While not strictly necessary, replacing the two ASCII tab characters in the markdown copyright comment makes it easier to detect problematic TAB indentation within markdown files. After this commit, only 90 markdown files have leading ASCII TAB characters. And again, while not strictly necessary, we can consider running expand on those 90 markdown files to see what effect that might have on the HTML files they produce. Replace leading ASCII TAB characters with multiples of 8 ASCII SPACE characters (the default action of the `expand(1)` tool) might have an negative effect on some HTML formatting where **hack-a-round** formatting was attempted to fix broken indentation caused by problematic ASCII TAB characters. Think of this as a baseline for evaluating leading TAB characters within markdown files. TODO: Consider either using `expand(1)` to replace leading ASCII TAB characters with multiples of 8 ASCII SPACE characters AND/OR modifying the appropriate `bin` tool to convert leading ASCII TAB characters into multiples of 8 ASCII SPACE characters.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
To build:
make all
To use:
./spinellis < spinellis.c
Judges' remarks:
While the code does not abuse the rules, its output surely does!
P.S. Does the source have any spelling errors?
Author's remarks:
96% of the program lines (631 out of the 658) are comment text rendering the program readable and understandable. With the exception of the two include file names (needed for a warning-free compile) the program passes the standard Unix spell checker without any errors. Checking for spelling errors is considered very important for programs that are so heavily commented. This program is exactly 3217 characters long through judicious use of white space. Rule abuse? Would I ever abuse the rules?