htlcswitch: rename policy check functions

This commit is contained in:
Joost Jager committed 2019-10-23 09:57:22 +02:00
1 parent 566680defb
commit 5404348f51
5 files changed
+38 -39

No files matched your search

+9 -9
View File
@@ -5396,9 +5396,9 @@ func TestForwardingAsymmetricTimeLockPolicies(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy tests that a link is properly enforcing the HTLC
// TestCheckHtlcForward tests that a link is properly enforcing the HTLC
// forwarding policy.
func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
func TestCheckHtlcForward(t *testing.T) {
fetchLastChannelUpdate := func(lnwire.ShortChannelID) (
*lnwire.ChannelUpdate, error) {
@@ -5423,7 +5423,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
var hash [32]byte
t.Run("satisfied", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1500, 1000,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1500, 1000,
200, 150, 0)
if result != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected policy to be satisfied")
@@ -5431,7 +5431,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("below minhtlc", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 100, 50,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 100, 50,
200, 150, 0)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailAmountBelowMinimum); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailAmountBelowMinimum failure code")
@@ -5439,7 +5439,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("above maxhtlc", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1500, 1200,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1500, 1200,
200, 150, 0)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailTemporaryChannelFailure failure code")
@@ -5447,7 +5447,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("insufficient fee", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1005, 1000,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1005, 1000,
200, 150, 0)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailFeeInsufficient); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailFeeInsufficient failure code")
@@ -5455,7 +5455,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("expiry too soon", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1500, 1000,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1500, 1000,
200, 150, 190)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailExpiryTooSoon); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailExpiryTooSoon failure code")
@@ -5463,7 +5463,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("incorrect cltv expiry", func(t *testing.T) {
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1500, 1000,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1500, 1000,
200, 190, 0)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailIncorrectCltvExpiry); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailIncorrectCltvExpiry failure code")
@@ -5473,7 +5473,7 @@ func TestHtlcSatisfyPolicy(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("cltv expiry too far in the future", func(t *testing.T) {
// Check that expiry isn't too far in the future.
result := link.HtlcSatifiesPolicy(hash, 1500, 1000,
result := link.CheckHtlcForward(hash, 1500, 1000,
10200, 10100, 0)
if _, ok := result.(*lnwire.FailExpiryTooFar); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected FailExpiryTooFar failure code")