Merge pull request #1113 from xexyl/cody-readmes

This commit is contained in:
Landon Curt Noll authored and GitHub committed 2023-10-19 11:28:46 -07:00
commit e96569e478
2 files changed
+22 -11

No files matched your search

+11 -9
View File
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Israel
make all
```
There is [alternate code](#alternate-code) for those using Turbo-C or MSC.
## To run:
```sh
@@ -36,22 +38,22 @@ Why is there no output?
### Alternate code:
[Cody Boone Ferguson](/winners.html#Cody_Boone_Ferguson) provided alternate code
for users using Turbo-C or MSC, based on the authors' remarks below, except
that he did not change the `" #Q"` string as that showed worse looking output
instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in
question. YMMV. Thank you Cody (though we all think <strike>[no
one](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/no_one#Pronoun)</strike> [very
few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
This alternate code is for the [very few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
[users](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows)
[here](https://www.ioccc.org) will need it :-) )!
[here](https://www.ioccc.org) who will need it but nonetheless if you're using
Turbo-C or MSC, the code is based on the authors' remarks except that the `"
#Q"` string was not changed as that showed worse looking output instead of
improved output though admittedly we have no way to test the compilers in
question. YMMV.
To compile:
#### To build:
```sh
make alt
```
#### To use:
Use `baruch.alt` as you would `baruch`.
+11 -2
View File
@@ -560,8 +560,17 @@ details in that file and further details are in the [bugs.md](bugs.md) file.
## [1990/baruch](1990/baruch/baruch.c) ([README.md](1990/baruch/README.md]))
Cody added an [alternate version](1990/baruch/baruch.alt.c) which allows certain
compilers to compile the code, based on the author's remarks.
Cody added an [alternate version](1990/baruch/baruch.alt.c) which allows Turbo-C
and MSC to compile this code, based on the authors' remarks, except that Cody
did not change the `" #Q"` string as that showed worse looking output
instead of improved output though he has no way to test the compilers in
question. YMMV.
Although this is appreciated we agree with him that <strike>no one</strike>
[very few](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0)
[users](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows)
[here](https://www.ioccc.org) will need it! :-)
## [1990/cmills](1990/cmills/cmills.c) ([README.md](1990/cmills/README.md]))