more-information">
+4
View File
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ We **DISLIKE** the use of obscure compiler flags, especially
if `gcc` and/or `clang` do not support it. We **suggest** if `gcc` and/or `clang` do not support it. We **suggest**
that you not use any really obscure compiler flags if you can help it. that you not use any really obscure compiler flags if you can help it.
<div id="nested-functions">
One side effect of the above is that you cannot assume the use One side effect of the above is that you cannot assume the use
of nested functions such as: of nested functions such as:
@@ -705,6 +706,7 @@ of nested functions such as:
| please_dont_submit_this(); | please_dont_submit_this();
} }
``` ```
</div>
On 2012 July 20, the [IOCCC judges](../judges.html) rescinded the encouragement of On 2012 July 20, the [IOCCC judges](../judges.html) rescinded the encouragement of
nested functions. Such constructions, while interesting and sometimes nested functions. Such constructions, while interesting and sometimes
@@ -1237,6 +1239,8 @@ Do not fear if you're not 100% sure of the significance of
`2305567963945518424753102147331756070` as it is not of prime importance: or is `2305567963945518424753102147331756070` as it is not of prime importance: or is
it? :-) it? :-)
With respect to [nested functions](#nested-functions), try `chkentry -b`.
Jump to: [top](#) Jump to: [top](#)
+2 -2
View File
@@ -16826,11 +16826,11 @@
</url> </url>
<url> <url>
<loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/guidelines.html</loc> <loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/guidelines.html</loc>
<lastmod>2025-11-30T06:53:29+00:00</lastmod> <lastmod>2025-11-30T07:10:28+00:00</lastmod>
</url> </url>
<url> <url>
<loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/guidelines.md</loc> <loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/guidelines.md</loc>
<lastmod>2025-11-30T06:53:23+00:00</lastmod> <lastmod>2025-11-30T07:10:21+00:00</lastmod>
</url> </url>
<url> <url>
<loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/index.html</loc> <loc>https://www.ioccc.org/next/index.html</loc>