multi: link quit can interrupt commitment signing

In this commit, we make sig job handling when singing a next commitment
non-blocking by allowing the shutdown of a channel link to prevent
further waiting on sig jobs by the channel state machine. This addresses
possible cases where the aux signer may be shut down via a separate quit
signal, so the state machine could block indefinitely on receiving an
update on a sig job.

contractcourt/chain_watcher_test.go

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package contractcourt
 
 import (
 	"bytes"
+	"context"
 	"crypto/sha256"
 	"fmt"
 	"testing"
@@ -145,17 +146,15 @@ func TestChainWatcherRemoteUnilateralClosePendingCommit(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// With the HTLC added, we'll now manually initiate a state transition
 	// from Alice to Bob.
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatal(err)
-	}
+	testQuit, testQuitFunc := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
+	t.Cleanup(testQuitFunc)
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(testQuit)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// At this point, we'll now Bob broadcasting this new pending unrevoked
 	// commitment.
 	bobPendingCommit, err := aliceChannel.State().RemoteCommitChainTip()
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatal(err)
-	}
+	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// We'll craft a fake spend notification with Bob's actual commitment.
 	// The chain watcher should be able to detect that this is a pending

htlcswitch/link.go

@@ -387,8 +387,10 @@ type channelLink struct {
 	// our next CommitSig.
 	incomingCommitHooks hookMap
 
-	wg   sync.WaitGroup
-	quit chan struct{}
+	// ContextGuard is a helper that encapsulates a wait group and quit
+	// channel and allows contexts that either block or cancel on those
+	// depending on the use case.
+	*fn.ContextGuard
 }
 
 // hookMap is a data structure that is used to track the hooks that need to be
@@ -469,7 +471,7 @@ func NewChannelLink(cfg ChannelLinkConfig,
 		flushHooks:          newHookMap(),
 		outgoingCommitHooks: newHookMap(),
 		incomingCommitHooks: newHookMap(),
-		quit:                make(chan struct{}),
+		ContextGuard:        fn.NewContextGuard(),
 	}
 }
 
@@ -548,7 +550,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) Start() error {
 
 	l.updateFeeTimer = time.NewTimer(l.randomFeeUpdateTimeout())
 
-	l.wg.Add(1)
+	l.Wg.Add(1)
 	go l.htlcManager()
 
 	return nil
@@ -588,8 +590,8 @@ func (l *channelLink) Stop() {
 		l.hodlQueue.Stop()
 	}
 
-	close(l.quit)
-	l.wg.Wait()
+	close(l.Quit)
+	l.Wg.Wait()
 
 	// Now that the htlcManager has completely exited, reset the packet
 	// courier. This allows the mailbox to revaluate any lingering Adds that
@@ -614,7 +616,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) Stop() {
 // WaitForShutdown blocks until the link finishes shutting down, which includes
 // termination of all dependent goroutines.
 func (l *channelLink) WaitForShutdown() {
-	l.wg.Wait()
+	l.Wg.Wait()
 }
 
 // EligibleToForward returns a bool indicating if the channel is able to
@@ -675,7 +677,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) IsFlushing(linkDirection LinkDirection) bool {
 func (l *channelLink) OnFlushedOnce(hook func()) {
 	select {
 	case l.flushHooks.newTransients <- hook:
-	case <-l.quit:
+	case <-l.Quit:
 	}
 }
 
@@ -694,7 +696,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) OnCommitOnce(direction LinkDirection, hook func()) {
 
 	select {
 	case queue <- hook:
-	case <-l.quit:
+	case <-l.Quit:
 	}
 }
 
@@ -903,8 +905,10 @@ func (l *channelLink) syncChanStates() error {
 		// We've just received a ChanSync message from the remote
 		// party, so we'll process the message  in order to determine
 		// if we need to re-transmit any messages to the remote party.
+		ctx, cancel := l.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+		defer cancel()
 		msgsToReSend, openedCircuits, closedCircuits, err =
-			l.channel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(remoteChanSyncMsg)
+			l.channel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctx, remoteChanSyncMsg)
 		if err != nil {
 			return err
 		}
@@ -933,7 +937,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) syncChanStates() error {
 			l.cfg.Peer.SendMessage(false, msg)
 		}
 
-	case <-l.quit:
+	case <-l.Quit:
 		return ErrLinkShuttingDown
 	}
 
@@ -1023,7 +1027,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) resolveFwdPkg(fwdPkg *channeldb.FwdPkg) error {
 //
 // NOTE: This MUST be run as a goroutine.
 func (l *channelLink) fwdPkgGarbager() {
-	defer l.wg.Done()
+	defer l.Wg.Done()
 
 	l.cfg.FwdPkgGCTicker.Resume()
 	defer l.cfg.FwdPkgGCTicker.Stop()
@@ -1040,7 +1044,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) fwdPkgGarbager() {
 					err)
 				continue
 			}
-		case <-l.quit:
+		case <-l.Quit:
 			return
 		}
 	}
@@ -1163,7 +1167,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) handleChanSyncErr(err error) {
 func (l *channelLink) htlcManager() {
 	defer func() {
 		l.cfg.BatchTicker.Stop()
-		l.wg.Done()
+		l.Wg.Done()
 		l.log.Infof("exited")
 	}()
 
