Files
ioccc/2020/yang
Cody Boone Ferguson ef456bfb1e Mass typo fixes
This is a HUGE commit:

    417 files changed, 874 insertions(+), 874 deletions(-)

As the IOCCC website now is https enabled I have updated the
'http://www.ioccc' to 'https://www.ioccc'.

There was also a typo in Makefiles where it said 'for VERY WELCOME' when
it should be 'are VERY WELCOME'.

Finally slashdot.org is also https enabled so references to
'http://slashdot' were changed to 'https://slashdot'.

This was done by my sgit tool (see https://github.com/xexyl/sgit)
like:

    sgit -e 's,http://www.ioccc,https://www.ioccc,g' -e 's/for VERY WELCOME/are VERY WELCOME/g' -e  .

but because I didn't have a list of files that should be modified I had
to be careful which files to commit as I had files that were changed but
not ready to be committed. Since I did it in steps, finding typos as I
went along, I actually ran sgit three times but to simplify the above
(and to show that it's possible to do more than one sed command) I made
it all as one. Since I did not have a list of files ahead of time I had
to determine what files to commit, first going through them like:

    for j in $(for i in $(git status|grep modified|cut -d: -f2); do \
	git grep 'https://www.ioccc' "$i"; done|cut -d: -f1|sort|uniq); \
	do git diff "$j"; done|less -r

(I had to pipe through less because of a strange problem with the git
diff which appears to be because of a terminal problem maybe due to the
command above but it was all I could come up with in a very tired head.)

The above and

    git status | grep modified:

showed that some C files had been modified which obviously should not be
done so I had to do:

    git co '*c'

to undo those changes.

Finally to commit the correct files I did:

    for i in $(git status|grep modified|cut -d: -f2); do \
	git grep -E 'https://www.ioccc|https://slashdot|are VERY WELCOME' "$i"; \
	done |cut -d: -f1|sort|uniq|xargs git commit -v

or so (with any formatting issues or typos here due to typos in the log
due to the terminal (in)sanity issue described).
2023-10-07 04:35:47 -07:00
..
2023-05-13 11:45:33 +10:00
2020-12-31 18:34:17 -08:00
2023-10-07 04:35:47 -07:00
2020-12-31 18:34:17 -08:00
2023-07-06 21:49:38 -07:00
2020-12-31 18:34:17 -08:00

Best abuse of CPP

Don Yang
http://uguu.org/

To build:

make

To run:

./prog [PIN] < input.txt > output.c

Try:

echo "International Obfuscated C Code Contest 2020" | ./prog 23209 > code.c

# compile without a PIN
cc code.c -o decode
# yes, you must compile with -DPIN=<number>

# compile with the wrong pin
cc -DPIN=555 code.c -o wrongcoded	 # wait for it ...
./wrongcoded | hexdump -C
# Use the wrong PIN: You're gonna have a bad time.

# compile with a PIN
cc -DPIN=23209 code.c -o decoded	# wait for it ...
./decoded
# weeeeeeeeeeeeee! You are having a good time!

Judges' remarks:

You might think of this entry as code obfuscater with a code. If you use the wrong code, you're gonna have a bad time. What is compiling this entry about? Having a good .. time!

This winning entry also comes with a JavaScript timelapse spoiler that shows how this entry was written.

Author's remarks:

Synopsis

echo "Hello world" | ./prog 12345 > encoded.c

gcc -DPIN=12345 encoded.c -o ./decoded && ./decoded

Details

Mile is a C code generator. Run without arguments for the help message below:

usage: [PIN] < input.txt > output.c

where [PIN] is an integer in the range of 1..65535

When run with an encoding PIN (first command line argument), Mile will read bytes from stdin and generate C code on stdout. Example:

echo "Hello, world!" | ./prog 56789 > encoded.c

This generated code will reproduce the same input bytes on stdout when executed, if it was compiled with the same encoding PIN.

gcc -DPIN=56789 encode.c -o decoded

The generated code reconstructs all data at compile time by seeding a random number generator with the given PIN to reproduce the input bytes, and simply does one fwrite() call at run time to print those bytes. Not specifying a PIN is a compile time error. Specify the wrong PIN and output code will still compile, but will likely produce garbage instead of the input bytes. If the original input was empty then any PIN works, but you might get a compile time warning complaining about empty arrays.

Because all data is reconstructed at compile time, expect the compile time to be excruciatingly long if you try to encode too much data. Code generated by encoding a haiku will probably compile in seconds, a limerick may require tens of seconds, a sonnet will take minutes. Give Mile an epic poem and you can probably write a faster preprocessor before GCC is done (Clang probably already failed long before then).

I see that there is a lack of preprocessor abuse in recent years, probably because programming in preprocessor is too tedious. Mile is meant to help with that by producing C code filled with at least 98% preprocessor lines for any input. Now you too can enjoy long compile times with minimal effort.

Features

  • Output is randomized using system clock, so if you wait a second between runs, you should get a different generated code even for the same encoding PIN.

  • Customized bytecode encoding of preprocessor boilerplates, mostly for compression but should also make reverse engineering more fun.

  • CRC32 of the source code is embedded in the source code itself.

  • Code layout shaped to resemble "Mile" from "Didn't I Say to Make My Abilities Average in the Next Life?!". Mile is known to be able to talk to nanomachines directly, which is exactly what programming in preprocessor feels like.

Compatibility

Mile has been verified to work in these environments (also, compiles without warnings on all of these):

  • gcc 9.2.0 on Cygwin
  • gcc 8.3.0 on Linux
  • gcc 7.4.0 on Cygwin
  • gcc 6.1.0 on JSLinux
  • gcc 5.4.0 on Linux
  • clang 8.0.1 on Linux
  • clang 8.0.1 on Cygwin
  • tcc 0.9.27 on Linux
  • tcc 0.9.25 on JSLinux

Output of Mile is a bit more taxing, and only works with a subset of the above:

  • gcc: works just fine when using 8.3.0 and below, but may trigger warning for large files. gcc 9.2.0 and above may crash with large files.
  • clang: works fine for small files, fails on large files due to preprocessor bug.
  • tcc: works just fine on Linux. Fails silently on JSLinux.

For people eager to encode large files, an extra utility has been packaged with this entry to preprocess the generated output to make them more acceptable to typical compilers. View the cppp.cc source and then compile it with a c++ compiler of your choice.

This file is Copyright (c) 2023 by Landon Curt Noll. All Rights Reserved. You are free to share and adapt this file under the terms of this license:

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

For more information, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/