Landon Curt Noll
0bc6c3e413
We quasi-canonicalized markdown links to FAQ entries. **IMPORTANT NOTE**: This is a useful step in completing issue #2417. This commit is consistent with the top level TODO comment requirements. Nevertheless, this changes made by this commit needs to be examined and in some cases improved. A link to an FAQ entry is of the form: ``` FAQ on "[the link text](....faq.html#string)" FAQ on "[the link text](....faq.html#string)" ``` The "FAQ" is at the start of the line, or in rare cases is preceded only by whitespace. The reference to the FAQ starts outside of the markdown link with the string **FAQ ON "**. After the markdown link is a **"** followed by either the end of line or a single punctuation character such as a period or comma. We reduced the size of "the link text" that refer to an FAQ to at most 3 words. In some cases the sentence and/or text surrounding the markdown link to a FAQ may need to be further adjusted to better accommodate this new style. **IMPORTANT NOTE**: References to a FAQ entry are on a separate line. p.s. When linking to the `faq.html` file itself, we use markdown of the form "`the [IOCCC FAQ](..../faq.html)`" and place the word "the" outside of the "IOCCC FAQ" link text. Given the above system (and because references to an FAQ entry is on a separate line), the following command shows links to FAQ entries, sorted by FAQ entry "link #name" so that one may evaluate the way a given FAQ entry is referenced: ```sh find * -name '*.md' -print0 | xargs0 grep -E '^[[:space:]]*FAQ on "' | sed -e 's/^\([^:]*\):\( *FAQ on "[^#]*\)#\([^)]*\)\()".*\)$/#\3\t\1\t\2#\3\4/' | sort ``` The above command shows the value of consistency when it comes to FAQ references. **NOTE**: There are a few differences on how a given FAQ is references. That is probably OK as there is NOT an "total mandate" that all references to a given FAQ must have the same "link text" for example. On the other hand if references to a given FAQ can be identical, that might be helpful. We are certain that in some contexts the "link text" might need to change. Should we decide to change the way FAQ are referenced, we will be able to modify identify and modify them with greater ease.' Examine the changes made by this commit and adjust and/or improve as needed. Performed `make www` to accomplish the above and to test under macOS.
Twenty Sixth International Obfuscated C Code Contest
Standard IOCCC stuff
View the index.html web page for the given winning entry for information on how
on how to compile it and how to run the winning program.
Look at the winning source and try to figure how it does what it does!
You may then wish to look at the Author's remarks for even more details.
Some C compilers are not quite as good as they should be. If yours is lacking, you may need to compile using clang or gcc instead of your local compiler.
The primary website can be found at www.ioccc.org.
Remarks on some of the winning entries
This year's winning entries are impressive!
The Most in need of debugging - 2019/endoh is very inventive in a way it produces its own text!
The Most alphabetic- 2019/ciura has an amazing vocabulary!
There are again nods to entries of the years:
These nods to not run afoul of the guideline:
We tend to dislike programs that: ... are rather similar to previous entries
because the entry 2019/dogon appropriately pays homage to past entries without blatantly reusing their code.
...We'll stop spouting too many details now. Have fun exploring all the entries!
Remarks on some of submissions that did not win
Some entries tried to get around the size limit by submitting a data file that was really C code and then blindly including code in prog.c.
Quite a few entries suffered from undefined behavior like accessing uninitialized locals and/or reading-writing below the stack. We advise running your entry through valgrind to make sure those mistakes are avoided.
Using extra arguments to main, or arguments of wrong types as a quick and dirty
way of declaring variables is now passé. Clang, for example, rejects them outright.
We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit them for the next IOCCC.
Some entries seemed to have a good idea, but the implementation of the idea was limited in scope.
Final Comments
IMPORTANT NOTE: See contact.html for up to date contact details as well as details on how to provide fixes to any of the entries. See also the IOCCC FAQ for additional information on the IOCCC.