@@ -1257,7 +1261,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) htlcManager() {
 		// With our link's in-memory state fully reconstructed, spawn a
 		// goroutine to manage the reclamation of disk space occupied by
 		// completed forwarding packages.
-		l.wg.Add(1)
+		l.Wg.Add(1)
 		go l.fwdPkgGarbager()
 	}
 
@@ -1441,7 +1445,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) htlcManager() {
 				)
 			}
 
-		case <-l.quit:
+		case <-l.Quit:
 			return
 		}
 	}
@@ -2299,7 +2303,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) handleUpstreamMsg(msg lnwire.Message) {
 		}
 
 		select {
-		case <-l.quit:
+		case <-l.Quit:
 			return
 		default:
 		}
@@ -2360,7 +2364,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) handleUpstreamMsg(msg lnwire.Message) {
 		}
 
 		select {
-		case <-l.quit:
+		case <-l.Quit:
 			return
 		default:
 		}
@@ -2590,7 +2594,10 @@ func (l *channelLink) updateCommitTx() error {
 		return nil
 	}
 
-	newCommit, err := l.channel.SignNextCommitment()
+	ctx, done := l.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+	defer done()
+
+	newCommit, err := l.channel.SignNextCommitment(ctx)
 	if err == lnwallet.ErrNoWindow {
 		l.cfg.PendingCommitTicker.Resume()
 		l.log.Trace("PendingCommitTicker resumed")
@@ -2627,7 +2634,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) updateCommitTx() error {
 	}
 
 	select {
-	case <-l.quit:
+	case <-l.Quit:
 		return ErrLinkShuttingDown
 	default:
 	}
@@ -3233,7 +3240,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) handleSwitchPacket(pkt *htlcPacket) error {
 // NOTE: Part of the ChannelLink interface.
 func (l *channelLink) HandleChannelUpdate(message lnwire.Message) {
 	select {
-	case <-l.quit:
+	case <-l.Quit:
 		// Return early if the link is already in the process of
 		// quitting. It doesn't make sense to hand the message to the
 		// mailbox here.
@@ -3932,7 +3939,7 @@ func (l *channelLink) forwardBatch(replay bool, packets ...*htlcPacket) {
 		filteredPkts = append(filteredPkts, pkt)
 	}
 
-	err := l.cfg.ForwardPackets(l.quit, replay, filteredPkts...)
+	err := l.cfg.ForwardPackets(l.Quit, replay, filteredPkts...)
 	if err != nil {
 		log.Errorf("Unhandled error while reforwarding htlc "+
 			"settle/fail over htlcswitch: %v", err)

htlcswitch/link_isolated_test.go

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 package htlcswitch
 
 import (
+	"context"
 	"crypto/sha256"
 	"testing"
 	"time"
@@ -94,7 +95,9 @@ func (l *linkTestContext) receiveHtlcAliceToBob() {
 func (l *linkTestContext) sendCommitSigBobToAlice(expHtlcs int) {
 	l.t.Helper()
 
-	sigs, err := l.bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	testQuit, testQuitFunc := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
+	defer testQuitFunc()
+	sigs, err := l.bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(testQuit)
 	if err != nil {
 		l.t.Fatalf("error signing commitment: %v", err)
 	}

htlcswitch/link_test.go

@@ -2252,12 +2252,14 @@ func newSingleLinkTestHarness(t *testing.T, chanAmt,
 		return aliceSwitch.AddLink(aliceLink)
 	}
 	go func() {
-		for {
-			select {
-			case <-notifyUpdateChan:
-			case <-aliceLink.(*channelLink).quit:
-				close(doneChan)
-				return
+		if chanLink, ok := aliceLink.(*channelLink); ok {
+			for {
+				select {
+				case <-notifyUpdateChan:
+				case <-chanLink.Quit:
+					close(doneChan)
+					return
+				}
 			}
 		}
 	}()
@@ -2324,7 +2326,10 @@ func handleStateUpdate(link *channelLink,
 	}
 	link.HandleChannelUpdate(remoteRev)
 
-	remoteSigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	ctx, done := link.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+	defer done()
+
+	remoteSigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctx)
 	if err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
@@ -2367,7 +2372,7 @@ func updateState(batchTick chan time.Time, link *channelLink,
 		// Trigger update by ticking the batchTicker.
 		select {
 		case batchTick <- time.Now():
-		case <-link.quit:
+		case <-link.Quit:
 			return fmt.Errorf("link shutting down")
 		}
 		return handleStateUpdate(link, remoteChannel)
@@ -2375,7 +2380,10 @@ func updateState(batchTick chan time.Time, link *channelLink,
 
 	// The remote is triggering the state update, emulate this by
 	// signing and sending CommitSig to the link.
-	remoteSigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	ctx, done := link.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+	defer done()
+
+	remoteSigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctx)
 	if err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
@@ -4931,12 +4939,14 @@ func (h *persistentLinkHarness) restartLink(
 		return nil, nil, err
 	}
 	go func() {
-		for {
-			select {
-			case <-notifyUpdateChan:
-			case <-aliceLink.(*channelLink).quit:
-				close(doneChan)
-				return
+		if chanLink, ok := aliceLink.(*channelLink); ok {
+			for {
+				select {
+				case <-notifyUpdateChan:
+				case <-chanLink.Quit:
+					close(doneChan)
+					return
+				}
 			}
 		}
 	}()
@@ -5919,7 +5929,12 @@ func TestChannelLinkFail(t *testing.T) {
 
