multi: rename FeePreference to FeeEstimateInfo

Results from running,
```
gofmt -d -w -r 'FeePreference -> FeeEstimateInfo' .
```

sweep/sweeper.go

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ type Params struct {
 	// Fee is the fee preference of the client who requested the input to be
 	// swept. If a confirmation target is specified, then we'll map it into
 	// a fee rate whenever we attempt to cluster inputs for a sweep.
-	Fee FeePreference
+	Fee FeeEstimateInfo
 
 	// Force indicates whether the input should be swept regardless of
 	// whether it is economical to do so.
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ type ParamsUpdate struct {
 	// Fee is the fee preference of the client who requested the input to be
 	// swept. If a confirmation target is specified, then we'll map it into
 	// a fee rate whenever we attempt to cluster inputs for a sweep.
-	Fee FeePreference
+	Fee FeeEstimateInfo
 
 	// Force indicates whether the input should be swept regardless of
 	// whether it is economical to do so.
@@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ func (s *UtxoSweeper) handleUpdateReq(req *updateReq) (
 // - Thwart future possible fee sniping attempts.
 // - Make us blend in with the bitcoind wallet.
 func (s *UtxoSweeper) CreateSweepTx(inputs []input.Input,
-	feePref FeePreference) (*wire.MsgTx, error) {
+	feePref FeeEstimateInfo) (*wire.MsgTx, error) {
 
 	feePerKw, err := feePref.Estimate(
 		s.cfg.FeeEstimator, s.cfg.MaxFeeRate.FeePerKWeight(),

sweep/sweeper_test.go

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ var (
 
 	testMaxInputsPerTx = 3
 
-	defaultFeePref = Params{Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 1}}
+	defaultFeePref = Params{Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 1}}
 )
 
 type sweeperTestContext struct {
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ func TestWalletUtxo(t *testing.T) {
 
 	_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 		&dustInput,
-		Params{Fee: FeePreference{FeeRate: chainfee.FeePerKwFloor}},
+		Params{Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{FeeRate: chainfee.FeePerKwFloor}},
 	)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
@@ -926,11 +926,11 @@ func TestDifferentFeePreferences(t *testing.T) {
 	// with the higher fee preference, and the last with the lower. We do
 	// this to ensure the sweeper can broadcast distinct transactions for
 	// each sweep with a different fee preference.
-	lowFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 12}
+	lowFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 12}
 	lowFeeRate := chainfee.SatPerKWeight(5000)
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
 
-	highFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
+	highFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6}
 	highFeeRate := chainfee.SatPerKWeight(10000)
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
 
@@ -995,12 +995,12 @@ func TestPendingInputs(t *testing.T) {
 		highFeeRate = 10000
 	)
 
-	lowFeePref := FeePreference{
+	lowFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{
 		ConfTarget: 12,
 	}
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
 
-	highFeePref := FeePreference{
+	highFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{
 		ConfTarget: 6,
 	}
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ func TestPendingInputs(t *testing.T) {
 func TestBumpFeeRBF(t *testing.T) {
 	ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
 
-	lowFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 144}
+	lowFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 144}
 	lowFeeRate := chainfee.FeePerKwFloor
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
 
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ func TestBumpFeeRBF(t *testing.T) {
 	assertTxFeeRate(t, &lowFeeTx, lowFeeRate, changePk, &input)
 
 	// We'll then attempt to bump its fee rate.
-	highFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
+	highFeePref := FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6}
 	highFeeRate := DefaultMaxFeeRate.FeePerKWeight()
 	ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
 
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ func TestExclusiveGroup(t *testing.T) {
 		exclusiveGroup := uint64(1)
 		result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 			spendableInputs[i], Params{
-				Fee:            FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
+				Fee:            FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6},
 				ExclusiveGroup: &exclusiveGroup,
 			},
 		)
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ func TestCpfp(t *testing.T) {
 		},
 	)
 
-	feePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
+	feePref := FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6}
 	result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 		&input, Params{Fee: feePref, Force: true},
 	)
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ func TestLockTimes(t *testing.T) {
 
 		result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 			inp, Params{
-				Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
+				Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6},
 			},
 		)
 		if err != nil {
@@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ func TestLockTimes(t *testing.T) {
 		inp := spendableInputs[i+numSweeps*2]
 		result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 			inp, Params{
-				Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
+				Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 6},
 			},
 		)
 		if err != nil {
@@ -2027,7 +2027,9 @@ func TestRequiredTxOuts(t *testing.T) {
 			for _, inp := range testCase.inputs {
 				result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
 					inp, Params{
-						Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
+						Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{
+							ConfTarget: 6,
+						},
 					},
 				)
 				if err != nil {
@@ -2141,7 +2143,7 @@ func TestClusterByLockTime(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Create a test param with a dummy fee preference. This is needed so
 	// `feeRateForPreference` won't throw an error.
-	param := Params{Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 1}}
+	param := Params{Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 1}}
 
