Format fix 2006/hamre/README.md + update bugs.md

There are a few 'issues' that are INABIAF so these were noted in the
README.md and the bugs.md. You might find some punning there.

2006/hamre/README.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Most Irrational
 
-    Steinar Hamre
-    Norway
+Steinar Hamre  
+Norway  
 
 ## To build:
 
@@ -21,28 +21,40 @@ make
 ./hamre '-1+4/3*(2+1/(3/2*(7/2-7/3+1/6)))/2'
 ```
 
+### INABIAF - it's not a bug it's a feature! :-)
+
+This program will very likely crash or do something completely irrational :-) if you
+don't supply it with an argument.
+
+As well supplying more arguments will possibly limit the number of nested
+operators supported.
+
+Don't try dividing by 0 (zero).
+
 ## Judges' remarks:
 
 An irrationally coded source presents rational things!
 
-A rational person might want to attempt the irrational task
+A rational person might want to attempt the
+[irrational](https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Rationality) task
 of supporting a new operator by way of an existing macro
 in the source.  And can you determine which macro this is
 and understand the purpose of its arguments?
 
 ## Author's remarks:
 
-This is a calculator for rational numbers. Believe it or not, that is
-a useful tool to have around, and I haven't found a useful version,
-much less an obfuscated one.
+This is a calculator for [rational
+numbers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number). Believe it or not, that
+is a useful tool to have around, and I haven't found a useful version, much less
+an obfuscated one.
 
-It is rather feature complete as rational calculators go. The
+It is rather feature complete as [rational calculators go. The
 supported operators are: `+`, `-` (binary and unary), `*`, `/` and `()`. Run it
 by supplying an expression as the first argument, and the normalized
 result will be written to stdout.
 
 ```sh
-$ ./hamre '-1+4/3*(2+1/(3/2*(7/2-7/3+1/6)))/2'
+./hamre '-1+4/3*(2+1/(3/2*(7/2-7/3+1/6)))/2'
 2/3
 ```
 
@@ -50,7 +62,7 @@ If you do not supply an argument, the calculator will crash.  Other
 arguments are ignored. Supplying more arguments may further limit the
 number of nested operators supported.
 
-Remember that 1/0 is not a rational number. You will not get any
+Remember that `1/0` is not a rational number. You will not get any
 answer if you divide by zero.
 
 By default, only 31 nested levels of operators are supported.
@@ -62,9 +74,9 @@ comes to understanding the source. The preprocessed source becomes
 rather verbose.
 
 IOCCC entries are often loaded with all kinds of hard-coded numbers. I
-have restricted myself to mostly use sensible numbers (<= 7) as
+have restricted myself to mostly use sensible numbers (`<= 7`) as
 smaller numbers are much easier to remember. Also the macros really
-help hiding most of the uses of these numbers away. All macros and
+help hide most of the uses of these numbers away. All macros and
 variables are easy-to-remember single character abbreviations, from
 some language, meaningful to the purpose(s) of the macro, I hope.
 

bugs.md

@@ -1760,6 +1760,18 @@ to including the [IOCCC website](https://www.ioccc.org) itself.
 
 
 # 2006
+
+## [2006/hamre](2006/hamre/hamre.c) ([README.md](2006/hamre/README.md))
+## STATUS: INABIAF - please **DO NOT** fix
+
+This program will very likely crash or do something completely irrational :-) if
+you don't supply it with an argument.
+
+As well supplying more arguments will possibly limit the number of nested
+operators supported.
+
+Don't try dividing by 0 (zero).
+
 # 2007
 # 2008
 # 2009