 				// Sign a commitment that will include
 				// signature for the HTLC just sent.
-				sigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+				quitCtx, done := c.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+				defer done()
+
+				sigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment(
+					quitCtx,
+				)
 				if err != nil {
 					t.Fatalf("error signing commitment: %v",
 						err)
@@ -5961,7 +5976,12 @@ func TestChannelLinkFail(t *testing.T) {
 
 				// Sign a commitment that will include
 				// signature for the HTLC just sent.
-				sigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+				quitCtx, done := c.WithCtxQuitNoTimeout()
+				defer done()
+
+				sigs, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment(
+					quitCtx,
+				)
 				if err != nil {
 					t.Fatalf("error signing commitment: %v",
 						err)

htlcswitch/test_utils.go

@@ -1197,12 +1197,14 @@ func (h *hopNetwork) createChannelLink(server, peer *mockServer,
 	}
 
 	go func() {
-		for {
-			select {
-			case <-notifyUpdateChan:
-			case <-link.(*channelLink).quit:
-				close(doneChan)
-				return
+		if chanLink, ok := link.(*channelLink); ok {
+			for {
+				select {
+				case <-notifyUpdateChan:
+				case <-chanLink.Quit:
+					close(doneChan)
+					return
+				}
 			}
 		}
 	}()

lnwallet/channel.go

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ package lnwallet
 import (
 	"bytes"
 	"cmp"
+	"context"
 	"crypto/sha256"
 	"errors"
 	"fmt"
@@ -138,6 +139,10 @@ var (
 	// errNoPartialSig is returned when a partial signature is required,
 	// but none is found.
 	errNoPartialSig = errors.New("no partial signature found")
+
+	// errQuit is returned when a quit signal was received, interrupting the
+	// current operation.
+	errQuit = errors.New("received quit signal")
 )
 
 // ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss is returned in the case that we receive a valid
@@ -3893,7 +3898,9 @@ type NewCommitState struct {
 // for the remote party's commitment are also returned.
 //
 //nolint:funlen
-func (lc *LightningChannel) SignNextCommitment() (*NewCommitState, error) {
+func (lc *LightningChannel) SignNextCommitment(
+	ctx context.Context) (*NewCommitState, error) {
+
 	lc.Lock()
 	defer lc.Unlock()
 
@@ -4059,7 +4066,13 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) SignNextCommitment() (*NewCommitState, error) {
 	auxSigs := make([]fn.Option[tlv.Blob], 0, len(auxSigBatch))
 	for i := range sigBatch {
 		htlcSigJob := sigBatch[i]
-		jobResp := <-htlcSigJob.Resp
+		var jobResp SignJobResp
+
+		select {
+		case jobResp = <-htlcSigJob.Resp:
+		case <-ctx.Done():
+			return nil, errQuit
+		}
 
 		// If an error occurred, then we'll cancel any other active
 		// jobs.
@@ -4075,7 +4088,13 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) SignNextCommitment() (*NewCommitState, error) {
 		}
 
 		auxHtlcSigJob := auxSigBatch[i]
-		auxJobResp := <-auxHtlcSigJob.Resp
+		var auxJobResp AuxSigJobResp
+
+		select {
+		case auxJobResp = <-auxHtlcSigJob.Resp:
+		case <-ctx.Done():
+			return nil, errQuit
+		}
 
 		// If an error occurred, then we'll cancel any other active
 		// jobs.
@@ -4169,7 +4188,9 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) resignMusigCommit(
 // previous commitment txn. This allows the link to clear its mailbox of those
 // circuits in case they are still in memory, and ensure the switch's circuit
 // map has been updated by deleting the closed circuits.
-func (lc *LightningChannel) ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+//
+//nolint:funlen
+func (lc *LightningChannel) ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctx context.Context,
 	msg *lnwire.ChannelReestablish) ([]lnwire.Message, []models.CircuitKey,
 	[]models.CircuitKey, error) {
 
@@ -4333,7 +4354,7 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) ProcessChanSyncMsg(
 		// revocation, but also initiate a state transition to re-sync
 		// them.
 		if lc.OweCommitment() {
-			newCommit, err := lc.SignNextCommitment()
+			newCommit, err := lc.SignNextCommitment(ctx)
 			switch {
 
 			// If we signed this state, then we'll accumulate

lnwallet/channel_test.go

@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ func testAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T, tweakless bool,
 	// we expect the messages to be ordered, Bob will receive the HTLC we
 	// just sent before he receives this signature, so the signature will
 	// cover the HTLC.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Bob receives this signature message, and checks that this covers the
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ func testAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T, tweakless bool,
 	// This signature will cover the HTLC, since Bob will first send the
 	// revocation just created. The revocation also acks every received
 	// HTLC up to the point where Alice sent here signature.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	// Alice then processes this revocation, sending her own revocation for
@@ -255,14 +255,14 @@ func testAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T, tweakless bool,
 		t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
 	}
 
