Add missing alt subsections to 1988/westley

The README.md file only had 'Alternate code' and no subsections for how
to build or use the alt code. This is because I had already gone through
this year before we changed the way to present alt code.

1988/westley/README.md

@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ make all
 ```
 
 NOTE: this version is a fixed version for modern C compilers. See the [Alternate
-code](#alternate-code) section below for how to use the original.
+code](#alternate-code) section below for how to use the original and why one
+might wish to do so.
 
 
 ### Try:
@@ -23,6 +24,30 @@ Also try:
 to show the code with followed by the result so you can truly see the magic.
 
 
+## Alternate code:
+
+This version is the original which might not work as you expect nowadays.
+
+
+### Alternate build:
+
+```sh
+make alt
+```
+
+
+### Alternate use:
+
+To see if your compiler has the problem described in the Judges' remarks below,
+try:
+
+```sh
+./westley.alt
+```
+
+Does it show the same output as `westley`?
+
+
 ## Judges' remarks:
 
 Your compiler must parse
@@ -51,17 +76,6 @@ cc -E westley.alt.c
 ```
 
 
-## Alternate code:
-
-To see if your compiler has the problem described above try:
-
-```sh
-make alt
-./westley.alt
-```
-
-Does it show the same output as `westley`?
-
 
 ## Author's remarks:
 

thanks-for-help.md

@@ -676,12 +676,13 @@ was fixed by Misha Dynin, based on the judges' remarks, so that this would work
 with modern C compilers. We encourage you to try the alternate version to see
 what happens with current compilers! See the README.md files for details.
 
-[Cody](#cody) changed the `int`s to be `float` as that's what they are printed as: not
-strictly necessary but nonetheless more correct, even if not warned against.
-
-Cody added the [try.sh](/1988/westley/try.sh) script to show the magic of the
+[Cody](#cody) added the [try.sh](/1988/westley/try.sh) script to show the magic of the
 entry as seeing the code with the result at once is far more beautiful.
 
+Cody also changed the `int`s to be `float` as that's what they are printed as:
+not strictly necessary but nonetheless more correct, even if not warned against.
+
+
 
 
 # <a name="1989"></a>1989