Format and typo fix 1998/df/README.md

1998/df/README.md

@@ -1,18 +1,22 @@
 # Best Data Hiding
 
-    Daniel Fischer
-    VNetx.com GbR
-    Salenbergstrasse 11		(home address)
-    D 72250 Freudenstadt
-    German Federal Republic
+Daniel Fischer  
+VNetx.com GbR  
+Salenbergstrasse 11		(home address)  
+D 72250 Freudenstadt  
+German Federal Republic  
 
 ## To build:
 
-        make all
+```sh
+make all
+```
 
 ## To run:
 
-	./df
+```sh
+./df
+```
 
 ## Judges' remarks;
 
@@ -25,7 +29,7 @@ the program are used.
 
 Curiously, the program only works if its source is in the directory
 it's run in.  More curiously, the program would fail if the program's
-name's second letter wasn't "r" (the source has been changed for your
+name's second letter wasn't `r` (the source has been changed for your
 convenience and this restriction does no longer exist).
 
 Modern design has come a long way since the unreadable, tightly-coupled
@@ -37,7 +41,7 @@ Extra credit questions:
 - How many words does this entry use?
 - Can you add more words to the program and still make it work?
 
-## Author's remarks
+## Author's remarks:
 
 This program lets you guess English words. It displays an underscore
 for each letter in the word; guessing a letter that actually is in
@@ -49,29 +53,28 @@ on the same line (completely solve it by entering
 "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"). Execution stops when all underscores
 have been replaced.
 
-The program offers a number of different words to guess, time() is
+The program offers a number of different words to guess, `time()` is
 used to pick one at random. All words are eight characters long.
 
 The source should compile with any ANSI C compiler (I used CodeWarrior
 w/ ANSI strict).  Using non-ANSI compilers that implement the ANSI
 features it uses will not work (unless they defined `__STDC__ 1`
 which they shouldn't). Due to space restrictions, I did not use
-any trigraph sequences.  It does not require any special -D defines.
+any trigraph sequences.  It does not require any special `-D` defines.
 
 The source passes lint without any complaint (if invoked with
 `>/dev/null`). (My lclint is unable to recover from some parts of it.)
 
-Actually, the code not only is compliant with the ANSI specifications,
-but uses a near minimum subset of them. C keywords that were not
-used have been re(de)fined to avoid unnecessary introduction of
-new, unknown character patterns. The source also includes all ANSI
-headers it needs (after most of the functions have been used), and
-the declaration of main() follows the guidelines (but the return
-type has a different meaning and the arguments are either mis- or
-unused). There also may be some compiler warnings. These are not
-bugs, but features. The more warnings, the better the compiler.
-There wouldn't be any if I had been allowed to use some extra space
-for prototypes etc.
+Actually, the code not only is compliant with the ANSI specifications, but uses
+a near minimum subset of them. C keywords that were not used have been
+re(de)fined to avoid unnecessary introduction of new, unknown character
+patterns. The source also includes all ANSI headers it needs (after most of the
+functions have been used), and the declaration of `main()` follows the
+guidelines (but the return type has a different meaning and the arguments are
+either misused or unused).  There also may be some compiler warnings. These are
+not bugs, but features. The more warnings, the better the compiler.  There
+wouldn't be any if I had been allowed to use some extra space for prototypes
+etc.
 
 Multiple defines are used (but not all of them define), and `#define
 y define` is used with `#y` but the code doesn't assume `#y` to expand
@@ -91,10 +94,10 @@ file is not hard-coded, `__FILE__` is used instead.
 In the original version which was sent in to the contest, there were
 some restrictions on the file name:
 
-- The second letter had to be a lowercase 'r'.
-- The third letter could never be a '+' or a 'b'.
+- The second letter had to be a lowercase `r`.
+- The third letter could never be a `+` or a `b`.
 
-Valid names would have been "pr4.c", "pr.c", "prog.c", "brownie.c" etc.
+Valid names would have been `pr4.c`, `pr.c`, `prog.c`, `brownie.c` etc.
 My first private version would only run when compiled on a Friday.
 I decided it would be better this way...
 These restrictions have been removed for your convenience.
@@ -104,15 +107,19 @@ want to know it at this time, please skip them. If this entry would
 by some mistake win the contest, please do not rot13 this - I hate
 rot13'd spoilers since it is somewhat complicated on a Mac to
 reverse them. Anyone out there should have enough discipline and
-rot13 shouldn't be required, really. After all, we are no children
+rot13 shouldn't be required, really. After all, we are not children
 anymore :-)
 
+---
+
 This paragraph is not part of the author's remarks, but is a helpful
 gift from the judges; if you read too fast to stop yourself, this should
 give you enough time to stop, which you really need to do RIGHT NOW if
 you don't want to read the spoilers, which really do spoil everything,
 we mean it.
 
+---
+
 The source file needs to be present because the words are read from
 it. The wordlist is encoded within the source using a 24 entry
 sliding dictionary where lowercase letters are offsets into the
@@ -121,14 +128,14 @@ dictionary, and all other characters are ignored. The words are
 spread over six lines in the source; decoding starts on a line
 after a tab and a whitespace have been found, and stops on a newline.
 The grin after the "Demonic Smiley" actually is one encoded letter
-while the string is completely ignored; and the "cut" in "cut here"
+while the string is completely ignored; and the `cut` in "cut here"
 is required while "here" is not.
 
 "For extra credit", explain why the words are sorted alphabetically
-(because I extracted them from a dictionary :-)
+(because I extracted them from a dictionary :-) )
 
 The file name had to fulfill the restrictions mentioned above
-because `__FILE__+1` was used as a second parameter to fopen(). (It
+because `__FILE__+1` was used as a second parameter to `fopen()`. (It
 essentially was `fopen(__FILE__,__FILE__+1)` ). This was an extra joke
 that does no longer exist in the released version.
 
@@ -137,9 +144,9 @@ but the statement that opens the file and initializes the dictionary.
 Similarly, int and signed have been redefined (to save space, of
 course).
 
-The main function (the guessing part) is between the last #else..#endif,
-but still is declared before main(). The `5[O]()` in main() calls
-this function.  Similarly, Most indexing operations have been
+The main function (the guessing part) is between the last `#else..#endif`,
+but still is declared before `main()`. The `5[O]()` in `main()` calls
+this function.  Similarly, most indexing operations have been
 changed to this form; and I tried to write each such operation
 different.