Files
ioccc/2004
Cody Boone Ferguson af5482825c Reorganise menus
The sections have been modified a fair amount. The Entries menu has been
extended to have: Fixing entries, Updating author info, Thanks for the
help. The first two were moved from FAQ and the last one from About.
The rationale for these, in order: entries and authors have to do with
entries and most of the help involves entries. It also has to do with
website but in 'about' it does not seem the right place, unless maybe it
is renamed to 'Credits' or something (I am not suggesting this one way
or the other). This one is debatable but that was the rationale.

The Status menu has been extended to have: Markdown guidelines and
Security policy. The rationale is that the markdown guidelines are part
of contest guidelines and the security policy is about the status of the
entries and how if there are any security problems they will not be
addressed (instead of about the IOCCC).

The FAQ was extended to have: Compiling entries, Running entries, How to
help. The reason to not have compiling and running entries under Entries
is because this is 'how to' and also the menu was too long. How to help
seems like a good idea under FAQ too (was in About).

About was extended to have the new 'about.html' page (from about.md).
This is a rare case where a new file is useful as it fits under 'About'.
The menu now is: Home page, About the IOCCC, The Judges, Contact us. I
was pondering the 'About [the IOCCC]' at the top and also naming it
'About us' but it seemed like a link to index.html was necessary and as
for 'about us' it seemed less clear as to whether it was about the
judges or the contest itself. The FAQ has been updated slightly for
this.

After further inspection the bin/index.html and the inc/index.html links
were removed from the about section.

With these changes, renaming an item or slight reordering
notwithstanding, I believe that #2006 is probably in good shape.
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
..
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-06-07 02:10:24 -07:00
2024-10-25 11:23:21 -07:00
2024-08-21 23:42:28 -07:00
2023-10-07 04:35:47 -07:00
2023-10-07 04:35:47 -07:00

Seventeenth International Obfuscated C Code Contest

Standard IOCCC stuff

View the index.html web page for the given winning entry for information on how on how to compile the entry and how to run the winning program. Look at the winning source and try to figure how it does what it does! You may then wish to look at the Author's remarks for even more details.

Some ANSI C compilers are not quite as good as they should be. If yours is lacking, you may need to compile using gcc instead of your local compiler.

Historical note:

The IOCCC has a website and now has a number of international mirrors. The primary website can be found at www.ioccc.org.

Historical update:

The IOCCC website once had a number of international mirrors. As of 2020 Dec 29, GitHub serves as the distributed server farm for the IOCCC winner repo that GitHub renders as Official IOCCC web site - www.ioccc.org.

Remarks on some of the entries

We believe you will be impressed with this year's winning entries. The Best of Show is a fine example of obfuscation. But don't ignore the other entries! There are games, utilities, programs that output images and a one-liner that is incredibly compact for what it can do.

The Best abuse of the guidelines is technically allowed by the rules. This year we allowed it due to the functionality of the program. This entry is one of the easiest to read! Don't assume you can win using similar techniques next time ... :-)

This year a single person won two awards! We also had repeat authors with their 6th, 4th and 2nd winning entries this year! (Please note that judging is done completely anonymously. Be warned that we may disqualify entries that reveal the identity of the submitter.)

Remarks on some losing entries

There were some outstanding entries that did not win. Unfortunately some very good entries lost because they:

  • depended too much on non-portable side effects in expressions; and/or
  • depended too much on a particular byte order; and/or
  • required the use of a special script, data file or pseudo-machine language that was not supplied with the entry.

We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit them for the next IOCCC.

Final Comments

IMPORTANT NOTE: See contact.html for up to date contact details as well as details on how to provide fixes to any of the entries. See also the IOCCC FAQ for additional information on the IOCCC.