checkpoint rules version 29.00 2025-11-19.

This is a work in progress towards an improved rule set for **IOCCC29**.

Links to rules elsewhere on the site were modified as needed.

next/submit.md

@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ And in the slot it will give you important details like:
 
 - the status of the submission
 - the filename, which will be in the correct format, assuming you used
-`mkiocccentry(1)` which is **HIGHLY** recommended so that you do not break [Rule
-17](rules.html#rule17)!
+`mkiocccentry(1)` which is **HIGHLY** recommended so that you do not break
+[Rule 17 Packaging](rules.html#rule-17-packaging)!
 - the file length, which `txzchk(1)` will also verify (the file itself and the
 tarball listing).
 - the upload date.
@@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ Or:
 
 ... or **ANY** other error then you **MUST FIX** your submission, repackage your
 tarball with `mkiocccentry` and upload to the same slot again! If you do not fix
-this your submission **WILL BE REJECTED** for violating [Rule
-17](rules.html#rule17)!
+this your submission **WILL BE REJECTED** for violating
+[Rule 17 Packaging](rules.html#rule-17-packaging)!
 
 If the format test went well, then you will see:
 
@@ -168,8 +168,9 @@ If the format test went well, then you will see:
 rules or that everything is OK once the tarball is extracted; it simply means
 the tests performed by the tools passed. If you find a flaw in a tool and
 abuse it and the tests pass then you stand a significant chance of having your
-submission rejected for violating [Rule 17](rules.html#rule17), even if the
-tests passed.
+submission rejected for violating
+[Rule 17 Packaging](rules.html#rule-17-packaging),
+even if the tests passed.
 
 For details on `txzchk`, see the
 FAQ on "[txzchk](../faq.html#txzchk)".