As some commits from yesterday and this morning caused conflicts with
commits I made last week I'm trying to fix it on the branch that I
believe introduced the changes. If this does not work I do not know what
I'll do but it have to be done another time.
Move copyright notice to the end.
Add a standard comment about the newly added `README.md` files.
Clean up trailing whitespace.
Fixed a few minor typos.
There are many more fixes to be made but I wanted these in. Even the
files I have checked will have to be checked again in more detail but I
needed these committed so I could fix something in another file that
will need a new branch. More updates to README.md files will then be put
into yet another branch if the pull requests have not yet been merged
before I get to these updates (which really ought to be a lot of
fun! :-) )
Depending on if it was the beginning of the sentence the EMail would
become 'Email' or 'email'.
Some references of 'Email' were changed to 'email' as well as those were
not in the beginning of a sentence.
A few places some consistency of capitalised email address (made lower
case) were changed to match other places of the same pattern.
There was a reference to Leo's fix to 1992/albert but although the
source code exists by the name given the email message did not. It
referred to 1992/albert/albert.fix.hint which did not exist. Previously
the README.md was actually that meant that the real entry README.md was
not generated into a html file. Thus I renamed the two files but only
now noticed that it's referenced in years-spoiler.html. I've renamed the
albert.bug.md to be albert.fix.hint.md to match the years-spoiler.html
wording (certainly another form could be contrived) but make it a
markdown file (even though it's not one).
The README.md had an email to the judges from Leo (prior to being a
judge, presumably) which means that the index file would not end up with
information about the entry.
The old contents of the README.md were copied to albert.bug.md though
perhaps it should not be a markdown file. The name was arbitrarily
selected and a better name could certainly be contrived.
There is one exception:
$ find . -name '*.hint' -execdir git mv '{}' README.md \;
git statufatal: destination exists, source=1992/albert/albert.hint, destination=1992/albert/README.md
Looking at the two files they differ quite a bit so I've not changed it.
I'll bring this up on GitHub.
We we move 1988-2004 entries from all of a year's winning entries
in a single directory to each winner being in their own sub-directory
under the given year directory.
The 2020 winners are hinted it, but the source code is not there,
nor are the hints. Someone could look into the HTML and
see what was commented out, but that is not a problem because
WHO won is known and the name of their AWARD is known already.
Moreover a number of the winners have talked about what their
entirs do, so the commented out spoiler text is not a bit problem.
One will find HTML commented out with:
<!-- XXX remove when 2020 is ready
2020 links here
XXX remove when 2020 is ready -->
The "XXX remove when 2020 is ready" string is found at the
start and end comment blocks. Again, soneone could read
what was commented out, but that is OK since most of that
information is known or can be known. The following files
have such HTML comment blocks in them.
./winners.html
./years-spoiler.html
./years.html
In addition, ./all/summary.txt was modified to not
include the 2020 entries for the momemt.
The 2020 winner code AND write-ups are NOT part of this set.
p.s. The all/all.tar.bz2 does not contain the 2020 source code (yet?).
Landon Curt Noll