Landon Curt Noll
0833c3e4f0
We set LC_ALL=C when sorting in a bin tool. This was done to make the result of using `sort(1)` consistent. Improved how the Primary files and Secondary files are sorted by `bin/output-index-inventory.sh` to sort with "-u -k 1n -k 3.2d". The above will change `index.html` files for all entries. Changed `bin/chk-entry.sh` VERSION from "1.1.2 2024-03-17" to "1.1.3 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/gen-authors.sh` VERSION from "1.3 2024-03-04" to "1.3.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/gen-location.sh` VERSION from "1.1 2024-03-04" to "1.1.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/gen-sitemap.sh` VERSION from "1.3 2024-03-16" to "1.3.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/output-index-inventory.sh` VERSION from "1.2 2024-02-27" to "1.2.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/pandoc-wrapper.sh` VERSION from "1.5 2024-03-18" to "1.5.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/sort.gitignore.sh` VERSION from "1.1.1 2024-02-23" to "1.1.2 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/tar-all.sh` VERSION from "1.1 2024-02-27" to "1.1.1 2024-03-18". Changed `bin/tar-year.sh` VERSION from "1.1 2024-02-27" to "1.1.1 2024-03-18". Performed `make www` to update all entry `index.html` files.
To build:
make
Bugs and (Mis)features:
The current status of this entry is:
STATUS: doesn't work with some platforms - please help us fix
For more detailed information see 2011 richards bugs.
To use:
echo expression | ./richards
Try:
./try.sh
Judges' remarks:
Oh no, yet another
dc-style calculator? (see
2000/dlowe using an embedded Perl interpreter and deemed Worst Abuse of the Rules). Well, this one does it (expression calculation, that is,
not the rule abuse) in a different way. The author claims that his calculator
does just-in-time compilation. What would you do to prove or disprove his claim
without attempting to unravel the source?
Author's remarks:
This is an implementation of the classic UNIX
dc command, the
reverse Polish
calculator. Actually it's a pretty bad implementation, since it only implements
32-bit integers (well, sizeof(int)-sized integers). It only implements the
commands +, -, *, /, p (only for numbers), register stacks, macros and
comparisons. Wow, you'd think I could've done better in 2K of code.
OH! I forgot to mention! It's a JIT.
Wait, don't stop reading! I know what you're thinking, platform-specific code is discouraged in IOCCC. But do you see any platform-specific code? There's no assembler here! This JIT works on a dozen platforms, and the only platform-specific assumptions it makes are that the stack grows down and integers are at least 32-bit.
You will probably get warnings while compiling the code. In particular:
-
If your system requires the inclusion of
alloca.hto use alloca, use the compile flag-DAH. -
If your system cannot use
mmap(), use the compile flag-DNM. -
I don't include any headers I don't strictly need to, so you'll get warnings about (at least)
memcpy(),isdigit(),atoi(),calloc(),malloc()andalloca()if you didn't use-DAH.- NOTE from judges: we added these includes in 2023.
-
GCC likes to complain about
while (a = b)(assignments as a condition). -
I don't return from
main(), even though it's declared to returnint.
Platforms on which all known/tested optimization levels work with no additional flags:
- gcc 4.6.2 + x86[_64] + GNU/Linux, Mac OS X or Windows
- clang 2.9-16 + x86[_64] + GNU/Linux or Mac OS X
- tcc 0.9.25
- gcc 4.4.5 + alpha, arm, mips[el], powerpc[64], s390x (IBM zSeries)
- gcc 4.1.3 + vax + NetBSD
Platforms which work but not at all optimization levels or needing special flags:
- owcc 1.9 + x86 + Windows: Needs
-DNM -DAH -fno-stack-check - gcc 4.4.5 + sh4: -O0 works, higher optimization levels don't work for unknown reasons.
Copyright and CC BY-SA 4.0 License:
This file is Copyright (c) 2023 by Landon Curt Noll. All Rights Reserved. You are free to share and adapt this file under the terms of this license:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
For more information, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/