Format/typo check 1996/dalbec

Also since it was my proposed fix to the code (for clang) I decided to
change the function name to how I've been doing it: rather than 'cain()'
it is now 'pain()'.

1996/dalbec/README.md

@@ -66,9 +66,7 @@ where `a==0`.
 4. The fact that `main()` is a single expression and so beautifies poorly.
 
 5. The fact that `main()` is used:
-
     - to compute powers in modular arithmetic.
-
     - to recursively call itself in the main loop.
 
 

1996/dalbec/dalbec.c

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
-int cain(int I, char **O, int O0, int OO, int l)
+int pain(int I, char **O, int O0, int OO, int l)
 {
 	return !!I>=I?!I>=I?!!~I>=~I?!~I>=~I?!OO?!I:OO%2?
-		OO=cain(I,O,O0,OO>>!!OO,l),
-		OO=cain(I-!I-!!I,O,OO,OO,l),
-		OO=cain(I-!I-!!I,O,O0,OO,l),
+		OO=pain(I,O,O0,OO>>!!OO,l),
+		OO=pain(I-!I-!!I,O,OO,OO,l),
+		OO=pain(I-!I-!!I,O,O0,OO,l),
 		!(OO-!I||I)?l-1:OO
-	:(OO=cain(I,O,O0,OO>>!!OO,l),
-		!(OO-l+!I||I)?l-1:cain(I-!I-!!I,O,OO,OO,l))
+	:(OO=pain(I,O,O0,OO>>!!OO,l),
+		!(OO-l+!I||I)?l-1:pain(I-!I-!!I,O,OO,OO,l))
 	:(O0+OO)%l
-	:cain(I-I/I-I/I,O,O0,OO+OO/OO,
-		cain(0,O,O0,OO,I-I-I)+I+1?1:printf("%d\n",I-I-I)+fflush(stdout))
-	:cain(I-I-I-I-I,O,I+I-I+I,I,0)
-	:cain(~!!I-!!I,O,atoi(1[O]),1,atoi(0[O]));
+	:pain(I-I/I-I/I,O,O0,OO+OO/OO,
+		pain(0,O,O0,OO,I-I-I)+I+1?1:printf("%d\n",I-I-I)+fflush(stdout))
+	:pain(I-I-I-I-I,O,I+I-I+I,I,0)
+	:pain(~!!I-!!I,O,atoi(1[O]),1,atoi(0[O]));
 }
-int main(int I, char **O) { int O0=0,OO=0,l=0; return cain(I,O,O0,OO,l); }
+int main(int I, char **O) { int O0=0,OO=0,l=0; return pain(I,O,O0,OO,l); }

thanks-for-fixes.md

@@ -1934,15 +1934,18 @@ commands.
 ## [1996/dalbec](1996/dalbec/dalbec.c) ([README.md](1996/dalbec/README.md]))
 
 Cody proposed a fix for this to compile with clang and Landon implemented it
-after some discussion. The reason Cody did not do it is because he thought it
-was the wrong output but as it happens the try section below was worded a bit
-confusingly. He looked at Yusuke's] analysis found
+after some discussion (though Cody changed the function name). The reason Cody
+did not do it is because he thought it was the wrong output but as it happens
+the try section below was worded a bit confusingly. He looked at Yusuke's
+analysis found
 [here](https://mame-github-io.translate.goog/ioccc-ja-spoilers/1996/dalbec.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp)
 but he missed that Yusuke added a '...' after the result which made him think
-the fix was wrong. Cody also made the recommended change of the author to make
-it so that each number is printed on a line by itself rather than having a long
-string of numbers on the same line. This was not put in an alternate version but
-perhaps it should be.
+the fix was wrong.
+
+Cody also made the recommended change of the author to make it so that each
+number is printed on a line by itself rather than having a long string of
+numbers on the same line. This was not put in an alternate version but perhaps
+it should be.
 
 
 ## [1996/eldby](1996/eldby/eldby.c) ([README.md](1996/eldby/README.md]))