Fix 1996/westley

It always segfaulted (though with the correct input it still showed the
right results) and when argc == 1 it showed an environmental variable.

The body of the for loop can now be empty (or so it appears). I put the
original in westley.alt.c because it has some interesting techniques in
which he wrote about (which I preserved in the README.md file). I also
put in the original code because I'm not entirely sure if the for loop
really can be empty in all cases. Certainly it can be in the scripts
provided but I don't know if there is a valid invocation that would need
it (but in any case it would always segfault with that loop body).

Updated 1996/westley/.gitignore (added westley.alt) and the Makefile so
that make alt will build westley.alt.

Formatting fixes in README.md.

1996/westley/.gitignore

@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 westley
+westley.alt

1996/westley/Makefile

@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ OBJ= ${PROG}.o
 DATA= clock1 clock2 clock3
 TARGET= ${PROG}
 #
-ALT_OBJ=
-ALT_TARGET=
+ALT_OBJ= westley.alt.o
+ALT_TARGET= westley.alt
 
 
 #################

1996/westley/README.md

@@ -11,26 +11,47 @@
 
         make all
 
-### To run
+
+[Cody Boone Ferguson](/winners.html#Cody_Boone_Ferguson) fixed a segfault in
+this entry as well as it displaying environmental variables if argc == 1.
+Although the scripts showed correct output these also segfaulted but with the
+fix they no longer do. Now if argc < 5 (argv[4] is referenced) it will not do
+anything and it will not segfault either (this was caused by the body of the
+for() loop which is now empty (it doesn't appear to be needed at all). Note that
+this does make some of the author's explanations / portability notes no longer
+valid but we have kept them there for the interested. The original is in
+[westley.alt.c](westley.alt.c). Thank you Cody for your assistance!
+
+
+## To run:
 
 	sh ./clock1
 
-## Judges' comments
+
+## Try:
+
+
+	    sh ./clock2
 
 Also try:
+	
+	
+	    sh ./clock2
 
-	sh ./clock2
 
 And for a good time, try:
 
-	sh ./clock3
+
+	    sh ./clock3
+
+## Judges' comments:
 
 Time and time again, Brian Westley seems to come up with a winner!
 We are amazed at how much is being done with only one relatively
 short line.  We think you will as well if you take the time to
 understand it.
 
-## Author's comments
+## Author's comments:
 
 This 1-line program allows various analog ASCII clocks
 to print out the time; the ASCII clock is built from

1996/westley/westley.alt.c

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+main(h,m)char**m;{for(time(*m);h/=2;)m[4][m[h][h[(int*)localtime(*m)]]]=m[3][h];puts(m[4]);}

1996/westley/westley.c

@@ -1 +1 @@
-main(h,m)char**m;{for(time(*m);h/=2;)m[4][m[h][h[(int*)localtime(*m)]]]=m[3][h];puts(m[4]);}
+main(h,m)int h;char**m;{if(h>4){for(time(*m);h/=2;);puts(m[4]);}}