server: remove accountability signal experiment period
In the previous iteration with endorsement signaling, the recommendation was for the sender to set it to 1 and that could have had privacy concerns when first deploying given that the default was to downgrade the signal to 0. In the latest proposal the recommended default for both sending and forwarding nodes is to set `accountable` to 0. As a result, the dates have been removed given that there are no privacy risks associated with relaying the signal with zero values.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
34329c684e
commit
6f49bea52b
7 files changed
+17
-69
No files matched your search
@@ -57,18 +57,12 @@ func testAccountability(ht *lntest.HarnessTest, aliceAccountable bool) {
|
||||
FeeLimitMsat: math.MaxInt64,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var expectedValue []byte
|
||||
hasAccountability := lntest.ExperimentalAccountabilityActive()
|
||||
|
||||
if hasAccountability {
|
||||
if aliceAccountable {
|
||||
expectedValue = []byte{lnwire.ExperimentalAccountable}
|
||||
t := uint64(lnwire.ExperimentalAccountableType)
|
||||
sendReq.FirstHopCustomRecords = map[uint64][]byte{
|
||||
t: expectedValue,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expectedValue = []byte{lnwire.ExperimentalUnaccountable}
|
||||
expectedValue := []byte{lnwire.ExperimentalUnaccountable}
|
||||
if aliceAccountable {
|
||||
expectedValue = []byte{lnwire.ExperimentalAccountable}
|
||||
t := uint64(lnwire.ExperimentalAccountableType)
|
||||
sendReq.FirstHopCustomRecords = map[uint64][]byte{
|
||||
t: expectedValue,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -76,12 +70,11 @@ func testAccountability(ht *lntest.HarnessTest, aliceAccountable bool) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate that our signal (positive or zero) propagates until carol
|
||||
// and then is dropped because she has disabled the feature.
|
||||
// When the accountability experiment is not active, no signal is sent.
|
||||
validateAccountableAndResume(
|
||||
ht, bobIntercept, hasAccountability, expectedValue,
|
||||
ht, bobIntercept, true, expectedValue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
validateAccountableAndResume(
|
||||
ht, carolIntercept, hasAccountability, expectedValue,
|
||||
ht, carolIntercept, true, expectedValue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
validateAccountableAndResume(ht, daveIntercept, false, nil)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -432,25 +432,14 @@ func testForwardInterceptorRestart(ht *lntest.HarnessTest) {
|
||||
// We should get another notification about the held HTLC.
|
||||
packet = ht.ReceiveHtlcInterceptor(bobInterceptor)
|
||||
|
||||
// Check the expected number of custom records based on whether the
|
||||
// accountability experiment is still active.
|
||||
expectedLen := 1
|
||||
if lntest.ExperimentalAccountabilityActive() {
|
||||
expectedLen = 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Len(ht, packet.InWireCustomRecords, expectedLen)
|
||||
require.Len(ht, packet.InWireCustomRecords, 2)
|
||||
require.Equal(ht, lntest.CustomRecordsWithUnaccountable(customRecords),
|
||||
packet.InWireCustomRecords)
|
||||
|
||||
// And now we forward the payment at Carol, expecting only an
|
||||
// accountability signal in our incoming custom records (if the experiment
|
||||
// is still active).
|
||||
// accountability signal in our incoming custom records.
|
||||
packet = ht.ReceiveHtlcInterceptor(carolInterceptor)
|
||||
expectedCarolLen := 0
|
||||
if lntest.ExperimentalAccountabilityActive() {
|
||||
expectedCarolLen = 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Len(ht, packet.InWireCustomRecords, expectedCarolLen)
|
||||
require.Len(ht, packet.InWireCustomRecords, 1)
|
||||
err = carolInterceptor.Send(&routerrpc.ForwardHtlcInterceptResponse{
|
||||
IncomingCircuitKey: packet.IncomingCircuitKey,
|
||||
Action: actionResume,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user