lnrpc: making PendingChannels req/resp naming scheme consistent

In this commit we rename the lnrpc.PendingChannelRequest and
lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse to
lnrpc.PendingChannelsRequest/lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse. We do this
as we strive to ensure that the naming scheme across the RPC interface
is consistent.
This commit is contained in:
Olaoluwa Osuntokun committed 2018-01-04 14:20:31 -06:00
1 parent 445e11db5c
commit 7421584341
7 files changed
+426 -421

No files matched your search

+8 -8
View File
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) ChannelBalance(ctx context.Context,
// workflow and is waiting for confirmations for the funding txn, or is in the
// process of closure, either initiated cooperatively or non-cooperatively.
func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
in *lnrpc.PendingChannelRequest) (*lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse, error) {
in *lnrpc.PendingChannelsRequest) (*lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse, error) {
// Check macaroon to see if this is allowed.
if r.authSvc != nil {
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
rpcsLog.Debugf("[pendingchannels]")
resp := &lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse{}
resp := &lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse{}
// First, we'll populate the response with all the channels that are
// soon to be opened. We can easily fetch this data from the database
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
resp.PendingOpenChannels = make([]*lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_PendingOpenChannel,
resp.PendingOpenChannels = make([]*lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_PendingOpenChannel,
len(pendingOpenChannels))
for i, pendingChan := range pendingOpenChannels {
pub := pendingChan.IdentityPub.SerializeCompressed()
@@ -1302,8 +1302,8 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
targetConfHeight := pendingChan.FundingBroadcastHeight + uint32(pendingChan.NumConfsRequired)
blocksTillOpen := int32(targetConfHeight) - bestHeight
resp.PendingOpenChannels[i] = &lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_PendingOpenChannel{
Channel: &lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_PendingChannel{
resp.PendingOpenChannels[i] = &lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_PendingOpenChannel{
Channel: &lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_PendingChannel{
RemoteNodePub: hex.EncodeToString(pub),
ChannelPoint: pendingChan.FundingOutpoint.String(),
Capacity: int64(pendingChan.Capacity),
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
// needed regardless of how this channel was closed.
pub := pendingClose.RemotePub.SerializeCompressed()
chanPoint := pendingClose.ChanPoint
channel := &lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_PendingChannel{
channel := &lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_PendingChannel{
RemoteNodePub: hex.EncodeToString(pub),
ChannelPoint: chanPoint.String(),
Capacity: int64(pendingClose.Capacity),
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
case channeldb.CooperativeClose:
resp.PendingClosingChannels = append(
resp.PendingClosingChannels,
&lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_ClosedChannel{
&lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_ClosedChannel{
Channel: channel,
ClosingTxid: closeTXID,
},
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ func (r *rpcServer) PendingChannels(ctx context.Context,
// If the channel was force closed, then we'll need to query
// the utxoNursery for additional information.
case channeldb.ForceClose:
forceClose := &lnrpc.PendingChannelResponse_ForceClosedChannel{
forceClose := &lnrpc.PendingChannelsResponse_ForceClosedChannel{
Channel: channel,
ClosingTxid: closeTXID,
}