Fix 1992/albert README

The README.md had an email to the judges from Leo (prior to being a
judge, presumably) which means that the index file would not end up with
information about the entry.

The old contents of the README.md were copied to albert.bug.md though
perhaps it should not be a markdown file. The name was arbitrarily
selected and a better name could certainly be contrived.
This commit is contained in:
Cody Boone Ferguson committed 2023-02-08 05:57:29 -08:00
1 parent 17ea7fbd9e
commit 5d9f9f6aec
3 files changed
+103 -103

No files matched your search

+81 -18
View File
@@ -1,22 +1,85 @@
From: leo _at_ zycad -dot- com (Leo Broukhis)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 96 17:37:51 PST
To: judges _at_ toad -dot- com
Subject: IOCCC 1992 - a bug
Most Useful Program:
Dear Judges,
Albert van der Horst
S P&A R&C
Oranjestraat 8
3511 RA UTRECHT
The Netherlands
albert.c (even in its fixed form) still has a bug. Although I don't
remember the number that exposed the bug (afair, resulting in coredump)
in albert.orig.c that has been fixed in albert.c,
I've found a number exposing another bug: 10000000001 (that's 9 0's).
Both albert and albert.orig loop without printing anything, although
the first factor is 101 and is usually found in an instant.
Unfortunately, the e-mail address in albert.hint is no longer valid,
and neither whois, nor replacing old domain name with a new one according
to the MX records, nor Altavista Web search were successful.
Judges' comments:
...Fortunately, Albert van der Horst did send me an unobfuscated
(but somewhat limited - it doesn't check the number for factors 2, 3, 5, 7)
version of his program. I didn't have a chance to augment its functionality
to the one of the contest entry.
For a canned example:
make albert
albert 1234567890123456789
We were impressed with the speed at which it was able to factor
arbitrarily large numbers consisting of factors that fit into
a long.
Selected notes from the author:
The Obfuscated version of the Horst algorithm.
This program will factor unlimited length numbers and print the
factors in ascending order. Numbers of one digit (e.g. 8)
are rejected without notice.
It quits as soon as there is at most one
factor left, but that factor will not be shown.
It accomplishes this efficiently, without resorting to division
or multiplication, until the candidate factor no longer fits in
a signed long.
The nicest way is to rename the program into e.g. 4294967297
if you want to factor Fermat's 4th number. Then just run it.
Or you may type "prog <some-number>"
A nice one is also (30 ones)
albert 111111111111111111111111111111
Apart from the foregoing there are no special execution instructions.
To customize the program into a factorizer of a fixed number, use
cc albert.c -o 4294967297
or some such.
There are no data files used, and it is not possible to feed input
via stdin.
I think this program is a nice example of algorithmic obfuscation.
Several times two similar algorithms are merged into one. Then you
need quite some tricks to get it running, such as long jumps
through recursive subroutines. I felt like a sword smith,
welding the sword very long, folding it again to the proper
length, keep on hammering till it is tight, then fold again.
Always keeping it at the proper red hot temperature, but not too
hot lest the hardness fades.
The strict naming conventions for subroutines did not make things
much clearer after all, but it was not supposed to.
I would like to draw attention to the robustness of the program
with respect to error handling and the nice stopping criterion.
The esthetic appeal of some lines is at the expense of clearness,
I apologize.
Running the program through the c-beautifier reveals nothing,
it will only destroy some of the lay out.
Running the program through lint shows the usual remarks for a
K&R program. Defeating this through casts does not make a program
cleaner in my opinion.
Here are some hints, but they may not be too helpful.
1. The Horst algorithm is described in the Hobby Computer Club
Newsletter, year 82, part 4, a real Dutch treat.
Assembler, c and Forth version have been around for some years.
2. Does fractal programming exist after all?
3. You remember the ToomCook algorithm in Knuth?
It uses iteration instead of recursion and is quite jumpy.
This program shares these disadvantages in a modified form.
4. The Conversion is to be found in Knuth, not so the Observation.
The Observation: "if it ends in a zero, it is divisible by ten"
Copyright (c) 1992, Landon Curt Noll & Larry Bassel.