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign settle commitment")
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to process bob's new commitment")
 
 	aliceRevocation2, _, _, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to generate revocation")
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign new commitment")
 
 	fwdPkg, _, err = bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation2)
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ func TestChannelZeroAddLocalHeight(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob should send a commitment signature to Alice.
 	// <----sig------
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ func TestChannelZeroAddLocalHeight(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob should now send a commitment signature to Alice.
 	// <----sig-----
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// Alice should accept the commitment. Previously she would
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ func testCommitHTLCSigTieBreak(t *testing.T, restart bool) {
 	// tie-breaking for commitment sorting won't affect the commitment
 	// signed by Alice because received HTLC scripts commit to the CLTV
 	// directly, so the outputs will have different scriptPubkeys.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ func testCommitHTLCSigTieBreak(t *testing.T, restart bool) {
 	// the offered HTLC scripts he adds for Alice will need to have the
 	// tie-breaking applied because the CLTV is not committed, but instead
 	// implicit via the construction of the second-level transactions.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign bob's commitment")
 
 	if len(bobNewCommit.PendingHTLCs) != numHtlcs {
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ func TestCommitHTLCSigCustomRecordSize(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	// We expect an error because of the large custom records blob.
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.ErrorContains(t, err, "exceeds max allowed size")
 }
 
@@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ func TestHTLCSigNumber(t *testing.T) {
 	// ===================================================================
 	aliceChannel, bobChannel := createChanWithHTLC(aboveDust, aboveDust)
 
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "Error signing next commitment")
 
 	if len(aliceNewCommit.HtlcSigs) != 2 {
@@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ func TestHTLCSigNumber(t *testing.T) {
 	// ===================================================================
 	aliceChannel, bobChannel = createChanWithHTLC(aboveDust)
 
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "Error signing next commitment")
 
 	if len(aliceNewCommit.HtlcSigs) != 1 {
@@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ func TestHTLCSigNumber(t *testing.T) {
 	// ==============================================================
 	aliceChannel, bobChannel = createChanWithHTLC(belowDust)
 
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "Error signing next commitment")
 
 	// Since the HTLC is below Bob's dust limit, Alice won't need to send
@@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ func TestHTLCSigNumber(t *testing.T) {
 	// ================================================================
 	aliceChannel, bobChannel = createChanWithHTLC(aboveDust)
 
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "Error signing next commitment")
 
 	// Since the HTLC is above Bob's dust limit, Alice should send a
@@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ func TestHTLCSigNumber(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Alice should produce only one signature, since one HTLC is below
 	// dust.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "Error signing next commitment")
 
 	if len(aliceNewCommit.HtlcSigs) != 1 {
@@ -2428,7 +2428,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeFail(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Alice sends signature for commitment that does not cover any fee
 	// update.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Bob verifies this commit, meaning that he checks that it is
@@ -2471,11 +2471,11 @@ func TestUpdateFeeConcurrentSig(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	// Alice signs a commitment, and sends this to bob.
-	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// At the same time, Bob signs a commitment.
-	bobNewCommits, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommits, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	// ...that Alice receives.
@@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeSenderCommits(t *testing.T) {
 	// Alice signs a commitment, which will cover everything sent to Bob
 	// (the HTLC and the fee update), and everything acked by Bob (nothing
 	// so far).
-	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Bob receives this signature message, and verifies that it is
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeSenderCommits(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob commits to all updates he has received from Alice. This includes
 	// the HTLC he received, and the fee update.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	// Alice receives the revocation of the old one, and can now assume
@@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeReceiverCommits(t *testing.T) {
 	// Bob commits to every change he has sent since last time (none). He
 	// does not commit to the received HTLC and fee update, since Alice
 	// cannot know if he has received them.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Alice receives this signature message, and verifies that it is
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeReceiverCommits(t *testing.T) {
 	// Alice will sign next commitment. Since she sent the revocation, she
 	// also ack'ed everything received, but in this case this is nothing.
 	// Since she sent the two updates, this signature will cover those two.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	// Bob gets the signature for the new commitment from Alice. He assumes
@@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeReceiverCommits(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob will send a new signature, which will cover what he just acked:
 	// the HTLC and fee update.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Alice receives revocation from Bob, and can now be sure that Bob
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeMultipleUpdates(t *testing.T) {
 	// Alice signs a commitment, which will cover everything sent to Bob
 	// (the HTLC and the fee update), and everything acked by Bob (nothing
 	// so far).
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee1)
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ func TestUpdateFeeMultipleUpdates(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob commits to all updates he has received from Alice. This includes
 	// the HTLC he received, and the fee update.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign alice's commitment")
 
 	// Alice receives the revocation of the old one, and can now assume that
@@ -2939,7 +2939,9 @@ func assertNoChanSyncNeeded(t *testing.T, aliceChannel *LightningChannel,
 		}
 	}
 
-	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceChanSyncMsg)
+	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, aliceChanSyncMsg,
+	)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("line #%v: unable to process ChannelReestablish "+
 			"msg: %v", line, err)
@@ -2949,7 +2951,9 @@ func assertNoChanSyncNeeded(t *testing.T, aliceChannel *LightningChannel,
 			"instead wants to send: %v", line, spew.Sdump(bobMsgsToSend))
 	}
 
-	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobChanSyncMsg)
+	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, bobChanSyncMsg,
+	)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("line #%v: unable to process ChannelReestablish "+
 			"msg: %v", line, err)
@@ -3143,7 +3147,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitment(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	// Now we'll begin the core of the test itself. Alice will extend a new
 	// commitment to Bob, but the connection drops before Bob can process
 	// it.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// If this is a taproot channel, then we'll generate fresh verification
@@ -3168,7 +3172,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitment(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	// above.
 	assertAliceCommitRetransmit := func() *lnwire.CommitSig {
 		aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
-			bobSyncMsg,
+			ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
 		)
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("unable to process chan sync msg: %v", err)
@@ -3260,7 +3264,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitment(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 
 	// From Bob's Pov he has nothing else to send, so he should conclude he
 	// has no further action remaining.
-	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceSyncMsg)
+	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(bobMsgsToSend) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected bob to send %v messages instead will "+
@@ -3288,7 +3294,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitment(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
 	bobRevocation, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 	_, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to recv revocation")
@@ -3478,7 +3484,7 @@ func TestChanSyncOweCommitmentAuxSigner(t *testing.T) {
 		fn.Ok(fn.Some(sigBlobBuf.Bytes())), nil,
 	)
 
