1991/westley cheating not a bug but a feature

Yes it's very easy to cheat at the game but as my late grandmother told
me when I was a kid: 'it's not cheating if you're not caught' and since
the computer does not catch you any more than her siblings did at the
card table with her hidden drawer with more cards it's not cheating! :-)
But on a more serious note it was documented as a possibility so it's
not a bug it's a feature so I added it to the README.md and bugs.md.

1991/westley/README.md

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Can you figure out why the board looks different than the
 
 What happens if you make a move already made?
 
-Now go try and draw or better yet win!
+Now go try and draw or better yet win (without cheating which is very easy :-) )!
 Why is win better than draw? Because everyone knows how to draw:
 
 > Professor Falken: Did you ever play tic-tac-toe?
@@ -131,7 +131,10 @@ at the [International Obfuscated C Code Contest judges'
 room](https://www.ioccc.org/https://www.ioccc.org/judges.html) they believe that
 you can win tic-tac-toe, that there can be acceptable draws.
 
-Try not to cheat, the computer has not learned how to catch you doing it.
+### INABIAF - it's not a bug it's a feature! :-)
+
+Try not to cheat (even though it's very easy :-) ), the computer has not learned
+how to catch you doing it..
 
 ## Author's remarks:
 
@@ -156,7 +159,7 @@ longer loses games.
 If you want a program that never loses, simply replace the string
 `"9999999999  :-| "` with `"9883857753  :-| "`.
 
-### How It Works (rot13 to read):
+### How it works (rot13 to read):
 
 
     Gur iregvpny "onef" bs gur tevq ner vqragvpny shapgvbaf, jvgu gur

bugs.md

@@ -542,6 +542,17 @@ This will be fixed in time but it's noted here for now.
 
 # 1991
 
+## [1991/westley](1991/westley/westley.c) ([README.md](1991/westley/README.md))
+## STATUS: INABIAF - please **DO NOT** fix
+
+There is a very simple way to always win. The program doesn't catch you and as
+someone called Cody's late grandmother said to him: 'it's not cheating unless
+you're caught'. :-)
+
+Please don't try and fix it as it's not a bug and was actually documented as a
+possibility. Can you find out how?
+
+
 # 1992
 
 ## [1992/buzzard.1](1992/buzzard.1/buzzard.1.c) ([README.md](1992/buzzard.1/README.md))