All Rights Reserved. Permission for personal, educational or non-profit use is
granted provided this this copyright and notice are included in its entirety
and remains unaltered. All other uses must receive prior permission in writing
from both Landon Curt Noll and Larry Bassel.
+22
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
From: leo _at_ zycad -dot- com (Leo Broukhis)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 96 17:37:51 PST
To: judges _at_ toad -dot- com
Subject: IOCCC 1992 - a bug
Dear Judges,
albert.c (even in its fixed form) still has a bug. Although I don't
remember the number that exposed the bug (afair, resulting in coredump)
in albert.orig.c that has been fixed in albert.c,
I've found a number exposing another bug: 10000000001 (that's 9 0's).
Both albert and albert.orig loop without printing anything, although
the first factor is 101 and is usually found in an instant.
Unfortunately, the e-mail address in albert.hint is no longer valid,
and neither whois, nor replacing old domain name with a new one according
to the MX records, nor Altavista Web search were successful.
...Fortunately, Albert van der Horst did send me an unobfuscated
(but somewhat limited - it doesn't check the number for factors 2, 3, 5, 7)
version of his program. I didn't have a chance to augment its functionality
to the one of the contest entry.
-85
View File
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
Most Useful Program:
Albert van der Horst
S P&A R&C
Oranjestraat 8
3511 RA UTRECHT
The Netherlands
Judges' comments:
For a canned example:
make albert
albert 1234567890123456789
We were impressed with the speed at which it was able to factor
arbitrarily large numbers consisting of factors that fit into
a long.
Selected notes from the author:
The Obfuscated version of the Horst algorithm.
This program will factor unlimited length numbers and print the
factors in ascending order. Numbers of one digit (e.g. 8)
are rejected without notice.
It quits as soon as there is at most one
factor left, but that factor will not be shown.
It accomplishes this efficiently, without resorting to division
or multiplication, until the candidate factor no longer fits in
a signed long.
The nicest way is to rename the program into e.g. 4294967297
if you want to factor Fermat's 4th number. Then just run it.
Or you may type "prog <some-number>"
A nice one is also (30 ones)
albert 111111111111111111111111111111
Apart from the foregoing there are no special execution instructions.
To customize the program into a factorizer of a fixed number, use
cc albert.c -o 4294967297
or some such.
There are no data files used, and it is not possible to feed input
via stdin.
I think this program is a nice example of algorithmic obfuscation.
Several times two similar algorithms are merged into one. Then you
need quite some tricks to get it running, such as long jumps
through recursive subroutines. I felt like a sword smith,
welding the sword very long, folding it again to the proper
length, keep on hammering till it is tight, then fold again.
Always keeping it at the proper red hot temperature, but not too
hot lest the hardness fades.
The strict naming conventions for subroutines did not make things
much clearer after all, but it was not supposed to.
I would like to draw attention to the robustness of the program
with respect to error handling and the nice stopping criterion.
The esthetic appeal of some lines is at the expense of clearness,
I apologize.
Running the program through the c-beautifier reveals nothing,
it will only destroy some of the lay out.
Running the program through lint shows the usual remarks for a
K&R program. Defeating this through casts does not make a program
cleaner in my opinion.
Here are some hints, but they may not be too helpful.
1. The Horst algorithm is described in the Hobby Computer Club
Newsletter, year 82, part 4, a real Dutch treat.
Assembler, c and Forth version have been around for some years.
2. Does fractal programming exist after all?
3. You remember the ToomCook algorithm in Knuth?
It uses iteration instead of recursion and is quite jumpy.
This program shares these disadvantages in a modified form.
4. The Conversion is to be found in Knuth, not so the Observation.
The Observation: "if it ends in a zero, it is divisible by ten"
Copyright (c) 1992, Landon Curt Noll & Larry Bassel.
All Rights Reserved. Permission for personal, educational or non-profit use is
granted provided this this copyright and notice are included in its entirety
and remains unaltered. All other uses must receive prior permission in writing
from both Landon Curt Noll and Larry Bassel.