fix many internal links

Fixed a number of internal links that need to
go to the GitHub site.

Ran `make www` to perform the above.
This commit is contained in:
Landon Curt Noll committed 2024-04-24 02:37:42 -07:00
1 parent b84f8cbe28
commit e7d69bc232
175 files changed
+645 -631

No files matched your search

+2 -2
View File
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ in an effort to get around the 1994 version of Rule 2:
followed by either whitespace or end of file, must be <= 1536.
```
Indeed, when [dodsond2.gz](dodsond2.gz) is uncompressed, it is identical
to the [dodsond2.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/dodsond2/dodsond2.c) file you find today.
Indeed the [dodsond2.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/dodsond2/dodsond2.c) file is
what you find today.
The IOCCC rules and guidelines were modified in an effort to address
this fun "_abuse of the rules_" style hack.
+2 -2
View File
@@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ in an effort to get around the 1994 version of Rule 2:</p>
<pre><code> 2) Your entry must be &lt;= 3217 bytes in length. The number of characters
excluding whitespace (tab, space, newline), and excluding any ; { or }
followed by either whitespace or end of file, must be &lt;= 1536.</code></pre>
<p>Indeed, when <a href="dodsond2.gz">dodsond2.gz</a> is uncompressed, it is identical
to the <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/dodsond2/dodsond2.c">dodsond2.c</a> file you find today.</p>
<p>Indeed the <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/dodsond2/dodsond2.c">dodsond2.c</a> file is
what you find today.</p>
<p>The IOCCC rules and guidelines were modified in an effort to address
this fun “<em>abuse of the rules</em>” style hack.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that without this compression “<em>abuse of the rules</em>”
+5 -5
View File
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ source file is self documenting. :-)
From time to time, run `ps(1)` and look at the new processes.
See [shapiro.html](shapiro.html) for more information in the internals of this program.
The file [shapiro.alt.c](shapiro.alt.c) contains a non-obfuscated version of
The file [shapiro.alt.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/shapiro/shapiro.alt.c) contains a non-obfuscated version of
this program. Note that this alt file is currently missing. See
[1994 shapiro bugs](../../bugs.html#1994_shapiro) for details.
@@ -67,18 +67,18 @@ The basic theme (pun) of this program is:
```
My entry ([shapiro.c](shapiro.c)) is mostly comments, formatted in the shape of a
My entry ([shapiro.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/shapiro/shapiro.c)) is mostly comments, formatted in the shape of a
clock. If you strip out the comments and look at the code you will
quickly realize that the comments were the important part and that
the code does very little (see pun above). It writes (to `stdout`)
another C program ([shapiro_t2.c](shapiro_t2.c)). This is the first level of
another C program ([shapiro_t2.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c)). This is the first level of
obfuscation.
The second program ([shapiro_t2.c](shapiro_t2.c) (use `make everything` first)
The second program ([shapiro_t2.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c) (use `make everything` first)
prints a clock in the upper right hand corner of your VTxxx/ANSI display.
Most of the surface obfuscation in the second program
([shapiro_t2.c](shapiro_t2.c)) was an attempt to make it as small as possible.
([shapiro_t2.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c)) was an attempt to make it as small as possible.
You should be able to see around this with `cb(1)` and some more intelligent
variable names. Once you get past this you will realize that the third level of
obfuscation is a six member client/server hierarchy. (See the
+5 -5
View File
@@ -403,23 +403,23 @@ bring it back to the foreground.</p>
source file is self documenting. :-)</p>
<p>From time to time, run <code>ps(1)</code> and look at the new processes.</p>
<p>See <a href="shapiro.html">shapiro.html</a> for more information in the internals of this program.
The file <a href="shapiro.alt.c">shapiro.alt.c</a> contains a non-obfuscated version of
The file <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/shapiro/shapiro.alt.c">shapiro.alt.c</a> contains a non-obfuscated version of
this program. Note that this alt file is currently missing. See
<a href="../../bugs.html#1994_shapiro">1994 shapiro bugs</a> for details.</p>
<h2 id="authors-remarks">Author’s remarks:</h2>
<p>The basic theme (pun) of this program is:</p>
<pre><code> &quot;This time (everything) is not where it should be.&quot;
~~~~</code></pre>
<p>My entry (<a href="shapiro.c">shapiro.c</a>) is mostly comments, formatted in the shape of a
<p>My entry (<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/shapiro/shapiro.c">shapiro.c</a>) is mostly comments, formatted in the shape of a
clock. If you strip out the comments and look at the code you will
quickly realize that the comments were the important part and that
the code does very little (see pun above). It writes (to <code>stdout</code>)
another C program (<a href="shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a>). This is the first level of
another C program (<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a>). This is the first level of
obfuscation.</p>
<p>The second program (<a href="shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a> (use <code>make everything</code> first)
<p>The second program (<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a> (use <code>make everything</code> first)
prints a clock in the upper right hand corner of your VTxxx/ANSI display.</p>
<p>Most of the surface obfuscation in the second program
(<a href="shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a>) was an attempt to make it as small as possible.
(<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/shapiro/shapiro_t2.c">shapiro_t2.c</a>) was an attempt to make it as small as possible.
You should be able to see around this with <code>cb(1)</code> and some more intelligent
variable names. Once you get past this you will realize that the third level of
obfuscation is a six member client/server hierarchy. (See the
+1 -1
View File
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ event of a system shutdown or reboot.
### Bugs
The alternative version ([weisberg.alt.c](weisberg.alt.c)) has never actually run
The alternative version ([weisberg.alt.c](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/weisberg/weisberg.alt.c)) has never actually run
to completion. After running for close to a week it had reached somewhere around
250e6, when it became necessary to test the reboot feature (which worked
remarkably well). As there are quite a lot of primes to be found before reaching
+1 -1
View File
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ run to completion, so as an added feature, it will cease execution upon
reception of a signal (any will do equally well), as well as in the
event of a system shutdown or reboot.</p>
<h3 id="bugs">Bugs</h3>
<p>The alternative version (<a href="weisberg.alt.c">weisberg.alt.c</a>) has never actually run
<p>The alternative version (<a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/weisberg/weisberg.alt.c">weisberg.alt.c</a>) has never actually run
to completion. After running for close to a week it had reached somewhere around
250e6, when it became necessary to test the reboot feature (which worked
remarkably well). As there are quite a lot of primes to be found before reaching
+1 -1
View File
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ compiler line you will get a different message (**as compiler errors** due to
_This is independent of the previous (if there are any previous) compiler
invocations_ specified. That means with the right compiler invocation you can
'win' the game on the first go. But unlike the [alternate code](westley.alt.c),
'win' the game on the first go. But unlike the [alternate code](%%REPO_URL%%/1994/westley/westley.alt.c),
you do not run this program as it will not compile: instead it will be compiler
error messages; there is no running the program.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ compiler line you will get a different message (<strong>as compiler errors</stro
(escape the dungeon) and others will show something else.</p>
<p><em>This is independent of the previous (if there are any previous) compiler
invocations</em> specified. That means with the right compiler invocation you can
‘win’ the game on the first go. But unlike the <a href="westley.alt.c">alternate code</a>,
‘win’ the game on the first go. But unlike the <a href="https://github.com/ioccc-src/temp-test-ioccc/blob/master/1994/westley/westley.alt.c">alternate code</a>,
you do not run this program as it will not compile: instead it will be compiler
error messages; there is no running the program.</p>
<h3 id="original-try">Original try:</h3>