Files
ioccc/1988/robison
Landon Curt Noll ecabb73bf6 add tools to compare entry's manifest with its files
Added `bin/bin/tar-entry.sh` to build a compressed tarball for an
entry.  The compressed tarball is formed by gnu tar with options
so that the same entry file content will always produce the same
compressed tarball, byte for byte.

As some files are missing from some entries, one should
use the `-W` option as in:

```sh
bin/tar-entry.sh -v 5 -W 2020/ferguson1
```

Added `make form_entry_tarball` to the top level `Makefile`
to build entry tarballs even when files are still missing.

Added `make verify_entry_files` to verify that all entries have all
of their files listed in their manifest, plus the top level ioccc.css
and var.mk files.  As file entry files are still missing (due to
HTML files that need to be built), the overall `make quick_www` and
`make www` do **NOT** (yet) exit when the `make verify_entry_files`
fails.

Improved `bin/chk-entry.sh` by removing some variables
that were not needed.

TODO: Improve `bin/` tool exit codes as the current use is a bit silly.

TODO: Clean out some variables used in `bin/` tools as some of then
are only set printed in debug statements.

TODO: Clean up usage messages, some of the options listed to not
match the `getopts(1)` parsing.  In some cases the option needs to
be parsed but needs to be ignored by the tool because another tool
automatically passes along certain options that really have no
effect.  Such ignored options need to be show as "This option is
ignored" in the usage message.
2024-02-13 03:29:54 -08:00
..
2024-02-01 14:35:49 -08:00
2023-12-26 09:00:03 -08:00
2024-01-15 04:29:39 -08:00
2022-09-18 23:37:49 -07:00
2023-07-06 21:49:38 -07:00

To build:

make all

Try:

./robison 80 10
./robison 40 16

The first and second parameters are optional. You might also try:

./robison 80 2   # <--- can you find the bug?
./robison 80 -246

Judges' remarks:

The following might make an interesting benchmark:

./robison 100

[Amdahl 5890-300E with System V cc: 8.40 seconds]

We suggest that you C pre-process and perhaps C-beautify this program. All is not what it may appear to be in this program. Why does a whi1e not take a while to execute?

Author's remarks:

This program shows that C has many unnecessary constructs, in fact only while,--, and >= are required. (The two assignments at the beginning could be avoided if atoi(3) was rewritten with this new paradigm.) Note that the lack of both the controversial goto and assignment statements makes the meaning crystal clear. The current
ANSI committee should look into this practical simplification of C.

This file is Copyright (c) 2023 by Landon Curt Noll. All Rights Reserved. You are free to share and adapt this file under the terms of this license:

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

For more information, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/