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	_, err = aliceChannel.GenMusigNonces()
@@ -3490,7 +3496,7 @@ func TestChanSyncOweCommitmentAuxSigner(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 
 	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
-		bobSyncMsg,
+		ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
 	)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	require.Len(t, aliceMsgsToSend, 2)
@@ -3582,7 +3588,7 @@ func TestAuxSignerShutdown(t *testing.T) {
 		fn.Some(sigBlobBuf.Bytes()), nil,
 	)
 
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.ErrorIs(t, err, auxSignerShutdownErr)
 }
 
@@ -3648,7 +3654,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitmentPendingRemote(t *testing.T,
 			t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
 		}
 
-		aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+		aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(
+			ctxb,
+		)
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
 		}
@@ -3686,7 +3694,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweCommitmentPendingRemote(t *testing.T,
 	}
 
 	// Bob signs the commitment he owes.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// This commitment is expected to contain no htlcs anymore.
@@ -3795,14 +3803,14 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocation(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	//
 	// Alice signs the next state, then Bob receives and sends his
 	// revocation message.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
 
 	bobRevocation, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 
 	_, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
@@ -3838,7 +3846,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocation(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 		t.Helper()
 
 		aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
-			bobSyncMsg,
+			ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
 		)
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("unable to process chan sync msg: %v", err)
@@ -3869,7 +3877,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocation(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	}
 
 	// From Bob's PoV he shouldn't think that he owes Alice any messages.
-	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceSyncMsg)
+	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(bobMsgsToSend) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected bob to not retransmit, instead has: %v",
@@ -3990,7 +4000,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommit(t *testing.T,
 
 	// Progressing the exchange: Alice will send her signature, Bob will
 	// receive, send a revocation and also a signature for Alice's state.
-	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommits.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
@@ -3999,7 +4009,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommit(t *testing.T,
 	// reach Alice before the connection dies.
 	bobRevocation, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// If we now attempt to resync, then Alice should conclude that she
@@ -4021,7 +4031,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommit(t *testing.T,
 		}
 	}
 
-	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(aliceMsgsToSend) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected alice to not retransmit, instead she's "+
@@ -4032,7 +4044,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommit(t *testing.T,
 		t.Helper()
 
 		bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
-			aliceSyncMsg,
+			ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
 		)
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("unable to process chan sync msg: %v", err)
@@ -4198,7 +4210,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition(t *testing.T,
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, bobChannel, aliceChannel, bobHtlc[1], nil)
 
 	// Bob signs the new state update, and sends the signature to Alice.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -4222,7 +4234,7 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition(t *testing.T,
 
 	// Progressing the exchange: Alice will send her signature, with Bob
 	// processing the new state locally.
-	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommits, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommits.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
@@ -4252,7 +4264,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition(t *testing.T,
 		}
 	}
 
-	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(aliceMsgsToSend) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected alice to not retransmit, instead she's "+
@@ -4263,7 +4277,9 @@ func testChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition(t *testing.T,
 	// send his RevokeAndAck message again. Additionally, the CommitSig
 	// message that he sends should be sufficient to finalize the state
 	// transition.
-	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceSyncMsg)
+	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(bobMsgsToSend) != 2 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected bob to send %v messages, instead "+
@@ -4456,7 +4472,9 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 
 		addAndReceiveHTLC(t, bobChannel, aliceChannel, bobHtlc, nil)
 
-		aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+		aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(
+			ctxb,
+		)
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("unable to sign next commit: %v", err)
 		}
@@ -4481,7 +4499,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 
 		// Alice should detect from Bob's message that she lost state.
-		_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+		_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 		if _, ok := err.(*ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss); !ok {
 			t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected "+
 				"ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss instead got: %v",
@@ -4489,7 +4507,9 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 
 		// Bob should detect that Alice probably lost state.
-		_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceSyncMsg)
+		_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+			ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
+		)
 		if err != ErrCommitSyncRemoteDataLoss {
 			t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected "+
 				"ErrCommitSyncRemoteDataLoss instead got: %v",
@@ -4550,7 +4570,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	bobSyncMsg, err := bobChannel.channelState.ChanSyncMsg()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 	bobSyncMsg.LocalUnrevokedCommitPoint = nil
-	_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 	if err != ErrCannotSyncCommitChains {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected ErrCannotSyncCommitChains "+
 			"instead got: %v", err)
@@ -4562,7 +4582,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	bobSyncMsg, err = bobChannel.channelState.ChanSyncMsg()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 	bobSyncMsg.NextLocalCommitHeight++
-	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 	if err != ErrCannotSyncCommitChains {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected ErrCannotSyncCommitChains "+
 			"instead got: %v", err)
@@ -4573,7 +4593,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	bobSyncMsg, err = bobChannel.channelState.ChanSyncMsg()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 	bobSyncMsg.NextLocalCommitHeight--
-	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 	if err != ErrCommitSyncRemoteDataLoss {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected ErrCommitSyncRemoteDataLoss "+
 			"instead got: %v", err)
@@ -4589,7 +4609,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to parse pubkey")
 
