This is a HUGE commit:
417 files changed, 874 insertions(+), 874 deletions(-)
As the IOCCC website now is https enabled I have updated the
'http://www.ioccc' to 'https://www.ioccc'.
There was also a typo in Makefiles where it said 'for VERY WELCOME' when
it should be 'are VERY WELCOME'.
Finally slashdot.org is also https enabled so references to
'http://slashdot' were changed to 'https://slashdot'.
This was done by my sgit tool (see https://github.com/xexyl/sgit)
like:
sgit -e 's,http://www.ioccc,https://www.ioccc,g' -e 's/for VERY WELCOME/are VERY WELCOME/g' -e .
but because I didn't have a list of files that should be modified I had
to be careful which files to commit as I had files that were changed but
not ready to be committed. Since I did it in steps, finding typos as I
went along, I actually ran sgit three times but to simplify the above
(and to show that it's possible to do more than one sed command) I made
it all as one. Since I did not have a list of files ahead of time I had
to determine what files to commit, first going through them like:
for j in $(for i in $(git status|grep modified|cut -d: -f2); do \
git grep 'https://www.ioccc' "$i"; done|cut -d: -f1|sort|uniq); \
do git diff "$j"; done|less -r
(I had to pipe through less because of a strange problem with the git
diff which appears to be because of a terminal problem maybe due to the
command above but it was all I could come up with in a very tired head.)
The above and
git status | grep modified:
showed that some C files had been modified which obviously should not be
done so I had to do:
git co '*c'
to undo those changes.
Finally to commit the correct files I did:
for i in $(git status|grep modified|cut -d: -f2); do \
git grep -E 'https://www.ioccc|https://slashdot|are VERY WELCOME' "$i"; \
done |cut -d: -f1|sort|uniq|xargs git commit -v
or so (with any formatting issues or typos here due to typos in the log
due to the terminal (in)sanity issue described).
2001 marked the "The Sixteenth International Obfuscated C Code Contest"
Standard IOCCC stuff
Look at the README.md file for the given winner for information on how to compile the winner and how to run the winning program. Look at the winning source and try to figure how it does what it does! You may then wish to look at the Author's remarks for even more details.
The IOCCC has a web site and now has a number of international mirrors. The primary site can be found at,
https://www.ioccc.org
Use make to compile entries. It is possible that on non-Un*x / non-Linux systems the makefile needs to be changed. See the Makefile for details.
Read over the makefile for compile/build issues. Your system may require certain changes (add or remove a library, add or remove a #define).
Some ANSI C compilers are not quite as good as they should be. If yours is lacking, you may need to compile using gcc instead of your local compiler.
Remarks on some of the entries
There were some outstanding entries that did not win. Unfortunately some very good entries lost because they:
+ depended too much on non-portable side effects in expressions;
+ depended too much on a particular byte order;
+ required the use of a special script, data file or pseudo-machine
language that was not supplied with the entry.
We hope the authors of some of those entries will fix and re-submit them for the next IOCCC.
We believe you will be impressed with this year's winners. The Best of Show is a fine example of obfuscation. But don't ignore the other winners! There are games, programs that speak, ones that compile code and one that might run binaries you already have!
The Worst Abuse of the Rules is technically allowed by the rules. This year we awarded it again, but don't assume you can get away with using the same technique next time ... :-)
This year there were several repeat winners. This is understating the achievement a little - one person has won 8 times before! (Please note that judging is done completely anonymously).
Why has it taken so long to post the winning source?
This is somewhat my (Simon Cooper) fault. I do apologize to the IOCCC community for this! Judging does take quite a lot of time, and I over-committed myself several times this year. Without divulging too much, we do look at and work out what every entry does.
Final Comments
Please send us comments and suggestions what we have expressed above. Also include anything else that you would like to see in future contests. Send such email to:
questions@ioccc.org
If you use, distribute or publish these entries in some way, please drop us a line. We enjoy seeing who, where and how the contest is used.
You must include the words ``ioccc question'' in the subject of your email message when sending email to the judges.
If you have problems with any of the entries, AND YOU HAVE A FIX, please email the fix (patch file or the entire changed file) to the above address.
Watch:
https://www.ioccc.org/
for news of the next contest.
=-=
Copyright (C) Landon Curt Noll, Simon Cooper, Peter Seebach and Leonid A. Broukhis, 2001-2002. All Rights Reserved. Permission for personal, educational or non-profit use is granted provided this copyright and notice are included in its entirety and remains unaltered. All other uses must receive prior permission from the contest judges.