multi: Fix typos [skip ci]

This commit is contained in:
Dimitris Apostolou committed 2022-01-24 12:19:02 +02:00
1 parent f50950640f
commit 530a2059e5
139 files changed
+254 -254

No files matched your search

+4 -4
View File
@@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) restorePendingRemoteUpdates(
logIdx)
}
// We previously restored Adds along with all the other upates,
// We previously restored Adds along with all the other updates,
// but this Add restoration was a no-op as every single one of
// these Adds was already restored since they're all incoming
// htlcs on the local commitment.
@@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) restorePendingLocalUpdates(
}
// At this point the restored update's logIndex must be equal
// to the update log, otherwise somthing is horribly wrong.
// to the update log, otherwise something is horribly wrong.
if payDesc.LogIndex != lc.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("log index mismatch: "+
"%v vs %v", payDesc.LogIndex,
@@ -3460,7 +3460,7 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) validateCommitmentSanity(theirLogCounter,
}
// Now that we know the total value of added HTLCs, we check
// that this satisfy the MaxPendingAmont contraint.
// that this satisfy the MaxPendingAmont constraint.
if amtInFlight > constraints.MaxPendingAmount {
return ErrMaxPendingAmount
}
@@ -6780,7 +6780,7 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) availableCommitmentBalance(view *htlcView,
// than the htlcCommitFee, where we could still be sending dust
// HTLCs, but we return 0 in this case. This is to avoid
// lowering our balance even further, as this takes us into a
// bad state wehere neither we nor our channel counterparty can
// bad state where neither we nor our channel counterparty can
// add HTLCs.
if ourBalance < htlcCommitFee {
return 0, commitWeight
+12 -12
View File
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ func testCommitHTLCSigTieBreak(t *testing.T, restart bool) {
lastIndex = htlc.OutputIndex
}
// If requsted, restart Alice so that we can test that the necessary
// If requested, restart Alice so that we can test that the necessary
// indexes can be reconstructed before needing to validate the
// signatures from Bob.
if restart {
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ func TestForceCloseDustOutput(t *testing.T) {
defer cleanUp()
// We set both node's channel reserves to 0, to make sure
// they can create small dust ouputs without going under
// they can create small dust outputs without going under
// their channel reserves.
aliceChannel.channelState.LocalChanCfg.ChanReserve = 0
bobChannel.channelState.LocalChanCfg.ChanReserve = 0
@@ -5427,7 +5427,7 @@ func TestChanCommitWeightDustHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
return w
}
// Start by getting the initial remote commitment wight seen from
// Start by getting the initial remote commitment weight seen from
// Alice's perspective. At this point there are no HTLCs on the
// commitment.
weight1 := remoteCommitWeight(aliceChannel)
@@ -5438,7 +5438,7 @@ func TestChanCommitWeightDustHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
bobDustHtlc := bobDustlimit + htlcSuccessFee - 1
preimg := addHtlc(bobDustHtlc)
// Now get the current wight of the remote commitment. We expect it to
// Now get the current weight of the remote commitment. We expect it to
// not have changed, since the HTLC we added is considered dust.
weight2 := remoteCommitWeight(aliceChannel)
require.Equal(t, weight1, weight2)
@@ -5711,7 +5711,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("unable to restart bob: %v", err)
}
// Readd the Fail to both Alice and Bob's channels, as the non-committed
// Re-add the Fail to both Alice and Bob's channels, as the non-committed
// update will not have survived the restart.
err = bobChannel.FailHTLC(htlc2.ID, []byte("failreason"), nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
@@ -5723,7 +5723,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
}
// Have Alice initiate a state transition, which does not include the
// HTLCs just readded to the channel state.
// HTLCs just re-added to the channel state.
aliceSig, aliceHtlcSigs, _, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
@@ -6808,7 +6808,7 @@ func TestChanReserveRemoteInitiator(t *testing.T) {
// Set Alice's channel reserve to be 5 BTC-commitfee. This means she
// has just enough balance to cover the comitment fee, but not enough
// to add any more HTLCs to the commitment. Although a reserve this
// high is unrealistic, a channel can easiliy get into a situation
// high is unrealistic, a channel can easily get into a situation
// where the initiator cannot pay for the fee of any more HTLCs.
commitFee := aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCommitment.CommitFee
aliceMinReserve := 5*btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin - commitFee
