If the provided ChainHash in a QueryChannelRange message does not match
that of our current chain, then we should send a blank response, rather
than reply with channels for the wrong chain.
We move from our legacy way of interpreting ReplyChannelRange messages
which was incorrect. Previously, we'd rely on the Complete field of the
ReplyChannelRange message to determine when our peer had sent all of
their replies. Now, we properly adhere to the specification by
interpreting the block ranges of these messages as intended.
Due to the large number of nodes deployed with the previous method, we
still maintain and detect when we are communicating with them, such that
we are still able to sync with them for backwards compatibility.
It's not possible to send another reply once all replies have been sent
without another request. The purpose of the check is also done within
another test, TestGossipSyncerReplyChanRangeQueryNoNewChans, so it can
be removed from here.
In order to properly adhere to the spec, when handling a
QueryChannelRange message, we must reply with a series of
ReplyChannelRange messages, that when consumed together cover the
entirety of the block range requested.
In this commit we fix in a bug in `lnd` that could cause other
implementations which implement a strict version of the spec to
disconnect when trying to sync their channel graph using the gossip
query feature. Before this commit, we would embed the request to a
`QueryChannelRange` in the response, causing some clients to reject the
response as the `FirstBlockHeight` and `NumBlocks` field would be
identical for each chunk of the response.
In order to remedy this, we now properly set these two fields with each
returned chunk. Note that even after this commit, we keep our existing
behavior surrounding the `Complete` field as is. Otherwise, current
`lnd` clients which rely on this field (rather than the two
aforementioned fields) wouldn't be able to properly detect when a set of
responses to their query was "complete".
Partially fixes#3728.
The policy update logic that resided part in the gossiper and
part in the rpc server is extracted into its own object.
This prepares for additional validation logic to be added for policy
updates that would otherwise make the gossiper heavier.
It is also a small first step towards separation of our own channel data
from the rest of the graph.
As a preparation for making the gossiper less responsible for validating
and supplementing local channel policy updates, this commits moves the
on-the-fly max htlc migration up the call tree. The plan for a follow up
commit is to move it out of the gossiper completely for local channel
updates, so that we don't need to return a list of final applied policies
anymore.
In this commit, we fix a bug where if a user updates a forwarding policy to be
zero, the update will be applied to the policy correctly on-disk, but not
in-memory.
We solve this issue by having the gossiper return the list of on-disk updated
policies and passing these policies to the switch, so the switch can assume
that zero-valued fields are intentional and not just uninitialized.
There's no need to broadcast these as we assume that online nodes have
already received them. For nodes that were offline, they should receive
them as part of their initial graph sync.
This ensures that the graph synced status is marked true at some point
once a historical sync has completed. Before this commit, a stalled
historical sync could cause us to never mark the graph as synced.
Conner Fromknecht