Merge pull request #7556 from ellemouton/addrIterFix

wtclient: address iterator fix
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Gugger authored and GitHub committed 2023-03-30 16:55:15 +02:00
commit 2e9795f26a
4 files changed
+234 -147

No files matched your search

@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
## Watchtowers
* [Fix Address iterator
panic](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/7556)
* [Allow caller to filter sessions at the time of reading them from
disk](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/7059)
* [Clean up sessions once all channels for which they have updates for are
+42 -1
View File
@@ -162,7 +162,15 @@ func (a *addressIterator) next(lock bool) (net.Addr, error) {
a.mu.Lock()
defer a.mu.Unlock()
// Set the next candidate to the subsequent element.
// In-case currentTopAddr is nil (meaning that Reset has not yet been
// called), return an error indicating this.
if a.currentTopAddr == nil {
return nil, ErrAddressesExhausted
}
// Set the next candidate to the subsequent element. If we are at the
// end of the address list, this could mean setting currentTopAddr to
// nil.
a.currentTopAddr = a.currentTopAddr.Next()
for a.currentTopAddr != nil {
@@ -172,9 +180,26 @@ func (a *addressIterator) next(lock bool) (net.Addr, error) {
// Check whether this address is still considered a candidate.
// If it's not, we'll proceed to the next.
candidate, ok := a.candidates[addrID]
// If the address cannot be found in the candidate set, then
// this must mean that the Remove method was called for the
// address. The Remove method would have checked that the
// address is not the last one in the iterator and that it has
// no locks on it. It is therefor safe to remove.
if !ok {
// Grab the next address candidate. This might be nil
// if the iterator is on the last item in the list.
nextCandidate := a.currentTopAddr.Next()
// Remove the address from the list that is no longer
// in the candidate set.
a.addrList.Remove(a.currentTopAddr)
// Set the current top to the next candidate. This might
// mean setting it to nil if the iterator is on its last
// item in which case the loop will be exited and an
// ErrAddressesExhausted exhausted error will be
// returned.
a.currentTopAddr = nextCandidate
continue
}
@@ -230,9 +255,25 @@ func (a *addressIterator) peek(lock bool) net.Addr {
addrID := a.currentTopAddr.Value.(string)
candidate, ok := a.candidates[addrID]
// If the address cannot be found in the candidate set, then
// this must mean that the Remove method was called for the
// address. The Remove method would have checked that the
// address is not the last one in the iterator and that it has
// no locks on it. It is therefor safe to remove.
if !ok {
// Grab the next address candidate. This might be nil
// if the iterator is on the last item in the list.
nextCandidate := a.currentTopAddr.Next()
// Remove the address from the list that is no longer
// in the candidate set.
a.addrList.Remove(a.currentTopAddr)
// Set the current top to the next candidate. This might
// mean setting it to nil if the iterator is on its last
// item but this will be reset at the top of the for
// loop.
a.currentTopAddr = nextCandidate
continue
}
+189 -146
View File
@@ -10,184 +10,227 @@ import (
// TestAddrIterator tests the behaviour of the addressIterator.
func TestAddrIterator(t *testing.T) {
// Assert that an iterator can't be initialised with an empty address
// list.
_, err := newAddressIterator()
require.ErrorContains(t, err, "must have at least one address")
t.Parallel()
// Prep some addresses to use in the subtests.
addr1, err := net.ResolveTCPAddr("tcp", "1.2.3.4:8000")
require.NoError(t, err)
// Initialise the iterator with addr1.
iter, err := newAddressIterator(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Attempting to remove addr1 should fail now since it is the only
// address in the iterator.
iter.Add(addr1)
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, wtdb.ErrLastTowerAddr)
// Adding a duplicate of addr1 and then calling Remove should still
// return an error.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, wtdb.ErrLastTowerAddr)
addr2, err := net.ResolveTCPAddr("tcp", "1.2.3.4:8001")
require.NoError(t, err)
// Add addr2 to the iterator.
iter.Add(addr2)
// Check that peek returns addr1.
a1 := iter.Peek()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Calling peek multiple times should return the same result.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Calling Next should now return addr2.
a2, err := iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
// Assert that Peek now returns addr2.
a2 = iter.Peek()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
// Calling Next should result in reaching the end of th list.
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
// Calling Peek now should reset the queue and return addr1.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Wind the list to the end again so that we can test the Reset func.
_, err = iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
iter.Reset()
// Now Next should return addr 2.
a2, err = iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
addr3, err := net.ResolveTCPAddr("tcp", "1.2.3.4:8002")
require.NoError(t, err)
// Add addr3 now to ensure that the iteration works even if we are
// midway through the queue.
iter.Add(addr3)
t.Run("always at least one address", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Now Next should return addr 3.
a3, err := iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
// Assert that an iterator can't be initialised with an empty
// address list.
_, err := newAddressIterator()
require.ErrorContains(t, err, "must have at least one address")
// Quickly test that GetAll correctly returns a copy of all the
// addresses in the iterator.
addrList := iter.GetAll()
require.ElementsMatch(t, addrList, []net.Addr{addr1, addr2, addr3})
// Initialise the iterator with addr1.
iter, err := newAddressIterator(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Also check that an iterator constructed via the Copy method, also
// contains all the expected addresses.
newIterAddrs := iter.Copy().GetAll()
require.ElementsMatch(t, newIterAddrs, []net.Addr{addr1, addr2, addr3})
// Attempting to remove addr1 should fail now since it is the
// only address in the iterator.
iter.Add(addr1)
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, wtdb.ErrLastTowerAddr)
// Let's now remove addr3.
err = iter.Remove(addr3)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Adding a duplicate of addr1 and then calling Remove should
// still return an error.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, wtdb.ErrLastTowerAddr)
})
// Since addr3 is gone, Peek should return addr1.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
t.Run("address iteration", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Lastly, we will test the "locking" of addresses.
// Initialise the iterator with addr1.
iter, err := newAddressIterator(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