@@ -7203,7 +7203,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreUpdateLogs(t *testing.T) {
// signature from Bob yet.
_, _, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recive revocation: %v", err)
t.Fatalf("unable to receive revocation: %v", err)
}
// Now make Alice send and sign an additional HTLC. We don't let Bob
@@ -7709,7 +7709,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
// Alice receives the revocation, ACKing her pending commitment.
_, _, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recive revocation: %v", err)
t.Fatalf("unable to receive revocation: %v", err)
}
// However, the HTLC is still not locked into her local commitment, so
@@ -7726,7 +7726,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
}
// At this stage Bob has a pending remote commitment. Make sure
// restoring at this stage correcly restores the HTLC add commit
// restoring at this stage correctly restores the HTLC add commit
// heights.
bobChannel = restoreAndAssertCommitHeights(t, bobChannel, true, 0, 1, 1)
@@ -7746,7 +7746,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
_, _, _, _, err = bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recive revocation: %v", err)
t.Fatalf("unable to receive revocation: %v", err)
}
// Alice ACKing Bob's pending commitment shouldn't change the heights
@@ -7790,7 +7790,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
}
// Since Bob just revoked another commitment, a restoration should
// increase the add height of the firt HTLC to 2, as we only keep the
// increase the add height of the first HTLC to 2, as we only keep the
// last unrevoked commitment. The new HTLC will also have a local add
// height of 2.
bobChannel = restoreAndAssertCommitHeights(t, bobChannel, true, 0, 2, 1)
+4 -4
View File
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ type ScriptInfo struct {
// CommitScriptToSelf constructs the public key script for the output on the
// commitment transaction paying to the "owner" of said commitment transaction.
// The `initiator` argument should correspond to the owner of the commitment
// tranasction which we are generating the to_local script for. If the other
// transaction which we are generating the to_local script for. If the other
// party learns of the preimage to the revocation hash, then they can claim all
// the settled funds in the channel, plus the unsettled funds.
func CommitScriptToSelf(chanType channeldb.ChannelType, initiator bool,
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ func CommitScriptToSelf(chanType channeldb.ChannelType, initiator bool,
// CommitScriptToRemote derives the appropriate to_remote script based on the
// channel's commitment type. The `initiator` argument should correspond to the
// owner of the commitment tranasction which we are generating the to_remote
// owner of the commitment transaction which we are generating the to_remote
// script for. The second return value is the CSV delay of the output script,
// what must be satisfied in order to spend the output.
func CommitScriptToRemote(chanType channeldb.ChannelType, initiator bool,
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ func HtlcSecondLevelInputSequence(chanType channeldb.ChannelType) uint32 {
// output for the second-level HTLC transactions. The second level transaction
// act as a sort of covenant, ensuring that a 2-of-2 multi-sig output can only
// be spent in a particular way, and to a particular output. The `initiator`
// argument should correspond to the owner of the commitment tranasction which
// argument should correspond to the owner of the commitment transaction which
// we are generating the to_local script for.
func SecondLevelHtlcScript(chanType channeldb.ChannelType, initiator bool,
revocationKey, delayKey *btcec.PublicKey,
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ func (cb *CommitmentBuilder) createUnsignedCommitmentTx(ourBalance,
// spent after a relative block delay or revocation event, and a remote output
// paying the counterparty within the channel, which can be spent immediately
// or after a delay depending on the commitment type. The `initiator` argument
// should correspond to the owner of the commitment tranasction we are creating.
// should correspond to the owner of the commitment transaction we are creating.
func CreateCommitTx(chanType channeldb.ChannelType,
fundingOutput wire.TxIn, keyRing *CommitmentKeyRing,
localChanCfg, remoteChanCfg *channeldb.ChannelConfig,
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ func (l *LightningWallet) handleFundingCancelRequest(req *fundingReserveCancelMs
pendingReservation.Lock()
defer pendingReservation.Unlock()
// Mark all previously locked outpoints as useable for future funding
// Mark all previously locked outpoints as usable for future funding
// requests.
for _, unusedInput := range pendingReservation.ourContribution.Inputs {
delete(l.lockedOutPoints, unusedInput.PreviousOutPoint)