 	bobSyncMsg.LocalUnrevokedCommitPoint = modCommitPoint
-	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 	if err != ErrInvalidLocalUnrevokedCommitPoint {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected "+
 			"ErrInvalidLocalUnrevokedCommitPoint instead got: %v",
@@ -4609,7 +4629,7 @@ func TestChanSyncFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	bobSyncMsg, err = bobChannel.channelState.ChanSyncMsg()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 	bobSyncMsg.LocalUnrevokedCommitPoint = modCommitPoint
-	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobSyncMsg)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobSyncMsg)
 	if err != ErrInvalidLocalUnrevokedCommitPoint {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected "+
 			"ErrInvalidLocalUnrevokedCommitPoint instead got: %v",
@@ -4676,7 +4696,7 @@ func TestChannelRetransmissionFeeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now, Alice will send a new commitment to Bob, but we'll simulate a
 	// connection failure, so Bob doesn't get her signature.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Restart both channels to simulate a connection restart.
@@ -4694,7 +4714,9 @@ func TestChannelRetransmissionFeeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to produce chan sync msg")
 
 	// Bob should detect that he doesn't need to send anything to Alice.
-	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceSyncMsg)
+	bobMsgsToSend, _, _, err := bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
+		ctxb, aliceSyncMsg,
+	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(bobMsgsToSend) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("expected bob to send %v messages instead "+
@@ -4706,7 +4728,7 @@ func TestChannelRetransmissionFeeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
 	// that she needs to first send a new UpdateFee message, and also a
 	// CommitSig.
 	aliceMsgsToSend, _, _, err := aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(
-		bobSyncMsg,
+		ctxb, bobSyncMsg,
 	)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to process chan sync msg")
 	if len(aliceMsgsToSend) != 2 {
@@ -4762,7 +4784,7 @@ func TestChannelRetransmissionFeeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
 	bobRevocation, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 	_, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to recv revocation")
@@ -4893,7 +4915,7 @@ func TestFeeUpdateOldDiskFormat(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now, Alice will send a new commitment to Bob, but we'll simulate a
 	// connection failure, so Bob doesn't get the signature.
-	aliceNewCommitSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommitSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Before restarting Alice, to mimic the old format, we fetch the
@@ -4950,7 +4972,7 @@ func TestFeeUpdateOldDiskFormat(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to process alice's commitment")
 	bobRevocation, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommitSigs, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommitSigs, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "bob unable to sign commitment")
 	_, _, err = aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to recv revocation")
@@ -5026,11 +5048,11 @@ func TestChanSyncUnableToSync(t *testing.T) {
 		NextLocalCommitHeight:  1000,
 		RemoteCommitTailHeight: 9000,
 	}
-	_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(badChanSync)
+	_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, badChanSync)
 	if err != ErrCannotSyncCommitChains {
 		t.Fatalf("expected error instead have: %v", err)
 	}
-	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(badChanSync)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, badChanSync)
 	if err != ErrCannotSyncCommitChains {
 		t.Fatalf("expected error instead have: %v", err)
 	}
@@ -5098,7 +5120,7 @@ func TestChanSyncInvalidLastSecret(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Alice's former self should conclude that she possibly lost data as
 	// Bob is sending a valid commit secret for the latest state.
-	_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(bobChanSync)
+	_, _, _, err = aliceOld.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, bobChanSync)
 	if _, ok := err.(*ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss); !ok {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss "+
 			"instead got: %v", err)
@@ -5106,7 +5128,7 @@ func TestChanSyncInvalidLastSecret(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob should conclude that he should force close the channel, as Alice
 	// cannot continue operation.
-	_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(aliceChanSync)
+	_, _, _, err = bobChannel.ProcessChanSyncMsg(ctxb, aliceChanSync)
 	if err != ErrInvalidLastCommitSecret {
 		t.Fatalf("wrong error, expected ErrInvalidLastCommitSecret, "+
 			"instead got: %v", err)
@@ -5589,7 +5611,7 @@ func TestSignCommitmentFailNotLockedIn(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// If we now try to initiate a state update, then it should fail as
 	// Alice is unable to actually create a new state.
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != ErrNoWindow {
 		t.Fatalf("expected ErrNoWindow, instead have: %v", err)
 	}
@@ -5618,7 +5640,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// We'll now manually initiate a state transition between Alice and
 	// bob.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5647,7 +5669,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now, have Bob initiate a transition to lock in the Adds sent by
 	// Alice.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5692,7 +5714,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// We'll now initiate another state transition, but this time Bob will
 	// lead.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5727,7 +5749,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now, begin another state transition led by Alice, and fail the second
 	// HTLC part-way through the dance.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5800,7 +5822,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Have Alice initiate a state transition, which does not include the
 	// HTLCs just re-added to the channel state.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5829,7 +5851,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	// Now initiate a final update from Bob to lock in the final Fail.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5861,7 +5883,7 @@ func TestLockedInHtlcForwardingSkipAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Finally, have Bob initiate a state transition that locks in the Fail
 	// added after the restart.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -5923,7 +5945,7 @@ func TestInvalidCommitSigError(t *testing.T) {
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, aliceChannel, bobChannel, htlc, nil)
 