// First we test the locking of an address via the PeekAndLock function.
a1 = iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Add addr2 to the iterator.
iter.Add(addr2)
// Assert that we can't remove addr1 if there is a lock on it.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddrInUse)
// Check that peek returns addr1.
a1 := iter.Peek()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Now release the lock on addr1.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr1)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Calling peek multiple times should return the same result.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Since the lock has been released, we should now be able to remove
// addr1.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Calling Next should now return addr2.
a2, err := iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
// Now we test the locking of an address via the NextAndLock function.
// To do this, we first re-add addr3.
iter.Add(addr3)
// Assert that Peek now returns addr2.
a2 = iter.Peek()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
a2, err = iter.NextAndLock()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Calling Next should result in reaching the end of th list.
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
// Assert that we can't remove addr2 if there is a lock on it.
err = iter.Remove(addr2)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddrInUse)
// Calling Peek now should reset the queue and return addr1.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
// Now release the lock on addr2.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr2)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Wind the list to the end again so that we can test the Reset
// func.
_, err = iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
// Since the lock has been released, we should now be able to remove
// addr1.
err = iter.Remove(addr2)
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
// Only addr3 should still be left in the iterator.
addrList = iter.GetAll()
require.Len(t, addrList, 1)
require.Contains(t, addrList, addr3)
iter.Reset()
// Ensure that HasLocked acts correctly in the case where more than one
// address is being locked and unlock as well as the case where the same
// address is locked more than once.
// Now Next should return addr 2.
a2, err = iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Add addr3 now to ensure that the iteration works even if we
// are midway through the queue.
iter.Add(addr3)
a3 = iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Now Next should return addr 3.
a3, err := iter.Next()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
a3 = iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Quickly test that GetAll correctly returns a copy of all the
// addresses in the iterator.
addrList := iter.GetAll()
require.ElementsMatch(
t, addrList, []net.Addr{addr1, addr2, addr3},
)
iter.Add(addr2)
a2, err = iter.NextAndLock()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Also check that an iterator constructed via the Copy method,
// also contains all the expected addresses.
newIterAddrs := iter.Copy().GetAll()
require.ElementsMatch(
t, newIterAddrs, []net.Addr{addr1, addr2, addr3},
)
// Now release addr2 and asset that HasLock is still true.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Let's now remove addr3.
err = iter.Remove(addr3)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Releasing one of the locks on addr3 now should still result in
// HasLocked returning true.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Since addr3 is gone, Peek should return addr1.
a1 = iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
})
// Releasing it again should now result in should still result in
// HasLocked returning false.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr3)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
t.Run("address locking", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Initialise the iterator with addr1 and addr2.
iter, err := newAddressIterator(addr1, addr2)
require.NoError(t, err)
// First we test the locking of an address via the PeekAndLock
// function.
a1 := iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Assert that we can't remove addr1 if there is a lock on it.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddrInUse)
// Now release the lock on addr1.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr1)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Since the lock has been released, we should now be able to
// remove addr1.
err = iter.Remove(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Now we test the locking of an address via the NextAndLock
// function. To do this, we first re-add addr3.
iter.Add(addr3)
a2, err := iter.NextAndLock()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Assert that we can't remove addr2 if there is a lock on it.
err = iter.Remove(addr2)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddrInUse)
// Now release the lock on addr2.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr2)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Since the lock has been released, we should now be able to
// remove addr1.
err = iter.Remove(addr2)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Only addr3 should still be left in the iterator.
addrList := iter.GetAll()
require.Len(t, addrList, 1)
require.Contains(t, addrList, addr3)
// Ensure that HasLocked acts correctly in the case where more
// than one address is being locked and unlock as well as the
// case where the same address is locked more than once.
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
a3 := iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
a3 = iter.PeekAndLock()
require.Equal(t, addr3, a3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
iter.Add(addr2)
a2, err = iter.NextAndLock()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, addr2, a2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Now release addr2 and assert that HasLock is still true.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr2)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Releasing one of the locks on addr3 now should still result
// in HasLocked returning true.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr3)
require.True(t, iter.HasLocked())
// Releasing it again should now result in should still result
// in HasLocked returning false.
iter.ReleaseLock(addr3)
require.False(t, iter.HasLocked())
})
t.Run("calling Next twice without Reset is safe", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Initialise the iterator with addr1.
iter, err := newAddressIterator(addr1)
require.NoError(t, err)
a1 := iter.Peek()
require.Equal(t, addr1, a1)
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
_, err = iter.Next()
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrAddressesExhausted)
})
}
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ func (t *towerListIterator) AddCandidate(candidate *Tower) {
for {
next, err := candidate.Addresses.Next()
if err != nil {
candidate.Addresses.Reset()
break
}