 	// We begin the test by creating three clusters of inputs, the first
 	// cluster has a locktime of 1, the second has a locktime of 2, and the
@@ -2316,7 +2318,7 @@ func TestGetInputLists(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Create a test param with a dummy fee preference. This is needed so
 	// `feeRateForPreference` won't throw an error.
-	param := Params{Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 1}}
+	param := Params{Fee: FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: 1}}
 
 	// Create a mock input and mock all the methods used in this test.
 	testInput := &input.MockInput{}

sweep/walletsweep.go

@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ var (
 	ErrFeePreferenceConflict = errors.New("fee preference conflict")
 )
 
-// FeePreference allows callers to express their time value for inclusion of a
-// transaction into a block via either a confirmation target, or a fee rate.
-type FeePreference struct {
+// FeeEstimateInfo allows callers to express their time value for inclusion of
+// a transaction into a block via either a confirmation target, or a fee rate.
+type FeeEstimateInfo struct {
 	// ConfTarget if non-zero, signals a fee preference expressed in the
 	// number of desired blocks between first broadcast, and confirmation.
 	ConfTarget uint32
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ type FeePreference struct {
 }
 
 // String returns a human-readable string of the fee preference.
-func (p FeePreference) String() string {
+func (p FeeEstimateInfo) String() string {
 	if p.ConfTarget != 0 {
 		return fmt.Sprintf("%v blocks", p.ConfTarget)
 	}
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ func (p FeePreference) String() string {
 // Estimate returns a fee rate for the given fee preference. It ensures that
 // the fee rate respects the bounds of the relay fee and the max fee rates, if
 // specified.
-func (f FeePreference) Estimate(estimator chainfee.Estimator,
+func (f FeeEstimateInfo) Estimate(estimator chainfee.Estimator,
 	maxFeeRate chainfee.SatPerKWeight) (chainfee.SatPerKWeight, error) {
 
 	var (

sweep/walletsweep_test.go

@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 )
 
-// TestFeePreferenceEstimate checks `Estimate` method works as expected.
-func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
+// TestFeeEstimateInfo checks `Estimate` method works as expected.
+func TestFeeEstimateInfo(t *testing.T) {
 	t.Parallel()
 
 	dummyErr := errors.New("dummy")
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 	testCases := []struct {
 		name            string
 		setupMocker     func()
-		feePref         FeePreference
+		feePref         FeeEstimateInfo
 		expectedFeeRate chainfee.SatPerKWeight
 		expectedErr     error
 	}{
@@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 			// When the fee preference is empty, we should see an
 			// error.
 			name:        "empty fee preference",
-			feePref:     FeePreference{},
+			feePref:     FeeEstimateInfo{},
 			expectedErr: ErrNoFeePreference,
 		},
 		{
 			// When the fee preference has conflicts, we should see
 			// an error.
 			name: "conflict fee preference",
-			feePref: FeePreference{
+			feePref: FeeEstimateInfo{
 				FeeRate:    validFeeRate,
 				ConfTarget: conf,
 			},
@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 					chainfee.SatPerKWeight(0), dummyErr,
 				).Once()
 			},
-			feePref:     FeePreference{ConfTarget: conf},
+			feePref:     FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: conf},
 			expectedErr: dummyErr,
 		},
 		{
-			// When FeePreference uses a too small value, we should
-			// return an error.
+			// When FeeEstimateInfo uses a too small value, we
+			// should return an error.
 			name: "fee rate below relay fee rate",
 			setupMocker: func() {
 				// Mock the relay fee rate.
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 					chainfee.SatPerKWeight(relayFeeRate),
 				).Once()
 			},
-			feePref:     FeePreference{FeeRate: relayFeeRate - 1},
+			feePref:     FeeEstimateInfo{FeeRate: relayFeeRate - 1},
 			expectedErr: ErrFeePreferenceTooLow,
 		},
 		{
-			// When FeePreference gives a too large value, we
+			// When FeeEstimateInfo gives a too large value, we
 			// should cap it at the max fee rate.
 			name: "fee rate above max fee rate",
 			setupMocker: func() {
@@ -100,7 +100,9 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 					chainfee.SatPerKWeight(relayFeeRate),
 				).Once()
 			},
-			feePref:         FeePreference{FeeRate: maxFeeRate + 1},
+			feePref: FeeEstimateInfo{
+				FeeRate: maxFeeRate + 1,
+			},
 			expectedFeeRate: maxFeeRate,
 		},
 		{
@@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ func TestFeePreferenceEstimate(t *testing.T) {
 					chainfee.SatPerKWeight(relayFeeRate),
 				).Once()
 			},
-			feePref:         FeePreference{ConfTarget: conf},
+			feePref:         FeeEstimateInfo{ConfTarget: conf},
 			expectedFeeRate: validFeeRate,
 		},
 	}