Files
ioccc/2018
Cody Boone Ferguson de8ee5f41a Many manifest improvements and fixes
This is a large update that modifies every .entry.json file and fixes
many others. The changes of every .entry.json file are as follows:

- change 'entry source' to 'entry source code' [0]
- change 'original source' to 'original source code' [0]
- change 'directory path from top directory' to 'directory path from top
  level directory'

[0] This is for consistency purposes. Other options were pondered but as
the index.html files refer to 'Alternate code' this was the simplest way
to go about it and it also feels more natural. A question was whether to
have 'entry code' and 'original entry code' or to have the word 'source'
added to it but I decided upon including the word 'source'. Another
question has occurred to me is whether or not 'original source code'
should instead be 'original entry source code' but that can be decided
upon later as that occurred to me after much of the files were already
rebuilt. The consistency that this commit has made is for the README.md
sections and in particular 'Alternate code'. One might wonder if that
should be changed to 'Alternate source code' as now the manifest
includes 'source' in the 'entry code' and 'original code' but the
manifest itself is what was actually updated and having 'source' feels
more natural for submitted files. After all not all entries have
alternate code. These questions can be decided on when looking at the
index.html files that have been rebuilt.

Changed 'alt code' to 'alternate code' where this was not already done
(in the manifest). It is questionable whether this should be done in
markdown files or not (in the README.md files section it already is done
but not necessarily in other places).

Many files had incorrect descriptions that have been checked.

Renamed 2020/endoh2/spoiler/spoiler.{md,html} to index.{md,html} so one
can go to just 2020/endoh2/spoiler and see the web page. Although the
manifest of 2 020/endoh2/index.html will link to it and that's probably
how most people will notice it it seems useful especially as the web
page links to the different files in spoiler/ or at least refers to
them, giving a description (kind of like the manifest in
2020/endoh2/index.html).

Due to the above changes all the entries had their index.html files
regenerated too.

There were likely other changes and fixes as well.

What has NOT been done is a check over all items, typos or otherwise,
though some typos have been fixed. Nonetheless this commit goes a long
way to resolving issue #1933.

Updated thanks file both with a missing <div> id and added a manifest
improvements section as the manifest is quite important.
2024-05-15 08:54:31 -07:00
..
2024-05-15 08:54:31 -07:00
2024-05-15 08:54:31 -07:00
2024-02-01 14:35:49 -08:00
2024-05-12 19:32:12 -07:00
2020-12-30 16:57:03 -08:00
2020-12-30 16:57:03 -08:00
2023-10-07 04:35:47 -07:00

Twenty Fifth International Obfuscated C Code Contest

Standard IOCCC stuff

View the index.html web page for the given winning entry for information on how compile the entry and how to run the winning program. Look at the winning source and try to figure how it does what it does! You may then wish to look at the Author's remarks for even more details. This year we included most of the information included by the submitter.

The primary site can be found at www.ioccc.org.

Use make to compile entries. It is possible that on non-Unix / non-Linux systems the Makefile needs to be changed. See the Makefile for details.

Look at the source and try to figure out what the programs do, and run them with various inputs.

Read over the Makefile and index.html files for compile/build issues. Your system may require certain changes (add or remove a library, add or remove a #define).

Some C compilers are not quite as good as they should be. If yours is lacking, you may need to compile using clang or gcc instead of your local compiler.

Remarks on some of the winning entries

We believe you will again be impressed with this year's winning entries.

The Best of show - 2018/mills is an amazing tribute to entries from 1984 and 2015.

Take a close look at the Most likely to top the charts - 2018/hou. Observe that while it contains no variables and no operators, it remains functional in what it does.

The Best one-liner - 2018/burton1, at 109 characters, is a short and sweet implementation of a classic utility and a nod to a winning entry from 1986. Sometimes it takes 20 some years to do things the true IOCCC way.

The color of the remarks text this year was inspired by one of the stars of the Most stellar - 2018/poikola.

The Best use of python - 2018/endoh2 is a not what you might think it is. It is something completely different.

The Most likely to be awarded - 2018/ciura has an amazing vocabulary!

There are also nods to entries of the years 2000/bellard, 2015/yang, ...

...We'll stop spouting spoilers now. Have fun exploring all the entries!

Remarks on some of submissions that did not win

The number of entries that would have made it into the final rounds would have been much higher had some people paid attention to rules 2 and 22 (one third of 666).

Rule 22, now known as "Catch 22" states:

    22) Your source code, data files, remarks and program output must NOT
        identify the authors of your code.  The judges STRONGLY prefer to
        not know who is submitting entries to the IOCCC.

        The "Peter Honeyman is exempt" guideline also applies to this rule.
        Identifying yourself, in an obvious way in your code, data, remarks
        or program output, unless you are Peter Honeyman or pretending
        to be Peter Honeyman, will be grounds for disqualification of your entry.

A number of other entries were based on iocccsize.c, making derivative works rather than original works.

Still other entries were too large, violating the first line of rule 2:

    2) The size of your program source must be <= 4096 bytes in length.

While these entries might have passed under the 2053 limit for iocccsize, they were larger than <= 4096 bytes, sometimes by an order or magnitude.

We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit them for the next IOCCC.

Some entries seemed to have a good idea, but the implementation of the idea was limited in scope.

Final Comments

IMPORTANT NOTE: See contact.html for up to date contact details as well as details on how to provide fixes to any of the entries. See also the IOCCC FAQ for additional information on the IOCCC.