 	// Alice will now attempt to initiate a state transition.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign new commit")
 
 	// Before the signature gets to Bob, we'll mutate it, such that the
@@ -6116,7 +6138,7 @@ func TestChannelUnilateralClosePendingCommit(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// With the HTLC added, we'll now manually initiate a state transition
 	// from Alice to Bob.
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
@@ -6350,7 +6372,7 @@ func TestMaxAcceptedHTLCs(t *testing.T) {
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, aliceChannel, bobChannel, htlc, nil)
 
 	// Add a commitment to Bob's commitment chain.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign next commitment")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to recv new commitment")
@@ -6445,7 +6467,7 @@ func TestMaxAsynchronousHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatalf("unable to receive fail htlc: %v", err)
 	}
 
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign next commitment")
 
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -6453,7 +6475,7 @@ func TestMaxAsynchronousHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Cover the HTLC referenced with id equal to numHTLCs-1 with a new
 	// signature (step 3).
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign next commitment")
 
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -6478,7 +6500,7 @@ func TestMaxAsynchronousHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Receiving the commitment should succeed as in step 7 since space was
 	// made.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign next commitment")
 
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -7103,7 +7125,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreUpdateLogs(t *testing.T) {
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, aliceChannel, bobChannel, htlcAlice, nil)
 
 	// Let Alice sign a new state, which will include the HTLC just sent.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Bob receives this commitment signature, and revokes his old state.
@@ -7133,7 +7155,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreUpdateLogs(t *testing.T) {
 	// and remote commit chains are updated in an async fashion. Since the
 	// remote chain was updated with the latest state (since Bob sent the
 	// revocation earlier) we can keep advancing the remote commit chain.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// After Alice has signed this commitment, her local commitment will
@@ -7280,7 +7302,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreUpdateLogsFailedHTLC(t *testing.T) {
 	restoreAndAssert(t, aliceChannel, 1, 0, 0, 0)
 
 	// Bob sends a signature.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to receive commitment")
@@ -7307,7 +7329,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreUpdateLogsFailedHTLC(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now send a signature from Alice. This will give Bob a new commitment
 	// where the HTLC is removed.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to receive commitment")
@@ -7370,7 +7392,7 @@ func TestDuplicateFailRejection(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// We'll now have Bob sign a new commitment to lock in the HTLC fail
 	// for Alice.
-	_, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commit")
 
 	// We'll now force a restart for Bob and Alice, so we can test the
@@ -7433,7 +7455,7 @@ func TestDuplicateSettleRejection(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// We'll now have Bob sign a new commitment to lock in the HTLC fail
 	// for Alice.
-	_, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commit")
 
 	// We'll now force a restart for Bob and Alice, so we can test the
@@ -7514,7 +7536,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, aliceChannel, bobChannel, htlcAlice, nil)
 
 	// Let Alice sign a new state, which will include the HTLC just sent.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// The HTLC should only be on the pending remote commitment, so the
@@ -7546,7 +7568,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now let Bob send the commitment signature making the HTLC lock in on
 	// Alice's commitment.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// At this stage Bob has a pending remote commitment. Make sure
@@ -7579,7 +7601,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Send a new signature from Alice to Bob, making Alice have a pending
 	// remote commitment.
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// A restoration should keep the add heights iof the first HTLC, and
@@ -7618,7 +7640,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Sign a new state for Alice, making Bob have a pending remote
 	// commitment.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// The signing of a new commitment for Alice should have given the new
@@ -7655,7 +7677,7 @@ func TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to recv htlc cancel")
 
 	// Now Bob signs for the fail update.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Bob has a pending commitment for Alice, it shouldn't affect the add
@@ -7713,13 +7735,13 @@ func TestForceCloseBorkedState(t *testing.T) {
 	// Do the commitment dance until Bob sends a revocation so Alice is
 	// able to receive the revocation, and then also make a new state
 	// herself.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commit")
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to receive commitment")
 	revokeMsg, _, _, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to revoke bob commitment")
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commit")
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to receive commitment")
@@ -7753,7 +7775,7 @@ func TestForceCloseBorkedState(t *testing.T) {
 	// We manually advance the commitment tail here since the above
 	// ReceiveRevocation call will fail before it's actually advanced.
 	aliceChannel.commitChains.Remote.advanceTail()
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != channeldb.ErrChanBorked {
 		t.Fatalf("sign commitment should have failed: %v", err)
 	}
@@ -8220,7 +8242,7 @@ func TestChannelFeeRateFloor(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	// Check that alice can still sign commitments.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := alice.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := alice.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "alice unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Check that bob can still receive commitments.
@@ -8979,7 +9001,7 @@ func TestChannelUnsignedAckedFailure(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob should send a commitment signature to Alice.
 	// <----sig------
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -8994,7 +9016,7 @@ func TestChannelUnsignedAckedFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	// Alice should sign the next commitment and go down before
 	// sending it.
 	// -----sig-----X
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	newAliceChannel, err := NewLightningChannel(
@@ -9025,7 +9047,7 @@ func TestChannelUnsignedAckedFailure(t *testing.T) {
 	// Bob sends the final signature to Alice and Alice should not
 	// reject it, given that we properly restore the unsigned acked
 	// updates and therefore our update log is structured correctly.
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = newAliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9083,7 +9105,7 @@ func TestChannelLocalUnsignedUpdatesFailure(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Alice should send a commitment signature to Bob.
 	// -----sig---->
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9107,7 +9129,7 @@ func TestChannelLocalUnsignedUpdatesFailure(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Bob sends the final signature and Alice should not reject it.
 	// <----sig-----
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = newAliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9166,7 +9188,7 @@ func TestChannelSignedAckRegression(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// -----sig---->
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9178,7 +9200,7 @@ func TestChannelSignedAckRegression(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// <----sig-----
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9190,7 +9212,7 @@ func TestChannelSignedAckRegression(t *testing.T) {
 	addAndReceiveHTLC(t, aliceChannel, bobChannel, htlc2, nil)
 
 	// -----sig---->
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9220,7 +9242,7 @@ func TestChannelSignedAckRegression(t *testing.T) {
 	// Bob should no longer fail to sign this commitment due to faulty
 	// update logs.
 	// <----sig-----
-	bobNewCommit, err = newBobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = newBobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	// Alice should receive the new commitment without hiccups.
@@ -9291,7 +9313,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	// removed from both commitments.
 
 	// ---sig--->
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9305,7 +9327,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	assertCleanOrDirty(false, aliceChannel, bobChannel, t)
 
 	// <---sig---
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9326,7 +9348,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	assertCleanOrDirty(false, aliceChannel, bobChannel, t)
 
 	// <---sig---
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9340,7 +9362,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	assertCleanOrDirty(false, aliceChannel, bobChannel, t)
 
 	// ---sig--->
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9364,7 +9386,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	assertCleanOrDirty(false, aliceChannel, bobChannel, t)
 
 	// ---sig--->
-	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9378,7 +9400,7 @@ func TestIsChannelClean(t *testing.T) {
 	assertCleanOrDirty(false, aliceChannel, bobChannel, t)
 
 	// <---sig---
-	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9513,7 +9535,7 @@ func testGetDustSum(t *testing.T, chantype channeldb.ChannelType) {
 	checkDust(bobChannel, htlc2Amt, htlc2Amt)
 
 	// Alice signs for this HTLC and neither perspective should change.
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -9532,7 +9554,7 @@ func testGetDustSum(t *testing.T, chantype channeldb.ChannelType) {
 
 	// The rest of the dance is completed and neither perspective should
 	// change.
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -10353,7 +10375,7 @@ func TestAsynchronousSendingContraint(t *testing.T) {
 	// Bob signs the new state for alice, which ONLY has his htlc on it
 	// because he only includes acked updates of alice.
 	// <----sig-------|---------------
-	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	err = aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -10369,7 +10391,7 @@ func TestAsynchronousSendingContraint(t *testing.T) {
 	// incoming htlc in her commitment sig to bob, but this will dip her
 	// local balance below her reserve because she already used everything
 	// up when adding her htlc.
-	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	_, err = aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrBelowChanReserve)
 }
 
@@ -10494,7 +10516,7 @@ func TestAsynchronousSendingWithFeeBuffer(t *testing.T) {
 	// Force a state transition, this will lock-in the htlc of bob.
 	// ------sig-----> (includes bob's htlc)
 	// <----rev------ (locks in bob's htlc for alice)
-	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceNewCommit.CommitSigs)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -10736,7 +10758,7 @@ func TestBlindingPointPersistence(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Now, Alice will send a new commitment to Bob, which will persist our
 	// pending HTLC to disk.
-	aliceCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceCommit, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "unable to sign commitment")
 
 	// Restart alice to force fetching state from disk.

lnwallet/test_utils.go

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package lnwallet
 
 import (
 	"bytes"
+	"context"
 	"crypto/rand"
 	"encoding/binary"
 	"encoding/hex"
@@ -103,6 +104,10 @@ var (
 	bobDustLimit   = btcutil.Amount(1300)
 
 	testChannelCapacity float64 = 10
+
+	// ctxb is a context that will never be cancelled, that is used in
+	// place of a real quit context.
+	ctxb = context.Background()
 )
 
 // CreateTestChannels creates to fully populated channels to be used within
@@ -557,7 +562,7 @@ func calcStaticFee(chanType channeldb.ChannelType, numHTLCs int) btcutil.Amount
 // pending updates. This method is useful when testing interactions between two
 // live state machines.
 func ForceStateTransition(chanA, chanB *LightningChannel) error {
-	aliceNewCommit, err := chanA.SignNextCommitment()
+	aliceNewCommit, err := chanA.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
@@ -570,7 +575,7 @@ func ForceStateTransition(chanA, chanB *LightningChannel) error {
 	if err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
-	bobNewCommit, err := chanB.SignNextCommitment()
+	bobNewCommit, err := chanB.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	if err != nil {
 		return err
 	}

lnwallet/transactions_test.go

@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ func testVectors(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType, test testCase) {
 
 	// Execute commit dance to arrive at the point where the local node has
 	// received the test commitment and the remote signature.
-	localNewCommit, err := localChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	localNewCommit, err := localChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err, "local unable to sign commitment")
 
 	err = remoteChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(localNewCommit.CommitSigs)
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ func testVectors(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType, test testCase) {
 	_, _, err = localChannel.ReceiveRevocation(revMsg)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
-	remoteNewCommit, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment()
+	remoteNewCommit, err := remoteChannel.SignNextCommitment(ctxb)
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	require.Equal(